chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Boris Spassky vs Viktor Korchnoi
"Pins in Boxes" (game of the day Sep-23-2024)
Korchnoi - Spassky Candidates Final (1977/78), Belgrade YUG, rd 14, Jan-02
Vienna Game: Mieses Variation (C26)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 9 times; par: 102 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 80 more Spassky/Korchnoi games
sac: 51.Re5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can make these tips go away by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Simply check the option "Don't show random tips on game pages." and click the Update Profile button at the bottom.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-02-07  talisman: no k-bitzing for this very historic game? this brings spassky dangerously close, 4-5 advantage korchnoi.i cannot believe spassky would be guilty of anything unsportsmanlike.looking forward to getting keene's book on this match for more information.
Sep-17-10  DoubtingThomas: ...accurate or otherwise.
Sep-17-10  paavoh: A wonderful finish by Spassky.
Aug-07-12  Everett: Nice zig-zag starting with White's 56th
May-21-14  Howard: This made the late Gligoric's Game of the Month column back in the summer of 1978, in Chess Life and Review.
Oct-27-14  Ulhumbrus: After 20 Kg2 Black's c4 pawn seems exposed to attack. An alternative to 20...Na5 is 20...Nb4 heading for d5 and on 21 d5 Bc5 attacks White's pinned bishop on e3
Jan-12-16  thegoodanarchist: <paavoh: A wonderful finish by Spassky.>

I thought the same thing. He used precise technique to sew up the win.

Jan-21-16  Joker2048: What a great finish by spassky wonderfull..
Jan-21-16  RookFile: The whole game was a masterpiece. I know I wouldn't want to have the black pieces, it looked like torture the whole way for black.
Jan-22-16  Joker2048: I agree with you rookfile..
Spassky absolutely control the game and it was beautiful play by Boris.
Mar-04-16  edubueno: I would like to comment Ulhumbrus remarks, 20...Nb4, that is much more interesting. However 21 d5! has to be answered by 21... De5, since 21...Ac5 allows 22 Dxc4!
Apr-28-23  tinnderbox: This was one of the 'panic' games in this match (game 11 to 14). Korchnoi was completely out of sorts here. 31... a6 is simply bad (Rb8 is much better). Spassky is winning, but 36. Rc7 is not great (R1b6 was winning) and 37 Rxc4 is also inaccurate, although here it is extremely difficult to see that white wins in a long line starting with 37. Rb8?! Rxb8 38. Nxd6. But now Korchnoi blunders again. 37... Qd7 is just equal, but after 37... Rxe4 black is completely lost. Spassky and his team then had a day to find the win after the adjournment on move 41. In such a concrete position it's not surprising they managed to do so.
Apr-28-23  Granny O Doul: I think it was Ray Keene who said of 31...a6, "like King Vortigern, Korchnoi invites his own invaders".
Apr-29-23  sudoplatov: So Spassky plays a Closed Sicilian against 1....e5.
Apr-29-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  fredthebear: Well, White's structural approach is very similar. Here's some background on the Vienna Game: https://www.chess.com/openings/Vien...
Jul-03-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  MarcusBierce: Interesting reading the engine analysis note 22.Bf4 creates a winning game for White, as Nb5 and d5 are waiting in the wings,

Shame Spassky missed it. Yet still created a beautiful game

Sep-23-24  goodevans: <tinnderbox: [...] 37 Rxc4 is also inaccurate, although here it is extremely difficult to see that white wins in a long line starting with 37. Rb8?! Rxb8 38. Nxd6.>

Of the many misses by both sides in this game, this is perhaps the one that I find most difficult to understand. After <37.Rb8!> (certainly not '?!') <37...Rxb8 38.Nxd6> White is threatening to invade with Qe6+ or Qe7, either of which would be fatal.


click for larger view

It turns out there are only two defences worth considering, neither of which is terribly 'long'.

The most obvious is <38...Rg5+>. How to escape the checks? The winning way is <39.Kh3 Rh5+ 40.Kg3 Rg5+ 41.Kf4> and Black must give up his R. He can get a couple more checks in with <41...Rf8+ 42.Kxg5 Qa5+ 43.Nb5> but then he's completely lost.

The more resilient defence is for Black to attack White's R with <38...Qa5>. The question then is whether Spassky would have recognised the R+P endgame resulting from <39.Qe6+ Kh8 40.Nxf5 Qxf5 41.Qxf5 gxf5> as winning for White. I would have thought so but I'm particularly weak at R+P endgames so I couldn't say for sure.

A great game despite its flaws but I'm a little mystified by the pun. Something to do with Black's 36...Bd6 perhaps?

Sep-23-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: User: goodevans I think it's something to both players playing from their <boxes>. They both sat in their "relaxation rooms" on the stage. What a pair of gits!
Sep-23-24  Allderdice83: <The most obvious is <38...Rg5+>. How to escape the checks? The winning way is <39.Kh3 Rh5+ 40.Kg3 Rg5+ 41.Kf4> and Black must give up his R. He can get a couple more checks in with <41...Rf8+ 42.Kxg5 Qa5+ 43.Nb5> but then he's completely lost.>

After 43 ... Qxb5+? White has to block with 44. Rc5, but after 44 ... Qb7, White's king is the one in danger.

Sep-23-24  goodevans: <Allderdice83: [...] After 43 ... Qxb5+? White has to block with 44. Rc5...>

43...Qxb5+ 44.Kh6!

Not only is the K perfectly safe there, he's also joined in the attack!

Sep-23-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Terrific game. It's a shame spassky never did an auto bio. What great stories he must have, to tell.
Sep-23-24  Allderdice83: BTW, the "?" there is punctuation, not an indication that 43 ... Qxb5 is a bad move.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC