< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 147 OF 237 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Aug-07-20 | | Big Pawn: < tpstar: <I found me a little tattle tale cry baby (unrelated to our discussions here) and have decided to act proactively and put him on [ignore] so that he can't make trouble for us here with his girly whining at any time in the future.> Someone new to the group might not know any better, especially when other posters (who should know better) use the Member Support Forum to report individual violations of the Posting Guidelines. He was trying to make things better and not worse. I hope you give him another chance. =).> Nope!
He's a little bitch and I've seen all I need to see. The guys in this forum need to be able to cut loose sometimes as men do and say what they've got to say when they're <heated>, without worrying about some little SOY BOY trying to control them like it's a 3rd grade classroom. Girly tattletales will not make it to this <excluse> (not inclusive!) forum. |
|
Aug-07-20
 | | Keyser Soze: Why MSM are so shy to talk about <Hesbollah> now?? https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.jpos... |
|
Aug-07-20 | | Big Pawn: This is a place for the <men> to hang out and be men - but <Jessica Tunafish Queen> can visit too if she wants, because she's not a sensitive little snowflake and she understands politics so she's not a <Boring Chick>. But aside from <JFQ>, this is a place where we can marinate in <Toxic Masculinity>. This is a forum where all the men stand up to pee. heh
This place is full of cigar smoke and no one is complaining about it (eh, I don't smoke tho...). This is not a <Man Cave>. No, this is a den. Do you guys remember when men had a <den> to sit in, relax, study, read, research, listen to music? Nowadays they have this thing called a <Man Cave>. Again, it's one of those things where men are made to look like idiotic overgrown children, where they sit in recliners draped in their favorite sports team branding, and they dress in these stupid shirts with numbers on them and some other guy's name on them, and they eat buffalo wings and drink beer and talk about tits, sports and carry on cussing and acting like a fool. We are not overgrown boys in this forum. This forum hearkens back to the days when men were men, not overgrown boys being babysat by their wives who are acting as their mothers. This forum hearkens back to the days when a man had a den in his house, not a damn <man cave>! A cave is for <knuckledraggers>. A <man cave> is a place where a submissive man is *allowed* by his wife-mother to pretend to be a <cave man> for a while with his friends and do "guy stuff" - until mom-wife says it's time to put your toys away and for your friends to go home. We will not use <the lib's> language. We will control the narrative by using the correct language. This forum is the <den>, not the <man cave>. So let it be written... |
|
Aug-07-20 | | Big Pawn: That <savage sanctuary> soy boy is <zanzibar> on another sock. He's trying to slime his way back into the community after his pathetic, silent protest utterly failed to win him any support. He's too embarrassed now to come back as <Zanzibar>, so he uses these socks, but he's so unmanly that his unmistakably cuck persona just leaks through and he can't help it. No trolls, cry babies, time wasters or cucks allowed in the <New Rogoff Page>. |
|
Aug-07-20
 | | tpstar: <That <savage sanctuary> soy boy is <zanzibar> on another sock.> Disagree. <zanzibar>'s identity was revealed two years ago, if you were paying attention, then he hasn't used the <z> handle in over a year. He was one of the strongest players here, FIDE 2400, frequently posting puzzles and combinations. He was also a shameless opportunist, trying so hard to weasel in with the site owner, making it hilariously funny when he couldn't figure out whether <Sneaky> was <Daniel>, or whether <Daniel> was <Sneaky>, or oh this is all so confusing. I will get off it.
<No trolls, cry babies, time wasters or cucks> OK. |
|
Aug-07-20
 | | jessicafischerqueen:
<Braised Prawns on a bed of crisp grain-fed lettuce with drizzled creamery butter and freshly squeezed lemon juice> Thanks for the shoutout!
I won't really be debating or politicking at cg.com any more. Nowadays I prefer to do that on the horror movie groups on Facebook. Why, you might ask.
An excellent question, and thanks for asking!
Facebook is a popular punching bag, but I have slowly come to learn that <Mark Zukkerborg> is making zero (0) effort to moderate anything posted on the horror groups. I'm certainly not being censored there at any rate. On that topic I do like your idea of a "free speech" forum, and I wish you and colleagues well with that. I want to avoid getting into political wrangles at cg.com because that invariably draws me into internecine squabbles with folks with whom I would prefer to remain on cordial terms. |
|
Aug-07-20 | | thegoodanarchist: @<jessicaFaceBookqueen> That <Mark Zukkerberg Lettuce> fellow is an enemy of the American people. I quite FB in 2012 and won't go back.
If you bought FB stock when it went public, though, you've done quite well. |
|
Aug-07-20 | | diceman: <OhioChessFan: Ashley Todd vs Rachel Miller, 2020 I definitely feel sorry for Ashley Todd. She strangely evokes thoughts of Joe Biden> A Democrat would say:
"You didn't lose a chess game, you learned how to resign!" |
|
Aug-07-20 | | thegoodanarchist: I have a difficult time trying to understand why a person would post something that is so obviously wrong. For example, someone in Rogoff said that a woman’s looks are not important. And <savage sanctuary > then distanced himself from the idea that looks are important, to agree. What?? Why would anyone subscribe to such foolishness? I can only guess that such people were raised by fat, sloppy feminists and never abandoned the dishonest internal dialogue they were taught |
|
Aug-07-20 | | diceman: <tpstar:
He was one of the strongest players here, FIDE 2400, frequently posting puzzles and combinations.> I thought that mattered until I saw this site. |
|
Aug-07-20 | | diceman: <Keyser Soze:
Why MSM are so shy to talk about <Hesbollah> now??> Problems in the world don't favor Biden. |
|
Aug-07-20 | | thegoodanarchist: Cigarette smoke is much more noxious than cigar smoke, IMO. And I am an ex cigarette smoker |
|
Aug-07-20 | | Big Pawn: I can't wait until the Trump-Biden debates!
Biden: "And that all men were created equal by, by, you know. The thing. Potato!" I think the regular American folks who haven't really tuned in yet to the election are going to be shocked when they see the shape Biden is in. Will he be more or less forced to undergo a mental health examination after the first debate? It's going to be a nightmare for old Joe. He doesn't know what day it is, isn't fit to drive a car, his son is a crackhead who is in the pocket of the Commie Chinese with Joe's help, he's seen on video bragging about how he strong armed Ukraine into firing the prosecutor who was investigating his son and he's been exposed for his part in an administration that illegally spied on Trump the candidate. Not only that, but Trump has his miracle record to run on. It's not just promises anymore. Trump has a great advantage now in that he can run on his record. How will the liberal media keep Joe from having to debate Trump? What's their plan going to be? They better get working on a No Debate Needed narrative now if they plan to go that route. |
|
Aug-07-20 | | Everett: <Big Pawn: What's important when it comes to women? Attractiveness is first and foremost. A woman should be in shape and take care to make herself look beautiful at all times.> I agree, mostly. Pleasantness is another, tho. Taming of the Shrew is a thing. A sweet 6 has more of a shot with me than an entitled cooont 9. |
|
Aug-07-20 | | Everett: <BP> and just Meditations by MA. I’ve read Plato’s Republic as well, not familiar with other major works by MA |
|
Aug-07-20 | | Everett: <TGA> you know that most (thirsty, beta, blue-pull) men find it almost impossible to say anything negative about women. Thus, looks can’t be important |
|
Aug-07-20
 | | gezafan: I don't think the Democrats will allow Biden to debate Trump. Trump will make Biden look very bad. Not only does Trump have a good record to talk about, a record some liberals have never heard about because of a biased media, Trump also will expose Biden as being mentally deficient. The Democrats might try to put a receiver in Biden's ear to tell him what to say. They might give that a shot if they think Biden could handle it. But Trump one on one with Biden? Biden wouldn't have a chance. |
|
Aug-07-20 | | thegoodanarchist: <Everett> Even before I got red-pilled I always knew I’d rather become a monk than get with a fat sloppy bich. Too much self respect to go hogging |
|
Aug-07-20 | | diceman: <Big Pawn:
How will the liberal media keep Joe from having to debate Trump? What's their plan going to be?> Chronic, chronic laryngitis. |
|
Aug-08-20 | | Big Pawn: < Everett: <Big Pawn: What's important when it comes to women? Attractiveness is first and foremost. A woman should be in shape and take care to make herself look beautiful at all times.> I agree, mostly. Pleasantness is another, tho. Taming of the Shrew is a thing.> Yes, pleasantness is a big part of it. No one really likes a <strong woman> if you know what I mean. <Strong woman> is a euphemism for pushy, disagreeable bitch. Excuse my foul language, but that's what it means. A <strong woman> is a woman who wants to wear the pants in the family. She wants to be the man of the house. That's a <strong woman>. That's fem-speak. It's true that a man prefers a pleasant woman rather than an unpleasant one. It's hard to find them in America, but we love a pleasant woman. |
|
Aug-08-20 | | Big Pawn: <gezafan: The Democrats might try to put a receiver in Biden's ear to tell him what to say. They might give that a shot if they think Biden could handle it.> I hadn't thought of that. I think it would further confuse old Joe. He wouldn't know what channel he's on! "You know, the thing!"
"Potato!"
Those voices talking to him in his ear when he's trying to talk himself or think, it would be a disaster. The libs must be suicidal with Joe "Out to Lunch" Biden as their candidate. |
|
Aug-08-20 | | diceman: <gezafan:
The Democrats might try to put a receiver in Biden's ear> Democrats implant electronics from
See'n say toy into Biden's head.
Hoping for:
First Debate:
1) Reporter: Candidate Biden, what is your economic plan? Biden: The cow says mooooooooo!
(puzzled look on libs faces)
2) Reporter: Candidate Biden, what is your plan to deal with China? Biden: The frog says ribbit!
(puzzled look on libs faces)
3) Reporter: Candidate Biden, what is your plan to deal with Police? Biden: The pig says oink, oink!
(libs go crazy) |
|
Aug-08-20 | | Big Pawn: <diceman: <gezafan: The Democrats might try to put a receiver in Biden's ear> Democrats implant electronics from
See'n say toy into Biden's head.
Hoping for:
First Debate:
1) Reporter: Candidate Biden, what is your economic plan? Biden: The cow says mooooooooo!
(puzzled look on libs faces) >
LOOOL! |
|
Aug-08-20 | | Big Pawn: <The ‘Long Night’ Falls on Twitter> https://www.amren.com/blog/2020/08/... Twitter now bans links to bitchute.
Bitchute is where people post their videos when the lib nazis at youtube ban them. It is the place where NON PC speech takes place. It's a short but informative article that all top level posters should read. |
|
Aug-08-20 | | Big Pawn: The libs are censoring non-lib speech all over the place these days. The question is why? It's not enough to say, "Because they don't like non-lib speech, that's why they ban it. They hate it" but is that the whole truth? If truth, logic, reason and reality were on their side, what would they have to fear from ideas that are untrue, illogical, unreasonable and unrealistic? They could easily engage those ideas and tear them down systematically and consistently, clearly demonstrating that lib ideas are proven to be superior over and over again in countless debates. So why don't they do this? Why resort to censoring non-lib speech? The reason is this: they know that the "forbidden ideas" and "forbidden speech" is powerful! They know that if the public at large were to see that the libs can't defend themselves in the arena of ideas, that people would start to abandon what the left has worked so hard to make mainstream. The libs know that they can't defeat our ideas in the intellectual arena, so what other choice do they have but to silence us? The snake eats its own tail eventually, as truth becomes the "forbidden fruit" and people are drawn to it precisely because it is off limits, but we are not there yet. |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 147 OF 237 ·
Later Kibitzing> |