New York (1924) (games of Efim Bogoljubov)

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

🏆 New York (1924)

In December 1923, following an aborted attempt to arrange a World Championship match between Capablanca and Alekhine, ... [more]

Player: Efim Bogoljubov

page 1 of 1; 20 games

Game Result Moves Year Event/Locale Opening
1. Tartakower vs Bogoljubov 1-0 58 1924 New York C33 King's Gambit Accepted

2. Ed. Lasker vs Bogoljubov ½-½ 49 1924 New York C41 Philidor Defense

3. Bogoljubov vs Marshall 1-0 56 1924 New York D02 Queen's Pawn Game

4. Bogoljubov vs Reti 1-0 45 1924 New York C12 French, McCutcheon

5. Maroczy vs Bogoljubov 0-1 27 1924 New York D05 Queen's Pawn Game

6. Bogoljubov vs Janowski 0-1 44 1924 New York D26 Queen's Gambit Accepted

7. Bogoljubov vs Lasker 0-1 71 1924 New York C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense

8. Bogoljubov vs Capablanca 0-1 32 1924 New York D05 Queen's Pawn Game

9. Yates vs Bogoljubov 0-1 33 1924 New York C91 Ruy Lopez, Closed

10. Alekhine vs Bogoljubov ½-½ 61 1924 New York A13 English

11. Reti vs Bogoljubov 1-0 25 1924 New York A13 English

12. Lasker vs Bogoljubov 1-0 61 1924 New York B40 Sicilian

13. Bogoljubov vs Ed. Lasker 1-0 57 1924 New York C60 Ruy Lopez

14. Bogoljubov vs Tartakower 1-0 65 1924 New York A90 Dutch

15. Bogoljubov vs Yates 1-0 90 1924 New York D65 Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox, Rubinstein Attack, Main line

16. Bogoljubov vs Alekhine ½-½ 85 1924 New York C12 French, McCutcheon

17. Marshall vs Bogoljubov 1-0 38 1924 New York A46 Queen's Pawn Game

18. Janowski vs Bogoljubov 0-1 82 1924 New York D52 Queen's Gambit Declined

19. Bogoljubov vs Maroczy 0-1 48 1924 New York D30 Queen's Gambit Declined

20. Capablanca vs Bogoljubov 1-0 65 1924 New York C12 French, McCutcheon

page 1 of 1; 20 games

REFINE SEARCH: White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Bogoljubov wins | Bogoljubov loses

< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 3 · Later Kibitzing>
Jun-02-16		RookFile: This tournament even had the great Geza Maroczy in it, who put a 50 percent up on the board.

Jun-03-16		offramp: <ughaibu: Had Tarrasch played, would he have scored 11.5?> That looks like a very likely score. Higher than Marshall and Réti but just below the big three. 11 or 11½ looks reasonable.

Jun-03-16		keypusher: <offramp: <ughaibu: Had Tarrasch played, would he have scored 11.5?> That looks like a very likely score. Higher than Marshall and Réti but just below the big three. 11 or 11½ looks reasonable.> Poppycock. In March 1924 Tarrasch was ranked 19th in the world. Bogoljubov, Tartakower, Reti, and Maroczy were all in the top 10. Marshall was #26, largely because of inactivity, but was shortly to bounce back into the top 10. http://chessmetrics.com/cm/CM2/Sing... http://chessmetrics.com/cm/CM2/Play... http://chessmetrics.com/cm/CM2/Sing... Tarrasch would have ranked below everyone in the tournament except Marshall, Edward Lasker, Yates, and Janowski, and there is good reason to think his ranking overstated his actual strength. He was 62 and going through a steep rating decline. He had one really good tournament result in those years, +4 at Vienna (1922), finishing fourth. He was -2 at Hastings (1922), -1 at Karlsbad (1923), = at Maehrisch-Ostrau (1923), -5 at Baden-Baden (1925), and -4 at Breslau (1925). He would have been very unlikely to reach 50% in this tournament.

Jun-03-16		offramp: <keypusher> I think you are right. Of course he might have had a good tournament, just like Efim D Bogo had a fairly bad one. But I agree that 11 points might be too optimistic. WWI was shattering to Tarrasch.

Oct-12-16		MissScarlett: <When he had his good days Yates played some delightful chess. Alekhine didn't want him to play in the New York 1924 Tounament as Yates had beaten him in the two previous clashes.> Alekhine vs Yates, 1923 This is ambiguous - at first, I took it to mean that Alekhine had intervened in order to blackball Yates's participation, but then it occurred it could simply be that Alekhine had stated he was worried about having to meet Yates again. If the former, corroboration is requested. Incidentally, Yates's wins over Alekhine weren't consecutive, but separated by Yates vs Alekhine, 1922.

Oct-13-16		JimNorCal: Wow! Thanks for posting the link, just awesome.... Jonathan Sarfati: you can hear Capablanca pronouncing the name AlYEKHeen in this rare film footage.

Dec-08-18		MissScarlett: Great picture, better for lacking the cheese - how recently was it added and what's the source?

Dec-08-18		WannaBe: 11 players, and Yates was a replacement/substitute. One player sat out each round(?) Anyway of knowing who sat out each round? (Without having to go through 110 games and look at each round...)

Dec-08-18		Retireborn: <WannaBe> Click on original collection (by Benzol) and you can see who played in each round, and deduce from that who didn't.

Dec-08-18		WannaBe: <Retireborn> Thanks! =)

Dec-08-18		zanzibar: <WannaBe> I think this is what you wanna: < 1 Lasker 2 Reti 3 Janowski 4 Marshall 5 Alekhine 6 Bogoljubov 7 Tartakower 8 Yates 9 Lasker 10 Maroczy 11 Capablanca 12 Marshall 13 Yates 14 Reti 15 Lasker 16 Maroczy 17 Capablanca 18 Janowski 19 Bogoljubov 20 Tartakower 21 Alekhine 22 Lasker >

Dec-08-18		WannaBe: Thanks <Z>, looks like the tournament did not simply reverse colours but kept players the same; for the second half like most double-round robin tournaments of today.

Dec-08-18		zanzibar: Here's another photo of the players, http://www.tabladeflandes.com/frank... (Great view of 71st st. and Broadway: https://www.nyhistory.org/sites/def... ha!)

Dec-08-18		zanzibar: <WannaBe> I haven't really looked at the pairing strategy for this tournament - I just fed the CG PGN into my canned routines to get the bye list. Maybe they drew lots again for the 2nd half? Not sure.

Dec-08-18		Sally Simpson: * Hi Zanzibar, In the reprint of the 1924 book by Alekhine there is a Forward by Andrew Soltis who writes: "They didn’t even know what color they would have each day or who their opponent would be until a drawing was held fifteen minutes before their clocks were started. (This helps explain Réti’s collapse in the tournament’s second half. Due to luck of the drawing he had five Blacks in a row.)" You can see this Forward at the link below - he also mentions, again, the Ed Lasker, Emanuel Lasker conversation about The good Lasker having no knowledge of the 'Marhsall Gambit'. https://static1.squarespace.com/sta... *

Dec-09-18		zanzibar: Good info <Sally>, thx.

Dec-09-18		MissScarlett: It occurs to me the best explanation for the players' expressions in the above picture is that one of their number has broken wind with disagreeable report. My guess as to the culprit is <Fred Yates>, someone known to have problems with faulty gas leaks.

Dec-09-18		zanzibar: Oh lordy.

Dec-09-18		WannaBe: Great info <Sally Simpson>, much thanks and appreciation.

Dec-10-18		Sally Simpson: * Hi MissScarlett, I was going to use that picture in my rant about increments. Look how worried they look. They not getting any increments, they do even know who they playing in the first round. Compare it with this smug pampered bunch. ('...and will those not wearing sponsors jackets pleas go to the back.') https://www.redhotpawn.com/imgu/blo... But I could not quite make it work. I finally ditched it when I thought it might have been taken at the closing ceremony and I'm in danger of giving some nit-picker a thrill. Lasker, Capablanca, Tartakower and Reti all appear to be distracted by something happening to their right...The dinner gong! *

Jan-21-19		HarryP: Marshall did quite well in this tournament. The top three were the past, present, and future world champions. And who was next? Marshall.

Mar-04-19		sudoplatov: Top five at St. Petersburg 1914: Emanuel Lasker 13.5/18 Jose Raul Capablanca 13/18 Alexander Alekhine 10/18 Siegbert Tarrasch 8.5/18 Frank James Marshall 8/18 And the top 3 from Cambridge Springs 1904: Frank James Marshall 13/15 David Janowski 11/15 Emanuel Lasker 11/15 Nice longevity from Marshall, Lasker, and Janowski.

Dec-21-19		HarryP: This is the only tournament I've played through all the games of. Surely it is one of the greatest, most exciting, and most lovable tournaments ever. And, to top it off, the tournament book has notes by the one and only Alekhine.

Dec-21-19		HeMateMe: I'm thinking it must have been miserable being on a boat with Alekhine for two weeks. He doesn't seem to me like the ideal cabin mate.

Dec-21-19		Howard: I browse through the tournament book quite regularly !

Jump to page # (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 3 · Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
No trolling.
The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!