chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆
TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
Moscow Tournament

Leonid Stein11/17(+6 -1 =10)[games]
Mikhail Tal10/17(+5 -2 =10)[games]
Vasily Smyslov10/17(+4 -1 =12)[games]
Milko Bobotsov10/17(+3 -0 =14)[games]
Aivars Gipslis10/17(+3 -0 =14)[games]
Lajos Portisch9.5/17(+6 -4 =7)[games]
Boris Spassky9.5/17(+4 -2 =11)[games]
David Bronstein9.5/17(+3 -1 =13)[games]
Paul Keres8.5/17(+2 -2 =13)[games]
Miguel Najdorf8.5/17(+2 -2 =13)[games]
Tigran V Petrosian8.5/17(+3 -3 =11)[games]
Efim Geller8.5/17(+2 -2 =13)[games]
Florin Gheorghiu8/17(+3 -4 =10)[games]
Svetozar Gligoric7.5/17(+2 -4 =11)[games]
Ludek Pachman6/17(+1 -6 =10)[games]
Istvan Bilek6/17(+0 -5 =12)[games]
Wolfgang Uhlmann6/17(+1 -6 =10)[games]
Miroslav Filip6/17(+0 -5 =12)[games]

Chessgames.com Chess Event Description
Moscow (1967)

Three years after the zonal tournament won by Boris Spassky, another elite international tournament was held in the Soviet capital of Moscow in 1967. Dubbed the 50th Jubilee tournament, eighteen grandmasters were invited to participate in the round robin event. Many of the best grandmasters from the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe participated, including the world champion Tigran Petrosian and former world champions Vasily Smyslov and Mikhail Tal. This strong international gathering was won by three-time Soviet champion Leonid Stein with 11/17.

Moscow, Soviet Union (Russia), 21 May - 16 June 1967 (1)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Pts 1 Stein * ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 0 1 ½ 1 1 1 11 =2 Smyslov ½ * ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 0 ½ 1 1 10 =2 Bobotsov ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 10 =2 Gipslis ½ ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 10 =2 Tal ½ ½ ½ ½ * 0 1 ½ ½ ½ 0 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 1 1 10 =6 Portisch 0 0 ½ ½ 1 * ½ 1 0 ½ 1 1 0 ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 9½ =6 Bronstein ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ * ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 1 ½ ½ 9½ =6 Spassky ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ * 0 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 1 9½ =9 Geller ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 * 0 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 8½ =9 Najdorf ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 1 * ½ 0 ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 8½ =9 Keres 0 ½ ½ ½ 1 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 8½ =9 Petrosian ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 0 ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ * 1 0 1 ½ ½ ½ 8½ 13 Gheorghiu 1 0 0 0 ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ 0 * ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 8 14 Gligoric 0 ½ 0 0 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ * ½ 1 ½ ½ 7½ =15 Pachman ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 0 0 0 ½ 0 0 0 ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ 6 =15 Filip 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ * ½ 0 6 =15 Bilek 0 0 ½ ½ 0 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ * ½ 6 =15 Uhlmann 0 0 0 0 0 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ * 6

(1) Chess Life 1967, p. 223.

Original Collection : Game Collection: Moscow 1967 by User: suenteus po 147.

 page 1 of 7; games 1-25 of 153  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. I Bilek vs Bronstein  ½-½261967MoscowA06 Reti Opening
2. Gheorghiu vs Geller 1-0371967MoscowB76 Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav Attack
3. Gipslis vs Uhlmann 1-0421967MoscowC07 French, Tarrasch
4. Najdorf vs Keres  ½-½201967MoscowE19 Queen's Indian, Old Main line, 9.Qxc3
5. Spassky vs Pachman 1-0301967MoscowD44 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
6. Bobotsov vs Petrosian ½-½201967MoscowD42 Queen's Gambit Declined, Semi-Tarrasch, 7.Bd3
7. Portisch vs Gligoric  ½-½301967MoscowE75 King's Indian, Averbakh, Main line
8. Smyslov vs Filip ½-½901967MoscowA14 English
9. Stein vs Tal  ½-½241967MoscowC84 Ruy Lopez, Closed
10. Stein vs I Bilek 1-0471967MoscowB27 Sicilian
11. Bronstein vs Gipslis  ½-½181967MoscowA02 Bird's Opening
12. Geller vs Spassky 1-0411967MoscowD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
13. Keres vs Portisch 0-1901967MoscowC93 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Smyslov Defense
14. Pachman vs Najdorf 0-1411967MoscowE55 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3, Gligoric System, Bronstein Variation
15. Petrosian vs Gheorghiu 1-0411967MoscowA29 English, Four Knights, Kingside Fianchetto
16. Gligoric vs Smyslov  ½-½221967MoscowE54 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3, Gligoric System
17. Tal vs Filip 1-0271967MoscowB17 Caro-Kann, Steinitz Variation
18. Uhlmann vs Bobotsov 0-1421967MoscowE75 King's Indian, Averbakh, Main line
19. I Bilek vs Tal 0-1301967MoscowA07 King's Indian Attack
20. Bobotsov vs Bronstein  ½-½221967MoscowA90 Dutch
21. Najdorf vs Geller 1-0681967MoscowE92 King's Indian
22. Gipslis vs Stein ½-½391967MoscowB76 Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav Attack
23. Smyslov vs Keres  ½-½211967MoscowE02 Catalan, Open, 5.Qa4
24. Portisch vs Pachman 1-0401967MoscowA05 Reti Opening
25. Spassky vs Petrosian ½-½231967MoscowB36 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto
 page 1 of 7; games 1-25 of 153  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-30-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: Didn't Fischer want to be invited to this tournament?
May-02-14  Gottschalk: <Benzol> Because Fischer was supercapitalist and this event celebrated 50 years of the bolshevik revolution.
May-02-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: Yes I suppose it might not have gone down so well if Fischer had won this event but that would have been a tall order given the field.
May-03-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Fischer would have had fun converting all his roubles into USD afterwards.
May-03-14  Peter Nemenyi: Fischer paid an indirect compliment to the strength of this tournament when he said, after his famous victory over Stein at Sousse 1967, "I beat Stein here and Stein was the winner of the Moscow tournament. I've proved I'm the best" (quoted in Soltis).

Looking at the crosstable, though, it's apparent that the Soviet grandmasters played for draws against each other and let the question of who best thrashed the foreigners decide the event. Stein played six decisive games out of nine against the guests, one out of eight against his fellow Soviets. Four other Soviets only had one decisive game against their compatriots, and two had none.

Apr-06-15  Howard: As far as Fischer's absence, only players from the Soviet Union and Eastern bloc countries, were invited. Western players, in other words, could
not take part.

It should also be noted, by the way, that Petrosian only scored 50%. Considering that he was world champion at the time, he surely should have done better.

Apr-06-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <It should also be noted, by the way, that Petrosian only scored 50%. Considering that he was world champion at the time, he surely should have done better.>

Such a lacklustre result was hardly unique to reigning titleholders during the period from Botvinnik to Spassky inclusive; it was only when Karpov and Kasparov ascended to the throne that we witnessed dominance by a champion as was the case, eg, during Alekhine's purple patch of 1930-34.

Apr-06-15  A.T PhoneHome: Perhaps Soviets wanted to draw an ideal picture of Bolshevism, excuse me for the lame pun. Anyways, as you guys can see from the standings, Portisch was the other one with six wins here. He didn't seem to be in such a drawing mood.

As for Leonid Stein, he was just incredible. He won three USSR Championships; in 1963, 1965 and 1966. That amounts to something!

Regarding Soviets drawing against each other, I don't think it meant so much. One could say that Soviets bet awful lot on themselves. For example, Milko Bobotsov, Bulgarian player had 3 wins and 14 draws. He was only 1 point behind Stein; Soviets couldn't afford to lose more than they did here. This woulda-coulda-shoulda talk is to illustrate that Soviets weren't doing themselves any favours with their common draws.

Oct-24-16  RookFile: Fischer at this tournament would have thought that Stein's 6 wins were cute. I see Fischer putting up something like 10 wins and 2 losses with his style of play.
Nov-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: Photo from the fourth round:

https://img.gazeta.ru/files3/389/10...

Nov-10-17  ZonszeinP: Stein! What a player!
Feb-02-18  zanzibar: Soltis, <Soviet Chess: 1917-1992> p276

<The Soviets held their own showcase event in Moscow, May 21-June 18, 1967, dedicated to the fiftieth anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution. No Westerners were invited — except for Najdorf of Argentina, a Russian-speaking former Pole. The attempt by Benko, a Hungarian defector, was naturally rejected —as well as a rumored effort by Fischer>

Can anyone definitely confirm the Fisher rumor? (see Benzol's comment)

Feb-02-18  Retireborn: <z> There's a mildly relevant discussion here:-

https://www.ecforum.org.uk/viewtopi...

<SallySimpson> can probably track down the issue of CHESS Sutton Coldfield referred to, but it's probably just speculation anyway.

Feb-02-18  zanzibar: Ah, yes, took a quick look, thanks. Soltis also implied that Najdorf's ability to speak Russian also contributed to him giving an invite.
Nov-28-19  Scuvy: More than any other player, Lajos Portisch took the role usually played by Korchnoi and imparted a definite character to the tourney. He came to play and had more decisive games than anyone else. His beautiful endgame versus Keres was proof of this, and maintained his fighting attitude even though he was defeated in a crushing miniature by Geller.
Nov-28-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: < Stonehenge: Photo from the fourth round: https://img.gazeta.ru/files3/389/10...

Nice picture! Taken during the fourth round. Uhlmann has launched a kamikaze attack on Spassky, Pachman is on his way to beating Smyslov, the World Champion will win against Najdorf, Bronstein and Gheorghiu have barely gotten started, and unfortunately the demonstration board for Geller-Portisch is not visible.

In profile, Petrosian resembles Mr. Punch.

Mar-31-20  ewan14: Gligoric said most of the Soviet players were not that bothered ( just so long as a Soviet won )
Jun-27-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: perfidious: <It should also be noted, by the way, that Petrosian only scored 50%. Considering that he was world champion at the time, he surely should have done better.

Such a lacklustre result was hardly unique to reigning titleholders during the period from Botvinnik to Spassky inclusive; it was only when Karpov and Kasparov ascended to the throne that we witnessed dominance by a champion as was the case, eg, during Alekhine's purple patch of 1930-34.>

I didn't realize that. Growing up under Karpov's scorched earth tournament record as WC, I just assumed the WC would have always done that... That's why no one took the FIDE world champion seriously during Kasparov's reign after all, right?

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC