chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Lev Alburt vs Garry Kasparov
"Triangulation Strangulation" (game of the day Feb-06-2024)
46th URS-ch selection (1978), Daugavpils URS, rd 8, Jul-??
King's Indian Defense: Averbakh. Benoni Defense Advance Variation (E75)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Alburt/Kasparov game
sac: 19...Qb5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-22-12  Tiggler: <EXIDE> <This is too difficult for a Tuesday puzzle. Anyway thanks to Once I am getting an inkling of the process needed to win.>

Regrettably, and unusually, there is a misleading error in <Once>'s post. After his second diagram, he states that Black can win by either ...Kg3 or ...Ke3, after White retreats from f2. Not if W retreats to f1: then only Kg3 will work, and it only works because of the possibility of capturing on h3. Without the h-pawns on the board, Black can triangulate forever and never be able to promote the f-pawn.

Aug-22-12  TheBish: Alburt vs Kasparov, 1978

Black to play (55...?) "Medium/Easy"

The key here is for Black to lose a move, using triangulation, since White to move in the diagrammed position would lose: 1. Kf2 Kf4 followed by 2...Kg3, or 1. Ke1 Ke3 2. Kf1 f2 etc. So how do we lose a move, and what the heck is triangulation, you might be asking?

55...Kf5! Distant opposition!

56. Ke1 (Kg1 is similar) Ke5! 57. Kf1 Ke4

Now it is the same position from the diagram, with White to play and lose, as described above. Funny, but I struggled with this until I realized that Black could easily triangulate, i.e. move the king over three squares while White shifts his king between two squares, thus "losing" a move.

Aug-22-12  Tiggler: <Jimfromprovidence>: <One must be careful to say that the success of triangulation as a tactic is very specific to the position. The reason the puzzle position is winning for black is that he uses triangulation to win white's h pawn and then white cannot defend the advance of both pawns.

<Tiggler> pointed out that black cannot win without his h pawn.>

JfP, thanks for your post. We should also point out the black cannot win if the h-pawns are on h2 and h3, instead of h3 and h4. Only if this is known can one understand Kasporov's maneuvering between moves 42 and 45, which force Alburt to advance 46.h3 .

Aug-22-12  Tiggler: Back in 2004, <mahmoudkubba> asked: <What were the loosing moves for white any how ? any suggestions?? in the whole game I mean??>

I don't know about the whole game, but White's last chance to draw might have been 46.g3, instead of h3. The position at this point is way too difficult for me to solve, but maybe others can do it, with an engine if necessary?

Aug-22-12  Alex56171: <Memethecat> You noticed a detail? By Nalimov Tables, all seven possible moves of the black king wins the game. Some in 16, others in 18 moves. It is a broader concept than triangulation, isn't it?
Aug-22-12  Tiggler: <Alex56171: <Memethecat> You noticed a detail? By Nalimov Tables, all seven possible moves of the black king wins the game. Some in 16, others in 18 moves. It is a broader concept than triangulation, isn't it?>

Moves other than 53...Ke5 and ...Kd5 are wasted moves. They don't throw away the win, but they only win after B discovers the correct plan! (I had a typo in my first attempt, and deleted it. In case you saw e4 and d4, instead of e5 and d5)

Aug-22-12  tivrfoa: Very cool endgame after 41. Kxg1
Aug-22-12  Tiggler: <tivrfoa: Very cool endgame after 41. Kxg1>

I agree, but what about 39...Qd1+. That was 17 moves before our puzzle position.

Did Kasparov know the ending was winning after he forced the Qs to come off? He must have thought so, at least. Awesome.

Aug-22-12  SuperPatzer77: It's almost like the game between Yasser Seirawan vs Garry Kasparov in 1983. He uses the brilliant triagulation method against White (Lev Alburt) like he (Black) did against Yasser Seirawan (White) in 1983. See website link below:

Seirawan vs Kasparov, 1983

Really awesome!!!

SuperPatzer77

Aug-22-12  Tiggler: Tiggler: <Alex56171: <Memethecat> You noticed a detail? By Nalimov Tables, all seven possible moves of the black king wins the game. Some in 16, others in 18 moves. It is a broader concept than triangulation, isn't it?> Moves other than 53...Ke5 and ...Kd5 are wasted moves. They don't throw away the win, but they only win after B discovers the correct plan! (I had a typo in my first attempt, and deleted it. In case you saw e4 and d4, instead of e5 and d5)

After all that, I still had errors: I meant 53...Ke5 and ...Kf5, of course.

Aug-22-12  chillowack: Does anyone know what tournament this is from? It says "Ch URS 1978," but according to this page (http://graeme.50webs.com/chesschamp...) Alburt didn't actually play in the 1978 USSR Championship (possibly he had already defected to America by that point). So what tournament was this?
Aug-23-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <chillowack> It was from the Daugavpils 'Otborochnii', from which first place qualified for the final, held in late 1978. Kasparov went 9-4 for clear first (+4 -1 =8). The page below calls this a semi-final, but that wasn't the case: in earlier days, 4-6 players would have qualified from such an event.

http://www.365chess.com/tournaments...

Aug-23-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Speaking of the Semi-Final:

Game Collection: USSR First League, Ashkhabad, 1978

Aug-24-12  Abdel Irada: <Alex56171: <Memethecat> You noticed a detail? By Nalimov Tables, all seven possible moves of the black king wins the game. Some in 16, others in 18 moves. It is a broader concept than triangulation, isn't it?>

The concept is broad, and it's called coordinate square theory. As I said, this is a fairly simple example of it, and triangulation is sufficient to win it. But there are some fascinating studies in which mapping is really essential: With more pawns, one often has to remember, e.g., that if the defender's king moves to c8, the attacker must move his to f5 to preserve the win.

Sep-07-12  tivrfoa: <Tiggler> Probably. He had a very strong endgame.
Sep-07-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: < chillowack: ....Alburt didn't actually play in the 1978 USSR Championship (possibly he had already defected to America by that point)....>

Alburt defected in 1979.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lev_Al...

Sep-07-12  RookFile: The position after 28....Qf2 must be drawable for white, if not easy. 29. h3 comes to mind, obviously Alburt was concerned with black setting up ....Be5 and Qg3. However, even if black gets all that in, white can run with Kg1. Maybe he should have played 29. h3 anyway. I realize that b2 drops, but white can actively put his queen on d5 or something. That would be a real tough ending for black to win.
Dec-20-18  MrJafari: Does an extra pawn results to win here?
Oct-24-20  fisayo123: Kasparov was barely 15 here. He won this qualifier for the Soviet championship filled with hungry, strong Soviet GM's held in Daugavpils.
Apr-11-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  marcusantoinerome: The position after 55. Kf1 is the same position in #1027 (page 242) of the Encyclopedia of Chess Endings Volume I (pawn endings). Except there the colors are reversed, and it says it's from the game "Fahrni-Alapin". However, I've not been able to find that game on chessgames.com. Perhaps it was a non-tournament game?
Apr-11-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <marcusantoinerome> Have you seen Edward Winter's article on the matter? https://www.chesshistory.com/winter... Quick summary: this ending appears several in old chess manuals, Fahrni himself vaguely attributed it to a Fahrni-Alapin game, and that game has never been found.
Apr-11-23  stone free or die: An endgame position worth studying, nice notice by <marcusantoinerome>.

<beat> - just wondering, did you just remember Winter's article off the top of your head?

Thanks for the link - I either never saw it, or completely forgot it.

Aug-28-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: There seems to be a great improvement to 12...Qa5 in the form of Nd4


click for larger view

So it implies a potential double pawn sac :

Bxc5

And we have Nxe2+ with Qc8 in mind :)

Feb-06-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Kaspy just too talented.

I submitted a pun for a very interesting game, Kasparov v. Alburt, <Murder by Numbers>.

if memory serves, Kasparov traded his Queen for three minors and strangled his opponent in a loooong mating net. It was a thing of beauty.

Feb-06-24  The Kings Domain: Solid and impressive win by the young Kasparov.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC