chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Louis Stumpers
L Stumpers 
 

Number of games in database: 63
Years covered: 1932 to 1969
Overall record: +14 -35 =14 (33.3%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games.

Repertoire Explorer
Most played openings
D94 Grunfeld (3 games)
B59 Sicilian, Boleslavsky Variation, 7.Nb3 (2 games)
D31 Queen's Gambit Declined (2 games)
D45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav (2 games)
E60 King's Indian Defense (2 games)
E21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights (2 games)
C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense (2 games)


Search Sacrifice Explorer for Louis Stumpers
Search Google for Louis Stumpers

LOUIS STUMPERS
(born Aug-30-1911, died Sep-27-2003, 92 years old) Netherlands

[what is this?]

Frans Louis Henri Marie Stumpers was born in Eindhoven, Netherlands, on 30 August 1911. (1) He was champion of the Eindhoven Chess Club in 1938, 1939, 1946, 1947, 1948, 1949, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1955, 1957, 1958, 1961 and 1963, (2) and champion of the North Brabant Chess Federation (Noord Brabantse Schaak Bond, NBSB) in 1934, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942, 1943, 1944, 1946, 1948, 1949, 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1955, 1959, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966 and 1967. (3) Stumpers participated in five Dutch Chess Championships, with his high-water mark a fourth place finish in 1948, (4) and represented his country at the 1st European Team Championship in Vienna in 1957 (two games, vs Josef Platt and Max Dorn). (5) From 1945 until about 1956, he was first Secretary and then Chairman of the NBSB. (3)

Stumpers was a physicist, and worked for the Philips company as an assistant from 1928. During 1934-1937, he studied at the University of Utrecht, where he took the master's degree. (6) In 1938 Stumpers was again employed at Philips, (6) and at a tournament in 1942, he supplied the hungry chess players with food from his employer. (3) After the war, Stumpers made a career in physics, with patents and awards on information ("radio") technology. He received degrees from several universities and colleges, including in Poland and Japan. (1, 3, 6) Stumpers retired from Philips in 1972, but continued teaching, (6) partly as professor at the University of Utrecht (1977-1981). (7) He was also Vice President (1975-1981) and Honorary President (1990-2003) of URSI, the International Union of Radio Science. (8)

Louis Stumpers married Mieke Driessen in 1954. They had five children, three girls and two boys. (6)

1) Online Familieberichten 1.0 (2016), http://www.online-familieberichten...., Digitaal Tijdschrift, 5 (255), http://www.geneaservice.nl/ar/2003/...
2) Eindhovense Schaakvereniging (2016), http://www.eindhovenseschaakverenig...
3) Noord Brabantse Schaak Bond (2016), http://www.nbsb.nl/pkalgemeen/pk-er... Their main page: http://www.nbsb.nl.
4) Schaaksite.nl (2016), http://www.schaaksite.nl/2016/01/01...
5) Olimpbase, http://www.olimpbase.org/1957eq/195...
6) K. Teer, Levensbericht F. L. H. M. Stumpers, in: Levensberichten en herdenkingen, 2004, Amsterdam, pp. 90-97, http://www.dwc.knaw.nl/DL/levensber... Also available at http://www.hagenbeuk.nl/wp-content/...
7) Catalogus Professorum Academiæ Rheno-Traiectinæ, https://profs.library.uu.nl/index.p...
8) URSI websites (2016), http://www.ursi.org/en/ursi_structu... and http://www.ursi.org/en/ursi_structu...

Suggested reading: Eindhovense Schaakvereniging 100 jaar 1915-2015, by Jules Welling. Stumpers' doctoral thesis Eenige onderzoekingen over trillingen met frequentiemodulatie (Studies on Vibration with Frequency Modulation) is found at http://repository.tudelft.nl/island...

This text by User: Tabanus. The photo was taken from http://www.dwc.knaw.nl.

Last updated: 2022-04-04 00:17:13

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 63  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. L Stumpers vs J Lehr 1-0191932EindhovenD18 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
2. L Prins vs L Stumpers  1-0391936NED-ch prelimB20 Sicilian
3. E Sapira vs L Stumpers 0-1251938NBSB-FlandersD94 Grunfeld
4. L Stumpers vs E Spanjaard  1-0551938NED-ch prelimE02 Catalan, Open, 5.Qa4
5. A J Wijnans vs L Stumpers  1-0361939NED-chB05 Alekhine's Defense, Modern
6. J van den Bosch vs L Stumpers  ½-½581939NED-chA48 King's Indian
7. L Stumpers vs S Landau 0-1411939NED-chD33 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch
8. H van Steenis vs L Stumpers  1-0251939NED-chB02 Alekhine's Defense
9. L Stumpers vs H Kramer  0-1361940HilversumE25 Nimzo-Indian, Samisch
10. L Stumpers vs S Landau  ½-½341940HilversumD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
11. A van den Hoek vs L Stumpers  1-0271941BondswedstrijdenB10 Caro-Kann
12. T van Scheltinga vs L Stumpers 1-0351942NED-ch12D94 Grunfeld
13. W Wolthuis vs L Stumpers  ½-½521946NED-ch prelim IC58 Two Knights
14. L Stumpers vs J H Marwitz  1-0401946NED-ch prelim ID31 Queen's Gambit Declined
15. G Fontein vs L Stumpers  ½-½261946NED-ch prelim ID94 Grunfeld
16. L Stumpers vs H van Steenis 0-1241946NED-ch prelim ID28 Queen's Gambit Accepted, Classical
17. C van den Berg vs L Stumpers  1-0581946NED-ch prelim ID19 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
18. L Stumpers vs Euwe 0-1301946NED-ch prelim IE60 King's Indian Defense
19. L Stumpers vs N Cortlever  ½-½501946NED-ch prelim IE60 King's Indian Defense
20. L Stumpers vs H Grob 1-0601947Baarn Group BA55 Old Indian, Main line
21. L Stumpers vs H van Steenis  0-1331947Baarn Group BD23 Queen's Gambit Accepted
22. Tartakower vs L Stumpers 1-0241947Baarn Group BD74 Neo-Grunfeld, 6.cd Nxd5, 7.O-O
23. V Soultanbeieff vs L Stumpers  ½-½461947Baarn Group BD96 Grunfeld, Russian Variation
24. L Stumpers vs A Vinken  0-1331948NED-ch sfE21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights
25. L Prins vs L Stumpers  ½-½301948NED-ch sfD02 Queen's Pawn Game
 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 63  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Stumpers wins | Stumpers loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 10 OF 277 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-30-06  themadhair: To give a gentle hint to <OhioChessFan>'s puzzle directly above - work out what value C must be first and start from there.

Here is a triumph of logic - can you deduce that at least two people in the world have the same number of hairs? (Arguing that there are two bald people doesn't count)

Sep-30-06  arctic tern: <OhioChessFan> A=2,B=6,C=1,D=0,E=4.

26*1.04=27.04=26+1.04

Oct-01-06  themadhair: <arctic tern> Can you prove that it is a unique solution?
Oct-01-06  arctic tern: <themadhair> Good question, I think so but I will work on it.
Oct-01-06  arctic tern: 'Proof' of uniqueness:

AB*C.DE=AB+C.DE. Assume that A through E are >=0, and further that A!=0. Then AB>=10.

Then C!=0, because otherwise AB*C.DE<AB+C.DE. Since C.DE<10 by assumption, if C>=2 then AB*C.DE>2*AB but AB+C.DE<2*AB so AB*C.DE<AB+C.DE. Therefore C=1 necessarily.

Now we have AB*1.DE=AB+1.DE. Rewrite this as AB(1+0.DE)=AB+AB*0.DE=AB+1.DE. => AB*0.DE=1.DE
=>
AB=1DE/DE multiplying through by 100.

Now we need to find a fraction of the form 1DE/DE whose quotient is a two digit integer AB. Since AB>=10, this immediately restricts the available options for DE to anything <12. We observe that DE=02,04,05,10 all yield two-digit integers and therefore represent solutions to the original equation, but only DE=04 yields a solution for which all five digits are unique (the other fractions yield integers with a '1' which is also what C is).

Therefore AB=26=1.DE/0.DE=1.04/0.04 and this is necessarily the only solution in which all digits are different.

The 3 other solutions, incidentally, are
AB=51=1.02/0.02
AB=21=1.05/0.05
AB=11=1.10/0.10

QED, I think.

Apologies for the rather colourful nature of this post, btw. Chessgames is not set up for math symbols.

Oct-02-06  themadhair: I bow to you sir.
Oct-05-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <Sneaky> per the motorcycle, I think the handlebars were carried off with the curtain. One of the models appears to be standing on a box which wasn't there before, so some portion of the bike is hidden in it. That's as far as I've gotten. Maybe a better computer would let me get a better look at the video.
Oct-08-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: One proof of the AB*C.DE=AB+C.DE problem:

For the sum & product of two numbers to be the same, if the first is x the second is of the form x/(x-1) or 1+1/(x-1). This is easily proved. In this case, x is a 2 digit number (AB) & C=1
1/(x-1) = y/100 (where y is a one or two digit number). This means that (x-1) divides 100. Since (x-1) cannot have more than two digits it does not equal 100. Check out the other possibilities x has 2 digits so (x-1) cannot be 2,4 or 5
(x-1)=50 implies that x=51 (oops: B=1=C)
(x-1)=20 - same problem: B=1=C
This leaves x-1 = 25; so x=26 & 1/(x-1) = 0.04
So: A=2; B=6; C=1; D=0; E=4

Oct-08-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: A more intuitive answer:
if ABxC.DE=AB+C.DE, subtracting C.DE from both sides and reordering terms, we get C.DE=AB/(AB-1).

Since AB and (AB-1) are relatively prime to each other, 1/(AB-1) must be a non-repeating fraction, so AB-1 must divide 100, which allows just a few values. Running through those values, AB=26 solves the problem.

Oct-09-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: What are the next 5 numbers in this sequence?

28, 32, 34, 32, 34, 36, 40, 38, 38, 40, 36, 38, 40

Oct-09-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: ** Hint to the above problem **

** **

1. The sequence could also be:

27, 28, 32, 34, 32, 34, 36, 40, 38, 38, 40, 36, 38, 40

Oct-10-06  themadhair: Require another hint....
Oct-10-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: ** Another hint **

The items in the sequence are sums. What series produces those sums?

Oct-13-06  themadhair: I accept defeat.
Oct-14-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: ** Another hint **

The sequence of numbers is infite, and all will continue to be even numbers.

Oct-14-06  ughaibu: Next: 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 42, 42, 40, 38, 40, 48
Oct-14-06  norami: When I was in 8th grade my teacher said that if you flipped a fair coin a few times you might get a skewed result but the more you flipped it the more chance things would even out and you'd get 50% heads. I said not true, if you flipped it a million times you'd probably get CLOSE TO 50% but probably not EXACTLY 50%. The teacher said no, if you flipped it a million times it would almost certainly even out and you'd almost certainly get exactly 500,000 heads. At that point I gave up - no use wasting time arguing with an idiot. The question remained open - if you flip a coin a million times what is the probability you'll get exactly 500,000 heads?
Oct-14-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: ** Answer to Stumper of October 9 **

Starting with the 2nd and 11th prime (3 and 31), these numbers are the differences between successive pairs of primes...

31 - 3 =28
37 - 5 =32
41 - 7 =34
43 - 11 =32
47 - 13 =34
53 - 17 =36
59 - 19 =40
61 - 23 =38
67 - 29 =38
71 - 31 =40
73 - 37 =36
79 - 41 =38
83 - 43 =40
89 - 47 =42
97 - 53 =44
101- 59 =42
103- 61 =42
107- 67 =40

Oct-14-06  arctic tern: <norami: When I was in 8th grade my teacher said that if you flipped a fair coin a few times you might get a skewed result but the more you flipped it the more chance things would even out and you'd get 50% heads. I said not true, if you flipped it a million times you'd probably get CLOSE TO 50% but probably not EXACTLY 50%. The teacher said no, if you flipped it a million times it would almost certainly even out and you'd almost certainly get exactly 500,000 heads. At that point I gave up - no use wasting time arguing with an idiot. The question remained open - if you flip a coin a million times what is the probability you'll get exactly 500,000 heads?>

The probability that you'll get 500,000 heads is very small but more likely than getting 499,999 heads and 500,001 tails, and so on. The exact odds of it are

(1000000 C 500000) / 2^1000000 where 1000000 C 500000 = 1000000!/(500000!*500000!) if I've done the calculation correctly, which my computer is now furiously trying to evaluate. I guarantee it will be a tiny number.

Oct-15-06  norami: <arctic tern> Strangely enough, another formula that also works is 1/2 times 3/4 times 5/6, and so on, until the final factor 999999/1000000.
Oct-15-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: <The question remained open - if you flip a coin a million times what is the probability you'll get exactly 500,000 heads?>

Easy... sort of. The concept is simple but by picking a number as large as a million you create an awful lot of work to figure out the result.

The question is the same thing as asking, "Of all the million digit binary numbers, how many have exactly 500,000 1's?"

Let r = # of million digit binary numbers, so r= 2^1000000.

Now let n = the # of million digit binary numbers with half a million 1's. We can find n with the "choose function", you would say "one million choose half-a-million" and the formula for this is 1000000!/500000!*500000! That's a huge number, but a lot smaller than 2^1000000.

So the answer is n/r. Unfortunately those are some incredibly large numbers so normal tools are insufficient to compute them. Since I have a Macintosh I have access to the powerful Unix tool "bc" which can handle integers of virtually any length, but even for "bc" these kinds of calculations could take hours.

Before we have our computers spend all night figuring out 1,000,000 factorial, let's solve the problem with a much nicer value of r, let's say "1000 coin flips." My computer quickly digests these numbers and comes back with the probability .0252, or 2.5 percent.

Next let me try something more extreme, let's say 10,000 coin flips. After a much longer pause, it comes back with the answer .0079, or 0.8 percent. It's gone down!

Finally let's try 20,000 coin flips. What are the odds of getting exactly 10,000 heads? Now it take almost a minute to come up with the answer, and that answer is .0056, still lower.

Clearly, the more flips you make, the less the odds of realizing an exact split. I can't estimate how low it is when you hit one million but I think this could be enough to convince your teacher of her folly.

Oct-15-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: <arctic tern> Seems you are on the same track I am! Unlike you, I have no interest in spending all night burning CPU's to find the answer but if you are going to do the work I'll be curious to learn the answer.

<Ohio> <Per the motorcycle, I think the handlebars were carried off with the curtain. One of the models appears to be standing on a box which wasn't there before, so some portion of the bike is hidden in it.> Are you speculating that this is some kind of George Jetson motorcycle than can be taken apart almost instantly and parts of it collapse into a briefcase? No sir, you are way off. In fact let me say that the concept is very old--from the 19th century--it has nothing to do with any radical technology.

It's a little bit tactless to pose this as a "stumper." If you really care about it, I invite you to discuss it on my chessforum. That way I can be sure to remove any message that may expose the secret while still giving you the nod that you figured it out.

Oct-15-06  arctic tern: <Sneaky> I've given up on that for the time being unfortunately but I'll play around with it on my workstation at school this week.

(I was using the standard microsoft calculator for this and I don't trust it to not tell me 'result is too large' or something like that after a night of calculation.)

Oct-15-06  norami: Odds are 1252.3 to 1 against getting exactly 500,000 heads after a million flips.
Oct-17-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: Is that a fact, did you grind it out? Cool. A far cry from what his teacher said. <The teacher said no, if you flipped it a million times it would almost certainly even out and you'd almost certainly get exactly 500,000 heads.> You might ask that teacher, "So, if there was only one flip left and the score was 499,999 heads to 500,000 tails, I suppose it would be a very good idea to mortgage your house and put it all on a wager that 'heads' is going to come up next, right?" But like the man said, no use arguing with an idiot.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 277)
search thread:   
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 10 OF 277 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC