chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
David Anton Guijarro vs Miguel Leon Acosta
Spanish Championship (2013), Linares ESP, rd 2, Aug-30
Indian Game: Wade-Tartakower Defense (A46)  ·  1-0

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
1-0

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1,474 more games of D Anton Guijarro
sac: 28.Rxe8 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-26-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Queen en prise? No problem, Black can have it. Re8 en prise? No problem, Black can have it--29...Kh8; 30.Rh1 and White will mate on h7, h6 or h5.
Aug-26-20  Cheapo by the Dozen: Ack. I missed the h-file mate threat. But I saw enough of the power of Re8/Be6+ to realize that Qb4 doesn't actually lose a piece, so I went with that winning-yet-incorrect move instead.
Aug-26-20  Walter Glattke: I found a tricky way with 28.Rxe8 Rxe8 29.Be6+ Rxe6 30.Qd8 Re7!? 31.gxh7+ QKxh7 32.Qxf8 Ne3!? 33.Rh1+ Kg6 32.Rg1+ Kh6(h5) 33.Qh8# 29.-Kh8 30.Rh1 h6 32.Rxh6#
Aug-26-20  Walter Glattke: 28.-Nxa5 29.Be6+ Kh8 30.Rh1 Qxb2+ 31.Bxb2 mate next
Aug-26-20  Brenin: 28 Rxe8 solves White's en prise problems, and delivers mate or wins material, e.g. 28 ... Nxa5 29 Be6+ Kh8 30 Rh1 h6 31 Rxh6 mate (thanks to the Bc3 pinning the g pawn).
Aug-26-20  newzild: The main line is obvious:

28. Rxe8 Nxa5
29. Be6+ Kh8
30. Rh1 and mates

Less obvious is:

28. Rxe8 Rxe8

...and now at first glance White can fork two bits with 29. Qa4. However, Black has the reply 29...Re3, hitting the Bh3.

Therefore, <Walter Glattke> is probably on the right track.

Aug-26-20  Brenin: After 28 ... Rxe8 I planned 29 Qa4, forking R and N, and maintaining the threat of Be6+.
Aug-26-20  Delboy: Nobody is mentioning the possibility of 28. ... Rxe8 29. Qd8, the main point being that black cannot capture the queen due to 30. Be6+ Kh8 31. Rh1, mating. Black can then play several other 29th moves now, but in all white now seems to win material due to the multiple threats (Qxe8, Be6+, gxh7)
Aug-26-20  agb2002: White has the bishop pair for a bishop, a knight and two pawns.

Black threatens Nxa5 and Nxb2.

White can start an attack against the black king with 28.Rxe8:

A) 28... Nxa5 29.Rxb8 Qxb8 30.Be6+ Kh8 31.Rh1 and mate in three.

B) 28... Rxe8 29.Qa4 Re4 30.Be6+ Kh8 31.Qe8 Rxf4 32.Rh1 wins.

Aug-26-20  Walter Glattke: I found some traps, after 28.Bxe6!? Rxe6 black could play Rxg6 or hxg6, continue with 29.gxh7+ Kh8, but the continuations are black advantage then.
Aug-26-20  Walter Glattke: *28.Be6+
Aug-26-20  Predrag3141: <newzild> 28 Rxe8 Rxe8 29 Qa4 Re3 30 Be6+ Rxe6 is nothing for White to avoid.

<Delboy> I avoided 28 Rxe8 Rxe8 29 Qd8 because of ... Qe7. But you're right, carrying out the threat of Be6+ -- after trading queens -- still forces Black to trade his rook for the bishop, giving white a strong passed pawn on e6. Tricky moves like 30 Be6+ and 30 Qxe8 lose though.

Aug-26-20  mel gibson: There were so many threats.
I saw the first ply.

Stockfish 11 says mate in 20:

28. Rxe8

(28. Rxe8 (♖e1xe8 ♖b8xe8 ♕a5-a4 ♖e8-e4 ♗h3-e6+ ♖e4xe6 d5xe6 ♕b7-c8 ♕a4-d7 ♕c8xd7 e6xd7 ♗f8-e7 ♖d1-e1 ♘c4-e5 f4xe5 h7xg6 e5xd6 ♗e7-g5+ ♗c3-d2 ♗g5-d8 ♖e1-e8+ ♔g8-f7 ♖e8xd8 ♔f7-e6 ♗d2-b4 g6-g5 ♖d8-e8+ ♔e6xd7 ♖e8-e7+ ♔d7-c8 ♗b4-a5 g5-g4 d6-d7+ ♔c8-b7 d7-d8♕+ ♔b7-c6 ♕d8-d3 a7-a6 ♖e7-c7+) +M20/66 293)

Aug-26-20  TheaN: Actually got this one throughout. After <28.Rxe8!> White leaves his queen en prise, given that after 28....Nxa5 29.Be6+ Kh8 30.Rh1 Black has no defense against mate, as Pg7 is pinned, after 30....Qxb2+ 31.Bxb2 Nb3+ 32.axb3 h6 33.Rxh6#.

<28....Rxe8> is slightly more involved, but my eye immediately fell upon the fork <29.Qa4 +-> and this simply works. The problem for Black is that the threat of Be6+ with Rh1 still exists, so defending both pieces with Rc8/Re4 doesn't work as White simply wins with 30.Be6+ and carnage.

Pretty on point for a Wednesday, given the sac-accept combination and the relatively tricky Qa4.

Aug-26-20  Eduardo Leon: The first move is reasonably easy to see: 28.♖xe8, threatening the deadly 29.♗e6+ ♔h8 30.♖h1 and mate next move. Thus black does not have enough time to take the queen with 28...♘xa5, and must play 28...♖xe8 instead. But then 29.♕a4 ♖e4 30.♕xc4 wins a minor piece, because 30...♖xc4 31.♗e6+ leads to the same mate that declining the queen was meant to prevent.
Aug-26-20  Whitehat1963: Stock fish: 28...Rxe8 29. Be6+ Rxe6 30. gxh7+ Kh8 31. Qd8 Qe7 32. Qc8 Re4 33. b3 Nb6 34. Qf5 Nd7 35. a4 Re2 36. Bd4 Nf6 37. Rg1 Nxh7 38. Rh1 Re1+ 39. Rxe1 Qxe1+ 40. Kb2 Qe7 41. b4 Qe1 42. c3 with equality.
Aug-26-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  chrisowen: Been a five plus no?
Aug-26-20  Brenin: <Whitehat1963>: Why bother with 28 ... Rxe8? As several have pointed out earlier, after 28 ... Rxe8 White wins convincingly with 29 Qa4 or Qd8: he is already two pawns up, and the threats of Qxc4, Qxe8 and Be6+ mean significant further loss of material or mate for Black.
Aug-26-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  fm avari viraf: < Englishman > Good analysis!
Aug-26-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jimfromprovidence: JUST FYI...I was wondering how 28 Qa4 compared to the text. Someone beat me to the punch and ran CG's engine for one minute. here are the results.

1) +11.43 (26 ply) 28.Rxe8 Rxe8 29.Qa4 Re7

2) +10.22 (25 ply) 28.Qa4 Ne3 29.Rd3 Nxd5

Putting that analysis aside for a minute, interestingly, even after 28 Qa4 Rxe1 29 Rxe1, below, if black moves the knight he is still susceptible to the mating threat beginning with 30 Be6+, seeing 31 Rh1. So it looks like that knight is lost.


click for larger view

Aug-26-20  messachess: Nice little puzzle.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC