< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 62 OF 65 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Jul-23-17
 | | Sally Simpson: Hi Zanzibar,
It is not Najdorf v Reshevsky 1953.
The game in the video is Najdorf vs H Huguet, 1951 This is the position in the vid.
 click for larger viewIt looks like analysis because Najdorf played Qe2. in the video he plays (looks at) Nxe6. |
|
Dec-22-17
 | | offramp: I wonder if child prodigies make blunders less often than normal chess players? |
|
Dec-22-17
 | | MissScarlett: <Writers sometimes err by putting a question mark after an indirect question, especially one beginning with I wonder. If you are asking a question, then yes. If you are simply telling people what you're wondering about, then it isn't a question and it should not have a question mark.> Your New Year's resolution. <NoMatesHe>, also take note. |
|
Dec-22-17
 | | offramp: Well spotted, MissScarlett. I know that you are right. Sometimes I go by the voice in my head. If it sounds like a question I put a question mark. For "I wonder" and "Perhaps" this is wrong, as you say. I normally forgive myself when I do it, though? |
|
Dec-22-17
 | | MissScarlett: Are you wondering if prodigies make less blunders as children or adults or both? |
|
Dec-22-17
 | | offramp: <MissScarlet> as adults. Botvinnik said that he often made childish errors because he had NOT been a child prodigy. But is that true? Did Blackburne blunder more often than Capablanca? Well, yes. But overall I'd say there was no real difference. |
|
Jan-05-18 | | Dr Winston OBoogie: https://twitter.com/HistoryInPix/st... An 8 year old Reshevsky playing a simul in 1920. |
|
Apr-03-18 | | RookFile: Keres helped out by dying relatively young. Bronstein kept his mouth shut for a while, but as he got older, he saw no reason not to unload a few thoughts. |
|
Feb-08-19 | | Caissanist: A man named Howard Langer, whose grandfather was Reshevsky's (and Horowitz's) dentist, shares some of his grandfather's stories here: https://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/21... . His grandfather was a friend to Reshevsky for nearly 50 years, but the end was less than pleasant: <My grandfather’s friendship with Reshevsky extended from Reshevsky’s childhood until the 1970s, when it ended abruptly. One day, Reshevsky was in his office and my grandfather showed him a game he was playing. (Between patients, my grandfather would play postal chess and when you would come into his office, you were likely to find him studying his chess games. He had spiral bound books with tabbed cardboard chess boards in which he recorded the moves, which were exchanged on post cards. Games took months, often years.) Reshevsky suggested a move, but it didn’t sit well with my grandfather and he lost sleep over it. The next time Reshevsky was in the office, my grandfather questioned him about the consequences of the move they had discussed. Reshevsky, apparently offended at my grandfather’s presumption in questioning the move he’d suggested, exploded at him, stormed out of the office, and never spoke to my grandfather again.My grandfather, an Orthodox Jew like Reshevsky, had rabbis mediate to no avail. An almost 50-year relationship ended over a chess move.> |
|
Feb-08-19 | | RookFile: The moral of the story is: when you're going to cheat, just accept the GM's help, and don't question it. |
|
Mar-12-19
 | | perfidious: The nerve of Dr Greenberg, using his skills in critical thought. |
|
Apr-21-19
 | | Dionysius1: Without wanting to do a biographer's job, I wish they wouldn't say "immigrated to the United States" for example, because that is only grammatically correct if the reader is in the US at the time. "Emigrated to the United States" would be right, because it was from Poland, but may be hard to swallow from a US pov. |
|
Apr-21-19
 | | OhioChessFan: <Dion> it's not that clear cut. I looked at the matter once, and gave up in despair. It seems that whether the country leaving from or arriving at is the point of emphasis also impacts the immigrated/emigrated issue. |
|
Apr-21-19 | | ChessHigherCat: <Dionysius1: Without wanting to do a biographer's job, I wish they wouldn't say "immigrated to the United States" for example, because that is only grammatically correct if the reader is in the US at the time. "Emigrated to the United States" would be right, because it was from Poland, but may be hard to swallow from a US pov.> Maybe that's why here in Costa Rica they talk about "migración" and "policía migratória" instead of immigration. Being a Murkan, I still tend to say "inmigración" by mistake instead of "migracíon", which reminds me of reindeer anyway. <Migration Offices in Costa Rica Crowded With Nicaraguans - Costa ...
https://news.co.cr/migration-office...
Jun 26, 2018 - The morning Monday June 25th, the offices of the General Directorate of Migration in Costa Rica were abnormally crowded by Nicaraguans> |
|
May-05-19 | | thegoodanarchist: <OCF>
Thank you very much... |
|
May-30-20
 | | offramp: Obviously, Sammy is one of the greatest prodigies in human history, at <anything>. Part of his secret is in the intro:
<He learned to play chess at the age of four. At eight years old he was ...defeating some of the country's most prominent players.> So he learnt chess at 4, and then had 4 years of solid study. Even if he only studied 2hrs a day that's about 3,000 hours of study. It's no wonder that by 8 he could beat most Polish players. |
|
Jun-07-20 | | morfishine: Now Dear <offramp> lets not let our guard down regarding ethnic jokes |
|
Sep-23-20 | | ARubinstein: In "The Great Reshevsky: Chess Prodigy & Old Warrior," Marek Soszynski reveals an unflattering and downright despicable side to Reshevsky's personality. He was apparently one of the most unsportsmanlike Grandmasters I've ever read about. From the "Gamesmanship & Worse" section, here is an appalling list of his "ringside tactics": <
• Exaggeratedly fiddling with items on the table top, such as cigarette or sweet/gum/candy wrappers.• Coughing, humming or whistling when, and only when, it was the opponent’s turn to move. • Deliberately causing a nuisance with cigarette (or pipe) smoke by chain-smoking. • Repeatedly holding down his own clock button so that the opponent couldn’t press their button (Hamilton-Reshevsky, Lugano Olympiad 1968). • Pressing his own clock button, without making a move, when the opponent was away from the board — or even when present. • Pestering the opponent with multiple draw offers, in the opponent’s time, particularly if the opponent was in time trouble. • After a loss on time, routinely but insistently complaining that the clock was faulty.
• Involving bystanders for them to comment on the game. • Refusing to shake hands after a game.
• Rather than resign, waiting outside/nearby while his own clock ran down (Fischer-Reshevsky, Sousse 1967). • If losing to a weaker player in Round 1, abandoning the game and the tournament disputatiously (Marshall CC Championship 1934, and Rubinstein Memorial 1983). • Apparently offering a draw then, when it was accepted by the opponent after a think, denying that he’d done so. • Shaking hands as if to resign, but claiming a draw. • Shaking hands as if to accept a draw, but claiming a win. • In a simultaneous display, as the penultimate game ends, declaring—from a distance—that the one other game is a draw, and rapidly exiting the building without a further word. • Falsifying his scoresheet in order to try to claim a draw by repetition (Reshevsky-Stahlberg, Helsinki 1952). • Repeatedly restarting the clock violently when the opponent was stopping it only in order to summon the arbiter (Fedorowicz-Reshevsky, Lone Pine 1981). • Complaining to the Tournament Director when a supposed pre-arranged draw agreement—itself unethical—wasn’t honoured (Benko-Reshevsky, US Championship, 1975). I could expand this list with other questionable behaviour and wrongdoing. However, I will leave reports of Reshevsky confronting opponents in their hotel rooms, or physically fighting with them, for a later occasion perhaps—not here in this book. So far I haven’t mentioned the infamous “Denker clock incident” of 1942 in which Reshevsky shamelessly benefited from an absurd but resolute decision of the Tournament Director that was criticised by witnesses. Basically, Reshevsky was wrongly awarded a win when it was he who had exceeded the time in a drawish position. Reshevsky acted indifferently to the morality of the situation, thereby exposing “the darker side of his personality”, as Gordon put it [Compendium, p72], not to mention his win-at-all-costs mentality. Reshevsky thus tied the tournament and even went on to win the playoff. All that was in a US Championship.
> |
|
Sep-23-20 | | ARubinstein: Also worth noting, it seems that Reshevsky was two years older than his official date of birth (November 26, 1911) suggests, somewhat dampering his storied feats as a child prodigy (still impressive, no doubt, but two years less impressive). As Soszynski reveals in "The Great Reshevsky": <
the Lodz address (registration/resident’s) card below shows, or rather states, that Szajndel Rzeszewska (i.e. Reshevsky’s mother) was born in Kock in 1876. She moved to Lodz; (district) from Ozorków, 5 February 1919. (The card dates from not much later.) And now the crucial bit. Among her children are Szmul (i.e. Samuel), born 1909 in Leczyca (about 7½ miles or 12km from Ozorków). Her other listed children do seem to roughly match the brief mention of his siblings given by the young Reshevsky in the Evening Telegram of 1921 quoted earlier in this book....
Just to make clear and summarise... the chessplayer known as Samuel Reshevsky had an official birthdate of 26 November 1911. However, the evidence presented here points to his real birthdate being 2 years earlier in 1909. Nonetheless, because it is his official birthdate that has been in general use and widely quoted for a century, it is reasonable to persist with that. Except that now we can say with some confidence—and we should not forget to occasionally explain—that really he was all along 2 years older. We should leave it to child psychologists to ponder over the effect of bringing up a child as if he was younger than he was.
> |
|
Sep-23-20
 | | MissScarlett: <As mentioned on page 259 of Chess Explorations and in C.N. 1943 (see pages 202-203 of Kings, Commoners and Knaves), a claim emerged in the early 1990s that Samuel Reshevsky was born in 1909 and not, as commonly accepted, in 1911. The matter is discussed by Bruce Monson in an article about Reshevsky on pages 46-55 of the 1/2019 New in Chess. (11199)>
https://www.chesshistory.com/winter... I'll see if I can dig up the Monson piece and report back. |
|
Sep-23-20
 | | paulalbert: On Reshevsky's reputation for cheating or at least unethical conduct, it was a comment frequently made by renowned U.S. GMs I knew in NY. The Denker clock incident is well known. Although I served on the American Chess Foundation/ Chess in the Schools Trustee Board for many years with Arnold Denker, I never asked him about it. The incidents reported to me were from younger GMs. I first met Reshevsky at a simultaneous exhibition he gave at Muhlenberg College in Allentown , PA , about 1956 or 1957 , later at the Karpov/ Kasparov WC Match in NY, and his wife. He was perfectly friendly, so personally I have no negative comments. Like all top level achievers, I am sure he was very competitive, and in his day chess prize funds were not lucrative, so perhaps not surprising that he took questionable advantage of certain situations, but not commendable. |
|
Sep-23-20
 | | perfidious: The 1942 incident involving Denker, and which had the direct impact of depriving Kashdan of that year's title, marked Reshevsky as a person of, at best, dubious ethics: someone possessing a basic sense of right or wrong would have protested Stephens' decision to award the game to him as being clearly incorrect. |
|
Sep-23-20 | | Big Pawn: <perfy boy: someone possessing a basic sense of right or wrong...> He did posses a basic sense of right and wrong. You just don't agree with it because you've invented a different moral system for yourself. After all, morals are arbitrary inventions.
NEXT! |
|
Sep-23-20
 | | perfidious: <heart attack giver....(Reshevsky) did posses [sic] a basic sense of right and wrong. You just don't agree with it because you've invented a different moral system for yourself. After all, morals are arbitrary inventions....> Sez the moralistic prig, himself utterly amoral. |
|
Sep-23-20 | | Granny O Doul: Lombardy on Reshevsky--"He was just a man. Some people liked him, most people hated him." |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 62 OF 65 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|