chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Louis Stumpers
L Stumpers 
 

Number of games in database: 63
Years covered: 1932 to 1969
Overall record: +14 -35 =14 (33.3%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games.

Repertoire Explorer
Most played openings
D94 Grunfeld (3 games)
B59 Sicilian, Boleslavsky Variation, 7.Nb3 (2 games)
D31 Queen's Gambit Declined (2 games)
D45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav (2 games)
E60 King's Indian Defense (2 games)
E21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights (2 games)
C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense (2 games)


Search Sacrifice Explorer for Louis Stumpers
Search Google for Louis Stumpers

LOUIS STUMPERS
(born Aug-30-1911, died Sep-27-2003, 92 years old) Netherlands

[what is this?]

Frans Louis Henri Marie Stumpers was born in Eindhoven, Netherlands, on 30 August 1911. (1) He was champion of the Eindhoven Chess Club in 1938, 1939, 1946, 1947, 1948, 1949, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1955, 1957, 1958, 1961 and 1963, (2) and champion of the North Brabant Chess Federation (Noord Brabantse Schaak Bond, NBSB) in 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942, 1943, 1944, 1946, 1948, 1949, 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1955, 1959, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966 and 1967. (3) Stumpers participated in five Dutch Chess Championships, with his high-water mark a fourth place finish in 1948, (4) and represented his country at the 1st European Team Championship in Vienna in 1957 (two games, vs Josef Platt and Max Dorn). (5) From 1945 until about 1956, he was first Secretary and then Chairman of the NBSB. (3)

Stumpers was a physicist, and worked for the Philips company as an assistant from 1928. During 1934-1937, he studied at the University of Utrecht, where he took the master's degree. (6) In 1938 Stumpers was again employed at Philips, (6) and at a tournament in 1942, he supplied the hungry chess players with food from his employer. (3) After the war, Stumpers made a career in physics, with patents and awards on information ("radio") technology. He received degrees from several universities and colleges, including in Poland and Japan. (1, 3, 6) Stumpers retired from Philips in 1972, but continued teaching, (6) partly as professor at the University of Utrecht (1977-1981). (7) He was also Vice President (1975-1981) and Honorary President (1990-2003) of URSI, the International Union of Radio Science. (8)

Louis Stumpers married Mieke Driessen in 1954. They had five children, three girls and two boys. (6)

1) Online Familieberichten 1.0 (2016), http://www.online-familieberichten...., Digitaal Tijdschrift, 5 (255), http://www.geneaservice.nl/ar/2003/...
2) Eindhovense Schaakvereniging (2016), http://www.eindhovenseschaakverenig...
3) Noord Brabantse Schaak Bond (2016), http://www.nbsb.nl/pkalgemeen/pk-er... Their main page: http://www.nbsb.nl.
4) Schaaksite.nl (2016), http://www.schaaksite.nl/2016/01/01...
5) Olimpbase, http://www.olimpbase.org/1957eq/195...
6) K. Teer, Levensbericht F. L. H. M. Stumpers, in: Levensberichten en herdenkingen, 2004, Amsterdam, pp. 90-97, http://www.dwc.knaw.nl/DL/levensber... Also available at http://www.hagenbeuk.nl/wp-content/...
7) Catalogus Professorum Academiæ Rheno-Traiectinæ, https://profs.library.uu.nl/index.p...
8) URSI websites (2016), http://www.ursi.org/en/ursi_structu... and http://www.ursi.org/en/ursi_structu...

Suggested reading: Eindhovense Schaakvereniging 100 jaar 1915-2015, by Jules Welling. Stumpers' doctoral thesis Eenige onderzoekingen over trillingen met frequentiemodulatie (Studies on Vibration with Frequency Modulation) is found at http://repository.tudelft.nl/island...

This text by User: Tabanus. The photo was taken from http://www.dwc.knaw.nl.

Last updated: 2022-04-04 00:17:13

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 63  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. L Stumpers vs J Lehr 1-0191932EindhovenD18 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
2. L Prins vs L Stumpers  1-0391936NED-ch prelimB20 Sicilian
3. E Sapira vs L Stumpers 0-1251938NBSB-FlandersD94 Grunfeld
4. L Stumpers vs E Spanjaard  1-0551938NED-ch prelimE02 Catalan, Open, 5.Qa4
5. A J Wijnans vs L Stumpers  1-0361939NED-chB05 Alekhine's Defense, Modern
6. J van den Bosch vs L Stumpers  ½-½581939NED-chA48 King's Indian
7. L Stumpers vs S Landau 0-1411939NED-chD33 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch
8. H van Steenis vs L Stumpers  1-0251939NED-chB02 Alekhine's Defense
9. L Stumpers vs H Kramer  0-1361940HilversumE25 Nimzo-Indian, Samisch
10. L Stumpers vs S Landau  ½-½341940HilversumD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
11. A van den Hoek vs L Stumpers  1-0271941BondswedstrijdenB10 Caro-Kann
12. T van Scheltinga vs L Stumpers 1-0351942NED-ch12D94 Grunfeld
13. W Wolthuis vs L Stumpers  ½-½521946NED-ch prelim IC58 Two Knights
14. L Stumpers vs J H Marwitz  1-0401946NED-ch prelim ID31 Queen's Gambit Declined
15. G Fontein vs L Stumpers  ½-½261946NED-ch prelim ID94 Grunfeld
16. L Stumpers vs H van Steenis 0-1241946NED-ch prelim ID28 Queen's Gambit Accepted, Classical
17. C van den Berg vs L Stumpers  1-0581946NED-ch prelim ID19 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
18. L Stumpers vs Euwe 0-1301946NED-ch prelim IE60 King's Indian Defense
19. L Stumpers vs N Cortlever  ½-½501946NED-ch prelim IE60 King's Indian Defense
20. L Stumpers vs H Grob 1-0601947Baarn Group BA55 Old Indian, Main line
21. L Stumpers vs H van Steenis  0-1331947Baarn Group BD23 Queen's Gambit Accepted
22. Tartakower vs L Stumpers 1-0241947Baarn Group BD74 Neo-Grunfeld, 6.cd Nxd5, 7.O-O
23. V Soultanbeieff vs L Stumpers  ½-½461947Baarn Group BD96 Grunfeld, Russian Variation
24. L Stumpers vs A Vinken  0-1331948NED-ch sfE21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights
25. L Prins vs L Stumpers  ½-½301948NED-ch sfD02 Queen's Pawn Game
 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 63  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Stumpers wins | Stumpers loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 46 OF 277 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-16-08  hkannan2000: Well i thought it was 144 assuming the nos are reversed.
Jun-16-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan:


click for larger view

1. What was the last move played?

2. There is a piece on h4. What is it?

Jun-16-08  arifattar: 1. cxd8R+?
Jun-16-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: The puzzle I posted is a retrograde study by Raymond Smullyan, 1925. Partially correct on #1. What was captured?
Jun-16-08  Manic: A black knight was captured I guess, since the black-squared bishop couldn't move and a queen or rook would mean that white would have to have been in check a move before.

The piece on h4 is a white black-squared bishop because all captures must have been made on white squares by black pawns (the h pawn must capture on g2 otherwise it could not be a white piece on h4 since the only other way to queen is to capture twice to the f-file, but this means white has no other pieces).

The reason it cannot be a black piece is because:

i)One pawn is needed to promote to a knight. There is only 1 promoted black pawn so the other two knights must be the knights at the start of the game.

ii)It cannot be a rook or queen otherwise white would be in check on his/her move

iii) Black's black-squared bishop could not have moved.

I hope I'm right =)

Jun-16-08  Manic: Some random riddles:

Alive without breath,
As cold as death;
Never thirsty, ever drinking,
All in mail clinking/.
What am I?

52 of us know only light,
36 of us know only dark,
None of us have the same voice,
But all of us have one purpose
What are we?

I do not exist, I'm just a word.
and When someone mentions me.. I break.
What am I?

For the record, I'm not the greatest riddle solver so yeh I kind of don't know how hard these are meant to be (i give up easily).

Jun-16-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: #3 = silence
Jun-16-08  percyblakeney: #1 = Rybka
Jun-16-08  acirce: #2 = Piano keys.
Jun-16-08  micartouse: <percy> Nice. :)
Jun-16-08  Gilmoy: The mystery piece on h4 is White's original Bc1.

================
Visible Analysis
================
A1. White is missing seven things: (a) the "light-eligible" group of 5: QRNN + Bf1, (b) the "dark-only" Bc1, and (c) Pf2.

A2. By minimality of diagonals, Black's Pa6 is its b7-pawn, which made 1 capture on a light square, and Black's doubled Pc4 is its f7-pawn, which has made 3 captures on light squares (e6-d5-c4). Black has 4 captures on light squares.

A3. Given [A2], Black is missing six things: (a) the "f-victim group" of 4: QRR + Ph7, (b) Bc8, (c) Bf8.

A4. Black's Bf8 is stillborn: it never got out (due to Pe7/Pg7), so it must have been captured on f8.

=====
Given
=====
G1. White's last move must have been cxd8=R+.

G2. Exactly one of [A1abc] and [A3abc] is the mystery piece on h4. This could include any result of a promotion.

=======
Shallow
=======
S1. By [A1c], White is missing only one pawn, at f2. By [G1], White's last move was a pawn promotion from c7. Ergo, that must be White's f2-pawn, and it has captured its way to c7. Then it has just captured again on d8. So White has made 4 captures.

S2. Of Black's six missing things, two cannot be captured on d8: [A2c] its Bf8, by [A4], and [A2b] obviously its Bc8 can never stand on d8. Therefore, White's 4 captures by [S1] exactly covers Black's "f-victim" group [A2a] of 4: QRR + Ph7.

<continued>

Jun-16-08  Gilmoy: <ct'd>
=====
Tally
=====
T1. Consider the fates of Black's missing things. [S2] pinpoints the fates of [A3a], Black's "f-victim" group of 4. [A4] pinpoints [A3c], the Bf8. [A3b], the Bc8, is unknown.

T2. Consider the fates of White's missing things. [A2] pinpoints 4/5 of [A1a], White's "white-eligible" group of 5. [G1] pinpoints [A1c], White's Pf2. 1 of [A1a], and [A1b] the Bc1, are unknown.

T3. One of [T1] and [T2] is the mystery piece. But Black's light-squared Bc8 is the wrong color to stand on dark h4. Therefore, the mystery piece on h4 is White.

T4. From [S2], Black's h-pawn (before or after promotion) is an f-victim, i.e. it must have been captured by White's f-pawn. We prove in two ways that Black's h-pawn has promoted.

T4-A. Suppose White's f-pawn captured Black's h-pawn while it was still a pawn. But this requires at least 3 additional captures total on both sides (e.g. Black captures once to g and White captures twice f->g and g->f; or Black captures three times h->f->g->e). But by [T3], there are only three total missing things of unknown fate, and one of them is still alive on h4. So there's not enough corpses to admit 3 more captures. Ergo, the assumption is false, and the h-pawn must have promoted.

T4-B. Consider: What Black piece was captured on d8? Lemma: It cannot have been a Black Qd8/Rd8. <Proof: It would be checking White's Kh8, and Black has no way to deliver that check. (a) c8/d7/e7 are blocked, and remember that c7 is blocked by White's pawn just before it captures. So Black couldn't move a Q or R to d8 with check. (b) Black might have moved the mystery piece from e8/f8/g8 to h4, with discovered check. But that's not a legal move for any piece. QED.> Therefore, White's Pc7 must have captured a Black Bd8 or Nd8. By [A4], Black's original Bf8 never got out, and Black still has two Ns in play. Hence, Black's piece on d8 is a second dark-square B, or a third N, ergo Black has promoted. By [A3], Black is missing only one pawn, its Ph7, so that's the one that promoted.

T5. How does Black's h7-pawn promote? It must have (a) captured once and promoted on g1, or (b) captured twice and promoted on f1, or (c) captured more than twice. But by [T2], White has only 2 unknown things left, and one's still alive on h4. Ergo, (b) and (c) are impossible, and Black's h-pawn captured exactly once, and promoted on g1.

T6. From the pawn structure, the only square on which Black's h-pawn could have captured to reach g1 is on g2, a light square. With [A2], this means Black made 5 total captures on light squares, which exactly covers [A1a], White's "light-eligible" group of 5. From [T2], that pinpoints all of [A1a].

T7. From [T2] and [T3], the only White unknown left is [A1b], its dark-square Bc1.

Therefore, the mystery piece on h4 is White's original Bc1.

Jun-16-08  Gilmoy: <Manic:> #1 = fish! ("mail" = scales)
Jun-16-08  SetNoEscapeOn: It's from The Hobbit
Jun-16-08  Once: My father and mother abandoned me in this world while I was dead; there was as yet no life, no being in me. Then a very kindly wife covered me with clothes, kept me and cherished me and canopied me with a protective covering, as fittingly as her own child - until under that sheet as were my innate qualities I became to my unrelated kindred inordinate of spirit. This beautiful wife continued to feed me until I grew mature and could set my paths further afield. She had the fewer beloved sons and daughters because she did so,
Jun-17-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <Once> a chick?
Jun-17-08  Once: <OhioChessFan> Close!
Jun-17-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: The bus number was indeed <196>
Jun-17-08  SetNoEscapeOn: <Once> A seed?
Jun-17-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I thought of seed, but even allowing for poetic license, I have a hard time attributing a father and mother.
Jun-18-08  Once: <Ohiochessfan> is much closer with chick than seed. But not there yet.
Jun-18-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I really thought chick was right, but then realized that it was a wife that took care of the mysterious object, and not the mother. While a hen might nest another's eggs, it didn't seem likeley. It almost has to be an egg, so I thought of turtles and fish. But that doesn't seem quite right either, mostly because of the fewer sons/daughters by the wife, who seems to be Mother Earth.
Jun-18-08  Gilmoy: <Once:>

- If "wife" is X's own wife: X is a parasitic male?

Anglerfish: http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/news/index.p...

Sea devil: http://www.austmus.gov.au/fishes/fi...

- If "wife" is some other dude's wife: X is a baby conceived in vitro from donated ovum and sperm (both "abandoned while dead"), she's the surrogate mother, she wears her own clothes, and he counts towards her (self-imposed) N-baby limit?

Jun-18-08  Once: <OhioChessFan> You are so close, but if I give you any clues I would make it too easy ...

<Gilmoy> Surrogate mother is getting warm ...

To give you some background, this is an anglo-saxon riddle (ie very old english) which is around about 2,000 years old. It is most definitely not one that I made up, nor is it from the hobbit or lord of the rings.

<OHF> is closest so far, but some of <Gilmoy's> thoughts may also help.

Jun-18-08  ughaibu: A cuckoo?
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 277)
search thread:   
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 46 OF 277 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC