< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 57 OF 76 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Jan-18-10 | | visayanbraindoctor: <chancho: Richard Teichmann was, I believe, the first to say that quote. The 99% tactics part....
<nimh> is quite right. <A spirit with a large and roomy brain who without error could keep in mind millions of variations would have no need for planning. Frail weak man can barely keep in mind only half a dozen variations since he has but little time for Chess. And if by chance had more time for it, and in addition had genius for the game, to see through hundreds of variations would turn his brain. His reason was not made to be a substitute for a printed table. His mind has a marvellous faculty which enables him to conceive deep and far sighted plans without being subject to the necessity of examining every possibility.> Emanuel Lasker
Lasker's Manual Of Chess.>
Lasker's Manual of Chess was the second book I have read, after My System. This is the peculiar thing about them. Lasker I believe is right. His book has more tactics in them, as he realized that chess is fundamentally a tactical game. Yet it was Nimzo's book that is more helpful for beginners. The reason, as Lasker says it, is that humans do no possess <A spirit with a large and roomy brain who without error could keep in mind millions of variations>. |
|
Jan-18-10 | | visayanbraindoctor: The game above Nimzowitsch vs Capablanca, 1911 is one good example that shows why chess is fundamentally tactical. Nimzo was trying to play positionally, and got demolished by tactics. Yet, had the positions varied by just a small bit - a pawn here, a piece there, that did not occur in the game - Nimzo's plan of advancing his Queen side majority would have been perfectly sound. It would have been Capablanca who would have been crushed. However Capa saw that he could enter the game's actual lines without fear, and this is because he was calculating more variations more deeply than Nimzo, and perfectly knew he had nothing to fear. Under most circumstances however, Nimzo's plan would be recommended. Advance your pawn majority! |
|
Jan-19-10 | | TheFocus: <candide1500> Here the missing games from Winterthur 1931. Feel free to Upload them to CG. Nimzowitsch – Voellmy, E.
English Opening
1.c4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Nxd4 Bb4+ 5.Bd2 Bc5 6.Nb3 Be7 7.Nc3 Nf6 8.e4 d6 9.Be2 O-O 10.O-O Re8 11.Qc2 Ne5 12.f4 Ng6 13.Rad1 Bf8 14.c5 Qe7 15.cxd6 cxd6 16.f5 Ne5 17.Bg5 Qc7 18.Bxf6 gxf6 19.Nd4 Be7 20.Qd2 Kh8 21.Nd5 Qd8 22.Nb5 Rg8 23.Nxe7 Qxe7 24.Qxd6 Qxd6 25.Rxd6 Bd7 26.Nc3 Bc6 27.Rfd1 Rae8 28.Rxf6 Ng4 29.Bxg4 Rxg4 30.Rxf7 Reg8 31.g3 h5 32.Nd5 Bxd5 33.Rxd5 Rxe4 34.f6 1-O. Joss, H. – Nimzowitsch
Slav Defense
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.cxd5 cxd5 4.Nc3 e6 5.e3 Bd6 6.Nf3 Nc6 7.Be2 f5 8.a3 a5 9.Bb5 Qf6 10.Na4 Nge7 11.Nb6 Rb8 12.Bd2 O-O 13.Qa4 Bc7 14.Nxc8 Rbxc8 15.O-O g5 16.Bc3 g4 17.Nd2 Qh6 18.g3 f4 19.exf4 Rxf4 20.Rfe1 Rxf2 21.Kxf2 Qxh2+ 22.Ke3 Bxg3 23.Rh1 Qf2+ 24.Kd3 Qf5+ 25.Ke2 Qf2+ 26.Kd1 Nf5 27.Bxc6 Ne3+ 28.Kc1 Qg2 29.Re1 Bxe1 30.Qxa5 Bxd2+ 31.Bxd2 Qf1+ 32.Be1 Qd3 33.Qa4 b5 34.Bc3 bxa4 35.Bxa4 g3 O-1. Nimzowitsch – Zimmermann, O.
Nimzo-Indian Defense
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Qc2 Nc6 5.e3 O-O 6.Bd3 d6 7.Nge2 e5 8.O-O Bxc3 9.Qxc3 Re8 10.d5 Ne7 11.Ng3 Ng6 12.b3 Nd7 13.f4 exf4 14.Nh5 Re5 15.Nxg7 fxe3 16.Nf5 Nf6 17.Nxe3 Qe7 18.Nc2 Ne4 19.Bxe4 Rxe4 20.Bb2 Qe5 21.Qd3 Qe8 22.Bf6 Bd7 23.Rf2 Nf4 24.Qd2 Ng6 25.Raf1 Qf8 26.Nd4 a6 27.Qd3 Rae8 28.Ne6 R4xe6 29.dxe6 Rxe6 30.Qd2 Bc6 31.h4 1-O. Grigorieff, N. – Nimzowitsch
Queen’s Pawn Opening
1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 Bf5 3.c4 e6 4.Nc3 c6 5.Bf4 Bd6 6.Bxd6 Qxd6 7.e3 Nf3 8.Bd3 dxc4 9.Bxc4 Nbd7 10.O-O O-O 11.Qe2 Bg4 12.Rfd1 Rad8 13.e4 Qb8 14.h3 Bh5 15.Qe3 Rfe8 16.Rd2 Bxf3 17.Qxf3 e5 18.d5 Nb6 19.Bb3 cxd5 20.Nxd5 Nbxd5 21.Bxd5 Nxd5 22.Rxd5 Rxd5 23.exd5 e4 24.Qb3 b6 25.Rc1 Qe5 26.Rd1 Rd8 27.Qb5 h6 28.Kf1 Qh2 29.d6 Qh1+ 30.Ke2 Qxg2 31.Qf5 g6 32.Qf6 Qg5 33.Qe7 Kg7 34.Qxe4 Qb5+ 35.Kf3 Qxb2 36.d7 Qf6+ 37.Kg2 Qg5+ 38.Kh2 Qf5 39.Qd4+ Kh7 40.Kg2 Qg5+ 41.Kh2 Qc5 42.Qf5 Kg8 43.Rd2 Kg7 44.Rd1 b5 45.Qd2 b4 46.Qf4 a5 47.Qd2 Qe5+ 48.Kh1 Qc3 49.Qd6 Qxh3+ 50.Kg1 Qg4+ 51.Kh2 Qh4+ 52.Kg2 Qg5+ 53.Kh2 Qf6 54.Qd2 Qh4+ O-1. Nimzowitsch – Johner, H.
Nimzo-Indian Defense
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Qc2 d5 5.cxd5 exd5 6.Bg5 c6 7.e3 Nbd7 8.Bd3 Bxc3+ 9.bxc3 h6 10.Bh4 c5 11.Nf3 O-O 12.O-O Re8 13.a4 c4 14.Be2 Qc7 15.a5 Ne5 16.Nd2 Nxd2 17.Qxd2 Nf8 18.Bg3 Qc6 19.Bd1 b5 20.axb6 axb6 21.Rxa8 Qxa8 22.Bc2 Bd7 23.Bd6 Ng6 24.Bb1 Qc6 25.Bg3 Ne7 26.Qb2 Ra8 27.Bc2 Ra5 28.Rb1 Rb5 29.Qa3 Rxb1+ 30.Bxb1 Bf5 31.Qxe7 Bxb1 draw. Gygli, F. – Nimzowitsch
Nimzo-Indian Defense
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Qb3 Qe7 5.Nf3 b6 6.g3 Bb7 7.Bg2 Bxc3+ 8.bxc3 Nc6 9.Ba3 d6 10.Qa4 Qd7 11.Nd2 O-O 12.e4 e5 13.O-O Rfe8 14.Bb2 Na5 15.Qc2 c5 16.f4 Rac8 17.fxe5 dxe5 18.d5 Qe7 19.Qd3 Ba6 20.Rae1 Rcd8 21.Re3 Rf8 22.Rfe1 Ne8 23.Bf1 Nd6 24.Qc2 Qd7 25.Bc1 f6 26.Rf3 Rf7 27.Rf2 Rdf8 28.Qd1 Bc8 29.Bd3 Qg4 30.Be2 Qd7 31.Bd3 Qe8 32.Be2 Bd7 33.Bd3 Qc8 34.Bf1 Bg4 35.Qc2 Bh3 36.Bd3 Qd7 37.Qd1 Bg4 38.Qc2 h5 39.Nf1 Naxc4 40.Bxc4 Nxc4 41.Qb3 Nd6 42.c4 f5 43.Nd2 Nxe4 O-1. Nimzowitsch – Naegeli, O.
Queen’s Gambit Declined
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 Nbd7 5.cxd5 exd5 6.Bf4 c6 7.e3 Be7 8.Bd3 O-O 9.Rc1 Re8 10.O-O Nf8 11.Ne5 Bd6 12.Bg3 Qe7 13.f4 N6d7 14.e4 dxe4 15.Bc4 Ne6 16.Nxf7 Kxf7 17.f5 Nf6 18.Bh4 Kg8 19.Nxe4 Rf8 20.fxe6 Bxe6 21.Nxf6+ Rxf6 22.Bxf6 gxf6 23.Qg4+ Kf7 24.Rfe1 1-O. |
|
Jan-19-10 | | AnalyzeThis: Chancho, obviously, you're pointing out that somebody is out to lunch. Obviously a Coakley supporter. |
|
Jan-19-10
 | | chancho: <AnalyzeThis> Teddy must be spinning in his grave. :-) |
|
Jan-19-10 | | AnalyzeThis: Met him once, in junior high school, with our class, as part of a field trip. He was nice enough. |
|
Jan-19-10
 | | keypusher: Thanks <TheFocus>!! |
|
Jan-19-10
 | | chancho: Never in a million years would I have imagined a Repub taking Ted's seat. Coakley blew it big time. She thought the seat was her's without working hard for it via the campaign effort. Unbelievable... |
|
Jan-19-10
 | | keypusher: <chancho: Never in a million years would I have imagined a Repub taking Ted's seat. Coakley blew it big time. She thought the seat was her's without working hard for it via the campaign effort. Unbelievable...> Hang on, are you from the future? They haven't counted the votes yet have they? |
|
Jan-19-10 | | euripides: Given the meaning of 'Bog' in Russian, does <Analyzethis>'s reference to 'Bogo the clown' constitute an unexpected homage to Samuel Beckett ? |
|
Jan-19-10
 | | chancho: <Keypusher> No, of course not. I hope I'm wrong, but the polling data is kind of convincing. |
|
Jan-19-10 | | candide1500: <TheFocus> Thank u very much for taking the time to do this. I have a test to study for 2nite but tomorrow I will try to start getting them added. It would be a shame not to display these games from Nimzo's peak years. |
|
Jan-19-10 | | TheFocus: <candide1500> My pleasure. Winterthur was a very good result for Nimzowitsch. 7.5 out of 8; a two point lead over Johner. |
|
Jan-28-10 | | candide1500: <The game above Nimzowitsch vs Capablanca, 1911 is one good example that shows why chess is fundamentally tactical. Nimzo was trying to play positionally, and got demolished by tactics.> I disagree with your assessment of this game. If anything Nimzowitsch¡¦s play makes an anti-positional impression. He doesn't get much out of the opening, makes a series of time wasting moves, ends up with in a seriously cramped position, and then tries to bail out with a dubious piece sac. The funny thing is Capa almost lets him back in, but Nimzo screws the pooch with 23 Qf3. Don¡¦t forget Capa was a great positional player as well. Many of his ¡§tactical¡¨ victories seem to come when his opponents, despairing at their deteriorating position, lash out prematurely. |
|
Jan-28-10 | | AnalyzeThis: Any way you look at it, it's pretty bad when you have the white pieces, and the best thing you can say about the game is that maybe you had a chance to equalize on move 23. |
|
Jan-28-10 | | candide1500: Sure...Nimzo lost. But it wasn't a "positional" player losing to a "tactical" one. Thats the point I was trying to make. |
|
Jan-28-10 | | TheFocus: <candide1500> Have you begun uploading the Winterthur games to CG? If you are not, then I will. |
|
Jan-28-10 | | AnalyzeThis: <candide1500: Sure...Nimzo lost. But it wasn't a "positional" player losing to a "tactical" one. Thats the point I was trying to make. > You're right. It was a positional player losing to a complete player, and one who slapped Nimzo around on a regular basis. |
|
Jan-28-10 | | candide1500: <TheFocus> Affirmative the first two are up and loaded...i will try to get another one up 2nite (sorry I am moving so slowly). There were a couple of minor mistakes in one or two of the games that I was planning to ask you about (I believe it was Grigorieff, Nimzowitsch).
<AnalyzeThis>
Thats not so much a point as it is polemic. If you are trying to "convince" people that capa was stronger than nimzo...well my friend you know what they say about flogging dead horses. If I might venture a personal question, why do you never spend your time reminding other great players fans (Anderssen, Gligoric, Korchnoi, Larsen, Shirov, Ivanchuck, Tartakower, ect) that they never quite made it to the top? Did someone once roll up My System and beat you with it when you were young? |
|
Jan-28-10 | | TheFocus: <candidie1500> If there are any mistakes in what I posted, I will look at my original source and see if I typed them in wrong to my database. Check out the posts I made about Nimzowitsch on the Keene page regarding a new upcoming book by Per Skjoldager. I am going to begin uploading the rest of the Nimzowitch tournament and match games that I have. |
|
Jan-28-10 | | TheFocus: <candide1500> I just checked the Grigorieff game at an on-line database and it is the same, except for my obvious mistake 7...Nf3, which should be 7...Nf6. Anything else?
Don't hold your breath waiting for anything you upload to appear soon. I am sure CG has quite a backlog. The three Fischer - Gligoric training games from 1992 that I and <parisattack> uploaded in November still have not appeared. |
|
Jan-28-10 | | candide1500: <TheFocus>
I will be sure to reserve a copy! I hope it contains some otherwise unknown biographical information. There is a quote from Bent Larsen in Ray Keene's book: "He was a very strange man, but people more or less liked him, also because he had a certain humour. In Denmark there are all these stories about Nimzowitsch and a lot of people tell about his persecution complex- how he was sure that the waiter in the Industrieverein wanted to poison him, and so on." I remember thinking how unfortunate it would be if none of these stories were ever recorded. We chess players are very much responsible for our own history. |
|
Jan-28-10 | | candide1500: <TheFocus> hmmm dang I thought that was the one with the middlegame mistakes. I will look at them again before I upload (something I am trying to get done 2nite) any mistakes I will post on this forum. |
|
Jan-28-10 | | TheFocus: <candide1500> I am sure this will the tribute that Nimzowitsch needed and deserved. Per Skjoldager is quite a scholar and this will, I hope, be a very exciting book. You could check out Per's website www.nimzowitsch.com. Another good site is Phillip Hughes' Uncrowned Kings page www.phileo.demon.co.uk/. |
|
Jan-28-10 | | TheFocus: <candide1500> Ask any questions. The database I used for Winterthur was Uncrowned Kings. Let me know if you find any mistakes so I can make the changes in my database. |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 57 OF 76 ·
Later Kibitzing> |