chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Viktor Korchnoi vs Alexey Suetin
4th Soviet Team-ch final (1955), Voroshilovgrad URS, rd 8, Sep-??
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation. Schlechter Defense (E52)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 25 more Korchnoi/Suetin games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-16-21  Straclonoor:


click for larger view

What's going on? Korchnoi missed mate in one? - 30.Qxg7#

Later he won, but...

Sep-27-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen:

<Straclonoor> I am looking at the score from <rusbase> and it confirms the curious fact you point out-

Move 30, White to play:


click for larger view

I have a hard time believing that Korchnoi missed 31.Qxg7# as well.

Sep-27-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  fredthebear: One of the worst habits in chess is looking for moves randomly. It's important to follow some sort of checklist faithfully; in the process one will notice other possibilities that otherwise would not be considered. Too often, we just play the first or second move that pops into our heads -- too many natural reactions without giving full consideration to the entire army.

It has been said that Korchnoi spent 30 minutes everyday studying tactics. He obviously did not consider all possible Checks & Captures in the position above. One must follow their checklist faithfully when studying tactics to form and habituate the same search process over and over and over again.

A few tips that could apply to the above position at the critical moment:

- Attack something that you already attack again; attack it a second and third time to outnumber the opponent's defenders.

- Seize open lines for long range pieces and connect batteries along it.

- Get the Queen in close! Give her support.

- When you see a good move -- WAIT! Put it in your cart and keep on shopping around. You can always go back and play the good move later if you don't find something even better.

- Compare three different moves by three different pieces at three different targets. (Actually one should consider a move in every direction by each and every unit on board, but this is only practical during long time controls.) Following the concept of three x three will at least get one to comparison shop.

__ __ __ __

Of course, Korchnoi was thinking strategically. White's bishop pair and extra pawn would win the endgame if he could manage to exchange queens to simplify matters. VK had to be pleased at the time to play 30.QxQf5? It gave him a winning position, strategically.

Suetin missed it too, as 29...Qf5?? is an awful blunder.

It seems possible that 18.Bg3 was actually played instead of 18.Bc3. Then the queen moves for both sides make a bit more sense.

Sep-27-21  Straclonoor: <jessicafischerqueen>, I checked gamescore in 'Chess bullletin' ("Shamtnyii bulleten") #12, 1955 and also confirms that this fact occured.

<It seems possible that 18.Bg3 was actually played instead of 18.Bc3.> No. <18.Bc3> was played by Korchnoi

Sep-28-21  Z truth 000000001: <Straclonoor> thanks for digging that ref out, let's fatten it up a bit:

<Shakhmatny Bulletin v1 N12 (Dec 1955) G-30 p366 (14)>(*)

* * * * *

That year's issues can currently be found here:

https://sites.google.com/site/zurna...

I follow Harding (and wiki) in the spelling of the source periodical:

https://web.archive.org/web/2013011...

Perhaps the best online source of games and info is the RusBase one here:

http://al20102007.narod.ru/team_ch/...

* * * *

(*) The (14) at the end is a convenience - giving the page number in djvu for quick lookup (for those in the know).

.

Sep-28-21  Z truth 000000001: Now, let's get to the real issue - what's wrong with the movelist (aka score)?

These kinds of problems can be weirdly fun to try to solve, but let's acknowledge the source above is definitive without another contemporaneous publication.

But still, could there have been a typo that allows a minimal correction to make better sense of the game, i.e. so that both players didn't miss a mate-in-1 ... ?

And, I think there could be, on White's 18th move - instead of 18.Bc3 perhaps 18.Bg3 was played instead.

Playing it over with SCID, and watching the evals - it does seem possible. It would be an easy typo too, just the one letter - and it certainly seems playable - with subsequent moves definitely being playable - all the way up to 31.Be5 when it merges back into the ML above.

Anyways, it's my best guess (at the moment).

Sep-28-21  Z truth 000000001: <White to move after 17...Rfd8 > ...


click for larger view

18.Bc3, as sourced, or 18.Bg3, as suggested.

Sep-28-21  SChesshevsky: < 18.Bc3, as sourced, or 18.Bg3, as suggested.>

18. Bg3 probably seems fine defensive move and diagonal might come in handy in an endgame.

18. Bc3 playing offense, aiming right for the king with the 2 B's. Doesn't appear any mating problems as long as 2nd rank and f3 covered.

If had to guess, would expect Korchnoi to go with most forcing most of the time.

My question is why Suetin not 21... Rxd1+ 22. Qxd1 Qxe3 with check? If it wasn't 1955, I'd guess it was a mouse slip

Sep-28-21  Z truth 000000001: Very good, more supporting evidence for 18.Bg3.

As <SChessevsky> points out, 22...Qxe3+ is possible if the dsb is on c3, whereas on g3 it can shield the check exposing Black's weak BR.

Maybe they didn't have mouse slips back in 1955, but they sure did have typo slip ups.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC