chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Aron Nimzowitsch
A Nimzowitsch 
 

Number of games in database: 713
Years covered: 1896 to 1934
Overall record: +325 -121 =217 (65.4%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 50 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Reti System (43) 
    A04 A06
 French Defense (31) 
    C02 C11 C00 C12 C01
 Four Knights (30) 
    C49 C48 C47
 Sicilian (20) 
    B22 B32 B21 B40 B30
 English (19) 
    A18 A16 A15 A13 A12
 English, 1 c4 e5 (18) 
    A28 A20 A25 A27 A21
With the Black pieces:
 French Defense (54) 
    C01 C17 C15 C11 C10
 Queen's Pawn Game (45) 
    A46 D02 D05 A45 D04
 Nimzo Indian (35) 
    E32 E23 E22 E20 E21
 Uncommon Opening (34) 
    B00 A00
 Caro-Kann (33) 
    B13 B16 B10 B15 B12
 Queen's Indian (24) 
    E15 E12 E16 E18 E14
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Saemisch vs A Nimzowitsch, 1923 0-1
   P Johner vs A Nimzowitsch, 1926 0-1
   A Nimzowitsch vs A Hakansson, 1922 1-0
   A Nimzowitsch vs Alapin, 1914 1-0
   A Nimzowitsch vs Rubinstein, 1926 1-0
   H Mattison vs A Nimzowitsch, 1929 0-1
   A Nimzowitsch vs Salwe, 1911 1-0
   A Nimzowitsch vs Systemsson, 1927 1-0
   N Mannheimer vs A Nimzowitsch, 1930 0-1
   A Nimzowitsch vs Ryckhoff, 1910 1-0

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Dresden (1926)
   Marienbad (1925)
   Nordic Congress, Copenhagen (1924)
   Frankfurt (1930)
   Karlsbad (1929)
   San Sebastian (1912)
   Kecskemet (1927)
   San Remo (1930)
   Bled (1931)
   Karlsbad (1907)
   17th DSB Congress, Hamburg (1910)
   Semmering (1926)
   Ostend Masters (1907)
   Karlsbad (1911)
   Karlsbad (1923)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Nimzowitsch opening collection by Metrocles
   Legend Nimzowitt by Gottschalk
   Book: Chess Praxis (Nimzowitsch) by nizmo11
   Chess Praxis (A. Nimzowitsch) by Olcol
   Book: Chess Praxis (Nimzowitsch) by Youngbobby
   Chess Praxis (Nimzowitsch) by StoppedClock
   Chess Praxis (Nimzowitsch) by Okavango
   Book: Chess Praxis (Nimzowitsch) by Baby Hawk
   Chess Praxis (Nimzowitsch) by Qindarka
   Chess Praxis (Nimzowitsch) by trh6upsz
   0ZeR0's Favorite Games Volume 67 by 0ZeR0
   15 N O P Players Stan Bac SP by fredthebear
   T N O P Playerss by Littlejohn
   Nimzovich: Chess Praxis by basilderat

GAMES ANNOTATED BY NIMZOWITSCH: [what is this?]
   Saemisch vs A Nimzowitsch, 1923
   A Nimzowitsch vs A Hakansson, 1922
   A Nimzowitsch vs Alapin, 1914
   A Nimzowitsch vs Salwe, 1911
   L Van Vliet vs Znosko-Borovsky, 1907
   >> 49 GAMES ANNOTATED BY NIMZOWITSCH


Search Sacrifice Explorer for Aron Nimzowitsch
Search Google for Aron Nimzowitsch

ARON NIMZOWITSCH
(born Nov-07-1886, died Mar-16-1935, 48 years old) Latvia (federation/nationality Denmark)

[what is this?]

Aron Nimzowitsch was born in Riga, Latvia (then part of the Russian Empire) in 1886. He came to prominence in the chess world just before the First World War. He finished joint second with Rudolf Spielmann, half a point behind Akiba Rubinstein, at San Sebastian (1912). He was Russian Champion in 1913 (jointly with Alexander Alekhine) at St. Petersburg. Like Alekhine and others, he fled Russia after the 1917 Russian revolution. He initially moved to Berlin. In 1922, he finally settled in Copenhagen, Denmark, where he lived for the rest of his life.

Nimzowitsch won a string of international events in the mid-1920s which led him to challenge Jose Raul Capablanca to a world championship match in 1925, but negotiations dissolved after monetary backing could not be found. He took first place at Copenhagen (1923), Dresden (1926), Karlsbad (1929) and Frankfurt (1930).

Nimzowitsch's chess theories flew in the face of convention. He had a lengthy and bitter conflict with Siegbert Tarrasch over which ideas constituted proper chess play. While Tarrasch refined the classical approach of Wilhelm Steinitz, that the center had to be controlled and occupied by pawns, Nimzowitsch shattered these dogmatic assumptions, and proposed the controlling of the center with pieces from afar. In this way, the opponent is invited to occupy the center with pawns which thus become the targets of attack. This idea became known as the hypermodern school of chess thought.

Nimzowitsch, along with other hypermodern thinkers such as Richard Reti, revolutionized chess with their argument that controlling the center of the board matters more than actually occupying it. Nimzowitsch is also a highly-regarded chess writer, most famously for his controversial 1925 book My System, which is considered a classic by some prominent modern players but derided by others. Other books include Chess Praxis, which further expounds the hypermodern idea, and the seminal work The Blockade (Die Blockade in German), which explores the strategy implied by his famous maxim, "First restrain, then blockade, finally destroy!"

As a profound opening theoretician, Nimzowitsch has left a legacy of variations, many of which are still popular today. The Nimzo-Indian Defense (1.d4 ♘f6 2.c4 e6 3.♘c3 ♗b4) is one of the best-respected defenses to 1.d4, to such an extent that most players avoid it with 3.Nf3 or 3.g3. He played a key role in the development of two important lines in the French Defense: the Winawer Variation (1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.♘c3 ♗b4) and the Advance Variation (1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5). His name is also attached to the Sicilian, Nimzovich-Rubinstein (B29) Variation (1.e4 c5 2.♘f3 ♘f6), the Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack (1.♘f3 followed by 2.b3), the Nimzowitsch Defense (1.e4 ♘c6), and the Nimzo-English (1.c4 ♘f6 2.♘c3 e6 3.♘f3 ♗b4).

He suddenly took ill at the end of 1934, and died of pneumonia three months later on March 16, 1935 in Copenhagen.

Wikipedia article: Aron Nimzowitsch

Last updated: 2023-06-27 11:05:43

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 29; games 1-25 of 713  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. A Nimzowitsch vs NN 1-0181896RigaB01 Scandinavian
2. E Schroeder vs A Nimzowitsch 0-1201903Cafe Kaiserhof offhand gameC63 Ruy Lopez, Schliemann Defense
3. B Blumenfeld vs A Nimzowitsch 1-0291903BerlinC45 Scotch Game
4. Tarrasch vs A Nimzowitsch ½-½711904Offhand gameD07 Queen's Gambit Declined, Chigorin Defense
5. E Cohn vs A Nimzowitsch 0-130190414th DSB Congress - Hauptturnier AC41 Philidor Defense
6. Vidmar vs A Nimzowitsch 1-048190414th DSB Congress - Hauptturnier AD02 Queen's Pawn Game
7. A Nimzowitsch vs W Hilse 1-065190414th DSB Congress - Hauptturnier AC27 Vienna Game
8. B Gregory vs A Nimzowitsch 1-036190414th DSB Congress - Hauptturnier AA30 English, Symmetrical
9. P Kaegbein vs A Nimzowitsch 1-042190414th DSB Congress - Hauptturnier AD07 Queen's Gambit Declined, Chigorin Defense
10. A Nimzowitsch vs Duras 1-055190414th DSB Congress - Hauptturnier AB15 Caro-Kann
11. A Nimzowitsch vs L Forgacs 0-1521905Austro-Hungarian championshipC45 Scotch Game
12. A Nimzowitsch vs Schlechter 0-1261905Austro-Hungarian championshipB22 Sicilian, Alapin
13. H Wolf vs A Nimzowitsch ½-½341905Austro-Hungarian championshipC63 Ruy Lopez, Schliemann Defense
14. L Forgacs vs A Nimzowitsch  0-1341905Austro-Hungarian championshipC63 Ruy Lopez, Schliemann Defense
15. A Nimzowitsch vs Albin 1-0381905Austro-Hungarian championshipB02 Alekhine's Defense
16. A Nimzowitsch vs Spielmann 1-0421905Nimzowitsch - Spielmann, 1st MatchC45 Scotch Game
17. A Nimzowitsch vs Spielmann 1-0201905Cafe Orlando di Lasso offhandC44 King's Pawn Game
18. Spielmann vs A Nimzowitsch 1-0191905Nimzowitsch - Spielmann, 1st MatchB15 Caro-Kann
19. A Nimzowitsch vs Spielmann  1-0351905Nimzowitsch - Spielmann, 1st MatchC45 Scotch Game
20. A Nimzowitsch vs Spielmann ½-½361905Nimzowitsch - Spielmann, 1st MatchC45 Scotch Game
21. A Nimzowitsch vs K Satzinger  1-03519051st simulB22 Sicilian, Alapin
22. A Nimzowitsch vs Fr Teltscher 1-02819051st simulB20 Sicilian
23. A Nimzowitsch vs D Przepiorka ½-½251905Barmen Meisterturnier BB22 Sicilian, Alapin
24. Spielmann vs A Nimzowitsch 1-0301905Barmen Meisterturnier BC25 Vienna
25. A Nimzowitsch vs L Forgacs 0-1331905Barmen Meisterturnier BC45 Scotch Game
 page 1 of 29; games 1-25 of 713  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Nimzowitsch wins | Nimzowitsch loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 58 OF 76 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-28-10  candide1500: 42.Qf5 is the move (Grigorieff-Nimzowitsch) that I was curious about...since in the given position it just seems to lose the queen. All the other games have been submitted.
Jan-29-10  TheFocus: <candide1500> Thanks for pointing out that error. The move should be 42. Qf4. How did you like those web-sites?
Jan-30-10  muwatalli: Copenhagen, 1924
white- A. Nimzovich Black - A. Olson
1. f4 c5 2. e4 Nc6 3. d3 g6 4. c4 Bg7 5. Nc3 b6 6. nf3 Bb7 7. g4 e6 8. Bg2 Nge7 9. Nb5 d6 10. 0-0 a6 11. Na3 0-0 12. qe2 qd7 13. Be3 Nb4 14. Nc2 Bxb2 15. Rab1 Bc3 16. Nxb4 Bxb4 17. Bc1 f6 18. Bb2 e5 19. g5 Nc6 20. gxf6 Qg4 21. fxe5 dxe5 22. Qe3 Qh5 23. Ng5 Bc8 24. f7+ Kg7 25. Qf4 kh6 26. Ne6+ exf4 27. Bg7#

this game doesn't appear to be in the database, under opening explorer for A nimzovich anyway and is taken directly from my system, is there a reason why it isn't included? or did i just not look in the right place?

Jan-30-10  TheFocus: <muwatalli> CG does not have every game of Nimzowitsch's available. Please Upload it to CG.
Jan-31-10  muwatalli: <TheFocus> ok, did it, was just making sure i wasn't wasting the sites time before doing it, as i am fairly new to the site, or at least doing much on it.
Feb-03-10  TheFocus: I originally posted this on the Capablanca page, but felt it also had a place here:

Last evening, Mr. Edvard Weiss of Munich, Germany, sent me a copy of the following article first published in 1934 in a Breslau newspaper.

Me and World Champion Jose R. Capablanca
After being eliminated in the preliminaries of the St. Petersburg Tournament of 1914, I was preparing to return to my home when that Cuban genius Jose R. Capablanca came to my rooms and asked me if I would consent to stay and train with him between rounds. I could see that he was gunning for Herr Lasker, and seeing the gleam in his eyes, I decided to stay and help Senor Capablanca better his chances in the Finals. I played rapid transit chess many nights after the day’s rounds and often times the other players, Senor Capablanca among them, also partook of this diversion, all excepting Herr Lasker, who retired to his rooms after each round. I and Senor Capablanca stood head and shoulders above the rest of the players, although, admittedly, Senor Capablanca beat all and sundry, my poor self included, just as he had at San Sebastian in 1911, when he was introduced to the European masters. After Senor Capablanca had been making short work of all the competitors, the general consensus was that maybe Senor would offer us time odds as he had at San Sebastian. Maybe you would give us the same odds that you gave us there, we argued. “What? 5-1 odds?” “Yes.” we said, “Make it interesting.”
“No,” he said. “I am not so sure that I can still play like that. How about, instead of 50 seconds a move, you only take 30 seconds to my 10 seconds? Of course, I will give Alexander Alekhine odds of 50 seconds to 10 seconds as he is not very good at rapid chess.” “Fair enough,” we said. But, again, he toyed with us and took many players money with him. Gentleman that he was, though, he returned many players money so that could afford train fare home. He freely took the stakes, and just as easily returned it, or bought champagne for all present. At rapid transit, Senor Capablanca was virtually unbeatable. To see him play rapid transit was a joy to behold with him gently picking up the pieces and carefully putting them on the correct squares. He seemed to move without thinking, so fluid were his moves. He toyed with his opponents as if he was a cat toying with a mouse! The great Russian genius, Herr A. Alekhine, even had tears in his eyes when he once said to me after repeatedly losing to Senor Capablanca, “He is a chess god. Don’t you understand, Herr Nimzowitsch? A god! I shall never rise to his level. Never!” I, on more than one occasion, admonished him, “Senor, you must stop these late nights. Be like Lasker. He plays, he goes to his apartment, he relaxes. He will win this tournament!” But, Senor Capablanca refused to listen. “Herr Nimzowitsch,” he would say, “I am leading that Old Man. I will win!” But, alas, my fears began to come true. After the brilliant crush against Herr Lasker, he would lose to Herr Tarrasch, my ever eternal enemy, in the following round, and his lead slipped away. Then the unthinkable happened. Lasker won St. Petersburg, as I had warned him about. It is no small thing to say that Senor Capablanca’s ego was hurt, and I and Herr Akiba Rubinstein, that brilliant master, decided to intercede, especially after we heard Senor Capablanca exclaim that he would never play chess again. “Senor, Herr Rubinstein and I have been examining your play, and we believe that you should play a small practice match against him.” “But I cannot play under tournament conditions now,” he exclaimed. “I just cannot.” “Then,” said I, “maybe we could arrange to play the games in private at a rate of ninety minutes per side per game. Would you agree to that,” I asked. “Yes, but at what stakes?” “You must present Herr Rubinstein with part of your prize money. He would also stay and help you overcome some of the weaknesses in your endgame. We believe that your game is very strong. Solid openings, imaginative middlegame play, bordering on the brilliant, even profound. But…” “But what?” he asked. “Your endgame lacks finesse.” I told him as gently as I could. And it was then that Senor Capablanca showed his true maturity when he said, “I appreciate your help. I will listen to your wise counsel. After all, I am determined to take Herr Lasker’s title.”

Feb-03-10  TheFocus: Part 2:

The Match with Rubinstein
The match between these two tyros was a grand affair. Back and forth the struggles went. The two were evenly matched through six games, with one win each and four draws between them. But the next three games, Herr Rubinstein’s much greater experience began to show itself. He won the next two games and allowed a draw in the ninth game. The match now stood at 5.5–3.5. Three games remained. After a couple of days rest and relaxation, Capablanca came back and lessened the gap with a win and and a draw. 6–5 now in Rubinstein’s favor. Who would falter first? Perhaps a quick and honorable draw? The twelfth and last game began with Senor Capablanca sacrificing a Knight on the seventeenth move, that Herr Rubinstein accepted. He had sufficient compensation and was ahead on the clock. It looked as if the match would be drawn, but at the critical moment, Senor Capablanca made a rare and deadly mistake, winning back his Knight but overlooking the loss of the Exchange. He wilted away but Rubinstein looked at him with sympathy in his eyes, and… offered a draw! Capablanca accepted graciously. 6.5–5.5 for Herr Rubinstein! Hurrah for Herr Rubinstein!! More important than the match was the many hours Herr Rubinstein and Senor Capablanca spent studying the endgame positions that had arisen in the match and in the just concluded tournament, especially those endgames of World Champion Lasker. Sitting in on those sessions, I must say that my endgame skills also improved under the watchful eye of Herr Rubinstein, the great Rook endgame specialist. We examined dozens of different endgames from various tournaments. Walking around the city, Senor Capablanca said that he was duly impressed with Herr Rubinstein’s strength, and that as much as he would like to challenge Herr Lasker, he hoped that Herr Rubinstein would get another chance to contest a match with him first. (The first attempt had fallen through due to financial difficulties). “I believe that Herr Rubinstein could beat him,” he exclaimed. But, alas, again, the Great War soon intervened and when it was over, Herr Rubinstein was but a shell of his former self. Never again would he be the pre-War threat he had been, although he remained a strong master. But his flame had burned out.

<Here, Mr. Weiss said that there were two games in the article. A loss by Rubinstein and a loss by Capablanca. Both games were analyzed by both players, but he refused to share them with me, citing his desire to publish them at a later date in a magazine.>

Feb-03-10  TheFocus: Part 3:

The Great War and My First Steps Back into Chess
When I was preparing to return to my home, the Senor asked me if we could continue training together. “I am returning to America and Cuba. Why don’t you come along?” I decided that I would come later in the New Year and we parted as friends, eager to train together again. As I said, the Great War intervened and I, like many of my countrymen, was called up for military service. While fighting against the dreadful enemy, I was wounded and spent a couple of years in a convalescent home. Eventually, I returned to my family’s country home and began the long process of healing. I was in a wheelchair for over a year, but eventually, with exercise and fresh air, I began to learn to walk again, and was never even afflicted with a limp. I was not able to go to America or Cuba. Oh, no, travel by sea was much too dangerous and I was much too ill. I did begin to play chess again at home with family and visitors and slowly began to change my way of playing chess, inventing a whole new system of playing, which, later, through my books and articles, many players began to copy. All phases of my game improved and I kept up my correspondence with both Senor Capablanca and occasionally Herr Rubinstein, but very infrequently with him. Herr Rubinstein’s letters would begin with some very accurate analyses of positions and games that he wanted to share, but eventually began to adopt a rambling, non-sensicle tone. At the time, I never imagined that I would not be able to compete again in a chess tournament until 1920, almost six years after St. Petersburg! I did not receive an invitation to the great 1919 London Victory tournament, although I was there to cover it for the newspapers. I did manage to talk to Senor Capablanca, who brilliantly won the tournament, I must say, about my new system and helped him with a couple of adjournments. But, only a couple. He did not really need anyone's help at this time. He won his games with ease and showed that he had grown in strength during the war years that he had spent in America, seemingly untouched by the Great War. The year 1920 saw my return to chess at Gothenburg where I did horribly, losing to Herren Rubinstein, Bogoljubow, Kostic, Mieses, and even Moeller. Moeller, for pity’s sake! I hastily, and with poor judgment, accepted the invitation to play Herr Bogoljubow in a short match immediately following this tournament. Overconfident after winning the first game, I then lost the remaining three to him. And, then, as if I had to accept that he was my better, I finished in second place in Stockholm to Herr Bogoljubow. The two of us had the satisfaction of decimating the field, with Herr Olson finishing four points behind me. But, I lost one and drew the second game with Herr Bogoljubow. Although I had finished well, I was extremely depressed and decided to give up chess altogether. But, then, a telegram arrived from Senor Capablanca. And with its arrival, my life changed. COME TO AMERICA STOP I WISH TO TRAIN AND HEAR ABOUT YOUR NEW SYSTEM STOP FORGET EUROPE STOP I AM ABOUT TO PLAY A MATCH WITH LASKER IF NEGOTIATIONS DO NOT FALL THROUGH STOP I NEED YOUR ASSISTANCE STOP COME RIGHT AWAY STOP YOURS SINCERELY JOSE RAUOL CAPABLANCA, FUTURE WORLD CHAMPION STOP

Feb-03-10  TheFocus: Part 4:

We Assault the World Championship
At last, I thought, he is ready to become Champion. And he will need my help. I must do this for my friend. So I packed a couple of trunks with my clothes and my writings and made the voyage to America. When I stepped off the gangway from the ship that had carried me to Senor Capablanca’s side, he was there waiting. Tall. Handsome. Like royalty. Did I mention that he was a diplomat in the service of Cuba? How proud Cuba must have been of their Capablanca, the great chess genius. No longer did he look like a timid child. Here was a man ready to become the Champion. “How do I play against Lasker,” he later asked. “Do I adopt some of your style?” “No. My style is too weak for you. Your natural talents must and will prevail. Just beat Herr Lasker at his own game. Fight hard, and destroy him in the endgame. My tactics are not for you. The match’s start date is too close for you to change styles at this late time. Hit him where he lives, as the pugilists would say!” We worked off and on for many months and I shared his joy when the match was finally arranged, even after Herr Lasker “retired” the chess crown. The long awaited match would take place, but I was unable to go with him to Cuba and had to report on it from afar. But, when Senor Capablanca had won the Supreme Title, I felt very proud of the new Chess King, and humbly say that if it had not been for my assistance in the months prior to the match, I do not believe Senor Capablanca would have had the courage to face down the mighty Lasker! In later years, I was unable to get financial backing for a match with Senor Capablanca, and even turned down his invitation to play for no stakes, just Honor. No, I reasoned, the chess world will not accept that. So, my chance passed me by. But in the years that followed, I began to see the changes that occurred in Senor Capablanca’s style. Senor Capablanca was always stronger than me. I am honest enough to admit it, so you must also admit it. I dare say, that he was actually stronger than everyone else, too. His results showed that. But, chess was too easy for him. What others saw after many moments of study, he saw at a mere glance. Chess, in a word, bored my Cuban friend, and he hardly had to make an effort to win. If he had not been the Champion, he might have retired from chess. He certainly did not enjoy the chess life. But, like all Hispanic peoples, he had great pride; in himself, in his accomplishments, in all his endeavors. But, when he accepted the invitation to play Herr A. Alekhine for the World Championship shortly before the New York 1927 tournament, he did not seek my help or training. After all, I was to be one of his opponents in this same tournament. And, after the tournament was over, his great and futile pride prevented him from seeking me out to train with. Me, who would have made such a difference in this defense of his grand title! Subsequently, he lost his title, and his world and the chess world was shaken like an earthquake. Now he had to admit that he was no longer the man he once was. Why did he lose? Over-confidence, mostly. He honestly did not believe he could lose. But lose he did and he would never be given a chance to win back “his” title, as Alekhine made it difficult for Senor Capablanca to get a rematch. After the match, we met and I asked him if he wanted to train again with me. With a break in his voice, he reluctantly, and humbly, said yes. So, again we trained together and I helped him to prepare for an active tournament year in 1928. He easily adopted some more of my system and it showed, especially in his games at Carlsbad 1929, one of my finest victories, and a great victory for My System, as other players had also adopted some of my teachings. Please see my book about the Carlsbad Tournament. My legacy will live on, not just through the other players, but in the games of Senor Capablanca!

I am ill again, and the doctors say I may not have but a few months to live, so in tribute to My System, I have put pen to paper to tell how I helped my student, Senor Capablanca to become World Champion. His achievement is my achievement! His honor is my honor! Although he never again held the title, I am proud of his accomplishments. And so are his many legions of fans. For them, the World Champion is always – CAPABLANCA!!

Feb-03-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <The Focus> I thought Nimzo and Capa despised each other since San Sebastian 1911.

<His student>!? Nimzo never succeeded in beating Capa once otb!

Something doesn't feel right about that article.

Can you provide some links for us to look at please?

That kind of monumental story would not have been hidden for such a long time, and surely historians like Winter would have found it.

Feb-04-10  FHBradley: <TheFocus:> Inspired, perhaps, by what Nimzowitsch had to say about Capablanca in his book on the Carlsbad tournament in 1929?
Feb-04-10  TheFocus: <FHBradley> Actually, it was inspired by the argument between <KingG> and <visayanbrainddoctor> on the Capablanca page.
Feb-05-10  FHBradley: <TheFocus:> OK, but provides delightful 'back up' for Nimzo's views on Capablanca.
Mar-04-10  rapidcitychess: I loved it! I have a great respect for these incredible chess players!
Mar-18-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: the nimzo story was a brilliant piece of work-rather in the style of the early thomas mann-i loved the way in which invention was blended with fact to create an aura of verisimilitude. however, if nimzo had been covering the 1919 "london" victory tournament for the newspapers-which i doubt-he would surely have noticed that it took place in hastings and not in london!! well written and conceived in any case.
congrats on the erudition and scholarship which went into it.its up there with the famous kmoch spoof game v sistemsson!
Mar-18-10  TheFocus: <ray keene> You pointed out the "stone" in the soup, as it were. I have the Hastings 1919 Victory Tournament Book, so my mistake is not justifiable. I should have double-checked before posting it. I don't think anyone else has noticed that mistake.

Thank you for your very kind comments. High praise indeed, coming from a noted Nimzowitsch scholar. I appreciate them very much.

Mar-18-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: thanks very much-its always good to see nimzo appreciated-i also detected elements of the stefan zweig style ( <sternstunden der menschheit> was what i had in mind and the short story <schachnovelle>) in your story-were zweig and mann conscious inspirations or was i reading something into it which was not there? i felt there was a touch of <tod in venedig> about it too.
Mar-18-10  TheFocus: <ray keene> I have never read either of those. Are they available in English? I have only a smattering of German, certainly not enough to read a short story or a novel.

Of course, I am going to make the correction on my profile page and make a note that you pointed it out.

I am a big fan of Capablanca and Nimzowitsch and a very lively debate on the Capablanca page inspired me to write the story. Fortified by beer, I was able to dash it out pretty quickly!

Mar-19-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: tod in venedig is translated as "death in venice" and sternstunden der menscheit is "stellar hours of humanity"-tho that may not be the official title of the translation-schachnovelle is rendered as "the royal game." it wasnt the subject matter so much as the writing style and various types of internalisation -the mixing of fact with fiction-which struck me as significant -but as you imply-i was doubtless detecting an influence which was not entirely present!
Mar-20-10  thegoodanarchist: There are no comments on his death in the chessgames biography at the top. Does anyone have any info on why Nimzo died so young? Thanks
Mar-20-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  paulalbert: Hans Kmoch in his unpublished commentary on various players he knew says cancer/pneumonia. He also comments that Alekhine said Nimzowitsch's cancer was syphlitic in origin. In any case, it was death at an early age from an illness which modern drugs might have been able to cure. Paul Albert
Mar-20-10  parisattack: <ray keene: tod in venedig is translated as "death in venice" and sternstunden der menscheit is "stellar hours of humanity"-tho that may not be the official title of the translation-schachnovelle is rendered as "the royal game." it wasnt the subject matter so much as the writing style and various types of internalisation -the mixing of fact with fiction-which struck me as significant -but as you imply-i was doubtless detecting an influence which was not entirely present!>

The Royal Game was done as an excellent movie starring, if memory serves, Curt Jergens - Brainwashed.

Mar-24-10  wordfunph: September 1 1929 Issue of the Czech Publication Narodni Politika: "Our major problem was how to write his name. Therefore, with his kind permission, we examined his passport, where he had written in his best Latvian 'Nimcovics'. Therefore it is perfectly permissible if, in Czech, we write his name 'Nimcovic'. In international tournaments, where German is the international language, he has signed his name 'Nimzowitsch'."

(taken from Inside Chess mag)

Mar-31-10  kurtrichards: <"...if it were possible to develop the pieces without the aid of the pawn moves..."> examples(?) are...the Nimzowitsch Defense 1.e4 Nc6; the Nimzo-Indian Defense 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 ...
Mar-31-10  whiteshark: Quote of the Day

" An important rule for the beginner is the following: if it were possible to develop the pieces without the aid of pawn moves, the pawnless advance would be the correct one, for, as suggested, the pawn is not a fighting unit until in the sense that his crossing of the frontier is to be feared by the enemy, since obviously the attacking force of the pawns is small compared with that of the pieces."

-- Nimzowitsch

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 76)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 58 OF 76 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC