chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Marmaduke Wyvill
M Wyvill 
 

Number of games in database: 35
Years covered: 1840 to 1859
Overall record: +14 -19 =2 (42.9%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games.

Repertoire Explorer
Most played openings
A13 English (7 games)
B21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4 (6 games)
C00 French Defense (2 games)
B20 Sicilian (2 games)
A03 Bird's Opening (2 games)
000 Chess variants (2 games)
A10 English (2 games)


Search Sacrifice Explorer for Marmaduke Wyvill
Search Google for Marmaduke Wyvill

MARMADUKE WYVILL
(born Dec-22-1815, died Jun-25-1896, 80 years old) United Kingdom

[what is this?]

Marmaduke Wyvill was an English Member of Parliament who finished 2nd to Adolf Anderssen at the London (1851) tournament.

Wikipedia article: Marmaduke Wyvill

Last updated: 2016-08-28 22:17:22

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 35  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. La Bourdonnais vs M Wyvill 1-0361840Casual game000 Chess variants
2. M Wyvill vs H Buckle  1-0301843Casual gameC00 French Defense
3. S Dubois vs M Wyvill  1-0301845Casual gameC51 Evans Gambit
4. M Wyvill vs S Dubois 0-1341846Odds Match000 Chess variants
5. Harrwitz vs M Wyvill  0-1251850Casual gameB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
6. M Wyvill vs H Kennedy 0-1201851Casual gameC33 King's Gambit Accepted
7. H Kennedy vs M Wyvill  1-0461851Casual gameC20 King's Pawn Game
8. E Lowe vs M Wyvill 0-1291851LondonC00 French Defense
9. M Wyvill vs E Lowe 1-0411851LondonA20 English
10. M Wyvill vs E Williams 1-0371851LondonA13 English
11. E Williams vs M Wyvill 0-1501851LondonA00 Uncommon Opening
12. E Williams vs M Wyvill 1-0321851LondonB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
13. H Kennedy vs M Wyvill 0-1281851LondonB32 Sicilian
14. H Kennedy vs M Wyvill 1-0651851LondonA03 Bird's Opening
15. E Williams vs M Wyvill 0-1611851LondonB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
16. M Wyvill vs E Williams 1-0361851LondonA13 English
17. M Wyvill vs H Kennedy 1-0571851LondonA13 English
18. M Wyvill vs H Kennedy 1-0361851LondonA13 English
19. M Wyvill vs H Kennedy 0-1351851LondonA13 English
20. H Kennedy vs M Wyvill 1-0371851LondonB46 Sicilian, Taimanov Variation
21. M Wyvill vs H Kennedy ½-½621851LondonA13 English
22. H Kennedy vs M Wyvill 0-1521851LondonB45 Sicilian, Taimanov
23. M Wyvill vs E Williams 0-1351851LondonA13 English
24. E Williams vs M Wyvill 1-0361851LondonB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
25. Anderssen vs M Wyvill 1-0261851LondonB20 Sicilian
 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 35  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Wyvill wins | Wyvill loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-08-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: Marmaduke Wyvill
Aug-08-03  Cyphelium: Now that's a cool name if I ever heard one.
Apr-10-04  morphyvsfischer: The very first English Opening specialist too...
Apr-10-04  ruylopez900: Marmaduke had something going with the c-file...
Apr-30-04  valerianus: Marmaduke Wyvill juggled a career in the British Parliament with a nearly wonderful upset elimination of Anderssen in London 1851 (wow!).
Jan-21-05  Knight13: Information from Wikipedia:

Marmaduke Wyvill (1815 - 1896) was a leading English chess master.

He made it through to the final of the first international chess tournament, held in London in 1851, but lost to Adolf Anderssen, 4.5-2.5.

Wyvill was elected Member of Parliament for Richmond, North Yorkshire in 1847.

In a chess game, Wyvill formation refers to a pawn formation in which White has no b pawn, a pawn at c3 and c4, and the d-pawn at d4 or d5 (Some authorities require a Black pawn to be at c5). White's c4 pawn is a weakness because it cannot be supported by other pawns.

Jan-05-06  BIDMONFA: Marmaduke Wyvill

WYVILL, Marmaduke
http://www.bidmonfa.com/wyvill_m.htm
_

Jul-31-06  sneaky pete: Is Marmaduke a name or a title? Is he related to the olde English breakfast table regular Marmaduke Chivers?
Jul-31-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <sneaky pete>

http://123-baby-names.com/origin_me...

Jul-31-06  sneaky pete: <chancho> Thanks, <leader of the seas>, who would have imagined? The <duke> part led me to believe it was a title rather than a name, but MP Wyvill was obviously just a commoner, not a Lord.
Sep-01-08  myschkin: . . .

<Marmaduke Wyvill> war ein englischer Aristokrat, Politiker und Schachmeister.

Der Stammsitz seiner Familie war Constable Burton Hall in North Yorkshire.

In den Jahren 1847 bis 1868 war er Abgeordner im britischen Parlament. Im Jahr 1851 nahm er in London am ersten internationalen Schachturnier in der Geschichte teil und wurde Zweiter hinter dem preußischen Meister Adolf Anderssen, der fortan als weltbester Schachspieler galt. Der ansonsten mit Lob sparsame Howard Staunton bezeichnete Wyvill daraufhin als einen der besten Spieler Englands.

Wyvill konzentrierte sich anschließend auf seine politische Laufbahn und hörte auf, ernsthaft Schach zu spielen. Es war ihm bis zu seinem Rückzug vom Schach möglich, sich mit den besten Spielern seiner Zeit zu messen, hierunter mit so glanzvollen Namen wie Louis Charles Mahe De La Bourdonnais, Lionel Adalbert Bagration Felix Kieseritsky, Henry Thomas Buckle und Daniel Harrwitz.

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marmad...

The Wyvill's of Constable Burton
http://www.wyvill.com/

Jul-27-09  Knight13: A great player who unfortunately quit playing competitive/professional chess for the sake of other reasons, probably politics (Parliament).

A politically educated talent AND very strong chess master.

Now that's impressive.

Aug-02-09  Knight13: K after examining all of his games, I must admit that they aren't that high quality or very instructive. Errors and stupid blunders everywhere; you're definitely better off learning from great players of modern era than him, but if you wanna have fun then sure run through Wyvill's games.

I'm surprised that at his skill level he reached SECOND in 1851 international tournament AHEAD of Staunton and others. If you believe in luck in chess, this is the time to use it as explanation!

Aug-02-09  YoungEd: I don't read German, so forgive me if this is already part of the post that <myschkin> left, but Staunton complained mightily about the slowness of Wyvill's play, suggesting that Wyvill managed to win his games principally through outsitting his opponents.
Aug-03-09  percyblakeney: <Staunton complained mightily about the slowness of Wyvill's play, suggesting that Wyvill managed to win his games principally through outsitting his opponents>

I think he said that about Elijah Williams but he would probably have said it about Wyvill too if he had lost against him :-) Staunton meant that only his <physical suffering could explain the result, against a player he could ordinarily defeat at P+2 odds> after Williams allegedly spent hours on some positions.

Williams won a 17-game match against Horwitz, and Staunton commented about the disadvantage Horwitz suffered from when playing <any opponent who seeks to irritate or exhaust him by protracting the games unnecessarily>. According to Horwitz none of the games took more than five hours, and most of them were finished in two.

Spinrad writes in his article on the subject that many sided with Williams in the dispute, and Staunton seems to have been rather slow himself in the 1851 tournament. Anderssen wrote that a game between Staunton and Horwitz took 11½ hours, and Kieseritzky singled out Staunton as playing slow games.

http://www.chesscafe.com/text/spinr...

Aug-03-09  YoungEd: Hi, <percyblakeny>-- You are right; I misremembered the names. Thanks for the correction and info.
Aug-03-09  Knight13: Of course, people might've disliked Staunton more than any other player in the tournament and so sided against him.

Note that Staunton intended to organize the tournament in order to attract the best players from around the world, and create brilliant games so that it will be talked about for centuries to come, but most importantly, he himself walking out as the winner of the tournament.

Guess what? Staunton didn't win the tournament. Most of the games sucked. No, it will not be talked about for centuries for its brilliancy either; most of the games weren't that good.

Dec-22-11  talisman: <happy birthday Marmaduke!
Dec-22-11  Eastfrisian: I guess, he won't answer.
Oct-01-12  DrDave: Just being lazy, but could anyone please point me to a game where Wyvill used his famous Wyvill formation? There are none on my database...
Oct-01-12  Olavi: <DrDave> A very good question. I have had the suspicion that it's a misnomer, originally by Tarrasch. There is for instance this game Wyvill vs Anderssen, 1851 in which Wyvill has the doubled pawns, but it is supposed that he recognized the weakness of such pawns, not that he endorsed them. Instead, there are some games by Elijah Williams, indeed one against Wyvill if memory serves, which seem to indicate that he deliberately tried to impose such pawns on the opponent. Further research is needed...
Oct-01-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Olavi: <DrDave> A very good question. I have had the suspicion that it's a misnomer, originally by Tarrasch. There is for instance this game Wyvill vs Anderssen, 1851 in which Wyvill has the doubled pawns, but it is supposed that he recognized the weakness of such pawns, not that he endorsed them. Instead, there are some games by Elijah Williams, indeed one against Wyvill if memory serves, which seem to indicate that he deliberately tried to impose such pawns on the opponent. Further research is needed...>

According to posting on this site, the term "Wyvill formation" was coined by Kmoch. It does seem to be a misnomer. Here's a very early example. Staunton was playing the City of Bristol by mail. One of the leading Bristol players was Elijah Williams, so maybe that is where he got the idea.

Staunton vs Bristol, 1841

Oct-01-12  Olavi: In "Die Kunst der Bauernführung" Kmoch atributes the term to Tarrasch, but doesn't mention where he used it.
Oct-01-12  Olavi: OK it's probably in his book on the 1914 St. Petersburg tournament, in his comments on Rubinstein-Alekhine. He states that Wyvill used the stratagem Sb8-c6-a5, Ba6, Rc8 against the pawns in several games in London 1851. I think that should be Williams.
Oct-02-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Olavi: OK it's probably in his book on the 1914 St. Petersburg tournament, in his comments on Rubinstein-Alekhine. He states that Wyvill used the stratagem Sb8-c6-a5, Ba6, Rc8 against the pawns in several games in London 1851. I think that should be Williams.>

I have that one, I'll check when I get a chance.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC