chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

FSR
Member since Aug-27-05 · Last seen Apr-28-25
I am Frederick Rhine. The United States Chess Federation awarded me the titles of National Master (at OTB chess) in 1983, and Senior Master of Correspondence Chess in 1997. In February 2024, less than a year after I began playing in the ICCF, it awarded me the title of Correspondence Chess Master. It looks like later this year I will qualify for the title of International Correspondence Chess Master.

I am currently the third highest-rated player on the USCF's list of the top correspondence chess players in the country. In January 2025, I was the second highest-rated player, rated just three points below perennial leader Michael Buss. https://www.uschess.org/component/o...

The August 2020 issue of Chess Life magazine had a profile of me (for the text, see Frederick Rhine (my August 1, 2020 comment in the forum)).

I played in the 1997 USCF Absolute Championship (open to the top 13 correspondence players who accept their invitations), scoring 6-6 (+2 =8 -2). The late Alex Dunne wrote in his book on the Absolute Championships, "This was Rhine's only Absolute and he held his own against the best. His two losses were against previous Absolute winners." http://bit.ly/1NB55YP That book contains my games F Rhine vs R Lifson, 1997 and F Rhine vs D Burris, 1997.

But the 1997 event was not my only Absolute. I have also played in the 2023-25 events. In the 2023 edition, I drew all 12 games. That was enough to tie for second! Unlike the 1997 event, this one was under ICCF auspices and allowed the use of engines. There was only one decisive game! https://www.iccf.com/event?id=101114 In the 2024 Absolute, I have ten draws and a win(!), with just one game left, which will very likely end in a draw. https://www.iccf.com/event?id=105325 This time +1 will probably only be enough to tie for third. I have also begun play in the 2025 Absolute, with six draws so far.

I have played first board for the Rogue Squadron in the Chicago Industrial Chess League. I have played online for the Shropshire & Friends team in the 4 Nations Chess League (4NCL), and the Oswestry team in the Shropshire League.

I attended Lane Technical High School in Chicago with the late Chessgames.com co-founder Alberto A Artidiello until he moved out of Chicago. Lane's chess team won the Illinois state championship my junior and senior years, becoming the first school ever to win consecutive championships. Albert also became a master, as did my teammates Kenneth Mohr and Christopher Kus. The late FIDE Masters Albert Charles Chow and Morris Giles were also Laneites.

In July 2013, I played in my second and third regular-rated tournaments of the millennium(!), the Greater Midwest Classic and the Chicago Class (under-2200 section). I tied for second, undefeated, in both, winning $700 and $550, respectively, and brought my rating back over 2200. http://www.uschess.org/assets/msa_j... http://www.uschess.org/assets/msa_j...

I have contributed to hundreds of chess-related articles on Wikipedia under the handle Krakatoa, notably "First-move advantage in chess," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-... "George H. D. Gossip," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George... and "Swindle (chess)," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_..., all of which are almost entirely written by me. The first two of those have been Today's Featured Article, the highest honor a Wikipedia article can receive, one attained by about one out of every 1,400 articles. I have received various Wikipedia awards, including the Imperial Triple Crown Jewels and the Timeless Imperial Triple Crown (which only 12 Wikipedians have received). My user page is at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:K.... Al Lawrence in the aforementioned Chess Life article referred to my "erudite chess articles on Wikipedia." Chess historian Edward Winter in his article "Wikipedia and Chess" commended my Wikipedia articles on Gossip and Hugh Edward Myers. (The latter article is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_....) https://www.chesshistory.com/winter...

I am the editor and proofreader of the book "Tournament Battle Plan: Optimize Your Chess Results!" by Daniel Gormally. I was the proofreader of the book "Triple Exclam!!! The Life and Games of Emory Tate, Chess Warrior" by Daaim Shabazz.

I was a contributor to the now-defunct Chicago Chess Blog, http://chicagochess.blogspot.com. I discovered, and documented in my blog post https://chicagochess.blogspot.com/2..., what Taylor Kingston calls "the Mortimer Effect," which has lowered the Morphy Numbers of many modern players (maybe you!). https://chesscafe.com/the-skittles-... I have a Morphy Number of 4 by virtue of L Barden vs F Rhine, 2010 as well as two simul games I lost to Arthur Bisguier when I was in high school.

Four hundred and ninety-four of my games are in chessgames.com's database. My favorites are F Rhine vs D Sprenkle, 1981, K Thompson vs F Rhine, 1992, and F Rhine vs A Boerkoel, 1996, each of which has been Game of the Day. Rhine-Sprenkle was published with my annotations in Chess Informant (Volume 32) and cited in the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings (Vol. B (2nd ed.) at 183 n.19). In Volume 33 of Chess Informant, my 18th move (18.Nxd6!) in that game was voted the 8th-9th most important theoretical novelty in Volume 32. The game was also cited in MCO-13 and "The Aggressive Nimzowitsch Sicilian 2...Nf6" by Eric Schiller, and occupies an entire chapter in all three editions of "Beating the Sicilian" by John Nunn. It is game 218 in "1000 TN!! The Best Theoretical Novelties" (Chess Informant, 2012). Anish Giri, in his 2023 Chessable course "Lifetime Repertoires: Giri's 1. e4 - Part 3" recommends this line for White. https://www.chessable.com/lifetime-... Following my game against Sprenkle, he writes after 22.Be3, "The computer evaluates this as completely hopeless for Black and it is. Our king is in fact much safer, thanks to our much better pieces." https://www.chessable.com/learn/159... More than 40 years after I played the game, my line still kicks ass!


click for larger view

Thompson-Rhine was published with my annotations in Chess Informant (Volume 57), and cited in the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings (Vol. B (3rd ed.) at 172 n.163). Jeremy Silman discusses the game and my analysis of it in his book "Winning with the Sicilian Defence" (2nd ed.).

Joel Johnson in his book "Attacking 101: Volume #005" says of my blitz game F Rhine vs NN, 2019, "White played a flawless Smith-Morra Gambit that IM Marc Esserman would have been proud of." Georges Koltanowski published F Rhine vs A Artidiello, 1974 in his syndicated newspaper column. Richard Palliser discusses the opening of F Rhine vs S Nagle, 1997 in his book "tango!"

I have played some theoretically significant correspondence games in the Damiano Variation of Petroff's Defense (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 Nxe4!?), demonstrating that Black's third move, commonly regarded as a blunder, is fully playable. https://www.chessgames.com/perl/che... D Brorens vs N Ntirlis, 2023 analyzes two of my games in an article on the variation in Volume 158 of Chess Informant. Cyrus Lakdawala and Carsten Hansen include five of my games in their book on the line, "None Shall Pass: The Unbeatable Damiano Petroff: A tricky and surprisingly solid defense."

Jacob Aagaard analyzes the endings of two of my Internet blitz games in his 896-page tome "A Matter of Endgame Technique" (alas, mine was lacking). Cyrus Lakdawala includes my study-like win in F Rhine vs A Zhao, 2019 in his book "Tactical Training in the Endgame." He also mentions me, albeit not by name, in his book "In the Zone: The Greatest Winning Streaks in Chess History" when he refers to "The Classical Sicilian, which as one of my atheist students told me, is the closest thing he has to a religion." Cyrus analyzes my game against Gadir Guseinov in his book "The Makogonov Variation: A ruthless King's Indian killer."

Commentator Mato Jelic somewhat extravagantly calls my game E Sollano vs F Rhine, 1977 "The Greatest Ever Blitz Game Played in Chicago." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl8... See also Suren's analysis at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWa... My 7...Bxc5!! in that game, played the year before Boris Avrukh was born, is a big improvement on the flaccid 7...Bg6, his recommendation in the book "Beating 1.d4 Sidelines" (2012).

Someone also made a video (moves only) of J Aagaard vs F Rhine, 2021, a 2-1 bullet game where I drew and should've beaten the grandmaster - if only I'd had time! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-O... Someone else (or perhaps two different people) did a video (moves only) of Tal vs F Rhine, 1988, my loss to the great Mikhail Tal in a simul. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfk... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3o... The latter refers to me as a "great grandmaster!" which isn't quite accurate . . .

User: JimmyVermeer discusses my games NN vs F Rhine, 2021, P Pantelidakis vs F Rhine, 1974, and P Napetschnig vs F Rhine, 1977 in his video "The 109 fastest checkmates in chess history, part 10 of 11." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GT... The sequel "The 109 fastest checkmates in chess history, part 11 of 11," contains a Fool's Mate I played, which I had mentioned in a comment on this site. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0Z... Napetschnig-Rhine is also mentioned in https://www.chess.com/terms/fools-m.... Rick Kennedy discusses my game F Rhine vs NN, 2018 on his Jerome Gambit blog. https://jeromegambit.blogspot.com/2... My game F Rhine vs NN, 2010 is mentioned in the "Checkmate Patterns Course" by Raf Mesotten and John Bartholomew on chessable.com.

I composed this study, which Pal Benko published in "Benko's Bafflers" in Chess Life, May 2006:

White to play and draw


click for larger view

The solution is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stale... It is based on an earlier study of mine, also published in Benko's column. Both compositions also appear in Harold van der Heijden's endgame study database. https://www.chess.com/news/view/76-... The above study is also cited in "The Complete Chess Swindler" by David Smerdon and "Rewire Your Chess Brain: Endgame Studies and Mating Problems to Enhance Your Tactical Ability" by Cyrus Lakdawala.

I was once one of the world's best players at suicide chess (also known as "losing chess"), a chess variant where one wins by giving away all of one's pieces. http://perpetualcheck.com/antichess...

I have successfully submitted 231 puns for Game of the Day. Game Collection: Puns I submitted. User: johnlspouge has remarked, "As far as I can tell, <FSR> is churning out 'actual puns' almost as fast as I can [insert bodily function of choice]." K Tjolsen vs S Marder, 2010. The coveted 2013 Caissar for Best (Worst) Pun went to "Control-Ault-Delete," the pun I submitted for Fischer vs R Ault, 1959, the Game of the Day on December 19, 2012. I won the 2019 Caissar in the same category for my greatest pun ever (and IMO one of the greatest chessgames puns ever) "Late December Back in '63: What a Lady, What a Knight!," N Littlewood vs B Brinck-Claussen, 1963, the Game of the Day on December 30, 2019. Since Caissars are awarded in January, my wins may illustrate recency bias. My pun "A Fine Attack" for I A Horowitz vs Fine, 1934 holds the record for the longest known time elapsed between pun submission and use as GOTD: 12 years, 4 months, and 18 days.

Nine of my games have been Game of the Day: NN vs F Rhine, 1977 ("Strangers on a Train"), F Rhine vs F Lasch, 1986 ("Lasch Call"), K Thompson vs F Rhine, 1992 ("Like a Rhinestone Cowboy"), R Delaune vs F Rhine, 1997 ("Red Red Rhine"), F Rhine vs D Burris, 1997 ("Fred Rhine Felled"), F Felecan vs F Rhine, 2019 ("Felecan Brief"), F Rhine vs D Sprenkle, 1981 ("Sparkling Rhine"), F Rhine vs A Boerkoel, 1996 ("Das Rhinegold"), and F Rhine vs NN, 2018 ("'Twas the Night Before Christmas"). Six wins, a draw, and two losses.

I am responsible for World Junior Championship (1957), Vidmar Memorial (1969), Carlsen - Anand World Championship Match (2014), Game Collection: Drawing lines, and 32nd Correspondence World Championship (2020), among others. Legendary chess journalist Leonard Barden recently told me in an email, "I follow your many thoughtful contributions to chessgames.com with interest."

I am a member of the ChessBookie Hall of Fame, having finished fourth in the Summer 2015 Leg, seventh in the Winter 2016 Championship Leg, ninth in the Winter 2017 Championship Leg, ninth in the Spring 2017 Leg, and seventh in the Summer 2017 Leg.

I am very active on Chessable, where my handle is "Krakatoa." https://www.chessable.com/profile/K... I am a "Legend" and have 134 badges, five shy of the world record held by maestro. https://www.chessable.com/badges/Kr...

>> Click here to see FSR's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   FSR has kibitzed 29378 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Apr-28-25 Kenneth Rogoff (replies)
 
FSR: <moronovich> That reminds me of a joke (or maybe more a comment) that I heard about Trump attending the Pope's funeral: <Trump was upset that the funeral wasn't about him. So was everyone else.>
 
   Apr-28-25 W Napier vs Pillsbury, 1904
 
FSR: This is a Philidor by transposition, not a Rat.
 
   Apr-28-25 Marshall vs Pillsbury, 1904 (replies)
 
FSR: Pillsbury was already dying of syphilis. This was his last tournament. He died two years later. A sad end. Had he stayed away from that hooker in St. Petersburg, he coulda been a contender.
 
   Apr-28-25 Janowski vs Lasker, 1904
 
FSR: Certainly Marshall did more than "swindle" in this tournament. He won by two points over Lasker and Janowski, winning 11 games and drawing the other 4. A staggering achievement, undoubtedly the tournament of his life.
 
   Apr-28-25 chessgames.com chessforum
 
FSR: I submitted a game Ingersol-Walton a few minutes ago. This tag should be added to the PGN: [Source " https://www.iccf.com/game?id=1530065 "] Thanks.
 
   Apr-28-25 FSR chessforum
 
FSR: Submitted: [Event "USCF/WS/25A01 (USA)"] [Site "ICCF"] [Date "2025.03.03"] [White "Barclay, Dean"] [Black "Rodriguez, Keith A."] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "E00"] [WhiteElo "2138"] [BlackElo "2399"] [PlyCount "37"] [Source " ...
 
   Apr-27-25 C Aarefjord vs Carlsen, 2001
 
FSR: Carlsen, just 10 at the time, evidently didn't know about the fork trick 4...Nxe4!, when Black has already equalized and gets a large plus score in practice. Opening Explorer . Of course White is still OK with precise play. Stockfish 17.1 gives 5.Nxe4 d5 6.Bd3 dxe4 7.Bxe4 Bd6 8.d4 exd4 ...
 
   Apr-27-25 Tarrasch vs Alekhine, 1923
 
FSR: <Retireborn> Keres had 65.7% in 226 games. Repertoire Explorer: Paul Keres (black) . Karpov 58.5% in 182 games. Repertoire Explorer: Anatoly Karpov (black) . Of course as time goes by the general standard of play improves, so it's impossible to put up such gaudy numbers. Carlsen ...
 
   Apr-27-25 L Vadasz vs C Balogh, 2000
 
FSR: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuE...
 
   Apr-27-25 E Zanan vs M Kerner, 2015
 
FSR: 4.d3? is a mistake (4.Nc3!). After 4...e4! 5.Ng5 (the only try), 5...Qf6! is best, when White must play 6.d4. Then 6...cxd4 7.Nxe4 Qe5 gives Black a large advantage.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 28 OF 147 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-18-13  goldenbear: <hms123> <FSR> Thanks for the info. How disappointing...
Feb-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <goldenbear> As you said, 6...Nf6 is way too logical to have much chance of being a TN. If you'd played some random move that resulted in White checkmating you on the next move, <that> might have been a novelty. Alas, it would have had no more theoretical value than, say, 3.Ke2?? in the Center Counter, Lindemann vs Echtermeyer, 1893, or 2...Ke7?? against the Parham Attack, E Schiller vs H Pack, 1969.
Feb-19-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <FSR> Another one for castling when one's rook is under attack.

This was played in the second round of the Jim Bulger Memorial on 14th January 1984 at the old Boylston Chess Club in downtown Boston.

AS (White)- Patrick Wolff began thus, in a then-topical line against the Benko:

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.e3 g6 6.Nc3 Bg7 7.Nf3 0-0 8.a4 e6 9.dxe6 fxe6 10.Qd6 axb5 11.Bxb5 Bb7 12.Qxc5 Ng4 13.Be2 Nc6 14.Qg5 Qxg5 15.Nxg5 Nxf2


click for larger view

In the post-mortem, Wolff noted that he had analysed this far with Jim Rizzitano and concluded that Black's chances were not bad, but was shocked when I played 16.0-0 with little thought-apparently, neither of them realised this was possible during their joint analysis.

Feb-20-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <perfidious> I have castled twice in blitz games in that sort of situation - once in the past year in an Internet game, the other time circa 1975. Of course, F A Hoffmann vs A Petrov, 1844, is the famous exemplar of that.
Feb-20-13  Shams: <FSR>, <perfidious> Anybody have an anti-Tromp line they like? I'm looking at <1.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5 e6>:


click for larger view

Either 3...c5 or 3...h6 immediately seem like the most popular. Thoughts? I just got crushed in blitz by an FM and the line is annoying me.

Feb-20-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Shams> My favourite was 2....c5. In 1984, I played this in my first serious game with Art Bisguier and got a clear edge in the middlegame after he played inaccurately.

About the last time I faced 2.Bg5 was 1989, when Tom Zuppa played 3.Nc3 and the game continued 3....cxd4 4.Qxd4 Nc6 5.Qh4. Zuppa then played e4, castled long and we wound up in a position analogous to the Chekhover line in the Sicilian.

Don't know anything about 2....h6 or 2....Ne4, except that the latter can lead to very sharp play.

Feb-20-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: I've always played 2...Ne4 against the Tromp, but don't claim to be an authority on it. Opening Explorer shows 2...c5 to be the best-scoring of Black's principal responses (just over 50% for White), followed by 2...e6. 2...Ne4 is the most popular move, but doesn't score very well. Then there's 2...c6, setting the sleazy trap 3.e3?? Qa5+. 2...c6 scores 50%, but in only 50 games. 2...Ng8!! gets a perfect 2/2 score, but I have a hard time taking that move seriously.
Feb-20-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: <FSR: 2...Ng8!! gets a perfect 2/2 score, but I have a hard time taking that move seriously.>

That both of those games continued <3. Bc1> doesn't really help matters :-)

Feb-20-13  goldenbear: <Shams> I remember thinking 1.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5 Ne4 3.Bf4 c5 4.f3 Qa5+ is a practical refutation of the Tromp because Black has such an easy game, but it's been a while since I've faced it. Once in a 15-minutes/game tournament I gave 2.g6 a try and was literally checkmated in 10 moves! In retrospect, I wish I'd written down the score of that game because, thinking back on it, I am perplexed as to how that is possible. I remember that the final move was 10.h6# and that I never saw it coming. After that I decided I'd stick to the main lines in the Tromp.
Feb-20-13  Shams: Thanks all. From what I understand the <2...e6> systems are giving White something of a fit at top levels, though there's nothing wrong with <2...Ne4> either.

I'll share a nugget I just unearthed, apparently little-known: one advantage of <2...Ne4> is you can meet Miladinovic's (admittedly rare and slightly dubious but nevertheless played) <3.h4?!> with <3...c5 4.dxc5 d5! 5.cxd5 e.p.> (instead two correspondence games went 5.Nd2 Nxc5 and Black was both times able to convert his more comfortable position) <5...Qb6!>:


click for larger view

Looks tasty.

Source: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yab...

Feb-21-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> Another funny trap is 2...Ne4 3.Bh4 c5 4.Qd3?!, when Black can win a pawn with 4...Qb6! 5.b3 Qh6!? 6.Nf3 (6.Qxe4?? Qc1#) Qc1+ 7.Qd1 Qb2! 8.Nbd2 Nxd2 9.Nxd2 Qxd4. http://www.365chess.com/view_game.p... See diagram for the position after 5.b3.


click for larger view

Interestingly, however, I see that Houdini considerably prefers (by about .5) the non-greedy 5...d5 (instead of 5...Qh6) 6.dxc5 (or 6.Nf3 Nc6) Qh6! 7.Nf3 g5! 8.Bg3 Nc6.


click for larger view

Note that now 9.Qxd5? g4! is winning for Black. White's best is 9.Nfd2 Bg7! 10.c3 Nxg3 11.Qxg3 d4 and White's position is abysmal.

Feb-21-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> Incidentally, I think that Hodgson is usually credited (if that's the right word) with 2...Ne4 3.h4!? He played it years before Miladinovic did. http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches... Miladinovic does seem to be a big exponent of 3...c5 4.dxc5, though. There, too, Hodgson beat him to the punch, http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches..., but Miladinovic has been a much more consistent exponent, whereas Hodgson seems to have usually preferred 4.d5. M Schulingkamp vs A J Goldsby, 1997 is an interesting game in the latter line (seriously), though not theoretically significant. Here's an amusing Tromp hyper-miniature, not featuring model play by either side. O Gant vs K Kauschmann, 1988
Feb-21-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <FSR> On reflecting about that snippet from the sharp anti-Benko variation I posted above, inter alia, seems to me that my play after 1.d4 Nf6 then was more interesting-if full of time trouble messes and lacking in discipline-than towards the end of career, when I began wimping out with 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 those last couple years or so.

Did the approach of middle age cause a change in your game, too?

Feb-21-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <perfidious> I've played only very rarely after college. Lately I've gotten a lot more aggressive, though this manifests itself almost exclusively in blitz games. But I am actually playing in a tournament in a couple of weeks.
Feb-21-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <FSR> A tournament? You, sir?

Per my remarks in the last post, the irony was that as Black against 1.d4, my aggro only ramped up later, by the 1990s, when I started getting to be an old bugger. The evolution was the reverse of the young tactical tigers who learn positional chess when they grow old.

From 1991-95, lots of King's Indians, then the Leningrad Dutch and even the odd Modern Benoni (only after 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3/g3, though-hated the idea of facing my old favourite the Taimanov).

Feb-21-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <goldenbear> It's sad that you don't have the score of that game ending with 10.h6#. It must be one of the fastest games ever to conclude with h6#. I searched the ~5.5 million games in Mega Database 2013, and the fastest game with h6# was 21 moves.
Feb-22-13  goldenbear: <FSR> Indeed, it's hard to imagine a help-mate that could occur within 10 moves in a Tromp, but that's basically what this was. I remember the opening was d4 Nf6 Bg5 g6 Bxf6 exf6, and that I made some mistake that I realized was a positional blunder and then trying to create some chances I dug the hole deeper. I think the finish was 8.h5 Kf7 9.Bc4+ Kg7 10.h6#, and that I was mated because I had the ugly pawn formation h7,g6,f6,f5, with a bishop on f8 and a rook on h8. Whatever made me think advancing my f-pawns was a practical chance, I can't explain. I remember I could have blocked 9.d5 after Bc4+, but I didn't see h6#. 2.g6?! seems like a good idea what with the open e-file and a secure king, but I've never witnessed anyone win a game that way.
Feb-23-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <goldenbear> You've already described most of the moves of the game. Here's a game I've composed like yours, but with mate on move 8:

1. d4 Nf6 2. Bg5 g6 3. Bxf6 exf6 4. e3 f5 5. h4 f6 6. h5 Kf7 7. Bc4+ Kg7 8. h6#


click for larger view

Now if you can just figure out what the other two moves by each side were, you'll have reconstructed your game.

Feb-26-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: I just submitted this game to CG.com:

[Event "Reggio Emilia 8485 27th"]
[Site "Reggio Emilia"]
[Date "1984.??.??"]
[EventDate "1984.12.??"]
[Round "6"]
[White "Garcia Martinez, Silvino"]
[Black "Kurajica, Bojan"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "E11"]
[WhiteElo "2500"]
[BlackElo "2530"]
[PlyCount "58"]

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. g3 d5 4. Nf3 Bb4+ 5. Bd2 Be7 6. Bg2 c6 7. Qb3 b6 8. Bb4 dxc4 9. Qxc4 Qd5 10. Qc3 Ne4 11. Bxe7 Nxc3 12. Nxc3 Qd7 13. Ba3 f6 14. O-O Bb7 15. Rfd1 Na6 16. Ne4 O-O-O 17. Nd6+ Kb8 18. e4 c5 19. e5 Bd5 20. dxc5 Nxc5 21.b4 Qa4 22. bxc5 Qxa3 23. Nd4 fxe5 24. N4b5 Qxc5 25. Rac1 Qb4 26. Bxd5 exd5 27. Rc6 d4 28. a3 Qb3 29. Rdc1 Qd5 0-1

Comment: An interesting game between grandmasters that features a surprising opening trap.

------

I saw the position after White's 9th move on chesstempo.com, then looked up the game. Can <you> solve it (without peeking at the score above)?


click for larger view

9...?

Mar-01-13  Shams: <FSR> When did you say your upcoming weekend tournament was?
Mar-01-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> Tomorrow.
Mar-03-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: I just submitted this game to CG.com:

[Event "Chicago Open"]
[Site "Chicago"]
[Date "2012.05.28"]
[EventDate "2012.05.??"]
[Round "6"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "Burgess, Jon"]
[Black "Auger, Michael"]
[ECO "B87"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[PlyCount "91"]

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bc4 e6 7.Bb3 b5 8.Qe2 Qb6 9.Be3 Qb7 10.f3 Nc6 11.O-O Bd7 12.Rfd1 Rc8 13.Nxc6 Bxc6 14.Bf4 b4 15.Nd5 Nh5 16.Qe3 Nxf4 17.Nxf4 Be7 18.Nd3 O-O 19.Re1 Rfd8 20.Kh1 Rc7 21.a3 bxa3 22.Rxa3 d5 23.exd5 Bxd5 24.Bxd5 Rxd5 25.Rb3 Rb5 26.Rxb5 Qxb5 27.Re2 Bf6 28.g3 a5 29.Kg2 a4 30.Qe4 Qa5 31.c4 g6 32.Rc2 Qf5 33.Qe2 Bd4 34.Nf2 Rb7 35.Ne4 Qe5 36.f4 Qb8 37.c5 Rxb2 38.Rxb2 Bxb2 39.c6 a3 40.Qa6 Qb3 41.Kh3 a2 42.c7 a1=Q 43.c8=Q+ Kg7 44.Qd6 Kh6 45.Qe7 f6 46.Qcf8+ 1-0

Mar-03-13  morfishine: <FSR> Those were some impressive correspondence games you posted over at the 'Fleetwood Mac' game. I'm curious, what was your highest rating? And whatever it was, or is, no aspirations to go higher?
Mar-03-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <morfishine> My peak USCF correspondence rating was 2498. It is currently 2412. I am pretty sure I could get an IMC (International Master of Correspondence Chess) title, and possibly higher. I stopped playing correspondence chess once computers got super-strong. In international correspondence chess these days, computers are allowed, so I'm not sure that one even has to be a good player in order to get a high rating. The USCF still bans them, but realistically there's no way to know if your opponent is using one (probably more than one, actually).
Mar-04-13  morfishine: <FSR> Here's a thought: If one were to examine a great correspondence player, for example, Hans Berliner, we know he didn't use an engine since they weren't around yet; and assuming he was allowed to 'move the pieces around' and finally, taking into account the time allowed per move, (which I think 1-week was standard), his games were of such a high quality, Can we conclude that an engine would be of little value for a player of this caliber? I look at some of his games, and some of his moves and innovations were so fantastic, that these bear a striking resemblance to engine-generated solutions, yet we know his games were not computer-assisted. You see what I'm getting at?

I mean, I think that if you give a GM that much time per move and only the ability to 'move the pieces around', whether physically or on a analysis board, I don't really think an engine would be needed. In other words, engines improve the quality only for lower-rated players. Or to put it another way, given enough time, a GM could do everything that an engine does (blunder-checking, etc.).

Or am I way off base here?

BTW: Have you seriously considered making a serious push to get your rating above the magic number 2500? You are so close to that figure. Just wondering

Thanks, Morf

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 147)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 28 OF 147 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC