chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

thegoodanarchist
Member since Jul-29-03
The Civil War - Why they fought:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHD...

************

Why America's decline is inevitable, and White Genocide is the ultimate aim of the Left:

https://newdiscourses.com/2020/07/w...

We cannot live in harmony with these evil scumbags, because they view anyone who isn't "woke" as a Nazi. It is our very <existence> that they hate.

************

What the Leftist rioters did to Manhattan:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXT...

************

https://identitydixie.com/2021/05/2...

>> Click here to see thegoodanarchist's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   thegoodanarchist has kibitzed 21803 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Oct-05-21 playground player chessforum (replies)
 
thegoodanarchist: <playground player: Where does it end? https://leeduigon.com/2021/10/04/wa... > I am guessing when George Washington is ruled to be black, but I am probably too optimistic.
 
   Sep-03-21 Duda vs Karjakin, 2021 (replies)
 
thegoodanarchist: I submitted this game for GOTD, with the following pun: "Camptown Ladies Sing This Song: Duda! Duda!" JKD deserves to be recognized for his dominant World Cup 2021 win, where he defeated the likes of Karjakin and Carlsen. Here is a reference for the pun, which contains the
 
   Aug-29-21 Louis Stumpers (replies)
 
thegoodanarchist: <aw> If you're interested, here's one on-line source that confirms it: https://www2.ph.ed.ac.uk/~ldeldebb/... And I am sure my grad school QM textbook would confirm it as well, but unfortunately I donated it to a library in 2018, and then moved 2 thousand miles away ...
 
   Aug-29-21 gezafan chessforum (replies)
 
thegoodanarchist: < gezafan: <<<Gregor Samsa Mendel: <<<tga--Keeping things below the RADAR is the best way forward. For ANY revolution.>>> White genocide, a genocide so delicate, so subtle, only trained observers can detect its presence. The Emperor's New ...
 
   Aug-26-21 Peter Catt vs S Rilberg, 2009
 
thegoodanarchist: It was Ril exciting
 
   Jul-31-21 George Wallace chessforum (replies)
 
thegoodanarchist: <George Wallace: Yes, Jesus died on the cross, was buried 3 days, and was risen to atone for our sins, but that is an offer of salvation. It is not salvation for everyone.> It is not salvation for everyone, but NOT because it isn't <the way> to be saved. He IS ...
 
   Jul-31-21 technical draw chessforum (replies)
 
thegoodanarchist: My Mac also has this thing: - - \_ It is on the option button.
 
   Jul-30-21 thegoodanarchist chessforum
 
thegoodanarchist: And my rebuttal (the latest): <Diademas: ... I will be happy to continue in Norwegian.> I think we BOTH would prefer that. Mainly because I don't speak Norwegian. <You think referring to me as Doctor Mengele will endear you to me or are in the spirit of what our ...
 
   May-29-21 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
thegoodanarchist: <Check It Out: ... Reposting those links is another, and shouldn't be done. > Then why aren't you crying to cg.com about this post: chessgames.com chessforum (kibitz #35561) ????????
 
   May-29-21 S Volkov vs E Romanov, 2008 (replies)
 
thegoodanarchist: "Romanov Dynasty"
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Old Ways are Better Ways

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 73 OF 73 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-02-21  morfishine: <thegoodanarchist> You are very welcome! I saw the painting or print for sale in a WW2 magazine over 40 years ago and had no idea the full story behind it. Watching the vid was quite touching

The bomber pilots' name was of all things Charlie Brown

The German pilot Franz Stigler finished the war with 45 kills

Feb-06-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: < OhioChessFan: ...

I remembered all of that. WHO SAID THAT WAS <THE> TOPIC? Quit playing with this. I'm about to drop you like I have <opt>>

Somehow I missed this previously. How close I came to falling out of fellowship with you, if the Lord had not directed my replies.

Brothers, we cannot have this. <op> is a Christian, yet I confess I also dropped him (put him on ignore) previously. He is NOT on my ignore list now, and never will be again..

(And I think he currently has me on ignore.)

And I am certain both you and I, <OCF>, have had each other on ignore at various times.

Brothers in Christ, I implore you all! Let us stop this dissension, please.

I will post this also in my forum, and <BP>'s forum, although I don't think <BP> has ever put a Christian on "ignore", to his credit. It is just that I want to spread the idea, and I know <op> reads <BP>'s forum.

As a request, <BP>, could you please repost this so <op> can read it? (maybe I am still on his ignore list).

This is beyond debate, beyond politics, beyond philosophy.

This is about the unity of the body of Christ. Going forward, times will get tougher, most likely. I pray we can all set aside our differences enough to at least never use the "ignore" function against a fellow believer.

What say you, Men of the West?

Feb-13-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <Somehow I missed this previously. How close I came to falling out of fellowship with you, if the Lord had not directed my replies.>

If you would have simply <answered the questions I put to you> this would have been over in an instant.

Feb-13-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I came to mention my growing concern that your thoughts of the union dissolving are spot on. This country is in trouble. The incredible dishonesty and wickedness of the Rogoff crew bodes ill for our future if people like that are any indication.
Feb-15-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: < OhioChessFan: <<<Somehow I missed this previously. How close I came to falling out of fellowship with you, if the Lord had not directed my replies.>>>

If you would have simply <answered the questions I put to you> this would have been over in an instant.>

I will just point out that you ignored many of my questions in the beginning of the discussion. Why should I then answer your questions, after you ignored my questions?

Not only that, in my mind the topic was sola scriptura, and I was under the impression that you had the same understanding. So, I was trying to keep the conversation on topic.

The first time you asked me "who said sola scriptura is the topic?" I about fell out of my chair with shock!

Feb-15-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <OhioChessFan: I came to mention my growing concern that your thoughts of the union dissolving are spot on. This country is in trouble.>

I already made my peace with it. Now I am preparing for persecution of Christians in the country that was the very cradle of liberty, America.

TBH, I consider 2020 to be the second greatest blessing of my entire life, behind only receiving Christ. It proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that our political class is hopelessly corrupt, and their chosen path is anarcho-tyranny whether they realize it or not. And it also proved the reality of evil beyond any shadow of a doubt in my mind.

Not only that, the ONLY way the world makes sense is when viewed through the lens of Christianity. God is real. Christ is real. Satan is real. And we are in a war of good versus evil until our dying day. I very roughly estimate that 80-90% of all members of Congress (535 total) are under demonic influence.

Feb-15-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <OCF> one last thing. I don't know if you ever saw this reply:

thegoodanarchist chessforum (kibitz #1844)

In any event, my point is that the plan to do whatever necessary to install Biden was in the works long before 2020.

May-15-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: The Problem With Sola Fide

A large percentage of Christians who adhere to this principle use it as justification for not loving their neighbors, not being generous with alms, not fasting, not praying often, and so forth.

They love to quote Ephesians 2:8-9 <For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is a gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast.>

But then they (conveniently?) omit verse 10, which follows immediately: <For we are His workmanship, create in Christ Jesus for...>

For what? <GOOD WORKS, <<<<which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.">>>>>

May-29-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <Check It Out: This discussion with it's porn crap links needs to go away.>

Wow. <My> reply post was deleted?

It was an effin reply, people!!!

Yet the post to which I was replying remains??? What???

Here is what happened after I replied:

<CIO> came to the forum crying. Did my cuttlefish joke trigger him?

I did not think that was the case, because he was talking about <links>. <jfq> is the one who posted the links!!!

How obtuse can you be, cg.com????????????

THE ONLY LINKS IN MY POST WERE FROM ME QUOTING <jessicafischerqueen:>!!!

Duh.

I only quoted <jfq> to provide contest for my joke. I didn't even look at the links!

Strain out a gnat and swallow a camel.

************

I am done supporting this website financially. I will NEVER renew my premium membership.

Jul-30-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: Today is a sad day for <Diademas>.

He was triggered by the revelation that he supports the ideology that got his ancestors in harms way, back 80 years ago. I hope he can recover from this devastating blow. And... I hope he can abandon his authoritarian beliefs, and embrace liberty.

Jul-30-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: OK, I wasn't planning on coming back, but this is a serious public health issue and needs to be addressed. <OhioChessFan: ...

Irrelevant to getting the vaccine. I continue to be bewildered by the anti-vaxer position.>

Facts:

1. There is no vaccine. Calling the jabs "vaccines" is deliberate misinformation. These are novel mRNA manipulation shots.

2. My understanding is that <OCF> is about 60 years old. For people his age and up, or people with co-morbidities, the jab might make sense. But for healthy people under 60 it is not worth the risk. If you are under 40, it is <definitely> not worth it.

3. VAERS has over 5000 confirmed deaths (and rising) from people getting the jab, as of a few weeks ago. If you don't know what VAERS is, you are definitely not making an informed decision about getting the jab.

4. Most new COVID cases are people who got the jab!

5. The jab will NOT prevent you from being contagious - COVID can be spread by "vaccinated" individuals.

The smartest blogger that I know of, Vox Day, has covered this topic extensively. You can check out his posts here:

https://voxday.blogspot.com

Jul-30-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: Troller posted: <tga> <1. There is no vaccine. Calling the jabs "vaccines" is deliberate misinformation. These are novel mRNA manipulation shots.> I think this is mostly semantics but you are right that we have not had vaccines based on the mRNA technology before. The technology has been used in other medical treatments though.

<VAERS> collects all data and does not analyze it. Among the <5000 confirmed deaths (and rising) from people getting the jab> there are examples of suicide and rabies just to give a few examples that seem not related to a vaccine.

<4. Most new COVID cases are people who got the jab! > Do you have data on this?

I fully understand skepticism towards covid vaccination, especially as it becomes in practise forced upon us. But when you present <facts> also be prepared to back them up.

Jul-30-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <<Troller: <<<tga: 1. There is no vaccine. Calling the jabs "vaccines" is deliberate misinformation. These are novel mRNA manipulation shots.>>> I think this is mostly semantics>

You are wrong. It is not semantics, there is a stark difference between the two mechanisms.

<<VAERS> collects all data and does not analyze it. Among the <5000 confirmed deaths (and rising) from people getting the jab> there are examples of suicide and rabies just to give a few examples that seem not related to a vaccine.>

This is irrelevant to the point I made. Since this is a matter of public health, please try to put aside your desire to "score points" with someone who doesn't share your politics. In other words, try to look at the big picture instead of your selfish agenda of trolling.

Not only that, this is SPECIFICALLY addressed in the 2nd link below.

<<<<4. Most new COVID cases are people who got the jab!>>> Do you have data on this?>

WTH???? Did you not click on the link???

< But when you present <facts> also be prepared to back them up.>

THAT'S WHY I INCLUDED THE LINK! SHEESH, TRY USING YOUR BRAIN.

Since you seem to have lost IQ points since the last time I interacted with you, here are links to the specific blog posts I was referring to, not just the blog home page:

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2021/07/...

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2021/07/...

(This is the particular post I was referring to earlier.)

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2021/07/...

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2021/07/...

(anecdotal, but there are many anecdotal stories)

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2021/07/...

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2021/07/...

(oops, it was 11,000 VAERS cases, more than double the 5,000 I mentioned before. The lower number is from the Scottish PHS.)

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2021/07/...

And...
http://voxday.blogspot.com/2021/07/...

<REMINDER: heard from another medical professional. Covid cases are on the rise in their area, but ALL of the infected are vaccinated. Not some, not most, all of them.

REMINDER: Reuters reports that three-quarters of the Covid cases in Singapore are vaccinated people.

REMINDER: 84 percent of the new cases of COVID in Israel are vaccinated individuals.>

And this guy has been covering the story all along, so there are lots more posts with information about what's going on.

Jul-30-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: Clicking on all my links has revealed that I mixed them up anyway, even though I thought I straightened it out. I apologize for the disorganization of that post. Here is the link:

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2021/07/...

<we already know more than 11,000 Covid vaccine deaths have been recorded in the VAERS system.>

Jul-30-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <Diademas: ...
I don't think anyone in Norway has lost their job for refusing to be vaccinated, but I could see situations where I would have no problems with that.>

After all, it's not <your> job that is being lost.

It never fails - whenever the mask is ripped off the Leftist/Socialist/Progressive, they never have a problem forcing suffering (or even death) onto OTHER people.

Jul-30-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <Diademas: ...
As I've tried to explain to you, the only alternative to vaccination, bar letting us all get infected, is a prolonged time of restrictions for people who represent a risk of spreading the disease.>

Maybe you should try to explain to yourself that 1) the vaccines do not prevent catching COVID, and 2) don't keep you from spreading COVID if you contract it!

<You are effectively trying to have your cake and eat it too. You're obviously critical to the restrictions we've seen, but your not willing to lift a finger to end it.>

And you are trying to sell us on an efficacy that exists only in liberal propaganda.

Jul-30-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: FYI, dear reader, these are all repeat posts of the discussion in <PGP>'s forum.
Jul-30-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: Posted by Diademas:

<thegoodanarchist: <Diademas: ... I don't think anyone in Norway has lost their job for refusing to be vaccinated, but I could see situations where I would have no problems with that.> After all, it's not <your> job that is being lost.

It never fails - whenever the mask is ripped off the Leftist/Socialist/Progressive, they never have a problem forcing suffering (or even death) onto OTHER people>

And the suffering and deaths of people tended to at a nursing home by the unvaccinated, asymptomatic carrier who work there?

The odds of dying from a blood cloth after taking the vaccine (applies to AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson) are far lower than getting it as a complication from Covid.

<<<<<4. Most new COVID cases are people who got the jab!>>> Do you have data on this?>

WTH???? Did you not click on the link???

< But when you present <facts> also be prepared to back them up.>

THAT'S WHY I INCLUDED THE LINK! SHEESH, TRY USING YOUR BRAIN.>

As a self-proclaimed PhD you must know that moronic opinion pieces from a discredited Sci-Fi author or a finance blogger, and political activist don't carry much weight as documentation. So I'll ask again: <<4. Most new COVID cases are people who got the jab!> Do you have data on this?> Cause I have plenty showing you wrong.

To show the level of accuracy. Your own quote: <we already know more than 11,000 Covid vaccine deaths have been recorded in the VAERS system.>

Really? There are no links. Here is what VAERS themselves are saying in their latest release: < More than 339 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through July 19, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 6,207 reports of death (0.0018%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine.> https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/201...

And even that number is quite meaningless given that FDA requires healthcare providers to report any death after COVID-19 vaccination to VAERS, even if it’s unclear whether the vaccine was the cause. So if you're run over by a train after vaccination, you end up there.

Jul-30-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: He also posted:

Diademas: <thegoodanarchist: <Diademas: ... As I've tried to explain to you, the only alternative to vaccination, bar letting us all get infected, is a prolonged time of restrictions for people who represent a risk of spreading the disease.> Maybe you should try to explain to yourself that 1) the vaccines do not prevent catching COVID, and 2) don't keep you from spreading COVID if you contract it!

<You are effectively trying to have your cake and eat it too. You're obviously critical to the restrictions we've seen, but your not willing to lift a finger to end it.>

And you are trying to sell us on an efficacy that exists only in liberal propaganda.>

And clinical studies. But what do you care having access to the medical expertise of <The smartest blogger that I know>. It's just depressing.

Jul-30-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: I replied:

<Diademas:
And the suffering and deaths of people tended to at a nursing home by the unvaccinated, asymptomatic carrier who work there?>

Again, that is not even on the table, since people who've received the not-vax are STILL contagious.

Thus, forcing anyone to get vaccinated does not solve the problem you are offering as justification for your fascism.

< Diademas:

The odds of dying from a blood cloth after taking the vaccine (applies to AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson) are far lower than getting it as a complication from Covid.>

Do you erroneously believe blood clots are the only potential side effect?

<As a self-proclaimed PhD> Not self proclaimed, but rather confirmed by a committee of physicists. But of course liberals never let truth stand in the way of their slanders.

<you must know that moronic opinion pieces from a discredited Sci-Fi author or a finance blogger, and political activist don't carry much weight as documentation.>

This is wrong in two distinct ways. Here they are:

1. For one, your rebuttal is nothing more than an error in logic. <Big Pawn> has lectured you (and others) in the Rogoff forum so many times about the genetic fallacy that I would have thought you'd understand it by now. Apparently not.

2. It is obvious that all of Vox's posts contain quotes from the sources from which he gets his info, and what is more, actual LINKS to the sources. This is blindingly obvious - how did you miss it??

Congrats on two own-goals.

<So I'll ask again: Do you have data on this? Cause I have plenty showing you wrong.>

And I will explain it again. What you are calling "opinion" are actually posts containing quotes from the sources, and what is more, actual LINKS to the sources.

Examples include not-vaccinated people dying within short order of receiving the jab, and vaccinated people passing on COVID to others.

Jul-30-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: My reply:

<Diademas:
<<<thegoodanarchist: And you are trying to sell us on an efficacy that exists only in liberal propaganda.>>>

And clinical studies. But what do you care having access to the medical expertise of <The smartest blogger that I know>. It's just depressing.>

I will tell you what's really depressing: You cannot even stay on topic in a conversation in which YOU came up with the topic:

<And the suffering and deaths of people tended to at a nursing home by the unvaccinated, asymptomatic carrier who work there?>

So, now that I have reminded you of your own topic, perhaps now you understand which efficacy I was referring to?

After all, there is 1) efficacy in diminishing the effects of COVID in the vaxxed patient himself. Without having looked into the clinical trial results even a tiny bit, I would guess that this is the efficacy to which you were referring when you wrote <And clinical studies.> in your most recent post.

But is that the efficacy required to reduce <the suffering and deaths of people tended to at a nursing home by the unvaccinated, asymptomatic carrier who work there>?

No. No it isn't. That would be 2) efficacy in preventing transmission from a vaxxed individual working in a nursing home to someone else. That is the efficacy to which I was referring.

And there is a 3rd form of efficacy, which is prevention of contracting COVID. This is also important if you are trying to prevent the suffering and death of nursing home patients. But since you can get the jabs and still contract COVID, and since there is some evidence that suggests getting the vax might actually increase your chances of getting COVID, it is obvious that, of the 3 categories of efficacy, the only one that doesn't reduce the threat to nursing home patients is the one you are touting.

Jul-30-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: The Norwegian Princess answered back (and no, Norwegian Princess is not a cruise ship. At least, not that I know of)

Diademas: <thegoodanarchist: <Diademas: And the suffering and deaths of people tended to at a nursing home by the unvaccinated, asymptomatic carrier who work there?> Again, that is not even on the table, since people who've received the not-vax are STILL contagious>

To a far lesser degree. This is absolutely on the table

<Thus, forcing anyone to get vaccinated does not solve the problem you are offering as justification for your fascism.>

So denying health hazards the ability to work with vulnerable patients equates to fascism?

<<you must know that moronic opinion pieces from a discredited Sci-Fi author or a finance blogger, and political activist don't carry much weight as documentation.>

This is wrong in two distinct ways. Here they are:

1. For one, your rebuttal is nothing more than an error in logic. <Big Pawn> has lectured you (and others) in the Rogoff forum so many times about the genetic fallacy that I would have thought you'd understand it by now. Apparently not.>

You are linking to opinion pieces that makes a lot of claims. The few links I clicked on were to other blog posts making the same unsourced claims.

<2. It is obvious that all of Vox's posts contain quotes from the sources from which he gets his info, and what is more, actual LINKS to the sources. This is blindingly obvious - how did you miss it??

Congrats on two own-goals.

<So I'll ask again: Do you have data on this? Cause I have plenty showing you wrong.>

And I will explain it again. What you are calling "opinion" are actually posts containing quotes from the sources, and what is more, actual LINKS to the sources.

Examples include not-vaccinated people dying within short order of receiving the jab, and vaccinated people passing on COVID to others.>

And when you're sources fails this miserable, you have the audacity to make the following statement: <Now, since those examples were REMINDERS of his earlier posts, <and> he posts frequently, the linked post only <mentions> the sources (Reuters, for one), and does not link to them. You would have to find the original post where he mentions those examples for the first time, if you want links to his sources.>

So it's basically not your job to give a direct source, but for us to roam through an endless amount of crap in a vague hope of finding a source?

And really: A PhD that can't find a scientific link to medical claims? Does the PhD stand for Pizza Hut Delivery boy?

Jul-30-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: My reply?

<Diademas:
<<<thegoodanarchist: Again, that is not even on the table, since people who've received the not-vax are STILL contagious>>>

To a far lesser degree. This is absolutely on the table>

Actually the data is showing that it is a greater degree, not lesser:

<Never mind that these jabs are not behaving like a vaccine. US Code: "The term “vaccine” means any substance designed to be administered to a human being for the prevention of 1 or more diseases."

The data is that these jabs do not prevent disease. They also do not prevent transmission of disease. In fact they appear to, if you get a breakthrough case, make transmission more likely in that the Ct data from these miners shows equal or lower values on balance in the vaccinated cohort with one sample at Ct22! Reminder: The lower the Ct the more virus you have in your body.

Now granted this is a small group -- very small. But it is extremely concerning that the lowest Ct recorded among these cases was a fully-vaccinated person. Where is the data from the state labs and CDC on these "breakthroughs" and their Ct numbers generally? It's not being reported. I bet you can guess why not without needing more than one guess.

This appears to be confirmed as something that does indeed happen by the reported "super-spreading" person who (1) was fully-vaccinated, (2) infected more than 60 other people and (3) most of those whom he gave it to were also vaccinated. He obviously was an extremely-efficient emitter of virus!>

More here:

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?...

<<<<Thus, forcing anyone to get vaccinated does not solve the problem you are offering as justification for your fascism.>>>

So denying health hazards the ability to work with vulnerable patients equates to fascism?>

I will attribute this word salad to the fact that English is not your native language. Forcing anyone to get novel mRNA manipulation shots against their will, while knowing that none of the not-vax variants passed the clinical trials process, and that the risk/reward calculation skews heavily for avoiding the not-vax in young and healthy persons, is essentially a giant and ghastly medical experiment, Doctor Mengele. Er, I mean, <Diademas>.

<And when you're sources fails this miserable,>

What failure? You've refuted nothing!

<You have the audacity to make the following statement: ....>

Evidently I do.

<So it's basically not your job...?>

Correct. I don't work for you. And I wasn't even talking to you. I was answering <OCF>. You decided to butt into our conversation and present the mainstream media/government/big Pharma narrative as Gospel truth. That's on you, not me.

<And really: A PhD that can't find a scientific link to medical claims?>

Seems your grasp of English does not include the difference between "can't" and "won't".

<Does the PhD stand for Pizza Hut Delivery boy?>

OK, Boomer.

Jul-30-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: And then what? This:

Diademas: < thegoodanarchist: <Diademas: <<<thegoodanarchist: Again, that is not even on the table, since people who've received the not-vax are STILL contagious>>> To a far lesser degree. This is absolutely on the table>

Actually the data is showing that it is a greater degree, not lesser:

<Never mind that these jabs are not behaving like a vaccine. US Code: "The term “vaccine” means any substance designed to be administered to a human being for the prevention of 1 or more diseases."

The data is that these jabs do not prevent disease. They also do not prevent transmission of disease. In fact they appear to, if you get a breakthrough case, make transmission more likely in that the Ct data from these miners shows equal or lower values on balance in the vaccinated cohort with one sample at Ct22! Reminder: The lower the Ct the more virus you have in your body.

Now granted this is a small group -- very small. But it is extremely concerning that the lowest Ct recorded among these cases was a fully-vaccinated person. Where is the data from the state labs and CDC on these "breakthroughs" and their Ct numbers generally? It's not being reported. I bet you can guess why not without needing more than one guess.

This appears to be confirmed as something that does indeed happen by the reported "super-spreading" person who (1) was fully-vaccinated, (2) infected more than 60 other people and (3) most of those whom he gave it to were also vaccinated. He obviously was an extremely-efficient emitter of virus!>

More here:

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?...>

What is it with you and primary sources? This piece of crap isn't even backed up by it's own sources. Here is the original paper: <Our observation suggested that BNT162b2 protected from severe COVID-19. However, this single unexpected outbreak in a small and isolated vaccinated population requires further real-life studies on BNT162b2 vaccine effectiveness against the VOC Gamma.> https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/2...

<<<<<Thus, forcing anyone to get vaccinated does not solve the problem you are offering as justification for your fascism.>>>

So denying health hazards the ability to work with vulnerable patients equates to fascism?>

I will attribute this word salad to the fact that English is not your native language.>

I will be happy to continue in Norwegian.

<Forcing anyone to get novel mRNA manipulation shots against their will, while knowing that none of the not-vax variants passed the clinical trials process, and that the risk/reward calculation skews heavily for avoiding the not-vax in young and healthy persons, is essentially a giant and ghastly medical experiment, Doctor Mengele. Er, I mean, <Diademas>.>

You think referring to me as Doctor Mengele will endear you to me or are in the spirit of what our host asked for?

You have a habit of coming into discussions with an appalling lack of insight, leave a great steaming dump of unsourced, half baked, infantile crap, before spinning away without addressing anything you are confronted with. And on your way out you're screaming insults to anyone while praising your own unique insight.

In respect of two of my ancestors, and millions of others, who perished in German concentration camps I will never talk to you again.

You are a pathetic member of the human race with an ego too large for your non existent titles and an impressive ability to not process any information you are presented.

Shame on you!

Jul-30-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: And my rebuttal (the latest):

<Diademas: ... I will be happy to continue in Norwegian.> I think we BOTH would prefer that. Mainly because I don't speak Norwegian.

<You think referring to me as Doctor Mengele will endear you to me or are in the spirit of what our host asked for?>

I meant it as a riposte to your query, which was: <denying health hazards the ability to work with vulnerable patients equates to fascism?> I don't really see much difference in my humorous reference to the Good Doctor and your belittling of my Ph.D. We have a saying in the US: Don't dish it out if you can't take it.

You want to FORCE people to receive an unproven mRNA manipulation shot. The parallels with other forced medical experiments, not just in Nazi Germany but in Fascist Japan's Unit 731 experiments, is stark and undeniable.

Even the USA has historical examples of such atrocities (google them if you are interested).

Your authoritarian attitude just reminds me of ALL such authoritarian attitudes throughout the history of Fascist and Marxist regimes, be it the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, Mao's Revolution in China, Pol Pot and the Kmer Rouge, Chavez and the Castros in Central America, African Dictators such as Issais in Eritrea, Idi Amin Dada, etc. etc. etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_...

Since my argument is undeniable, you put me on ignore. I will interpret that as your inability to refute my assertions.

Jul-30-21
Premium Chessgames Member thegoodanarchist: <Diademas: You have a habit of coming into discussions with an appalling lack of insight...> The startling lack of self-awareness from Euro-libs, or Libs of any nationality, continues to astound me. I am not the one who came into this discussion! YOU came into a discussion between 2 other people. Yet you seem oblivious to this truth!!!

<leave a great steaming dump of unsourced, half baked, infantile crap,>

Half baked? infantile? If it is so half baked and infantile, then you would be able to produce a logical refutation. Yet all you have mustered is your personal disagreements.

<before spinning away without addressing anything you are confronted with.>

I addressed EVERYTHING! But the problem is, you don't like the WAY I addressed it! You want me to do your damn homework for you. The synopsis is this: I replied to <OCF>. Then, <Diademas> and <Troller> and <WannaBe> came into the forum firing attacks at me. I gave you some info and some links to where I got it.

One called me a liar (<WannaBe>).

One replied reasonably (<Troller>). (Thanks for that, btw.)

And one went off the deep end of the pool (You, <Diademas>.)

I did far more work than I ever intended to do, just to reply to you and the others (WHOM, BTW, I WASN'T EVEN TALKING TO!!!).

Yet I got crucified for it in the forum. So be it. This is the internet, rough and tumble. I understand. But back again to the original conversation! I was just explaining stuff to <OCF>.

You want to come in marauding? Attacking? Fine! So be it! But then stop pouting like a little girl! Stop running off and putting me on ignore, and abandoning the website, just because I came back at you with THE SAME INTENSITY you blasted at me!!!!

Sheesh! If you are going to dish it out, THEN LEARN TO TAKE IT BACK!!! DUH.

<And on your way out you're screaming insults to anyone while praising your own unique insight.>

Would you like me to start crying and cowering, asking for forgiveness? Not in this lifetime.

<In respect of two of my ancestors, and millions of others, who perished in German concentration camps I will never talk to you again.>

I thank you kindly for that.

<You are a pathetic member of the human race>

That's redundant. We are all pathetic, and need the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ. I truly hope you find it.

<with an ego too large for your non existent titles>

Heh. If you only knew the truth. But that will all come out on Judgement Day. See you there!

<and an impressive ability to not process any information you are presented.>

It's called "filtering". The smarter you are, the better you can filter out the nonsense.

<Shame on you!> You're too kind.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 73)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 73 OF 73 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC