Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Emanuel Lasker vs Samuel Reshevsky
Nottingham (1936), Nottingham ENG, rd 11, Aug-22
Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense (D26)  ·  0-1



explore this opening
find similar games 1,587 more games of Reshevsky
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can step through the moves by clicking the < and > buttons, but it's much easier to simply use the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  paulalbert: When a high level competitor defeats another high level competitor, be it in chess, tennis, football, business,etc. that is competition, not disrespect. Naturally, competitors want to win the next head to head contest and prepare to do so.I doubt that either Lasker or Reshevsky viewed this as a matter of personal animosity. It was a matter of professional competition. Paul Albert
May-08-04  iron maiden: Well, if "treated without respect" means "defeated in a chess game", then I'd like to see that game, if a record exists. I thought Reshevsky and Lasker played only this one game.
May-08-04  Benjamin Lau: I read the thing and don't see any mention of Lasker insulting Reshevsky, I think Hans Ree just said that Reshevsky was "treated without respect" to make it sound like Lasker utterly demolished Reshevsky the first time around. I've never seen the other game before (there is only an Edward Lasker game besides this).
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: I think Ree had the Laskers mixed up.
American Chess Journal 1921 has the first hand account of this game by Edward Lasker,Reshevsky vs Edward Lasker, 1920 "Edward Lasker is impressed with the play of prodigy Sammy Reshevsky, but points out the only thing the child has to learn is to lose gracefully. 306pp."
Jul-07-05  calman543: What would be the finish up if white did not resign?
Jul-08-05  suenteus po 147: <calman543> 23.Kh1 Qh5 and now there is no way for white to prevent mate without losing his queen.
Jul-08-05  sheaf: <suenteus po 147> u mean 23.Kh1 Qg4
Jul-08-05  PivotalAnorak: <sheaf> well if 23.♔h1 ♕h5 24.♔g2 ♕g4+ is .
Nov-11-05  RookFile: This game is misunderstood. Lasker
should have emerged from this game
with an advantage. The Queen to d5
idea shouldn't have worked out so
well for black.
May-23-06  netlava: <RookFile> The queen to d5 idea forces white to lose a pawn.
Jun-28-06  RookFile: It does no such thing. Lasker should have been able to force the queen to retreat, and emerge with an opening advantage. I'll set up a reminder to myself to analyze this.
Jul-07-06  RookFile: Ok. In my hands is great book, called "American Chess Masters from Morphy to Fischer", by Bisguier and Soltis. This game is analyzed, and some of the notes are given below:

13.... Nd5!

"In this semi-open position, it is very much in Black's interest to exchange off minor pieces. On 14. Bxe7 Qxe7 15. Ncxd5 Bxd5 16. Be4, White concedes Black equality. Lasker chooses a tricky attacking line but misses the essential follow up three moves later."

14. Bc1 (!?)

16. a4 (!) Qd5 !?

".... Here White has offeed a strong pawn sacrifice that would allow him to play c4 and Bb2. The lost queen rook pawn is meaningless - that is, meaningless in the middlegame. Reshevsky's reply (16... Qd5) complicates the game, and although it is not as powerful as was thought duing the game, it's practical effect was powerful. Lasker now fumbles."

17. Nf3 ?

"A sorry retreat, but the seemingly aggressive 17. f4 could be effectively answered by .....b4!", Reshevsky wrote in his notes. But then 18. c4! puts Black in real trouble because 18... Qxd4+ 19. Be3 Qc3 20. Bxh7+! and 21. Rd3 is too strong. If Black must retreat his queen, White stands very well."

19.... Ng5 !

".... White has been victimized by Black's bluff and his otherwise very astute counterplay...."

Dec-17-06  shr0pshire: Here is how Reshevsky recounts the game in his book, "Great Chess Upsets."

"I played Lasker only once. He was sixty years old when the following game was played. I had no difficulty equalizing with the black pieces, and Lasker also misplayed the middle game, making several dubious moves. On his 21st turn, Lasker blundered by over-looking a three move combiation, which forced his resignation."

Reshevsky doesn't mention anything about Lasker' attitude toward Reshevsky in either way.

Dec-17-06  suenteus po 147: <sheaf> You're right, your way is faster and thus better.
Sep-02-09  WhiteRook48: 34 Kh1 Qh5 24 Kg1 Bxf3 25 Qe5 Qg4+ 26 Qg3
Sep-05-09  backrank: 34. Kh1 is not answered by Qh5, but by the much stronger Qg4!, mating or winning the White Queen.
Aug-26-12  Ulhumbrus: On 17 f4 instead of 17 Nf3 an alternative to 17...b4 is 17...Ne4! as in the game starting an attack on the c3 pawn.

Lasker's first mistake may have been the withdrawal 14 Bc1?

An alternative to this is 14 Bd2. On 14...Nxc3 15 bxc3 Nf6 16 f4 Qd5 17 Bb1 Ne4 18 Be1 Rfc8 19 Rf3 f5 Black may be able to defend but that is much better for White than passing the advantage to Black

Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: Nowadays Nc3 is it usually delayed; partially as it is a potential target for Black's queenside play. Lasker's 8 Bd3?! is inferior to 8 Bb3 which eyes the important d5 square. Avoiding exchanges with 14 Bc1? was over-optimistic; 14 Bxe7 was better. 21 Ne1 would have been slightly better but after 21..Nh3+ 22 Kh1..Nf4 23 Qg4..Bg5 24 Rc2..h5 25 Qg3..h4 26 Qg4..h3 Black is still winning.
Nov-21-17  JimNorCal: So this is the only Reshevsky/Lasker game then.

I recall reading about an Ed Lasker/Reshevsky exhibition game. It ended as being "abandoned". Lasker had crushed young Sammy, who was reduced to starting angrily at the chessboard.

Jan-26-18  TheFocus: This score is not complete.

Alekhine in <The Book of the Nottingham International Chess Tournament>, pg. 197-198, gives 23. Kh1 Qg4! 0-1.

Euwe in <Meet the Masters>, pg. 192-195, agrees, giving the following note by Euwe after 23...Qg4!: <With the threat of 24…Bxf3+, against which nothing can be done.>.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Gregor Samsa Mendel: <TheFocus>--I have a 1962 edition of Alekhine's book, and it says that white resigned after black's 22nd move.
Jan-26-18  TheFocus: Yikes. Sorry, I was only looking at the notes by Euwe.

The Reshevsky bio by Gordon also ends it after Black's 22nd move.

I wonder why Euwe thought different?

Jan-31-19  billy2182: I read somewhere that after one hour of play in this game, Lasker had used 2 minutes, and Sammy 58.

Anyone else ever see that quoted?

Jun-10-19  SVarden: Yes, but not in connection with this games. Instead, it was Reshevsky-Smyslov from the USSR-USA Radio Match from 1945. Apparently Reshevsky ran into a variation of the Slav Defense that was well known to the Soviet players, and so Smyslov didn't have to spend much time during the opening.

RookFile posted that "In his book, Kasparov praises Reshevsky's play in the late opening, early middle game, pointing out how, in an unfamiliar position, that had been deeply analyzed by the Russians before the game, he found good moves, although at the cost of time, in a position where some others before him had gone astray." Smyslov eventually won the game in 71 moves.

Oct-08-22  Ricosupercapo: Probably Lasker's worst defeat.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
World champions lose miniatures 1.
by ughaibu
Game 498
from The Golden Treasury of Chess Part 2 by biglo
Across the generations
by Minor Piece Activity
one-time prodigy beats G.O.M
from American chess triumphs by kostich in time
Samuel Reshevsky !
from Chess gives joy and insight ......... by arielbekarov
Round 11
from Nottingham 1936 by Hesam7
A Diagonal
from Positional Chess Handbook II by monopole2313
Middlegame: IQP on d4
by PassedPawnDuo
Game 37
from Reshevsky's Best Games of Chess, Vol. I by suenteus po 147
Reshevsky crushes Lasker
from Reshevsky plays 11 world champions by FSR
Challenger of 48 Reshevsky_125
by Gottschalk
72 Samuel Diary
from Herkus' favorite games by Herkus
both wc
from jewish playersin chess by gmlisowitz
by 64idi0t
Xadrez Básico - D'Agostini
by amadeus
51a1_IQP on d4
by whiteshark
Game 498: The Golden Treasury of Chess by I.A. Horowitz
from -ER Lasker by fredthebear
Quite brutal leading to King safety issues
from IQP loses by PassedPawnDuo

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC