chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Louis Stumpers
L Stumpers 
 

Number of games in database: 63
Years covered: 1932 to 1969
Overall record: +14 -35 =14 (33.3%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games.

Repertoire Explorer
Most played openings
D94 Grunfeld (3 games)
B59 Sicilian, Boleslavsky Variation, 7.Nb3 (2 games)
D31 Queen's Gambit Declined (2 games)
D45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav (2 games)
E60 King's Indian Defense (2 games)
E21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights (2 games)
C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense (2 games)


Search Sacrifice Explorer for Louis Stumpers
Search Google for Louis Stumpers

LOUIS STUMPERS
(born Aug-30-1911, died Sep-27-2003, 92 years old) Netherlands

[what is this?]

Frans Louis Henri Marie Stumpers was born in Eindhoven, Netherlands, on 30 August 1911. (1) He was champion of the Eindhoven Chess Club in 1938, 1939, 1946, 1947, 1948, 1949, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1955, 1957, 1958, 1961 and 1963, (2) and champion of the North Brabant Chess Federation (Noord Brabantse Schaak Bond, NBSB) in 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942, 1943, 1944, 1946, 1948, 1949, 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1955, 1959, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966 and 1967. (3) Stumpers participated in five Dutch Chess Championships, with his high-water mark a fourth place finish in 1948, (4) and represented his country at the 1st European Team Championship in Vienna in 1957 (two games, vs Josef Platt and Max Dorn). (5) From 1945 until about 1956, he was first Secretary and then Chairman of the NBSB. (3)

Stumpers was a physicist, and worked for the Philips company as an assistant from 1928. During 1934-1937, he studied at the University of Utrecht, where he took the master's degree. (6) In 1938 Stumpers was again employed at Philips, (6) and at a tournament in 1942, he supplied the hungry chess players with food from his employer. (3) After the war, Stumpers made a career in physics, with patents and awards on information ("radio") technology. He received degrees from several universities and colleges, including in Poland and Japan. (1, 3, 6) Stumpers retired from Philips in 1972, but continued teaching, (6) partly as professor at the University of Utrecht (1977-1981). (7) He was also Vice President (1975-1981) and Honorary President (1990-2003) of URSI, the International Union of Radio Science. (8)

Louis Stumpers married Mieke Driessen in 1954. They had five children, three girls and two boys. (6)

1) Online Familieberichten 1.0 (2016), http://www.online-familieberichten...., Digitaal Tijdschrift, 5 (255), http://www.geneaservice.nl/ar/2003/...
2) Eindhovense Schaakvereniging (2016), http://www.eindhovenseschaakverenig...
3) Noord Brabantse Schaak Bond (2016), http://www.nbsb.nl/pkalgemeen/pk-er... Their main page: http://www.nbsb.nl.
4) Schaaksite.nl (2016), http://www.schaaksite.nl/2016/01/01...
5) Olimpbase, http://www.olimpbase.org/1957eq/195...
6) K. Teer, Levensbericht F. L. H. M. Stumpers, in: Levensberichten en herdenkingen, 2004, Amsterdam, pp. 90-97, http://www.dwc.knaw.nl/DL/levensber... Also available at http://www.hagenbeuk.nl/wp-content/...
7) Catalogus Professorum Academiæ Rheno-Traiectinæ, https://profs.library.uu.nl/index.p...
8) URSI websites (2016), http://www.ursi.org/en/ursi_structu... and http://www.ursi.org/en/ursi_structu...

Suggested reading: Eindhovense Schaakvereniging 100 jaar 1915-2015, by Jules Welling. Stumpers' doctoral thesis Eenige onderzoekingen over trillingen met frequentiemodulatie (Studies on Vibration with Frequency Modulation) is found at http://repository.tudelft.nl/island...

This text by User: Tabanus. The photo was taken from http://www.dwc.knaw.nl.

Last updated: 2022-04-04 00:17:13

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 63  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. L Stumpers vs J Lehr 1-0191932EindhovenD18 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
2. L Prins vs L Stumpers  1-0391936NED-ch prelimB20 Sicilian
3. E Sapira vs L Stumpers 0-1251938NBSB-FlandersD94 Grunfeld
4. L Stumpers vs E Spanjaard  1-0551938NED-ch prelimE02 Catalan, Open, 5.Qa4
5. A J Wijnans vs L Stumpers  1-0361939NED-chB05 Alekhine's Defense, Modern
6. J van den Bosch vs L Stumpers  ½-½581939NED-chA48 King's Indian
7. L Stumpers vs S Landau 0-1411939NED-chD33 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch
8. H van Steenis vs L Stumpers  1-0251939NED-chB02 Alekhine's Defense
9. L Stumpers vs H Kramer  0-1361940HilversumE25 Nimzo-Indian, Samisch
10. L Stumpers vs S Landau  ½-½341940HilversumD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
11. A van den Hoek vs L Stumpers  1-0271941BondswedstrijdenB10 Caro-Kann
12. T van Scheltinga vs L Stumpers 1-0351942NED-ch12D94 Grunfeld
13. W Wolthuis vs L Stumpers  ½-½521946NED-ch prelim IC58 Two Knights
14. L Stumpers vs J H Marwitz  1-0401946NED-ch prelim ID31 Queen's Gambit Declined
15. G Fontein vs L Stumpers  ½-½261946NED-ch prelim ID94 Grunfeld
16. L Stumpers vs H van Steenis 0-1241946NED-ch prelim ID28 Queen's Gambit Accepted, Classical
17. C van den Berg vs L Stumpers  1-0581946NED-ch prelim ID19 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
18. L Stumpers vs Euwe 0-1301946NED-ch prelim IE60 King's Indian Defense
19. L Stumpers vs N Cortlever  ½-½501946NED-ch prelim IE60 King's Indian Defense
20. L Stumpers vs H Grob 1-0601947Baarn Group BA55 Old Indian, Main line
21. L Stumpers vs H van Steenis  0-1331947Baarn Group BD23 Queen's Gambit Accepted
22. Tartakower vs L Stumpers 1-0241947Baarn Group BD74 Neo-Grunfeld, 6.cd Nxd5, 7.O-O
23. V Soultanbeieff vs L Stumpers  ½-½461947Baarn Group BD96 Grunfeld, Russian Variation
24. L Stumpers vs A Vinken  0-1331948NED-ch sfE21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights
25. L Prins vs L Stumpers  ½-½301948NED-ch sfD02 Queen's Pawn Game
 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 63  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Stumpers wins | Stumpers loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 8 OF 277 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-16-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: There is a hallway with 1000 doors, each clearly numbered, and they are all closed. You decide to walk down the hallway exactly 1000 times, opening and closing doors according to a formula.

Here's the formula. The first time you walk through the hall, you change the state of every door (if it's closed, you open it -- if it's open, you close it.) The second pass, you only change the state of doors divisible by 2; i.e., you change doors 2, 4, 6, 8, etc. The third pass, you only change doors divisible by 3. Then doors divisible by 4, then 5, then 6, and so forth, until on the 1000th pass you only change the state of doors divisible by 1000 (i.e., the very last door).

When you're all done, which doors are open?

Jul-16-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: <142857x5=714285> That's very interesting. Of course this number looks familiar to you, right?

1/7 = 0.142857 repeating.

Jul-16-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: LOL, <LoFarkas> it IS that simple. I knew it would be too easy for Chessgames users, but decided to post it anyway. Try it out as a bar bet sometime. You'd be amazed how hard some people make it.
Jul-16-06  themadhair: <Sneaky> Nice. Lets see now - any numbers state is determined by the number of factors it has. So, for example, 12 will remain closed due to having an EVEN number of factors (6 factors - 12,6,4,3,2,1). Clearly a door will only be open if it has an ODD number of factors. Consider any arbitrary number X. For every factor F of X we have the factor (X÷F). So X will have an odd number of factors if and only if there exists an F such that F=(X÷F) - in other words if X is the square of some number.

Since 32²=1024>1000 and 31²=961<1000 then we can only have 31 square numbers and hence 31 doors that remain open.

Jul-26-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: How about a few anagrams? All of these are famous comics. 1. Dear Darling
2. Babe Thrown
3. Servant Time
4. Limbo Relent
5. Muddier Hype
Jul-26-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Comic strips or comedians?
Jul-26-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Comedians, comediennes. TV/Movies
Jul-28-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Answer to Stumper of July 15:
A number has 6 different digits. If the last digit is moved to the front, then a new number is formed which is exactly 5 times the old number. What is the original number?

Write down the digits in the first number as ABCDEF. The new number is hence to be written as FABCDE. We define G to be ABCDE. So: 100000F + G = 5 (10G + F)
99995F = 49G
Division by 7 gives 14285F = 7G
Because F is a number with 1 digit, the solutions is G = 14285 and F = 7. We started with 142857.

Jul-28-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <themadhair> Playing around with the 314 problem in my mind, it seems that if we were talking whole numbers, we'd want to go with (17+19) (16+20), etc. to maximize as closely as possible the squares that add up to 314. That's a little less than the square of 18. I am at a loss, though, to see how there can be a finite answer with the provision they need not be whole numbers. Should we use 17.1 and 19.9? 17.11 and 19.89? At some point, there's an infinite regression toward the square.
Jul-29-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: While you are leaving from your previous ordeal, you notice that another convict is being taken to another jail cell. As you watch the guard and the convict go to the cell, they start talking. "You do realize your rights, right?" says the guard.
The convict replies, "The judge said something strange, but I didn't understand it. What was it?" "You are free to go anytime you like," declares the guard, "as long as you fulfill the required conditions. In your case, your door is secured with a ten-digit lock. If you can guess the right number, you are free to go." "That's easy," says the prisoner. " I can just keep guessing numbers until I guess the right one." "Even so," says the guard, "it would take you a hundred years to find the right number at the rate of one per second. Of course, you can always look for the hints we give you." He then points at you and proceeds to tell the new prisoner about your imprisonment. "In addition to the normal amenities, you have a desk and a scientific calculator. Good luck." The guard walks away.

You stand there for a few minutes before you realize that you can go. As you turn to leave, you notice that the new prisoner is walking up behind you. "Wow, this place is great!" he says. "I only had to input one number!"

What number did he try?
Note: There is some room for assumption in the question, so different people may in fact come up with different, though similar, answers.

Jul-29-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: ** Answer to July 25 Anagram Stumper **

***
***

1. Dear Darling = Gilda Radner
2. Babe Thrown = Bob Newhart
3. Servant Time = Steve Martin
4. Limbo Relent = Milton Berle
5. Muddier Hype = Eddie Murphy

Jul-30-06  zarra: <OhioChessFan> <What number did he try?>

Did he try 3153600000?

Jul-30-06  TIMER: <themadhair> I don't have a calculator on me right now, but I can give the method to solve the 314 problem:

Clearly all the numbers (which are positive) must be atleast 1 (otherwise the multiple decreases) so have at most 314 numbers. Now all the numbers should be the same (to maximise the product) so just find whole number n between 1 and 314 such that (314/n)^n is maximum.

n (314/n)^n

1 314
2 24649
etc.

Jul-30-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: <themadhair> That's the right answer and the best way to think about it. Only perfect squares have the slightly unusual property of containing an odd number of factors.
Jul-30-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: A monk decides to climb to the top of a tall mountain. There is a single path from the foot of the mountain to the top, but luckily it's a rather pleasant one. It takes the monk exactly 24 hours to get up to the top of the mountain. He leaves at noon on one day and arrives at the top of the mountain at noon the next day.

Mind you, the monk does not travel at a constant rate. Sometimes he's walking sometimes he's running, sometimes he stops for a while, eats some fruit, picks some flowers, maybe takes a nap, and so forth, but in the end he averages 1 day for the entire trip.

Once he's on the top of the mountain he hangs out there for a week or so, meditating, and then makes his travel down the mountain. He leaves at noon again, and arrives at the foot of the mountain exactly 24 hours later. Again, when he descends the mountain, he moves at a very staggered rate, taking breaks, picking berries, and so forth.

NOW THEN ... what do you think of the following hypothesis?

"At some point in the monk's travel down the mountain, between his starting and his ending point, he will be on the exact same point in the path at the exact same time of day as he was when he first ascended the mountain."

What do you think of my hypothesis? Now I understand, he will be at the starting and ending points at exactly noon, but that's not what I'm talking about (that's why I said BETWEEN his starting and ending points).

What I mean is, there might be some creek 2/3rds the way up the mountain, and he gets to that spot at exactly 11:15pm on the way up, and he happens to be right there at 11:15pm on the way down as well. I say there MUST be such a location. I have a lovely proof in mind, do you know what it is?

Jul-30-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <Zarra> There are a few different numbers a person might come up with, but you have clearly figured out the gist of the problem.
Jul-30-06  TIMER: <themadhair> I would go for something like n=116, as 314/116 =157/58 is as close as you can get to e = 2.718...
Jul-30-06  ganstaman: <Sneaky> I actually think I saw this before on this site, though it didn't involve a monk. Superimpose the monk climbing the mountain and the monk descending the mountain. So we have the monk climbing and descending at the same time (maybe just play the videos on the same screen). At some point, the 'two' monks must cross paths since they are traveling the same path but in opposite directions.

When they do intersect, it obviously has to be at the same time for each since we started their clocks at the same time. In fact, it doesn't even matter if he takes the same time to go up and down. As long as he doesn't finish one trip before the other begins, your hypothesis holds true.

Jul-30-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: What do you sit on, sleep in, and brush your teeth with?
Jul-30-06  suenteus po 147: <OhioChessFan> A chair, a bed, and a toothbrush.
Jul-30-06  Tomlinsky: <OhioChessFan> My backside, a coma and vigour?
Jul-30-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <suenteus po 147> and <Tomlinsky> I happened to ask that at church today and nobody got it. I think a few may have called down fire and brimstone on me when I told the answer.
Aug-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: <ganstaman> You have hit the nail on the head.

It is interesting to try to concoct strategies where you, as a monk, would make the situation not be true. You can hypothesize "near light speed" for some parts of your journey, try to spend 90% of your time in a single location, etc., but no matter how hard you try you always end up "meeting your ghost" on the trail.

I found that delightful, for some reason that I can't explain. If others found it simpleminded and dull, I can understand that position as well.

Aug-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: ** Answer to July 29 Stumper **

What number did the prisoner enter? Here's one possible answer. Leap years, beginning choice of number, extra seconds in some days, simple rounding off, all enter into it. Of course, the gist was the prisoner recognizing the importance of the words "Even so, it would take you a hundred years to find the right number at the rate of one per second."

There are 86,400 seconds in a day.

There are 365 days in an ordinary year and 366 in a leap year.

Leap years ordinarily come every fourth year, except that, in the 100 years starting now, the year 2100 will not be leap.

Therefore, starting from now, there are 86,400 * 36,524 seconds in 100 years, or 3155673600.

Aug-17-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: What is the next number in this sequence:

45, 44, 36, 32, 31, 26, 22, 21, ?

A few hints in the next post.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 277)
search thread:   
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 8 OF 277 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC