chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Robert James Fischer vs Tigran V Petrosian
Curacao Candidates (1962), Willemstad CUW, rd 13, May-23
French Defense: McCutcheon. Lasker Variation (C12)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 48 times; par: 76 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 28 more Fischer/Petrosian games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have annotation. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-28-08  euripides: ... actually using the link I recommended I discover it was 8.Ba5 that was really unusual.

Games Like Fischer vs Petrosian, 1962

May-28-08  euripides: Curiously at Curacao Petrosian also benefited from a rather bizarre queenside excursion in the French by Tal, who was ill and later withdrew from the tournament:

Tal vs Petrosian, 1962

May-28-08  Petrosianic: Yeah, that was a very bizarre game. Tal is the Anti-Tal in this game, going pawn hunting out of the opening and getting rolled. Black is much better even before the blunder at the end.
May-28-08  Petrosianic: <euripides> <... actually using the link I recommended I discover it was 8.Ba5 that was really unusual.>

Unusual, yes, but not improv. It was a line recommended in some obscure chess periodical or other, by Kopylev, or someone. Fischer, being surprised by the McCutcheon, decided to try it out, hoping to surprise the surpriser, but it didn't work out because it just wasn't that good a line. He'd have done better sticking with the main lines.

This is the single best example of Fischer's flat play at Curacao. It's almost painful to see in how many games as White he piddles away the advantage of the first move in ways like this.

May-29-08  euripides: <Pet> that's interesting. So that's how the Russkies fixed Curacao: by feeding Bobby duff opening analysis.
Jul-21-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  sackman: In his "My 60 most memorable games" Fischer refers to this game, he gives 7 Ba5? and 8 Ba5?? and comments that black already had the initiative after move 11.
Jul-21-09  AnalyzeThis: The MacCutcheon is a great opening. Pillsbury used to use it sometimes. Excellent way to play for the win with black.
Aug-20-09  ewan14: Does anyone know how Petrosian would have continued if Bobby had played

7 bxc3 ?

Thanks

Ewan

Apr-13-10  parisattack: My recollection of this game is that Fischer's Ba5 was a suggestion of a Russian analyst in Shakmatnyi Bullyetin and that *somehow* Petrosian got a high sign that Fischer would play the move.

Anyone know more on this story, true/untrue? (I am pretty sure the 'Russian analyzt' part is true, not so sure on the 'high-sign' part.)

Apr-13-10  Petrosianic: The first is true (a suggestion by Kopylev, Kopylov, or someone like that). The second is unlikely. Petrosian had actually prepared the McCutcheon to use on Fischer in the Stockholm Interzonal, but seeing little point in wasting it there, held it back for the Candidates instead.
Apr-13-10  parisattack: <Petrosianic: The first is true (a suggestion by Kopylov, or someone like that). The second is unlikely. Petrosian had actually prepared the McCutcheon to use on Fischer in the Stockholm Interzonal, but seeing little point in wasting it there, held it back for the Candidates instead.>

Thanks for the clarification!

Apr-13-10  TheFocus: In Stockholm, Fischer also played 4. Bg5, but Petrosian played 4...dxe4 and later drew. In his preparations of the McCutcheon, Petrosian would have been sure to see N. Kopayev's suggestion and dismissed it.
Apr-13-10  Petrosianic: I've never heard if Petrosian was aware of 8. Ba5. He might not have been, it was apparently a minor footnote in a magazine, and had never been played. If he was aware of it, I'm sure he dismissed it, yes, because it wasn't very good.

There'd be no way to know Fischer was going to play it unless Fischer, in turn, had known that Petrosian was going to play the McCutcheon, which he probably didn't (Petrosian had never played it before). Probably Fischer, wary of falling into a novelty, wanted to get out of Petrosian's "book" as quickly as possible, and played something offbeat that he remembered seeing somewhere. Had Fischer given the variation any serious study before the game, I doubt he would have played it at all, as it allows Black to equalize fairly easily.

Here's the way this game is described in Tigran Petrosian: His Life and Games>:

<In round thirteen the French Defence brought Petrosian yet another victory - in his game with Fischer. For this meeting he had long ago prepared an old and (for the present day) very rare continuation - the so-called McCutcheon variation. Tigran had travelled to Stockholm with this variation, but there had been no sense unleashing his secret move there, so he stored it for a more serious moment. Petrosian was not only relying on the variation itself, but on its psychological effect, for he knew that Fischer did not orientate very well in unknown situations.

When Fischer saw that Petrosian had chosen an unexpected, but difficult for himself opening, he even glanced reproachfully at his opponent. Petrosian returned this glance, and mentally congratulated himself on his success - the 'secret weapon' was doing its work, even if Fischer should find the strongest answer. But the question of the refutation of the defence did not arise; Fischer went in for a peculiar bishop manoeuvre (a suggestion of Soviet origin) and Petrosian was soon in command of the game, which he carried to victory in the second session.>

Nov-12-10  Knight13: 8. Ba5 was an outdated move, which Petrosian already knew. Good try though.
Dec-02-10  Ulhumbrus: <Mateo: The losing move seems to be 27.a4? (27.Nb5! is equal). After 27...Rf4! 28.Rd1 (forced as the Knight is pinned)) Ng6 (or 28...Re4), White loses a pawn.> On 27 Nb5 Bxa2 28 Nxa7 Ra8 29 Ra1 Rxa7 30 Rxa2 it is inexact for Black to play 30...Nc6? at once because on 31 Bc4 Rxa2 32 Bxe6+! gains a tempo. 30...Kf7! is the right move order and after 31 Bc4 Rxa2 32 Bxa2 Nc6 wins the e5 pawn.
Mar-10-11  Garech: Great game from Petrosian, and great preparation gooing by the kibitizing above - thanks for the info.

-Garech

Mar-11-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Timman mentions that Fischer only had 5 weeks after Stockholm, "giving him too little time for thorough preparation against the Soviet players."

"Curacao 1962"

He gives the source of the novelty 8 Ba5 as Nikolay Antonovich Kopaev, a theoretician noted mainly for his endgame analysis.

It is a pity Fischer never annotated these games, as it is unclear what he could have thought was good about this move.

Dec-21-11  ewan14: Has anyone managed to find out ( yet ) what Petrosian intended to play if Fischer had played the main line ?

No info. in my Petrosian books

Dec-21-11  Petrosianic: None of my Petrosian books mention what specific improvement he'd found, or for sure if he'd found ANY new improvement, or was just relying on Fischer's unpreparedness for the line to get an edge. The Vasliev quote above isn't quite clear whether "secret move" meant the McCutcheon itself, or some new move IN the McCutcheon.

I think Petrosian played the McCutcheon once or twice after this. You might look to those games to see what he might have been planning here.

May-21-15  RookFile: What a great game by Petrosian. I thought after move 24. Rd3 that white still might have been able to get a draw. Petrosian really took advantage of his opportunities in this game.
Feb-21-16  ZonszeinP: The French could be a strong weapon in the hands of Petrosian and Korchnoi
Feb-21-16  Ulhumbrus: The move 29...Kf7 suggests that one advantage of having the e pawn on e6 is that Black can defend it with his king
Aug-30-17  Albion 1959: After this game Petrosian held a 3-1 plus score against Fischer. But over the next 20 games, Petrosian was only ever able to defeat Fischer one more time. Game 2 of the 1971 Candidates match:
Sep-11-19  Everett: <Albion 1959: After this game Petrosian held a 3-1 plus score against Fischer. But over the next 20 games, Petrosian was only ever able to defeat Fischer one more time. Game 2 of the 1971 Candidates match:>

Yeah, Petrosian was too busy winning and defending his title for six years while Fischer cried himself to sleep until 1970.

Sep-11-19  RookFile: It's just a guess on my part but I think Fischer and Petrosian were the same strength in 1966. Was playing over this game the other day, it's a pity they didn't play more that year. There could have been a lot of games like this one:

Fischer vs Petrosian, 1966

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Tigran Petrosian - his life and games (Vasiliev)
by neontheorist
French MacCutcheon
by Xmas elf
The French Defence
by Deji
petrosian beats Fischer with french macutheon
from Tigrano's favorite games by Tigrano
Match Fischer!
by amadeus
Match Fischer!
by dwinco
Game 44
from book: Russians versus Fischer by Baby Hawk
French McCutcheon. Lasker (C12) 0-1Better endgame
from French McCutcheon Fredthebear C12 by fredthebear
Curacao ct 1962
from Fischer vs The Russians by wanabe2000
Game 44
from Russians versus Fischer by Anatoly21
Game 54 in Petrosian's Best Games: 1946-1963 by P.H. Clarke
from Fictional Atticus Finch Subpoenaed Fredthebear by fredthebear
4 ...Bb4
from French Defense by JoseTigranTalFischer
p455's favorite games
by p455
rajat21's french defense
by rajat21
Petrosian's McCutcheon beats Fischer
from FRENCH DEFENSE MASTERPIECES by notyetagm
Petrosian Victories Playing French w/Black
by JoseTigranTalFischer
The Fixer of Curacao 1962 CT
from Fischer Favorites by Micah Tuhy by micahtuhy
Hoist by His Own Petard
from Tigran V. Petrosian - A Stupendous Tactician by demirchess
4 ...Bb4
from French Defense by builttospill

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC