< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Sep-12-05 | | Hesam7: <AdrianP> Thank you! But I have the feeling that 25 ... Be7 is a mistake. This is an improvement for White in my previous line: 25 ... Qb8 26 Rbd1 Qd8 27 Rc6 Kg7 28 Qf4 Nb5 29 Rc8 Qe7 30 Rxf8! Qxf8 31 d8=Q Bxd8 32 Qxf8+ Kxf8 33 Rxd8+ Ke7 I think the rook vs knight ending is better for White than the rook vs bishop ending which happens in the previous line. |
|
Sep-12-05 | | BeautyInChess: Wow, nice game. Sacrifices and declined material for positional value. This is what the world is missing from Kasparov's retirement. Thanks for commenting on this game. |
|
Sep-13-05 | | acirce: <AdrianP> Thanks. |
|
Oct-28-05 | | yunis: seems like black is very weak player! |
|
Oct-28-05 | | aw1988: What garbage. |
|
Jun-12-08 | | ToTheDeath: <25. ...Bd8 26 Re1 is similar. Black's queen remains offside even after 26. ...Qa6 27 Qc3+ Kg8 28 Qc2 and White should gradually win by increasing his pressure against g6> Can someone post the win in this line? It still looks far from lost for Black. |
|
Aug-10-11 | | whiteshark: GK analyses the game:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRov...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXcD... |
|
Apr-01-12 | | wordfunph: "I think that my 5th round game against Pribyl illustrates my strongest points. A positional build-up till the collected advantages logically allow an attack." - Garry Kasparov
Source: Chess World Title Contenders and Their Styles by Kopec & Pritchett |
|
Apr-09-12 | | vinidivici: this game has to be a GOTD someday. don't u think...??? |
|
May-30-12 | | Anderssen99: 26...,Rxd8 loses prettily as follows: 27.Rxd8+,Bxd8. 28.Rd1!! (Better than 28.Qf7 directly),Be7. 29.Qf7,Nb5. 30.Rd8+!!,Bxd8. 31.Qf8 mate. |
|
Oct-26-12 | | kasparvez: Kasparov, while annotating Bronstein vs Keres, 1955 and scrutinising White's 14th move [14. Bxh6!!]says: "Bronstein recalls that later many of the tournament participants spent a long time trying to demonstrate that the bishop sacrifice was incorrect; Geller was especially agitated, being convinced that any attack should be properly prepared. The situation is familiar to me: when i won an attractive game against Pribyl with a piece sacrifice [Skara 1980], my older colleagues observing the game- Karpov, Vaganian and others- also spent a long time seeking a refutation, some 'hole'. It is evident that brilliance by others provokes a certain inner dissatisfaction: why can't I do that?"
[OMGP vol. 2 game no. 58]
Looking at this game i don't see anything wrong with Kasparov's illustrious older colleagues. After the bishop sac, the position indeed makes for a fascinating case study. I don't think Karpov was trying to refute it just because he was jealous. He was probably trying to uphold his chess principles by refuting a premature sacrifice by his classical, positional standards. That the sacrifice is alright shows that Kasparov's handling of the attack was by no means premature or anti-positional. He simply thought in a different, more dynamic [and also more brilliant] category that was ahead of his time! |
|
May-01-14
 | | Domdaniel: The idea that Pribyl was a 'weak' player to lose like this is risible ... could somebody assemble a collection of Pribyl's best wins, just to give an impression of how strong he was ...? |
|
May-01-14 | | TheFocus: it is wrong to quibble over the strength of Pribyl. |
|
May-02-14
 | | Domdaniel: Ribble, ribble ... The Trouble with Pribyls? |
|
Jan-02-17 | | Albion 1959: Whoarrr - More "Kaspowerov" energy !! |
|
Jan-02-17
 | | perfidious: <yunis: seems like black is very weak player!> Anyone who believes Pribyl was 'weak' should probably look in the mirror--he was clearly of international standard from roughly the late 1960s into the eighties. The greatest players can make even strong masters appear much weaker than they are, a phenomenon I have observed and experienced in poker. |
|
Jul-27-17 | | bla bla: amazing game by Kasparov |
|
Jul-27-17 | | Howard: There seems to be some renewed interest on this website the last few days regarding Kasparov's earlier games. |
|
Jul-27-17
 | | offramp: The Problem With Pribyls. |
|
Nov-07-20 | | fisayo123: 20. d7!! is an incredibly powerful bishop sacrifice. White's phalanx of pieces controlling the f7 square. 26. d8Q!! is just Kasparov trolling. What a position and what a spectacular way to decide the game. At just 16 as well. Very impressive. Together with Tal, has anyone ever played so many spectacular games? It's not even close |
|
Nov-25-21 | | Saniyat24: Garry gives his bishop a toss...! |
|
Jan-21-22
 | | fredthebear: Here's video w/game analysis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZ7... |
|
Jan-21-22
 | | fredthebear: Agadmator made a video on this game: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0B... |
|
Jul-06-25 | | andrea volponi: 20...Rad8!? - 21Rd6!! Nb8 - Qc4+ Kh8 - Ne5 Qc7 - Rbd1 fxe5 - Qe6 e4 +- . |
|
Jul-08-25 | | andrea volponi: 20...Rad8!? - Qc4+ Kh8 - Ne5 fxg5! - Nf7+ Rxf7 - Qxf7 Qc6 - Rb3 Qf6 - Qe8+ Qf8 - Re3 Nc7 - Rde1 Bf6 - Qxf8+ Rxf8 - Re8 Kg7 - Rc8 ⩲/+- . |
|
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing> |