< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 59 OF 76 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Apr-07-10 | | sneaky pete: An example of what can happen when black tries to develop his pieces, while leaving the central pawns at home. click for larger viewFroim Simchowitsch, 1924. White to play and draw. |
|
Apr-07-10 | | Alphastar: The solution is 1. Nf7 Re8 (Rf8 is answered by 2. Rf3+ Kg6 3. Ne5+ with a draw by perpetual by shuffling the rook around) 2. Nd6+! exd6 3. Rf3+ Ke6 4. Re3+ Kf7 5. Rxe8 Kxe8 6. a3! Ra8 7. Kd2 Bb7 8. Ke2 Kf7 9. Kf1! (9. f3?? Rh8 and the rook penetrates) Rh8 10. Kg1! Kf6 11. f3 12. Kf5 g3 = and white has a fortress. The black king and bishop can't do anything and white moves his king from g1-g2 all the time, and if black switches his rook to the e-file white moves from f1-f2. |
|
May-08-10 | | suenteus po 147: Another tournament collection highlighting a stellar Nimzowitsch finish: Game Collection: Frankfurt 1930 |
|
May-23-10 | | whiteshark: Quote of the Day
< When a farmer loses a suckling pig through illness, he mourns not only the little pig, but also the good food he has gambled on it. > -- Aron Nimzowitsch
Quiz: Topic/Chapter? |
|
Aug-10-10 | | whiteshark: Quote of the Day
< There is no such thing as an absolutely freeing move. A freeing move in a position in which development has not been carried far always proves illusory, and vice versa, a move which does not come at all in the category of freeing moves can, given a surplus of tempi to our credit, lead to a very free game. > -- Nimzowitsch
Is that understood? :D |
|
Aug-10-10 | | FHBradley: <whiteshark:> Clear as daylight in Moscow! :-) |
|
Aug-10-10 | | whiteshark: <FHBradley> Inhaling the obvious (that is the air you just have seen right in front of you). |
|
Aug-11-10 | | whiteshark: Quote of the Day
< The old dogmas, such as the ossified teaching on the center, the worship of the open game, and in general the whole formalistic conception of the game, who bothers himself today about any of these?> -- Nimzowitsch
Well, every dogma has its day. |
|
Aug-11-10
 | | Check It Out: My dogma got ran over by my karma. |
|
Aug-12-10 | | whiteshark: <Check It Out: My dogma got ran over by my karma.> I like that! :D |
|
Aug-12-10 | | whiteshark: Quote of the Day
< We engage one wing, or the obvious weakness in it, and thus draw the other enemy wing out of its reserve, when new weakness will be created on that reserve wing, and so the signal is given for systematic manoeuvring against two weaknesses. > -- Nimzowitsch
Happy Nimzo-Weeks on ceegee.com |
|
Aug-21-10
 | | OhioChessFan: < When a farmer loses a suckling pig through illness, he mourns not only the little pig, but also the good food he has gambled on it. > An important economic principle known as opportunity costs. The suckling he chose to buy costs not only the purchase price, but all the other foregone opportunities he could have used that money on. |
|
Nov-07-10 | | parisattack: Happy Birthday to the Stormy Petrel of chess! |
|
Nov-07-10 | | AgentRgent: For changing chess, both mine and the world's, forever, today is a momentous day. Happy birthday! |
|
Nov-07-10 | | visayanbraindoctor: Birthday of Nimzo! Author of the the most influential book for newly-learning chess players throughout history, My System! |
|
Nov-08-10 | | TheFocus: Ah, Nimzowitsch. I first met him through Blockade!. Such an influential book on my early style. Then My System and Chess Praxis. Next year we should see the appearance of a new biography by Danish historian Per Skjoldager. It should include every game of Nimzowitsch's with many new games. |
|
Jan-11-11
 | | chancho: <thegoodanarchist> Nimzowitsch suffered from heart trouble but died from Pneumonia in 1935 after suddenly getting ill towards the end of 1934.
He was bed ridden for three months when he passed away on March 16, 1935 Source: The Oxford Companion To Chess. |
|
Feb-08-11
 | | Penguincw: < "There is no such thing as an absolutely freeing move. A freeing move in a position in which development has not been carried far always proves illusory, and vice versa, a move which does not come at all in the category of freeing moves can, given a surplus of tempi to our credit, lead to a very free game." > Very long quote by
Aron Nimzowitsch. |
|
Feb-09-11
 | | Penguincw: < "The old dogmas, such as the ossified teaching on the center, the worship of the open game, and in general the whole formalistic conception of the game, who bothers himself today about any of these? "> Another long quote by Aron Nimzowitsch. |
|
Feb-09-11 | | Shams: That dogma don't hunt. |
|
Feb-10-11
 | | Penguincw: < "We engage one wing, or the obvious weakness in it, and thus draw the other enemy wing out of its reserve, when new weakness will be created on that reserve wing, and so the signal is given for systematic manoeuvring against two weakness." > Wow.Third day in a row that Aron Nimzowitsch has made a quote! |
|
Mar-25-11 | | candide1500: I had an interesting conversation with a master friend of mine the other day that I thought he would share. We were talking about why the 'positional exchange sac' seemed to get so much more attention in chess literature than other sacs (a queen for a rook and minor piece specifically) which are actually less of a material investment. To my surprise, he thought 'blockade' had a lot to do with it. Positional exchange sacs tend to seek to conquer a square of a certain color and rob the enemies pawn mass of its dynamic potential (Nimzowitsch!) while other sacs are harder to classify and don't fit as nicely into books. Really the only author I can think to tackle the subject is Hansen ('The Queen is a fairly overrated piece') and even he really didn't try to draw any generalizations about when such exchanges are warranted. I wondered if any Kibitzers had any ideas? |
|
Apr-17-11 | | vellerup58: Biography about Aron Nimzowitsch has been announced by McFarland http://www.mcfarlandpub.com/book-2.... |
|
May-07-11
 | | Penguincw: Quote of the Day
< "An important rule for the beginner is the following: if it were possible to develop the pieces without the aid of pawn moves, the pawnless advance would be the correct one, for, as suggested, the pawn is not a fighting unit until in the sense that his crossing of the frontier is to be feared by the enemy, since obviously the attacking force of the pawns is small compared with that of the pieces." > Wow. Nimzowitsch always has long quotes. |
|
May-07-11 | | MrToad: Good posts - generally relating to the way chessplayers can become 'blinkered' in their outlook on the game. Sometimes you have to play against the rules ie when the position demands it. Be your own person ... or, in this case, chessplayer! There is more to be found on this subject in John Watson's "Secrets of Modern Chess Strategy" and I have drawn heavily on this book in a post in my "Celebrate Chess" blog at: http://celebratechess.blogspot.com/... John Watson's text has been described by GM Simen Agdestein as one which "may have as much influence on our future understanding of the game as Nimzowitsch's MY SYSTEM had". He shows how chess has evolved since Nimzowitsch - without in any way denigrating Nimzowitsch's powerful and beneficial impact. |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 59 OF 76 ·
Later Kibitzing> |