Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Efim Bogoljubov vs Savielly Tartakower
New York (1924), New York, NY USA, rd 15, Apr-06
Dutch Defense: Stonewall. Modern Variation (A90)  ·  1-0



explore this opening
find similar games 25 more Bogoljubov/Tartakower games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: All games have a Kibitzer's Corner provided for community discussion. If you have a question or comment about this game, register a free account so you can post there.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: After Tartakower’s <4. … d5>, Alekhine gives the following comment:

“This variation has been tried out repeatedly by Dr. Tartakower with intermittent success. Its sole advantage is that it renders Black’s position difficult of access; its disadvantages, on the other hand (condemning the queen’s bishop to passivity and weakening the black squares in a manner hardly to be remedied), are much more weighty. More alluring appears to be 4. Bb4+ 5. Bd2 Bxd2+ 6. Qxd2 Nc6, followed by … 0-0 and, eventually, … d5 and … Bd7.”

source: <New York 1924>, by Alekhine Alexander, Russell Enterprises, Inc. ©2008, at p. 224.

There are two things in Alekhine’s comment of which I cannot make sense, to wit: (1) Why would Black want to exchange his DSB in the first place in this structure; and (2) Having done so, why would he play … d5 (rather than ..d6) in preparing the LSB’s development? (I realize, of course, that if Black refrains from playing <... d5> indefinitely we are no longer in the same variation, and perhaps Alekhine was saying, if you want to play the Stonewall, this is the move order to follow; but this gets back to question #1, above: if Black is going to play the Stonewall, why trade the DSBs?)

Can any one out there provide elucidation of Alekhine's point?

Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: It is perhaps worth noting with regard to my earlier comment that in one of Alekhine's most famous games, Bogoljubov vs Alekhine, 1922, in playing the Dutch (with Bogoljubov again handling the White pieces, as here vs. Tartakower), he exchanged DSBs and then adopted a pawn structure with <... d6>.
Dec-10-20  zydeco: Interesting long-term pawn sacrifice by Bogoljubov.

Alekhine suggests 41...Kg6. If 42.h5+ Kf5 43.Rf7+ Ke4 44.Rxf4+ Kd3 45.Rf7 Kc4 and black's b-pawn becomes very powerful.

Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: 7 Nbd2 had been played in the draw Tarrasch-Mieses Teplitz-Schonau 1922; 7 Nc3 was new. 7..Nbd7 was an inaccuracy when after 8 Qc2 White is able to control the c-file; 7..0-0 would have been more accurate. 15..Qxf4? 16 Qxf8+ would cost Black a rook. Black played the simplifying combination 22..Bxa4 with the idea that the extra pawn was worth allowing White to get to the 7th rank. 28..b6? was a positional error weakening c6; 28..Rc8 was equal. After 41..Kf8? Black's game was hopeless.; 41..Kg6 was necessary.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
New York 1924
by Benzol
Dutch Defense: Stonewall. Modern Variation
from DUTCH DEFENSE by gambitfan
Dutch Stonewall. Modern Bd6 (A90) 1-0 Passer
from Headed to Holland Next Year with Fredthebear by fredthebear
New York 1924
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Qc2 < cxd5 -The pawn collector
from Super Bogo 1 by Nimzophile
New York 1924 - Alekhine
by StoppedClock
Fifteenth Round (75)
from Alekhine, A. NEW YORK 1924 by superstoned
New York 1924 - Alekhine
by dwinco
New York 1924 - Alekhine
by igiene
New York 1924
by Mal Un
from The Dutch Defense by LittleKibitzer
New York 1924 - Alekhine
by MSteen
0ZeR0's Favorite Games Volume 17
by 0ZeR0

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC