< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 6 OF 35 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
May-16-05 | | fred lennox: Larson's quote is ammusing but i don't agree with it. I consider the most important function is to bring the player beer and bratwurst. |
|
Jun-09-05 | | mynameisrandy: Wait a minute, wait a minute. First we discover that Larsen believes that the second is mainly for bringing you sandwiches and now we find out that his wife is his second? Cult of domesticity! |
|
Jun-09-05
 | | chancho: That picture of Larsen makes him look nerdy. |
|
Jun-09-05 | | aw1988: Um, he's a chess player. He's quite good looking actually. |
|
Jun-16-05 | | Heavy Metal Thunder: Those glasses are indeed nerdy. |
|
Jun-20-05 | | vampiero: what exactly does ZOOM 001 talk about, which openings. i like the grunfeld so maybe i should get it. and is there a ZOOM 002. lol. |
|
Aug-08-05
 | | WTHarvey: Here are some crucial positions from Bent's games: http://www.wtharvey.com/lars.html |
|
Aug-11-05 | | Blugar: Beware of Larsen games, that are not Bent Larsen games in this collection!! |
|
Oct-11-05
 | | offramp: What is the Jorgen part of his name here http://webpages.charter.net/stormki... |
|
Oct-12-05
 | | Benzol: I thought his name was Bent Jorgen Larsen. |
|
Oct-17-05 | | henderson10: I'm looking for other players who could be considered similar in style to Larsen. One name I've seen mentioned is Ljobojevic--does anyone have any other suggestions? |
|
Oct-17-05 | | AdrianP: <Henderson10> Tangential to your query, but it put me in mind of Timman, in Power Chess with Pieces referring to Huebner's comments on Smyslov and Ljubojevic. Apparently, Huebner said something like, Smyslov who is considered to be a classical positional player, was really just an attacking player and Ljubojevic, who is considered to be an out-and-out attacking player, is really a positional player. This struck me as Huebner being idiosyncatic just for the sake of it, like when in his monograph on Fischer, he concludes that Fischer's weakness was accurate, concrete calculation. Larsen had a very singular style, so far as my impression goes, which was characterised by (i) aggression; (ii) an offbeat opening repertoire; and (iii) pushing wing-pawns. Comparable modern players might be Morozevich and, perhaps, Ivanchuk. |
|
Oct-17-05 | | henderson10: I've always thought of Larsen as more of a counterattacker, one who preferred a sharp tactical game as opposed to a positional one. I'm basically trying to build an opening repertoire (especially playing White) suitable for that style, but as you said Larsen's openings are very unusual. |
|
Oct-27-05 | | who: I never noticed till now, but according to our database Larsen never even drew Fischer with the white pieces. |
|
Oct-27-05 | | Larsker: <I'm looking for other players who could be considered similar in style to Larsen.> Larsen himself has said that Petrosian was the top player whose style resembled his own the most. |
|
Oct-27-05
 | | keypusher: <Larsen had a very singular style, so far as my impression goes, which was characterised by (i) aggression; (ii) an offbeat opening repertoire; and (iii) pushing wing-pawns. Comparable modern players might be Morozevich and, perhaps, Ivanchuk.> <henderson10> I think AdrianP sums it up pretty well. Or you could just say he was an aggressive positional player. It's always impressed me how Larsen could get wins from seemingly quiet, unpromising openings, by just <playing>. Here's an example Kasparov writes up in OMGP IV: Larsen vs Geller, 1960
This was the decisive game in a candidates match:
Larsen vs Portisch, 1968
He seemed to demonstrate that, even at the super-GM level, it didn't matter so much whether your opening was "aggressive" or "quiet"; what mattered was how you played the game. I was reminded of this watching Topalov in the San Luis tournament, especially this game: Topalov vs Kasimdzhanov, 2005
|
|
Oct-27-05 | | suenteus po 147: <Larkser> That would explain why I enjoy a majority of Larsen's games when I see or review them. |
|
Oct-31-05 | | Poulsen: I haven't read Kasparov's description of Larsen in OMGP IV. Can anyone enlighten me on the main points? |
|
Nov-01-05 | | larsenfan: I also enjoy very much Larsen games -so my nickmane- and I have recently got a copy of Bent Larsen master of counter attack, in english, also I had it in danish - let me aclare than I am spaniard and do not konw danish, just to point out how fond of this book I am- I also recommend his book on Baguio match and San Antonio 72 tournament. Probably you know there is a web page devoted to him.
In my opinion one of most imaginitave players ever. |
|
Nov-02-05 | | henderson10: <Larsker, Keypusher, et al.> Thanks much--appreciate the help. |
|
Nov-02-05 | | henderson10: <Larsker> Isn't that (re: Petrosian) because they were both of what I'll call the Niemzowitsch school? I always thought of them as being representative of the two branches of that style, with Larsen looking for openings to counterattack and Petrosian playing crushing positional games. |
|
Nov-02-05 | | Hesam7: @ henderson10
From an interview with Larsen:
<Q. Tell me, who of modern chess players has a style of playing that is similar to yours?L. It’s a difficult question. Certainly, I don’t keep up with modern chess, but I don’t see a congenial candidate. Q. Probably, any chess player of your generation had this style. L. Maybe it was Petrosian. We had the same basis: “My System,” by Nimzovitch. We are so called foster-brothers. However, we had different feelings of a position – - and of danger. On the one hand, Petrosian hasn’t lost so many games as I, but, on the other hand, he hasn’t won so many of them. Q. Have you ever wanted to play like some other chess player? L. Certainly, I have. When I was young, Tal was my idol! Fortunately, I have never tried to play in his style – I just liked to watch him playing. Tal was a fearless fighter. Nobody could successfully accomplish so many incorrect maneuvers! He simply smashed his opponents… Q. Did you really want to play “correct” chess, to make only correct evaluations? L. Not so fast, mister! The point is that chess doesn’t have a strict criterion of correctness – chess is a multiform game!> the full interview: http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail... |
|
Nov-03-05 | | you vs yourself: <Tal was idol! Fortunately, I have never tried to play his style> Is there anyone who successfully replicated Tal's style? Tal occupies a place in chess history that is very unique and unreachable in today's computer influenced theory. |
|
Nov-03-05 | | henderson10: <Hesam> Thanks much--en route to check out the rest of the interview right now. <AdrianP> Sorry for the much-delayed response, but I'm rapidly becoming a fan of Ivanchuk's play. Not to slight Moro, who I also enjoy, but he reminds more of a pure attacking player. Thanks again to all. |
|
Nov-03-05 | | BishopofBlunder: I had a Bent Larsen once. But I went to the doctor and got it all straightened out. |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 6 OF 35 ·
Later Kibitzing> |