chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Wilhelm Steinitz
Steinitz 
 

Number of games in database: 1,085
Years covered: 1859 to 1899
Overall record: +472 -192 =152 (67.2%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 269 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Vienna Opening (111) 
    C25 C29 C28 C27 C26
 French Defense (86) 
    C00 C11 C01 C10 C02
 King's Gambit Accepted (71) 
    C39 C37 C38 C35 C34
 French (51) 
    C00 C11 C10 C13 C12
 King's Gambit Declined (42) 
    C30 C31 C32
 Evans Gambit (30) 
    C51 C52
With the Black pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (132) 
    C62 C70 C60 C64 C65
 Evans Gambit (74) 
    C52 C51
 Giuoco Piano (37) 
    C50 C53 C54
 King's Gambit Accepted (28) 
    C33 C39 C37 C38 C34
 Scotch Game (22) 
    C45
 Three Knights (16) 
    C46
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Steinitz vs von Bardeleben, 1895 1-0
   Steinitz vs Chigorin, 1892 1-0
   Steinitz vs A Mongredien, 1862 1-0
   S Dubois vs Steinitz, 1862 0-1
   S Rosenthal vs Steinitz, 1873 0-1
   Steinitz vs A Mongredien, 1862 1-0
   Zukertort vs Steinitz, 1886 0-1
   Steinitz vs Paulsen, 1870 1-0
   Steinitz vs A Sellman, 1885 1-0
   Steinitz vs Lasker, 1896 1-0

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   Steinitz - Zukertort World Championship Match (1886)
   Steinitz - Chigorin World Championship Match (1889)
   Steinitz - Gunsberg World Championship Match (1890)
   Steinitz - Chigorin World Championship Rematch (1892)
   Steinitz - Lasker World Championship Match (1894)
   Lasker - Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Bird - Steinitz (1866)
   Anderssen - Steinitz (1866)
   Vienna (1873)
   Steinitz - Blackburne (1876)
   Steinitz - Martinez (1882)
   Vienna (1882)
   2nd City Chess Club Tournament (1894)
   Baden-Baden (1870)
   London (1883)
   St. Petersburg Quadrangular 1895/96 (1895)
   Paris (1867)
   Vienna (1898)
   Hastings (1895)
   Nuremberg (1896)
   London (1899)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   The t_t Players: Staunton, Steinitz & Zukertort by fredthebear
   Match Steinitz! by amadeus
   Match Steinitz! by docjan
   The Dark Side by lonchaney
   Stupendous Play from Steinitz' Day Lee by fredthebear
   World Champion - Steinitz (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
   World Champion - Steinitz (I.Linder/V.Linder) by nbabcox
   Stupendous Play from Steinitz' Day by Okavango
   World championship games A-Z by kevin86
   The t_t Players: The 1900s rok by fredthebear
   1883 Beyond London lks SP by fredthebear
   the rivals 1 by ughaibu
   y1870s - 1890s Classic Chess Principles Arise by plerranov
   y1870s - 1890s Classic Chess Principles Arise by fredthebear

GAMES ANNOTATED BY STEINITZ: [what is this?]
   Showalter vs Gossip, 1889
   J McConnell vs Steinitz, 1886
   Chigorin vs Gunsberg, 1889
   M Weiss vs N MacLeod, 1889
   Showalter vs Taubenhaus, 1889
   >> 130 GAMES ANNOTATED BY STEINITZ


Search Sacrifice Explorer for Wilhelm Steinitz
Search Google for Wilhelm Steinitz

WILHELM STEINITZ
(born May-14-1836, died Aug-12-1900, 64 years old) Austria (federation/nationality United States of America)
PRONUNCIATION:
[what is this?]

William (né Wolfgang, aka Wilhelm) Steinitz, born Prague BOH (Austrian Empire); died New York, NY USA.

Wilhelm Steinitz is the earliest World Champion of chess recognized by FIDE.

Background

The last of thirteen sons of a hardware retailer, he was born in Prague in what was then the Kingdom of Bohemia within the Austrian Empire and which is now within the Czech republic. Like his father he was a Talmudic scholar, but then he left to study mathematics in the Vienna Polytechnic. He eventually dropped out of the Polytechnic to play chess professionally. Soon after, he played in the London tournament of 1862, and then settled in London for over twenty years, making his living at the London Chess Club. He emigrated to the USA in 1883, taking out US citizenship, living in New York for the rest of his life, and changing his first name to "William".

Matches

He was recognized as the world's leading player, and considered to be the world champion by many, after he defeated the then-acknowledged number one chess player in the world (now that Paul Morphy had retired), Adolf Anderssen, in a match in 1866 which he won by 8-6. However, it was not until his victory in the Steinitz - Zukertort World Championship Match (1886) – where he sat beside a US flag - that he was recognised as the first undisputed world chess champion. He successfully defended his title three times in the Steinitz - Chigorin World Championship Match (1889), the Steinitz - Gunsberg World Championship Match (1890), and in the Steinitz - Chigorin World Championship Rematch (1892). In 1894, Emanuel Lasker won the crown from Steinitz by winning the Steinitz - Lasker World Championship Match (1894) and retained it by winning the Lasker - Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896).

Steinitz was an extremely successful match player. Between 1860 and 1897, he played 36 matches, winning every serious match with the exception of his two matches against Lasker. Some of the prominent players of the day that he defeated in match play other than in his world championship matches included Max Lange, Serafino Dubois, Frederick Deacon, Dionisio Martinez, Joseph Blackburne, Anderssen, Augustus Mongredien, Henry Bird, Johannes Zukertort, George Mackenzie, and Celso Golmayo Zupide.

Tournaments

Steinitz was more adept at winning matches than tournaments in his early years, a factor, which alongside his prolonged absences from competition chess after 1873, may have prevented more widespread recognition of his dominance of chess as world champion until the first "official" world championship match in 1886. Nevertheless, between 1859 and his death in 1900, the only tournament in which he did not win prize money was his final tournament in London in 1899. His wins include the Vienna Championship of 1861 which he won with 30/31 and earned him the nickname the "Austrian Morphy", the London Championship of 1862, Dublin 1865 (equal first with George MacDonnell), London 1872, equal first at Vienna 1873 and 1882 (the latter was the strongest tournament to that time, and Steinitz had just returned from 9 years of absence from tournament chess), and first in the New York Championship of 1894. Other successes include 3rd and 2nd at the Vienna Championships of 1859 and 1860 respectively, 2nd at Dundee in 1867, 3rd in Paris in 1867, 2nd in Baden Baden in 1870, 2nd in London in 1883, 5th at the Hastings super tournament in 1895, 2nd at the sextuple round robin St Petersburg quadrangular tournament behind Lasker and ahead of Harry Pillsbury and Mikhail Chigorin, 6th at Nuremburg in 1896, and 4th at Vienna in 1898.

Steinitz's Legacy

The extent of Steinitz's dominance in world chess is evident from the fact that from 1866, when he beat Adolf Anderssen, to 1894, when he relinquished the world crown to Emanuel Lasker, Steinitz won all his matches, sometimes by wide margins. His worst tournament performance in that period was third place in Paris in 1867. This period of Steinitz's career was closely examined by Chessmetrics exponent and advocate, Jeff Sonas, who wrote an article in 2005 in which he found that Steinitz was further ahead of his contemporaries in the 1870s than Robert James Fischer was in his peak period (1970–1972), that he had the third-highest total number of years as the world's top player, behind Emanuel Lasker and Garry Kasparov, and that he placed 7th in a comparison the length of time great players were ranked in the world's top three.

Despite his pre-eminence in chess for those decades in the late 19th century, Steinitz's main contribution to chess was as its first true theoretician. He rose to prominence in the 1860s on the back of highly competent handling of the romantic attacking style of chess that had been popularised by Morphy and Anderssen and which characterised the style of the era. However, in the Vienna tournament of 1873, he introduced a new positional style of play which not only commenced his run of 25 consecutive high level victories, but profoundly transformed the way chess was played from shortly after that time, when its efficacy was embraced by the chess world. It enabled him to establish his complete dominance over his long time rival, Johannes Zukertort, and to easily win the first official match for the World Championship.

Lasker summarised Steinitz's ideas as follows:

"In the beginning of the game ignore the search for combinations, abstain from violent moves, aim for small advantages, accumulate them, and only after having attained these ends search for the combination – and then with all the power of will and intellect, because then the combination must exist, however deeply hidden."

Although these ideas were controversial and fiercely debated for some years in what has become known as the <Ink Wars>, Lasker and the next generation of the world's best players acknowledged their debt to him.

"He was a thinker worthy of a seat in the halls of a University. A player, as the world believed he was, he was not; his studious temperament made that impossible; and thus he was conquered by a player ..." - <Emanuel Lasker>.

"He understood more about the use of squares than did Morphy, and contributed a great deal more to chess theory.' - <Bobby Fischer>.

Sources
<jessicafischerqueen>'s YouTube documentary http://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis... - in turn sourced mainly from <Kurt Landsberger's> biography "Bohemian Caesar."

References
Wikipedia article: Wilhelm Steinitz
https://www.findagrave.com/memorial...

Last updated: 2025-04-13 18:53:01

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 44; games 1-25 of 1,085  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. K Hamppe vs Steinitz 0-1231859ViennaC29 Vienna Gambit
2. Lenhof vs Steinitz 0-1451859Casual gameC23 Bishop's Opening
3. Steinitz vs Lenhof 1-0321859Casual gameC52 Evans Gambit
4. Steinitz vs P Meitner 1-0341859Casual gameC52 Evans Gambit
5. E Pilhal vs Steinitz 0-1211859Casual gameC53 Giuoco Piano
6. K Hamppe vs Steinitz 0-1281859Casual gameC38 King's Gambit Accepted
7. Steinitz vs F Nowotny 1-0311859Vienna CC tC55 Two Knights Defense
8. Steinitz vs NN 1-0121860UnknownC25 Vienna
9. Steinitz vs Harrwitz  0-1391860Casual gameB44 Sicilian
10. Steinitz vs NN  1-0201860Odds game000 Chess variants
11. Steinitz vs NN  1-0151860Casual gameC41 Philidor Defense
12. Steinitz vs NN 1-0161860Casual gameC50 Giuoco Piano
13. Steinitz vs NN  1-0181860Casual game000 Chess variants
14. NN vs Steinitz 0-1241860Casual gameC59 Two Knights
15. Harrwitz vs Steinitz  1-0251860Casual gameD20 Queen's Gambit Accepted
16. K Hamppe vs Steinitz 0-1311860Casual gameC27 Vienna Game
17. Steinitz vs NN  1-0201860Casual gameC52 Evans Gambit
18. Steinitz vs E Pilhal 1-0171860ViennaC52 Evans Gambit
19. Steinitz vs NN  1-0241860Odds game000 Chess variants
20. H Strauss vs Steinitz 0-1311860Casual gameC51 Evans Gambit
21. Steinitz vs H Strauss 1-0331860Casual gameC29 Vienna Gambit
22. Steinitz vs P Meitner 1-0261860Casual gameC55 Two Knights Defense
23. Steinitz vs Lang 1-0191860Casual gameC37 King's Gambit Accepted
24. Steinitz vs Reiner 1-0321860Casual gameC51 Evans Gambit
25. Steinitz vs Lang 1-0291860Casual gameC25 Vienna
 page 1 of 44; games 1-25 of 1,085  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Steinitz wins | Steinitz loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 20 OF 48 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-11-06  lblai: Nobody has found a record (from the time when Morphy was alive) of a challenge by Morphy to everyone in the world to a Pawn-and-move match. It was reported that Morphy had decided that he would play no more matches without such odds, but there does not seem to be any indication of an invitation, open to anyone, to play with those odds.
Feb-11-06  lblai: Nobody has found any record (from the time when they were alive) of an incident where both Steinitz and Zukertort rose in answer to a request for the World Champion to stand. Steinitz biographer, Landsberger, found a record of an incident where such a request was made and NEITHER stood. This was in the 1880s, long after Morphy had stopped playing.
Feb-11-06  lblai: Nobody has found any record (from the time of the Steinitz matches) of a condition specifying that Steinitz would be champion in the event of a 9-9 score.
Feb-11-06  lblai: As early as the 1870s (long before Lasker wrote on the matter), there were those who were saying that Steinitz was the world champion.
Feb-13-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <lblai> <Nobody has found a record (from the time when Morphy was alive) of a challenge by Morphy to everyone in the world to a Pawn-and-move match. It was reported that Morphy had decided that he would play no more matches without such odds, but there does not seem to be any indication of an invitation, open to anyone, to play with those odds.> I thought such a challenge was published in December 1858. I think it is somewhere on <SBC>'s site, but I couldn't find it just now. Your characterization of it may be right, I don't recall exactly what the wording of the article was.

I found an email from Taylor Kingston on the Chigorin-Steinitz matches, looks like you are right about there being no proof of a 9-9 clause. Such a clause does appear to have been in effect for other Steinitz matches.

<Date: 16 Nov 2004 08:48:06
From: Taylor Kingston
Subject: Re: Lasker-Steintz 1894
graemecree@aol.compost (Graeme) wrote in message news:<20041113205300.07117.00000579@mb-m10.aol.com >... >

> Does the book mention whether or not there was a 9-9 tie clause in the 1894 and > 1896 matches? So far, 1886 is the only championship match I can find that > definitely had it.

According to the contracts as presented by Landsberger, a 10-win requirement with a 9-9 drawn match clause was in effect for Steinitz-Zukertort 1886 and Steinitz-Gunsberg 1890-91. Also for Gunsberg, whoever led after 20 games would win, if neither had 10 wins at that point. This apparently did come into effect, when the match ended after 19 games, when Steinitz led +6 -4 =9 for 10&#65533; points overall.
I do not see any 9-9 tie clause for Steinitz-Lasker 1894, only that the first to win 10 games takes the match, but perhaps it's buried somewhere in the fine print. None of the contracts for the 1889 and 1892 Chigorin matches, nor for the 1896 Lasker match, are presented in the book.>

Feb-13-06  Karpova: from his profile:
<morpstau: paul morphy, i think everyone agrees, is the greatest of them all.>

what makes people write down something like that? how can you <think> everyone agrees with you before you started <thinking>?

Feb-13-06  lblai: There was a follow up to the discussion mentioned by keypusher:

"I see no indication that Steinitz would have kept his title in the event of a 9-9 draw. Indeed, Steinitz grumbled in his magazine about the possibility that he would have to share his title if he did not finish with a higher score than his opponent. As far as I can tell, the notion that a champion kept his title in the event of a tie originated in 1910." - Louis Blair (23 Nov 2004 13:15:51 -0800)

Again, nobody has found any record (from the time of the Steinitz matches) of a condition IN ANY OF THE MATCHES specifying that Steinitz would be champion in the event of a 9-9 score.

Mar-31-06  Whitehat1963: Steinitz -- the winner of what some have called the strongest chess tournament of all time:

http://www3.sympatico.ca/g.giffen/t...

May-04-06  blackburne: WILHELM STEINITZ

Article in spanish with biography, results, best games:

http://www.ajedrezdeataque.com/04%2...

-----------

May-04-06  who: <Sneaky> who's Adolf Schwartz?
May-05-06  percyblakeney: <who> With the spelling Adolf Schwarz there's more of his games here. His best result is sharing first with Blackburne and Englisch in Wiesbaden 1880.
May-16-06  TylerD: Schwarz said of Steinitz during the Vienna Tournament in 1882: This little man has taught us all to play chess.
May-16-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Steinitz said of Schwarz: That big goon barely knows how to set up the pieces correctly.
May-17-06  blingice: Happy Birthday to Mr. Steinitz.
Jun-16-06  Bartleby: Steinitz: The man not afraid to wave his king in the center like a big red flag in front of bull, then watch the animal crash to the side like it was on liquored up and on ice skates.

Steinitz vs S Rosenthal, 1870

Steinitz vs Paulsen, 1870

Steinitz vs W Kamphuijen, 1873

Steinitz vs Dufresne, 1874

A toast to the braggadocio of the boldest defender in chess.

Jun-16-06  RookFile: Don't forget about this example, a 19
move win (!) in world championship play, featuring a little stroll by Steinitz's king:

Steinitz vs Zukertort, 1886

Jun-16-06  Bartleby: <Don't forget about this example, a 19 move win (!) in world championship play, featuring a little stroll by Steinitz's king:>

I love it. Half the tourney players in my home town would probably faint at the idea of employing such a line.

Jun-16-06  RookFile: Well, Zukertort was high strung, and probably drugged up, for that match. But, he 'crashed' physically as that match went on, and that ridiculous game shows just how far Zukertort had sunk by the time the match was over.
Jun-16-06  Bartleby: Yes, from what I've read about him, including a Polish biography that was reviewed at chesscafe.com, he seems to have been plagued with more health-related problems than any player until Tal. One wonders if his constitution was better how his chess career would have turned out.
Jun-16-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: <Iblai: but there does not seem to any indication of an invitation, open to anyone, to play at those odds>

The following information is from, "Paul Morphy The Pride and Sorrow of Chess" by David Lawson.

<Fiske had written to Professor Allen in January that Morphy was "about to offer Harrwitz a match at Pawn and Move and will make the same offer to any English player upon his return to London." Until the Anderssen match, Morphy had exempted Harrwitz from his "odds-to-all" rule from France, but now decided to silence the latter's pretensions. In the presence of witnesses, Morphy authorized a fellow American, probably James Mortimer, to propose to Harrwitz on his behalf a second match, on the following terms: Harrwitz to receive the odds of Pawn and move; the winner of the first five or seven games to be the victor, and the stake to be five hundred francs, more or less, as Harrwitz might choose.

The challenge was duly presented to Harrwitz on January 3 (1859), but he declined on the grounds that Morphy had treated him badly. However, as the Era commented : "Considering the courtesy that Mr. Morphy had extended to each and all of his antagonists since he visited Europe, this is perhaps the most ludicrous excuse that could have been made for declining the challenge so boldly proposed."

Edge says that "Morphy felt so much desire to play this proposed match, that he even offered to find stakes to back his antagonist, but all to no purpose." As he is quoted in the New York Herald of January 30, 1859, St. Amant said he believed Morphy could "give pawn and move to any living player" and he hoped to witness such a contest between Morphy and Harrwitz. It was the general opinion that Harrwitz lacked the courage to accept Morphy's challenge. When he received Harrwitz's refusal, Morphy seemed to lose all interest in playing at Le Regence, and to have taken a positive aversion to chess.

Harrwitz now made an attempt to give La Regence players the same odds as had Morphy, but without success. Morphy had given Budzinsky - a very strong Polish player, probably as strong as Laroche - the odds of Pawn and move, winning five games to Budzinsky's one. Harrwitz offered him the same odds but the results were Harrwitz one, Budzinsky three.>

Lawson also provides additional correspondence references regarding Morphy's challenge and he also provided the following:

<Edge, in his long dispatch of January 5, 1859, to the New York Herald, was the first to announce that "Paul Morphy had declared that he will play no more matches with anyone unless accepting Pawn and move from him">

The above information alone, definitely shows that Morphy did indeed offer a Pawn and move challenge.

Jun-16-06  RookFile: Hey, Pawn and Move - you continue to bring up valuable quotes. I suggest you put this one on the Paul Morphy page itself. About a year ago I said that Morphy had issued an open challenge to anybody in the world at pawn and move, and was practically crucified for saying this. I'm glad you can set the record straight on this.
Jun-16-06  Bartleby: <About a year ago I said that Morphy had issued an open challenge to anybody in the world at pawn and move, and was practically crucified for saying this>

That's phenomenally bizarre. I thought that tidbit was fairly common knowledge for most chess players half familiar with the career of Paul Morphy.

The wikipedia article on Paul Morphy has now become much more expanded and detail orientated, and includes the bit on Morphy's match offer.

Jun-16-06  RookFile: People today don't listen unless you can find a link on the internet. I mentioned wikipedia at the time, and that didn't persuade them.
Jun-17-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <About a year ago I said that Morphy had issued an open challenge to anybody in the world at pawn and move, and was practically crucified for saying this>

Wow. That isn't *quite* what happened.

Here's a post from the time in question. <bartleby> and anyone else interested in just what <Rookfile> was <practically crucified> for can scroll back to April 2005 on this page and read the whole ridiculous exchange. <SBC>, who really does know a thing or two about Morphy, was much more polite than I managed to be.

<Apr-02-05
Wilhelm Steinitz keypusher: <Rookfile>

You seem to confuse facts with opinions. Right now you are arguing with <SBC> about the circumstances of Morphy's offer to play anyone at odds of pawn and move. She says there was no mention of money, quoting the 1859 New York Herald, and you say there was, quoting Wikipedia. You concede that <SBC> is a Morphy expert, but argue that the anonymous people who wrote the Wikipedia piece are experts too, so that's that. It's a question of differing "views."

Historical research doesn't work like that. <SBC> is indeed a Morphy expert, but she is to be trusted over Wikipedia in this matter not because she is an expert, but because she is quoting an original source -- in fact, THE original source -- the newspaper in which Morphy's offer appeared, on the day it appeared. It's not a question of "views", it's a question of facts. And she's got 'em. (And loads more, especially about Morphy! Spend some time at her website.)

It was the same earlier in this thread re Tarrasch-Lasker. You said it was Lasker who delayed the match with Tarrasch, but it was actually Tarrasch who passed up the chance to play a match with Lasker in 1903. (He also declined an invitation to play a match with Steinitz when Steinitz was still champ, by the way.) In support of your position, you quoted Reuben Fine's book about the '72 World Championship match saying that Lasker had waited to play Tarrasch until Tarrasch was no longer dangerous.

Actually, Reuben Fine wrote a lot of garbage about chess history, but that's not the point. The point is he is no more a source for the circumstances of the Tarrasch-Lasker match than you or I are. He wasn't around in 1903 when the match was supposed to take place, or 1908 when it finally did. Unless he actually adduced some evidence for the viewpoint advanced in his Fischer-Spassky book, it's just so much hot air.

The funny thing is, the reason you gave for trusting Fine is that he said nice things about Lasker in other books. That doesn't matter! It doesn't matter if he thinks the sun rose because of Emanuel Lasker, or if he thinks the stars in their courses marched against him. It only matters what evidence he has and what he can prove. If I know Fine (I haven't read the book in question), he had no evidence whatever. >

Jun-18-06  whatthefat: <keypusher>
Well thanks for giving me a headache! To read <RookFile> spouting the exact same nonsense a year ago, with no regard to context, or even simple logic, is painful. It's just impossible to argue against such an impervious mind. One can only wonder how the biases were ingrained to begin with.
Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 48)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 20 OF 48 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC