chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Russell John Dive vs Heikki Westerinen
"Taking a Dive" (game of the day Feb-03-2014)
It (open) (1989), Gausdal, Norway
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal. Bronstein (Byrne) Variation (E45)  ·  0-1

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
0-1

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more R J Dive/Westerinen games
sac: 20...Qh5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-03-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: The bishop on a6 is a long way away but there is nothing to interpose!
Feb-03-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Well, OK. But what if White plays something like 22.Qe4 instead of committing suicide?
Feb-03-14  RandomVisitor: <Phony Benoni>Both 22.Qe4 and 22.Ng3 appear to allow white to continue with about an even game.
Feb-03-14  Gouvaneur: Not a good game of the day. Probably chosen for the sake of the pun. Anyway, <Phony Benoni> is right of course, White simply oversaw a mate with 22.Bxe5. The game looks quite spectacular, but if you analyze it a bit you will find out that both sides played rather mediocre chess.
Feb-03-14  morfishine: Yes, not a very good game by players rated 2300+

But then again, even GM's produce really ugly efforts, like this: Naiditsch vs Harikrishna, 2014

Hideous

*****

Feb-03-14  Conrad93: Well, the mate is unique, but nothing here really shines.
Feb-03-14  kevin86: I bet the loser's nickname is "swan".

Queen sac and mate with minor pieces (good show)

Feb-03-14  sfm: Funny to see these comments. One person has one suggestion, otherwise mostly totally superficial remarks.

GMs make lots of mistakes all the time, just less than the rest of us. Just less.

White's idea, with 12.Ne4,13.Bb2 and 14.Qc2, putting pressure on the black king and exploiting the uncovered black knight on c6 is very creative.

As Larsen once wrote "It is OK that you can't calculate what happens - but it is not so good if you didn't even get the idea."

At 14.-,Ng4 things start to get a bit complicated and surprisingly (for me, at least) is is suddenly Black that attacks White's king. Beware of bishops on a6, they may suddenly step in. (R Byrne vs Fischer, 1963)

Did you see this turn after 14.Qc2 ? Is Black's attack healthy? If no, does this mean he was in trouble already. If so, was White's plan a stroke of genius?

What would happen on the simpler 16.dxe? Doesn't White's bishop on b2 look like having a great future? But white struggles for more advantage with 16.Bxh7+ and 16.Be4.

I see a very complicated game where it is very hard to know what to really think.

<Phony Benoni: Well, OK. But what if White plays something like 22.Qe4 instead of committing suicide?>

Good question. -,Re8 seems to be the only reply, and the game goes on.

But Westerinen, who was a sly rat (on the chess board) (maybe still is) - might just had planned the possibility of the little detail that ended the game. A good chance for a sudden murder - and if not, well, we will think of something else.

I recall a tongue-in-cheek comment from an old long gone player in my club 30 years ago: "All these players here, with no true understanding of the game. They only beat me because they make so cheap traps, which I fall right into!"

Perfection would be great, and while I tried I didn't even get close.

But ah, the smart ideas where the opponent can go wrong, and the surprises which sent me home laughing so many times. Or near-crying when on the receiving end.

So, we are different. What else is new?
I really liked this game.

Feb-03-14  sfm: <if you analyze it a bit you will find out that both sides played rather mediocre chess.> But what does that mean? Many mistakes according to Fritz and Co?

This is a very difficult game, centre dissolving, mutual threats, "non-standard" and "unclear" written all over it.

There are positions where making a mistake is almost impossible and some where finding the right move is so too.

You might be interested in the discussion on

Lasker vs W Napier, 1904

Feb-03-14  Ferro: Loose a friend
Feb-03-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  freewheel: The game is worth it for the beautiful mate.
Feb-03-14  Chessmensch: Jack Russell Terrorist.
Feb-03-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <sfm> Interesting comments, as always. Are you still fighting the chess addiction? Because, I think, sometimes it is better to embrace an addiction.
Feb-03-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: I'm still addicted. I beat Dive in 2 Correspondence Games but haven't played him otherwise. I'm not in his class OTB.

A bit unfair on IM Dive of kiwiland but it's a nice finish by Westerinen!

I've seen Russell play some nice combos also.

< sfm: Funny to see these comments. One person has one suggestion, otherwise mostly totally superficial remarks. >

Yes but we are like that: we tend mostly to chat, that is very human and very "chessic" we often just blast through a game. Sometimes if it interests us we take a longer look...this is not a crit. of your comment just an observation.

Feb-03-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: Yes, that's a beautiful finish!!
Feb-04-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 22...Qxh3+! was a bolt from the blue for white.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC