chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Louis Stumpers
L Stumpers 
 

Number of games in database: 63
Years covered: 1932 to 1969
Overall record: +14 -35 =14 (33.3%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games.

Repertoire Explorer
Most played openings
D94 Grunfeld (3 games)
B59 Sicilian, Boleslavsky Variation, 7.Nb3 (2 games)
D31 Queen's Gambit Declined (2 games)
D45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav (2 games)
E60 King's Indian Defense (2 games)
E21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights (2 games)
C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense (2 games)


Search Sacrifice Explorer for Louis Stumpers
Search Google for Louis Stumpers

LOUIS STUMPERS
(born Aug-30-1911, died Sep-27-2003, 92 years old) Netherlands

[what is this?]

Frans Louis Henri Marie Stumpers was born in Eindhoven, Netherlands, on 30 August 1911. (1) He was champion of the Eindhoven Chess Club in 1938, 1939, 1946, 1947, 1948, 1949, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1955, 1957, 1958, 1961 and 1963, (2) and champion of the North Brabant Chess Federation (Noord Brabantse Schaak Bond, NBSB) in 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942, 1943, 1944, 1946, 1948, 1949, 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1955, 1959, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966 and 1967. (3) Stumpers participated in five Dutch Chess Championships, with his high-water mark a fourth place finish in 1948, (4) and represented his country at the 1st European Team Championship in Vienna in 1957 (two games, vs Josef Platt and Max Dorn). (5) From 1945 until about 1956, he was first Secretary and then Chairman of the NBSB. (3)

Stumpers was a physicist, and worked for the Philips company as an assistant from 1928. During 1934-1937, he studied at the University of Utrecht, where he took the master's degree. (6) In 1938 Stumpers was again employed at Philips, (6) and at a tournament in 1942, he supplied the hungry chess players with food from his employer. (3) After the war, Stumpers made a career in physics, with patents and awards on information ("radio") technology. He received degrees from several universities and colleges, including in Poland and Japan. (1, 3, 6) Stumpers retired from Philips in 1972, but continued teaching, (6) partly as professor at the University of Utrecht (1977-1981). (7) He was also Vice President (1975-1981) and Honorary President (1990-2003) of URSI, the International Union of Radio Science. (8)

Louis Stumpers married Mieke Driessen in 1954. They had five children, three girls and two boys. (6)

1) Online Familieberichten 1.0 (2016), http://www.online-familieberichten...., Digitaal Tijdschrift, 5 (255), http://www.geneaservice.nl/ar/2003/...
2) Eindhovense Schaakvereniging (2016), http://www.eindhovenseschaakverenig...
3) Noord Brabantse Schaak Bond (2016), http://www.nbsb.nl/pkalgemeen/pk-er... Their main page: http://www.nbsb.nl.
4) Schaaksite.nl (2016), http://www.schaaksite.nl/2016/01/01...
5) Olimpbase, http://www.olimpbase.org/1957eq/195...
6) K. Teer, Levensbericht F. L. H. M. Stumpers, in: Levensberichten en herdenkingen, 2004, Amsterdam, pp. 90-97, http://www.dwc.knaw.nl/DL/levensber... Also available at http://www.hagenbeuk.nl/wp-content/...
7) Catalogus Professorum Academiæ Rheno-Traiectinæ, https://profs.library.uu.nl/index.p...
8) URSI websites (2016), http://www.ursi.org/en/ursi_structu... and http://www.ursi.org/en/ursi_structu...

Suggested reading: Eindhovense Schaakvereniging 100 jaar 1915-2015, by Jules Welling. Stumpers' doctoral thesis Eenige onderzoekingen over trillingen met frequentiemodulatie (Studies on Vibration with Frequency Modulation) is found at http://repository.tudelft.nl/island...

This text by User: Tabanus. The photo was taken from http://www.dwc.knaw.nl.

Last updated: 2022-04-04 00:17:13

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 63  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. L Stumpers vs J Lehr 1-0191932EindhovenD18 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
2. L Prins vs L Stumpers  1-0391936NED-ch prelimB20 Sicilian
3. E Sapira vs L Stumpers 0-1251938NBSB-FlandersD94 Grunfeld
4. L Stumpers vs E Spanjaard  1-0551938NED-ch prelimE02 Catalan, Open, 5.Qa4
5. A J Wijnans vs L Stumpers  1-0361939NED-chB05 Alekhine's Defense, Modern
6. J van den Bosch vs L Stumpers  ½-½581939NED-chA48 King's Indian
7. L Stumpers vs S Landau 0-1411939NED-chD33 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch
8. H van Steenis vs L Stumpers  1-0251939NED-chB02 Alekhine's Defense
9. L Stumpers vs H Kramer  0-1361940HilversumE25 Nimzo-Indian, Samisch
10. L Stumpers vs S Landau  ½-½341940HilversumD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
11. A van den Hoek vs L Stumpers  1-0271941BondswedstrijdenB10 Caro-Kann
12. T van Scheltinga vs L Stumpers 1-0351942NED-ch12D94 Grunfeld
13. W Wolthuis vs L Stumpers  ½-½521946NED-ch prelim IC58 Two Knights
14. L Stumpers vs J H Marwitz  1-0401946NED-ch prelim ID31 Queen's Gambit Declined
15. G Fontein vs L Stumpers  ½-½261946NED-ch prelim ID94 Grunfeld
16. L Stumpers vs H van Steenis 0-1241946NED-ch prelim ID28 Queen's Gambit Accepted, Classical
17. C van den Berg vs L Stumpers  1-0581946NED-ch prelim ID19 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
18. L Stumpers vs Euwe 0-1301946NED-ch prelim IE60 King's Indian Defense
19. L Stumpers vs N Cortlever  ½-½501946NED-ch prelim IE60 King's Indian Defense
20. L Stumpers vs H Grob 1-0601947Baarn Group BA55 Old Indian, Main line
21. L Stumpers vs H van Steenis  0-1331947Baarn Group BD23 Queen's Gambit Accepted
22. Tartakower vs L Stumpers 1-0241947Baarn Group BD74 Neo-Grunfeld, 6.cd Nxd5, 7.O-O
23. V Soultanbeieff vs L Stumpers  ½-½461947Baarn Group BD96 Grunfeld, Russian Variation
24. L Stumpers vs A Vinken  0-1331948NED-ch sfE21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights
25. L Prins vs L Stumpers  ½-½301948NED-ch sfD02 Queen's Pawn Game
 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 63  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Stumpers wins | Stumpers loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 48 OF 277 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-22-08  SetNoEscapeOn: <Once>

A rose?

Jun-22-08  Once: <setnoescapeon> Not a rose.
Jun-22-08  ughaibu: Nettle?
Jun-22-08  ughaibu: Poppy.
Jun-22-08  percyblakeney: Onion?
Jun-22-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Hmmm. A rose sounded perfect. The stand up in bed was a little shaky, though there is the oft used visual of a rose on a pillow.

I'm trying to make a bottle of wine work. Not sure how that makes her eye wet.

Jun-22-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: I am going with onion, though I am not sure why it's serviceable to close-lying companions.
Jun-22-08  Once: <keypusher> <percyblakeney> You got it! The answer is an onion, with a fairly obvious misdirection on an adult theme.
Jun-22-08  percyblakeney: Here's a deeply difficult one...

I am the beginning of eternity
the end of time and space,
I am the beginning of every end,
and the end of every place.

What am I?

Jun-22-08  ughaibu: e?
. .
Jun-22-08  percyblakeney: <e?> Indeed...
Jun-22-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Onion? I almost posted that it didn't work. Wondrous expectancy?
Jun-22-08  Once: <OhioChessFan> This is a very famous anglo-saxon riddle. I remember having it read to me in a lecture in my English Literature degree more than 20 years ago. The trick is to make you think of one answer while the real solution is rather more innocent.

So I am not sure if I can defend everything in the riddle. I just copied it from a book! I guess that "joyous expectancy" is meant to hint at pregnancy, but actually mean that she is looking forward to cooking with the onion.

Some of the anglo-saxon riddles from the same source have never been solved (to my knowledge), so it is almost anybody's guess what they really mean.

Jun-22-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: The double entendres were obvious. I just got hung up on that one. I'll allow some poetic license.
Jun-22-08  SetNoEscapeOn: <I guess that "joyous expectancy" is meant to hint at pregnancy, but actually mean that she is looking forward to cooking with the onion.>

That must be an incredible tasting- or smelling- onion :)

<Manic>

Still wondering about #1 and #3 from your post.
#1 Leaving Paris aside, I am having trouble with "a false good feeling"... A bolt of lighntning? A firecracker?

#3 I don't really have any ideas...

Any non-giveaway hints?

Jun-22-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: <I harm no city dweller except my slayer alone> Lots of men have been done in chasing their favorite onion.

I am envisioning a really bad outdoor theater troupe having onions hurled at them. The audience may consider them "serviceable" but the performers wouldn't find the experience so poetic.

Cute riddle. =)

Jun-22-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <SNEO> I think #1 is cigarette
Jun-22-08  SetNoEscapeOn: Ah... yes! Thanks
Jun-23-08  Once: <SNEO> and #3 is surely some kind of egg?
Jun-24-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <OCP>: The quadruplet (P, Q, R, S) of positive integers satisfies the relationship (P)(S) = (Q)(R) with the restriction P > Q > R > S.

Prove that (P-S)^2 is greater than/equal to (4)(S) + 8.

I can prove a weaker result, namely, (P-S)^2 ≥ 4S+5, as follows.

From PS = QR it follows that we can write P = ab, S = cd, Q = ac, R = bd, where a, b, c, and d are positive integers.

From P > Q we have b > c, which means b ≥ c+1, since these are integers, and from P > R we have a > d, which means a ≥ d+1.

Hence (P-S)^2 = (ab-cd)^2 ≥ [(c+1)(d+1) - cd]^2 = (c+d+1)^2 = c^2+2cd+d^2+2c+2d+1 ≥ 4cd+2c+2d+1 ≥ 4cd+5 = 4S+5, since c^2-2cd+d^2 = (c-d)^2 ≥ 0 and 2c+2d ≥ 4.

If I could justify c ≠ d (e.g., S is not a perfect square), this argument would yield the desired result (P-S)^2 ≥ 4S+8, because then I could say 2c+2d ≥ 6 and (c-d)^2 ≥ 1, i.e., c^2+d^2 ≥ 2cd+1, but I don't see any way to do it.

But I think this is pretty darn good for a first cut.

Jun-25-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <OCF>: OK, here's the rest of the proof.

Using the notation of my previous post, suppose d = c.

Then the basic inequalities can be written in the form

P = ab > Q = ac > R = bc > S = c^2, where a, b, and c are positive integers.

It follows that a > b > c, or a ≥ b+1 and b ≥ c+1, which in turn implies a ≥ c+2.

Hence (P-S)^2 ≥ [(c+2)(c+1) - c^2]^2 = (3c+2)^2 = 9c^2+12c+4. This is greater than 4S+8 = 4c^2+8 for all c > 0.29666, hence for all positive integers.

That leaves only the case c ≠ d, which was disposed of earlier.

QED.

Jun-25-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: I don't have the solution to this one, I've been pondering this one for a while...

You have 8 identically shaped objects, however, one of them weights a little more (or less) than the other 7, now, with a balance, can you determine the one that is more/less with just 2 weighings?

I was thinking this, divide them into 2 groups of 4 objects each, then take the side that is more/less, and divide them into 2 groups of 2 objects, eventually you'd find the odd-ball out. But that involves 3 weighings....

Jun-25-08  Thorski: <WannaBe> Set aside two, weigh the other six. If they're equal, weigh the other two; if they're not, weigh two of the three on the correct side. If they're equal, it's the third one.

I'm assuming you're told whether the odd one out is heavier or lighter than the rest...

Jun-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <Thorski> Don't think if the odd one is heavier/lighter matters, if the scale tilts one direction.

you are just asked to find it with two tries (or weighing...) Then again, I may not have remember this puzzle in its entirety...

Another one... 4 people needs to cross a rickety/dangerous bridge. And here is the kicker/puzzle...

You have 1 flash light, it will only last 17 minutes on its battery. And because of the danger of crossing this bridge, you <NEED> the flashlight to be working/on...

Person A can cross the bridge in 1 min.
Person B can cross the bridge in 2 mins.
Person C can cross the bridge in 5 mins.
Person D can cross the briege in 10 mins.

The bridge can at most, hold the weight of 2 people, how do all 4 cross safely?

When I first encountered this puzzle, all kinds of 'things' crossed my mind...

1. Does/can this flashlight need to be passed from one person to another?

2. How far 'ahead' does the light shine? And can the knowledge of this 'rickety/dangerous' bridge's info be passed on?

3. Can I leave it 'securely' tied to the bridge?

4. Can I pass it off to the next person like a track relay?

5. Why am I asked this question in a job interview?

Jun-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <Thorski> Yes, thinking about it again, more/less weight does matter in the equation. Thanks!! =)
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 277)
search thread:   
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 48 OF 277 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC