chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Hikaru Nakamura
Nakamura 
 

Number of games in database: 3,902
Years covered: 1995 to 2025
Last FIDE rating: 2804 (2734 rapid, 2837 blitz)
Highest rating achieved in database: 2816
Overall record: +592 -245 =719 (61.2%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 2346 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Sicilian (271) 
    B90 B30 B23 B51 B42
 Ruy Lopez (171) 
    C65 C67 C78 C77 C84
 Reti System (147) 
    A06 A04 A05
 Queen's Gambit Declined (119) 
    D37 D31 D38 D30 D35
 Queen's Pawn Game (115) 
    A45 D00 D02 E10 A46
 Nimzo Indian (77) 
    E32 E46 E34 E21 E20
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (251) 
    B90 B30 B80 B22 B92
 Ruy Lopez (247) 
    C67 C65 C70 C78 C72
 Queen's Gambit Declined (155) 
    D37 D31 D30 D06 D39
 Queen's Pawn Game (123) 
    D02 A45 A40 A41 A46
 King's Indian (115) 
    E97 E90 E92 E63 E94
 Giuoco Piano (107) 
    C53 C50 C54
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Krasenkow vs Nakamura, 2007 0-1
   Gelfand vs Nakamura, 2010 0-1
   Rybka vs Nakamura, 2008 0-1
   So vs Nakamura, 2015 0-1
   G Sagalchik vs Nakamura, 2003 0-1
   Crafty vs Nakamura, 2007 0-1
   Nakamura vs Karjakin, 2004 1-0
   Nakamura vs Kramnik, 2012 1-0
   A Beliavsky vs Nakamura, 2009 0-1
   Nakamura vs J W Loyte, 2001 1-0

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2004)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Corsica Masters (2007)
   Trophee CCAS (2008)
   Bullet Chess Championship (2023)
   Meltwater Tour Final (2021)
   Magnus Carlsen Invitational (2020)
   Ordix Open (2009)
   Chess.com Speed Chess Championship 2017/18 (2017)
   chess.com Speed Chess (2020)
   Magnus Carlsen Chess Tour Finals (2020)
   New In Chess Classic (2021)
   Chess.com SpeedChess Finals (2024)
   Tata Steel India (2022)
   Champions Showdown (2019)
   Pro Chess League (2018)
   PRO League Group Stage (2019)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Naka's Nook Mistook Fredthebear stan theo by fredthebear
   0ZeR0's collected games volume 212 by 0ZeR0
   0ZeR0's collected games volume 243 by 0ZeR0
   Notable Nakamura Games by caracas1970
   book: Fighting Chess with Hikaru Nakamura by Baby Hawk
   Fighting Chess with Hikaru Nakamura by kenilworthian
   Vid e o put Fredthebear in th is cent ury by fredthebear
   Notable Nakamura Games by iron maiden
   2020 The Corona Beer & Black Bears Matter Mo Ode by fredthebear
   Hikaru! by larrewl
   Match Nakamura! by docjan
   Match Nakamura! by amadeus

RECENT GAMES:
   🏆 Freestyle Grand Tour Paris
   Nakamura vs Carlsen (Apr-14-25) 1/2-1/2, unorthodox
   Carlsen vs Nakamura (Apr-13-25) 1-0, unorthodox
   Keymer vs Nakamura (Apr-12-25) 0-1, unorthodox
   Nakamura vs Keymer (Apr-11-25) 1/2-1/2, unorthodox
   Nakamura vs A Erigaisi (Apr-10-25) 1-0, unorthodox

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Hikaru Nakamura
Search Google for Hikaru Nakamura
FIDE player card for Hikaru Nakamura

HIKARU NAKAMURA
(born Dec-09-1987, 37 years old) Japan (federation/nationality United States of America)

[what is this?]

IM (2001); GM (2003). Hikaru Nakamura won the US Championship in 2004, 2009, 2012, 2015 and 2019. He was the world's second-ranked player as of October 2015. In July 2023, he married WGM Atousa Pourkashiyan.

Prodigy

Christopher Hikaru Nakamura was born December 9, 1987 in Hirakata in Osaka, Japan, to a Japanese father and an American mother. He is the younger brother of Asuka Nakamura. When he was two years old, he and his mother and brother moved to the United States. He started playing chess when he was seven, coached by his stepfather, Sunil Weeramantry. He was the youngest player in US history to defeat an International Master (Jay Bonin) in a USCF-rated game (10 years, 0 months), to become a National Master (USCF) (10 years, 79 days), to defeat a Grandmaster (Arthur Bisguier) in a USCF-rated game (10 years, 117 days), and to become an IM (13 years, 2 months), although most of these records have subsequently been surpassed. In 2003 he became the USA's youngest-ever grandmaster (15 years, 2 months and 19 days), a record later broken by Fabiano Caruana and Ray Robson.

Championships

<Youth> In 2001 he won the World U14 championship.

<National> When he won the Chessmaster US Championship 2005 (2004) (on tiebreak from Alexander Stripunsky), he was the youngest player to win the US championship since Robert James Fischer. He also won the US Championship (2009) outright by half a point ahead of the joint runners-up Robert Hess and Alexander Onischuk, and the United States Championship (2012) outright by a full point ahead of the winner of the 2010 and 2011 events, Gata Kamsky. He won the national title for a fourth time when he took out the US Championship (2015) with 8/11, half a point ahead of the outright runner up Ray Robson.

<World championship cycle> Seeded number 87 and aged 16, Nakamura reached the final 16 in the FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2004), defeating 46th seed Sergey Volkov, 19th seeded Aleksej Aleksandrov, and 51st seed Alexander Lastin in the preliminary rounds before bowing out to number 3 seed and finalist Michael Adams in the round of 16. He qualified to play in the World Cup (2013) through his rating, and defeated Peruvian WGM Deysi Estela Cori Tello in the first round, Azeri GM Eltaj Safarli in the second round and Indian GM Baskaran Adhiban in the third round, but was eliminated in the Round of 16 (fourth round) by Ukrainian GM Anton Korobov. He qualified by rating to participate in the World Cup (2015), and is doing so although he has already qualified for the Candidates Tournament of 2016 via the Grand Prix series of 2014-15. He defeated Richmond Phiri, Sam Shankland in the first two rounds, as well as Ian Nepomniachtchi in a third round thriller that Nakamura won in the deciding Armageddon blitz tiebreaker game after the three previous sets of rapid and blitz tiebreakers had been drawn. In the Round of 16 (the fourth round) he won against Michael Adams by 1.5-0.5 but lost to Pavel Eljanov in the quarter final, bowing out of the event.

<Grand Prix Series 2012-2013> He started the Grand Prix series with last at the FIDE Grand Prix London (2012). After bouncing back into contention with outright second in the FIDE Grand Prix Zug (2013), a poor showing at the FIDE Grand Prix Thessaloniki (2013) eliminated him from contention for the top 2 spots that would have qualified him for the 2014 Candidates Tournament. (1) He did however place 3rd behind Fabiano Caruana and Boris Gelfand in the FIDE Grand Prix Paris (2013) to accumulate 300 GP points and place 6th in the 2012-13 Grand Prix series. Subsequently, his only chance to play in the 2014 Candidates Tournament was to be nominated as the Organizer's wild card once the venue was settled, however this did not eventuate.

<Grand Prix Series 2014-2015> Nakamura competed in the first leg of the series at the FIDE Grand Prix Baku (2014), where he scored 6/11 to place 3rd-7th, half a point behind the joint leaders Caruana and Gelfand. He therefore kicked off with a GP tally of 82 points, representing the even distribution of points applicable to each place from 3rd to 7th. In the second leg of the series, namely the FIDE Grand Prix Tashkent (2014), he placed =2nd and stood in 2nd place overall, excellently situated to take advantage of the opportunity to qualify for the Candidates tournament in 2016. He took full advantage of this in FIDE Grand Prix Khanty-Mansiysk (2015), when he came =1st to qualify for the Candidates Tournament of 2016.

Standard tournaments

In 2005, he won the 7th Foxwoods Open (2005).

In 2007, he won both the National Open (2007) that was held in Las Vegas and the Casino de Barcelona (2007).

The following year, he beat Xiangzhi Bu in the play-off to win the Gibraltar Masters (2008) Masters Open with 8.0/10.

Nakamura tied for first with Evgeny Najer at the 37th World Open (2009) after taking two last-day byes, each worth half a point and won the Donostia Chess Festival (2009) in tiebreak over Ruslan Ponomariov.

In 2010, he came =4th at Corus Group A (2010), and was equal top scorer in the victorious Rising Stars team in the Rising Stars - Experience (2010) tournament. He scored 5/9 (+1 -0 =8) at the Tal Memorial (2010), placing =4th, and finished the year with =4th place in the London Chess Classic (2010).

Nakamura began 2011 by taking clear first place at the A-Group of the prestigious category 20 Tata Steel Group A (2011) (formerly Corus) with a 9/13 score (+6 -1 =6) and a 2880 performance rating, ahead of a powerful field including the world's top four players: World Champion Viswanathan Anand, Magnus Carlsen, Levon Aronian and former World Champion Vladimir Kramnik. In June 2011, Nakamura placed =3rd in the Bazna King's Tournament (2011), in July he scored 4.5/10 at Dortmund Sparkassen (2011), in August he came =1st in the 2011 US Open Championship with 7.5/9 and in October he came =3rd in the Grand Slam Chess Final (2011) with 5/10. The following month, he suffered a lapse in form at the category 22 Tal Memorial (2011), scoring 3/9 and coming last but recovered to finish 2011 with second place behind Kramnik at the category 20 London Chess Classic (2011), scoring +4 -1 =3 (TPR of 2887).

He started 2012 by coming =2nd (4th on count back) at the Reggio Emilia (2011), half a point behind Anish Giri, and then came =5th at Tata Steel Group A (2012), scoring 7.5/13 (+3 -1 =9). He followed up in April 2012 with 1st at the 6th Annual Grand Pacific Open held in British Columbia. He competed in the Tal Memorial (2012) held in June, scoring 4/9. In July/August 2012, Nakamura placed a solid =3rd at the Biel Chess Festival (2012), but underperformed at the European Club Cup (2012), although in October 2012, he recovered to some extent by winning the 4 player double round robin 16th Unive Tournament (2012) (crown group) with 4.5/6 (+3 -0 =3). Nakamura finished 2012 with a strong 3rd placement in the London Chess Classic (2012) behind Carlsen and Kramnik, adding enough rating points to restore him to the top 10.

2013 started with a modest 7/13 result for outright 6th at the Tata Steel Group A (2013) event. He then followed up in May 2013 with equal 2nd at the Norway Chess (2013) with 5.5/9, half a point behind Sergey Karjakin and 3rd on tiebreak behind Carlsen; he also placed =2nd with 6/9 at the preliminary Norway Chess (Blitz) (2013) held to determine the draw for the main tournament, and earned the right to play with the White pieces in 5 games out of 9. In June 2013, he contested the category 22 Tal Memorial (2013), and was outright leader after 6 rounds. However, he lost the last 3 game to place 6th with 4.5/9, winning more games (4) and losing more games (4) than any other player in the tournament. Soon after, he came =3rd in the Houston Open in July 2013. In September he played in the quadrangular double round robin category 22 Sinquefield Cup (2013), and was in contention for first place until the last round, when he drew against Gata Kamsky finishing second with 3.5/6 (+2 -1 =3; TPR 2863) behind Magnus Carlsen.

Nakamura's first event in 2014 was the category 20 Tata Steel Masters (2014) where he scored 5/11 (+2 -3 =6) to shed a few rating points for FIDE's February rating list. He next competed in the category 23 Zurich Chess Challenge (2014) in which he placed 4th with 2/5 after coming agonisingly close to defeating World Champion Magnus Carlsen. He came 2nd with 3.5/5 in the Zurich Chess Challenge (Rapid) (2014) which followed the standard time event, to remain in 4th in the overall event with the results of the standard and rapid events combined. In April, he participated in the inaugural Gashimov Memorial (2014), a category XXII 6-player DRR event inaugurated in honor of the late Azeri grandmaster, scoring 5/10 and placing =3rd behind Carlsen and Caruana. At the London Chess Classic (2014), he scored 2.5/5 to place 4th.

Nakamura's start to 2015 was to win the powerful Gibraltar Masters (2015) with 8.5/10 (+7 =3), and return a PB on his live rating and his new FIDE rating due in March. Despite cracking the 2800 barrier in the live ratings during the RR category 22 Zurich Chess Challenge (2015) held in February, he placed outright 2nd in the standard portion of the event behind Anand, ahead of Kramnik, Karjakin, Aronian and Caruana respectively. His second place in the Zurich Chess Challenge (Rapid) (2015) with 3/5 made him =1st with Anand in the overall event, but he won an Armageddon tiebreaker with the former World Champion to win first prize. His good form continued at the category 22 Norway Chess (2015) event, where he was undefeated to place =2nd (3rd on a narrow SB tiebreak), behind Topalov and alongside Anand with 6/9 and a TPR of 2900. In September he competed in the second leg of the inaugural Grand Chess Tour at Sinquefield Cup (2015), and finished equal second with 5/9 behind Aronian in what amounted to a par for rating performance. October saw Nakamura compete in the lucrative Millionaire Chess (2015) tournament, which he won after battling through a complicated tiebreak system that involved a playoff to decide a playoff for fourth, and then winning a knockout rapid game semi-final that was called after round 7 of 9 of the main standard time event. He finished the year with a poor performance at the London Chess Classic (2015) where he came in toward the bottom of the field after scoring 4/9.

He started 2016 with an upbeat result at the Gibraltar Masters (2016), winning first prize after a rapid and blitz game tiebreak that ended in an Armageddon victory against runner-up Maxime Vachier-Lagrave. He finished clear second at the
FIDE Grand Swiss (2023), scoring 8/11 (+5 =6 -0) and qualifying for the 2024 Candidates tournament.

Team Events

<Olympiads> Nakamura has represented the U.S. in the Olympiads of 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012 and 2014, helping his country to the bronze medal in 2006 and 2008. He scored 6/10 during the Khanty-Mansiysk Olympiad (2010) on top board for the USA and a performance rating of 2741 and 6/9 in the Istanbul Olympiad (2012), coming in fourth on top board. His overall score in Olympiads is 31 points accumulated in 49 games played.

<World Team Championship> Nakamura played board 1 for the USA at the World Team Championship (2010), scoring individual gold and team silver. He also played top board at the World Team Championship (2013), winning individual silver and helping his team to 4th place in the event.

<European Club Cup> He played top board for the SK Husek Vienna in the European Club Cup (2009) and top board for the Italian club Obiettivo Risarcimento Padova in 2012 and 2013, second board for the Italian club in 2014 and board 3 for the same club in 2015. He scored individual bronze in 2013 and 2014.

Rapids

Nakamura is one of the world's best rapid and blitz players, and the world's best bullet (one-minute) player. He regularly plays on the internet, usually at the ICC where he is the highest rated player (userid <Smallville>), and at Playchess, where he is known as <Star Wars>. He has set many rating records under different categories. In 2008, he challenged and broke blitz king Alexander Grischuk 's record at ICC of 3737, reaching 3750. Grischuk subsequently challenged Nakamura to a 20 game 3 minutes blitz match, which Nakamura took out convincingly by 14.5-5.5. (2) He also won the first ICC Open in 2011 ahead of over 2000 other contestants. (3)

In 2007, he won the annual Corsica Masters (2007), defeating Rustam Kasimdzhanov in the final. One of the most convincing demonstrations of Nakamura's ability as a rapid player was when he won the Trophee CCAS (2008), defeating Xiangzhi Bu, Anatoly Karpov and Vasyl Ivanchuk in the playoff matches to take first prize in a field that included Carlsen. Nakamura also defeated Carlsen to take out the BNbank Blitz (2009). He was runner-up to Ivanchuk at the Cap d'Agde (2010) in the playoff. He also defeated Rising Stars team mate Anish Giri for the right to play at Amber 2011.

In 2012, Nakamura won the trifecta of silver medals at the SportAccord World Mind Games (Men's Rapid) (2012), the World Mind Games (Men's Blitz) and the World Mind Games (Men's Blindfold) events. He closed out 2013 by winning the London Chess Classic (Knockout) (2013), defeating Gelfand in the final by 1.5-0.5, after qualifying for the final by winning the preliminary London Chess Classic (Group C) (2013).

In June 2014, he competed in both the World Rapid Championship (2014) and the World Blitz Championship (2014) that were held in Dubai. In the former, he scored a relatively meager 8.5/15, losing 40 rapid rating points, while he was much more successful in the latter, scoring 16/21, being the runner up by a point behind the winner Magnus Carlsen. His blitz rating skyrocketed to over 2900. Subsequently he competed in the Super Rapidplay Open that was a companion event to the 2014 London Classic (see above), winning the event with an almost perfect score of 9.5/10. He also competed in the London Elite Player Blitz that was the other companion event, and placed =1st with 6/10.

The 2016 edition of the Zurich Chess Challenge was a two-part event, which kicked off with a preliminary Zurich Chess Challenge (Opening Blitz) (2016) to determine who had three whites in the five rounds of the Zurich Chess Challenge (2016) (rapid). Nakamura placed first in the Opening Blitz earning the use of the white pieces in three of the five rounds of the first section of the actual tournament, the round robin rapid event where he placed equal first alongside Anand. Nakamura playing the black pieces three times in the second section of the event, the Zurich Chess Challenge (Blitz) (2016), again placed equal first with Anand to tie the overall score, but won on tiebreak to take first prize.

He has authored the book Bullet Chess: One Minute to Mate.

Matches

In December 2004, Nakamura played the best-of-six game Karjakin - Nakamura Match (2004) in the "Duelo de los Jovenes Prodigios" (Duel of the Wonder Boys) in Cuernavaca, Estado de Morelos, Mexico, winning 4.5-1.5 (+4 -1 =1). In May 2011 at the St Louis chess club, he won the Nakamura - Ponomariov Match (2011) by 3.5-2.5 (+2 =3 -1). In June 2014, he played for the Cez Trophy Navara - Nakamura Match (2014) in Praha, Czechia, which involved a 4-game standard time match against David Navara. He won the match by 3.5-0.5.

960 Chess

In August 2009, Nakamura defeated Aronian in Mainz, Germany to become the 960 world champion and remained unchallenged as such until Carlsen defeated him in a match in February 2018 by a margin of 14-10.

Ratings and rankings

Nakamura's highest ranking as a Junior (U20) was #3 in April 2004 and 2005. He first broke into the world's top 100 in October 2004 when he was still 16 years old, and has remained in the top 100 continuously since that time. He reached the world's top 10 in January 2011, and has remained in that elite group continuously since January 2013. In September 2015 his rating reached 2814 despite which he was still ranked world #4 behind Carlsen, Anand and Topalov respectively. However in October 2016, his ranking reached its highest point so far, 2816, when his ranking was world #2, his highest ranking so far.

Sources and references

(1) Wikipedia article: FIDE Grand Prix 2012–2013 (2) http://dod.ru/chess/game/Crest/Smal...; (3) Further details are at this post: Hikaru Nakamura; (4) https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast... (podcast interview by Ben Johnson through iTunes); Live rating list: http://www.2700chess.com/; Wikipedia article: Hikaru Nakamura

Last updated: 2024-04-14 20:46:42

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 157; games 1-25 of 3,902  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. S Predescu vs Nakamura 1-0641995U.S. National Scholastic Grade 2 ChampionshipB08 Pirc, Classical
2. L Au vs Nakamura 1-0431997Hawaii opB83 Sicilian
3. Nakamura vs J Bonin 1-0361997Marshall Chess ClubC02 French, Advance
4. J Kleinman vs Nakamura  ½-½411997January CongressA49 King's Indian, Fianchetto without c4
5. Nakamura vs B Karen 0-1521997Nassau FuturityB06 Robatsch
6. A Bisguier vs Nakamura 0-1211998Somerset ACN Action SwissE70 King's Indian
7. B Karen vs Nakamura  0-1261998Nassau g/30B23 Sicilian, Closed
8. A Stripunsky vs Nakamura 0-1431998Marshall Chess ClubB40 Sicilian
9. P MacIntyre vs Nakamura  1-0541998US Amateur Team EastA07 King's Indian Attack
10. J Thinnsen vs Nakamura 1-035199899th US OpenA45 Queen's Pawn Game
11. Nakamura vs I Krush 1-062199899th US OpenB67 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack, 7...a6 Defense, 8...Bd7
12. S Kriventsov vs Nakamura  1-0241999Rated TournamentB80 Sicilian, Scheveningen
13. Nakamura vs J Fang 0-12119998th Eastern Class ChampionshipsB73 Sicilian, Dragon, Classical
14. A David vs Nakamura  1-025199927th World OpenB92 Sicilian, Najdorf, Opocensky Variation
15. Nakamura vs W Paschall  ½-½251999North Bay OpenB65 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack, 7...Be7 Defense, 9...Nxd4
16. J Hebert vs Nakamura  1-0601999North Bay OpenE97 King's Indian
17. Nakamura vs V Rajlich  1-0521999North Bay OpenB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
18. G Taylor vs Nakamura  1-0311999North Bay OpenE75 King's Indian, Averbakh, Main line
19. Nakamura vs F Baragar  0-1451999North Bay OpenC17 French, Winawer, Advance
20. M Stroud vs Nakamura  0-1371999North Bay OpenE92 King's Indian
21. S Glinert vs Nakamura  ½-½381999North Bay OpenA07 King's Indian Attack
22. D Moody vs Nakamura 0-1201999100th US OpenB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
23. Nakamura vs A Aleksandrov ½-½601999100th US OpenC45 Scotch Game
24. A Wojtkiewicz vs Nakamura 1-0421999100th US OpenE62 King's Indian, Fianchetto
25. Nakamura vs G Gaiffe 1-0541999100th US OpenB23 Sicilian, Closed
 page 1 of 157; games 1-25 of 3,902  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Nakamura wins | Nakamura loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 642 OF 858 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-14-11  selfmate: <Shams: If you really want to fight the good fight, may I suggest tackling "of" as a verb? That one makes me want to swing a clawhammer at people.> Sometimes one just has to know which fights are best avoided.

Besides, why would we want to make it harder to identify the stupid?

Dec-15-11  Shams: <Besides, why would we want to make it harder to identify the stupid?>

An educational reformer walks among us.

Dec-15-11  King Death: <selfmate: Hopefully a year long 2011 performance rating for Naka will put things into a little clearer perspective instead of half the crowd focusing on Tata and the other half on Tal - at least one can hope.>

One of the points that I think gets overlooked is that Nakamura will take risks to probably a larger degree than many other top class GMs. This is where the slippery question of style comes in.

If faced with a position with (say) two alternatives, and one leads to a quiet game with few winning (or losing) chances and the other leads down an unclear path, what will any player do, when each choice is objectively equal? Nakamura seems to go down that path of risk more than many. Maybe from his point of view this is player dependent, in the same way Lasker approached it.

As far as Naka's overall results for this year, they all come under the single heading and should be judged against that framework to gain a better impression of the player overall. Forget about this business of "he won Tata, so he's ready to play Anand for the title" or "he didn't do anything at the Tal, so he should never play at the highest level again". The truth is somewhere in the middle.

Dec-15-11  rilkefan: <<selfmate>: <shams: The "objectivity" fight will have its day again, as with any language squabble.> And when that day comes, selfmate, guardian of truth and light, will be there>

I'm a prescriptivist, and I think you're defending a bastardization. Everyone upset about Naka's usage ought to insist on "with best play", which mathematics (e.g. optimization theory) shows isn't knowable beyond forcing lines.

Dec-15-11  Shams: <rilkefan> sides with William Safire, I can't believe it!
Dec-15-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Re: Chess Oscar--why not award it to the player who was most improved, or who accomplished something unique, in the past year?

Naka had a huge break out year. Yifan, very young, defended her world title.

Awarding the chess Oscar to "the best" player just seems to waste the opportunity to recognize achievement. We have ELO ratings. We already know who the best player is.

Yifan, Nakamura or the rising stars Giri or Naiditsch seems better than once again *YAWN* handing a trophy to Anand or Carlsen.

Dec-15-11  blueofnoon: Nakamura was 2751 on January this year and now his live rating is 2759.

So yeah, he's improved 8 points, but during the same period Carlsen raised his rating by 20 points.

I am not really sure what you are talking about.

Dec-15-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: I'm talking about tournament victories. Naka cemented his right to play in these events.
Dec-15-11  SatelliteDan: It would be nice to reconize Ivanchuck imho.
Dec-15-11  SatelliteDan: Chuck is not only a warrior, but a trouper and gentlemen. Also entertaining and tireless.
Dec-15-11  jussu: <Yifan, Nakamura or the rising stars Giri or Naiditsch seems better than once again *YAWN* handing a trophy to Anand or Carlsen.>

Yet the chess Oscar if for "the best". It would be kind of weird if they, all of a sudden, handed the Nobel prize to a promising PhD student, wouldn't it?

Dec-15-11  firebyrd: <<However, his twitter comment implies that he bedded these ladies.>

That is ridiculous. It implies nothing of the kind.>

Well read again: <GMHikaru: Reason #248 ... etc>

You see his <nick> there, and the reason <248>, together with a <hash> tag, clearly indicating that you should somehow mix these, producing <2 - 4 - nick - 8>. Clear as daylight!

Dec-15-11  Shams: <firebyrd> Brilliant and inspired! I had no idea there was a cryptology to Nakamura's tweets.
Dec-15-11  arkansaw: Objectively, losing != lost
Dec-15-11  Jambow: <I'm a prescriptivist, and I think you're defending a bastardization. Everyone upset about Naka's usage ought to insist on "with best play", which mathematics (e.g. optimization theory) shows isn't knowable beyond forcing lines.>

I think I agree ;0] Nakamura's comments taken in isolation could be misconstrued, they were given with distinctions and clarifications, the most important are he was facing a human so he had real chances objectively, and perhaps objectively worse would have been a better way to state it, not lost. I listened to his answers and had no difficulty understanding what he was trying to convey, but then again that's what I intended to do.

So was Nakamura playing Rybka, no he would have lost as would any other human player starting from 1.e4 so then 1.e4 according to all the english majors is objectively lost right?

<blueofnoon: Nakamura was 2751 on January this year and now his live rating is 2759.>

A better method would be to use his average elo in 2010 vs his average in 2011, picking a single point anywhere is not representative. His average elo in 2010 using FIDE was 2730 and in 2011 average elo was 2763 for a <33pt> improvement inspite of having some notably poor form. Also peak to peak Nakamura was 2741 peak in 2010 compared to 2774 in 2011, which is the same 33pts?

Carlsen has achieved a new peak live elo of 2835, which is awsome, but until he maintains it it is just a momentary point. I think he will exceed it eventually passing Kasparov's 2851 zenith, then let the heated rating inflation wars begin to dominate the Carlsen page. BTW using Carlsens FIDE numbers he averaged a 2819 elo in 2011 vs a 2015 elo in 2010 or on average <4pts> improvement. Peak to peak if we're generous and mix his live rating peak went from 2826 to 2835 or <9pts>. Notice it is more difficult from Carlsens position than from Nakamura's too and this year it was Nakamura not Carlsen who had the assistance of Kasparov.

Seems some of our resident statiticians could have done a better job but are absent, so you're left with my clumsy representation.

Dec-15-11  Riverbeast: Perhaps the questions about Nakamura's game that were raised at the Tal Memorial, were answered at the London Classic

Especially when it comes to 'chess understanding' and getting the kind of positions you like

IMO, Nakamura should strive for dynamism and complications in his games

When it comes to understanding and thriving in those kind of positions, maybe he understands them at least as well as anybody else

Dec-15-11  Jambow: I think you're correct <Riverbeast> and when he has done so he has defeated some 2800 players and most often with black pieces too.

When I see Nakamura win he seldom just gets an overwhelming position out of the opening, usually he seems to be defending until he turns it around in the complications. Now he is starting to do so against the very best, which is now an uninteresting topic for some reason. When he's winning what he says is of prime importance ;0].

That doesn't mean that there are'nt real flaws that have to be delt with, but Chris Littlejohn needs to help Nakamura find those confusing compicated positions that he plays best, not just a +1.5 engine evaluation with no risks, those positions play better for Carlsen on the whole. He will have to gain a better understanding in those positions and I think he is, but he shouldn't strive for them either.

Nakamura has been steam rolled several times during 2011 by Ivanchuk, Carlsen and Svidler. Carlsen and Svidler have just outplayed him often so that is where the learning is imho.

Dec-15-11  bronkenstein: Speaking of Naka`s results in 2011 , his victory over Pono - one of the most dangerous (short!?) match players - is IMO on par with his London performance . That match victory seems to be often marginalised or forgotten compared to his tournaments play in this year( maybe due to unofficial nature of the match + Pono`s relatively low Elo in this rating-obsessed world - but matches are almost different sport).

PS Maybe mr Rex was training his wildcard for the 2012 candidates.

Dec-15-11  rilkefan: <<Shams>: <rilkefan> sides with William Safire, I can't believe it!>

Stopped clock, poetic license, take your pick. Or maybe it's just continuing resentment that having learned one perfectly reasonable language, Latin, I had, due to the irresponsibility of generations of Europeans, to start from scratch with French, Italian, and Spanish, so instead of speaking one language well I speak four poorly to awfully. Or that I don't get half of Shakespeare's jokes without footnotes. Or that I really ought to have a bunch more English dictionaries, one per generation.

Dec-15-11  frogbert: <<Besides, why would we want to make it harder to identify the stupid?>

An educational reformer walks among us.>

love you guys ...

Dec-15-11  frogbert: <<blueofnoon: Nakamura was 2751 on January this year and now his live rating is 2759.>

A better method would be to use his average elo in 2010 vs his average in 2011, picking a single point anywhere is not representative. His average elo in 2010 using FIDE was 2730 and in 2011 average elo was 2763>

james, i agree that blueofnoon's measure isn't a good one. however, i'm not sure how you've calculated "average elo" either, and regardless i think <performance rating> is better if you want to compare year by year (possibly removing some won games against very low-rated player when the performance measure used by fide results in a negative performance change for winning additional games - old discussion, don't want to go into details...)

in short, i'll provide the "good" measure shortly. :o)

Dec-15-11  frogbert: <due to the irresponsibility of generations of Europeans>

or maybe simply, "due to the generations of Europeans", in a world without internet or air travel. :o)

Dec-15-11  frogbert: yearly performances nakamura, based on rated, classical games.

2009: 2703 tpr (83 games)
2010: 2757 tpr (75 games)
2011: 2770 tpr (69 games)

avg opposition and percentage score

2009: 66% score against 2587 avg
2010: 62% score against 2671 avg
2011: 54% score against 2742 avg

---

details 2009:

+38 -13 =27 against 2587 average
own avg 2707, tpr 2703 over 83 games

(5 wins against sub-2200 players excluded, if included tpr would be 2692 instead. only the 8 games of the austrian league 2008/2009 actually played in 2009 were included.)

details 2010:

+28 -10 =37 against 2671 average
own avg 2725, tpr 2757 over 75 games

(1 win against sub-2200 player excluded, if included tpr would be 2755)

details 2011:

+18 -13 =38 against 2742 average
own avg 2761, tpr 2770 over 69 games

---

the numbers speak quite well for themselves, i think, but it's quite clear that nakamura has taken big steps over the past 3 years. and based on the 2010-2011 development, there seems to be little reason to think that he can't continue to improve; adjusting to playing much tougher opponents doesn't happen just like that, and it's only natural with some form fluctuations.

as an illustration of the current (measured over 2011) difference between nakamura and the world number one, naka needs to have a score nearly 10 percentage points higher than the 54% he scored in 2011 against a 2742 average to match carlsen's 2011 performance. assuming he played the same 69 games as he did in 2011, that translates to turning "only" 5 losses into victories - or drawing 10 of the 13 games he lost (the latter would've also made nakamura the most solid elite player in the world, so i guess the nakamura fans prefer that he wins more games instead :o)

and although nakamura has reduced his tournament activity year by year over the past 3 years, it's still only one elite player - ivanchuk - who played more games than his 69. for reference, kramnik played 61, carlsen 60, aronian 52 and anand only 40. and there is still reggio emilia to come for nakamura. for the remainder of 2012 i guess that nakamura can afford to say no to a couple of invitations - it might be that maximum performance at the topmost level requires a little more rest than what he's been used to. carlsen played 73 games in 2009 which might be pushing it and 92 games in 2008 which i think is simply too much.

in summary: go nakamura! :o)

Dec-15-11  frogbert: <details 2009:

+38 -13 =27 against 2587 average
own avg 2707, tpr 2703 over 83 games
>

sorry, it should be 78 games, with 5 "japanese league" games removed.

Dec-15-11  frogbert: <he would have lost as would any other human player starting from 1.e4 so then 1.e4 according to all the english majors is objectively lost right?>

the confusion thrives, it seems. :o)

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 858)
search thread:   
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 642 OF 858 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC