< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 107 OF 107 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Feb-21-25
 | | keypusher: Thanks all, and I'll need all the luck I can get -- feel free to butt in anytime, SFOD. |
|
Feb-21-25
 | | Fusilli: A good number of pearls there. For example, #10 USCF column: <To claim a win on time in a non-sudden death time control, the opponent must have a reasonably complete scoresheet with no more than three missing or incorrect move pairs for the time control. A player may call his own flag as a means of preventing the opponent from filling in missing moves on the scoresheet. (Once the flag has been called, the opponent may not update the scoresheet.)Only the scoresheet of the player making the claim that the opponent overstepped the time limit may be used to prove that the required number of moves was not made. However, the opponent’s scoresheet may be used to prove the claim is incorrect.> This is interesting because it does not specify what happens then. I mean, say I'm in a terrible position, and about to flag, but my opponent kept terrible records, so I flag and call my own flag. Then the TD looks at my opponent's scoresheet and is a mess. So, a win on time cannot be claimed. But then what? The game was stopped, my flag is down, my opponent's scoresheet is a mess. I can argue that I played badly because my opponent kept moving without writing down his moves, so I ran out of time. What does the TD do? |
|
Feb-22-25 | | stone free or die: <<kp> feel free to butt in anytime, SFOD.> Don't encourage the guy, <kp>! |
|
Feb-23-25
 | | keypusher: Incidentally, are Jerry and Jeremy Spinrad different people? Jerry is playing in the Music City Open...he was seated two boards away from me last round. |
|
Feb-23-25
 | | Fusilli: Hi <keypusher>! I just checked you are at +2 -1 right now. Good luck! I plan to stop by to watch a bit of round 4. Yes, Jeremy is his name, Jerry is his nickname. He retired from Vanderbilt some four or five years ago: https://engineering.vanderbilt.edu/.... Nice guy, I always liked him. BTW, Austin Powell, a Vanderbilt student who is playing the open section, is doing research assistant work for me. He is rated about 1920 at the moment, and improving. In the first round, he beat Matthew Puckett (rated ~ 2300). Then lost to IM Ron Burnett. Los the third game too, but on average he has played opponents rated 2247, so 1 in 3 so far is a good performance. We met Friday in my office to talk about competitive chess strategy. My goal was to help him play with confidence and not be intimidated by the big boys. I think it worked! |
|
Feb-24-25
 | | keypusher: A pleasure to meet you in person, Professor! I finished 3-2, but more importantly I really enjoyed competitive chess for the first time in a while. Sure looked like Austin was winning in Rd. 4, but I'm not sure how he did in Rd. 5. |
|
Feb-24-25
 | | Fusilli: <keypusher> Likewise! I got a couple of good photos of you "in action." Email me at my Vanderbilt email address (easy to find by just googling me) and I'll email them over. I thought Austin position looked good when I left, shortly out of the opening, but I see in the tournament table that he actually lost in round 4. The table is not up to date with round 5 results. |
|
Feb-24-25
 | | moronovich: Sounds like a great experience <keypusher> and on top of that you met <Fussilli> ! Chapeau. |
|
Feb-24-25
 | | keypusher: Thanks <moronovich>. <Fusilli> It's funny, I was thinking "you never see a Gruenfeld" and there it was on Austin's board. Can't believe he lost, I thought it looked so good for him. <SFOD> Somehow moving, pressing the button and then writing the move down was psychologically reinforcing...I felt very decisive. So thank you! It was probably good to have a set routine too. (But when my position was collapsing late in one game I completely forgot to press the button after I moved...my opponent, bless him, reminded me. Once (during a rapid game no less) my opponent let 10 minutes run off my clock when I did that.) |
|
Feb-24-25 | | stone free or die: <KP> glad to be of (some) help. Especially glad you enjoyed getting back to it! (And bless those chess players who play the game as a true gentleman/woman of merit). |
|
Feb-25-25
 | | OhioChessFan: Belatedly to the Death Tournament, I think Iivo Nei has to be the last of several tournaments that would otherwise be in the lead. |
|
Feb-25-25
 | | Fusilli: <OCF> I think your link is wrong. |
|
Mar-19-25
 | | Fusilli: Blitz on chess.com, I am black.
Black to play:
 click for larger view(Don't ask... it's been a crazy game. I actually sacked a piece first.) The good move is 26...Kg8, but I thought it made no difference to let him play Rxh6+ first and respond to that with Kg8. So, I played 26... c5  click for larger viewWhat did I miss? |
|
Mar-20-25
 | | OhioChessFan: Ouch. Rxh6+ gxh6 Qxh6+ and a perpetual. |
|
Mar-20-25
 | | Fusilli: <OCF> Right, but I thought Rxh6+ Kg8 was still winning. But... what does white have there? |
|
Mar-20-25
 | | moronovich: Kg8 is met by the classic Nf5 ! double attack. |
|
Mar-20-25 | | stone free or die: I'm seeing the knight getting to f5 then e7 for mate, all depending if Black cooperates of course. |
|
Mar-21-25
 | | Fusilli: <stone> <moro> Exactly. Black isn't dead though.
Against Nf5, black has Qd7. Without looking at the lines, it's about equal, silicon monster says. Against Nc6, black has nothing better than Qxc6+... and again it's about equal. The advanced pawns compensate for the rook v queen. |
|
Mar-21-25 | | stone free or die: I have to ask, out of idle curiosity, who ultimately won? |
|
Mar-21-25
 | | Fusilli: <stone> Good question! He actually didn't see the knight maneuver. He played Qh4? and I won. chess.com has a "review game" feature where you can run the game quickly by the computer and quickly discover things. I did that and discovered what both of us had missed. |
|
Mar-21-25
 | | Fusilli: <stone> I mean he played Rxh6+ Kg8, Qh4 |
|
Mar-22-25 | | stone free or die: Ah blitz, such a cruel mistress! |
|
Apr-15-25
 | | OhioChessFan: What was the last move?
 click for larger view |
|
Apr-15-25 | | areknames: <OCF> I think I've got it. White has a bishop on g1, black's king is on h1 so the last move is Bh2+ followed by Kxh2. But how did black's king get to h1 in the first place? These things drive me crazy! |
|
Apr-15-25 | | stone free or die: (Maybe the question should be what were the two last moves - one for each color!) |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 107 OF 107 ·
Later Kibitzing> |