chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Charles Gilbert Heydon vs Andrew Burns
NSW v VIC Telegraph Match (1870), Australia, Nov-09
Dutch Defense: Rubinstein Variation (A84)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 31 more games of A Burns
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can display posts in reverse order, by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page and checking the option "Display newest kibitzes on top."

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-11-13  optimal play: This game was played on Board 3 (out of 7) in the telegraph match between New South Wales and Victoria on 9th November 1870 with seven players on each team playing from Sydney & Melbourne.

<<<<<NOTES.>

(a) 6.f3

This move, the source of much subsequent embarrassment to White, is inexplicable on the part of so experienced an amateur as Mr. Heydon.

(b) 6...♘h5

Black at once assumes the attack.

(c) 10.b4

White's position is one of great difficulty, and calls for active measures. P to K B 4 would have freed his game somewhat.

(d) 13.♘e2

Playing his opponent's game. By moving P to K 4 he would have obtained a fine game. For suppose:- 13. P to K 4 ; P takes P ; 14. Kt takes P ; B to K 2 ; 15. B to Q B sq. <(13.e4 fxe4 14.♘xe4 ♗e7 15.♗c1)>

(e) 16...♗g5

Black has been gradually enmeshing his adversary in a web from which it is now impossible to escape without loss.

(f) 19...♘e7

It would have been better to have taken Kt with B first.

(g) 20.♘gh3

Well played.

(h) 23.♘gxe6

There was no escape for the Kt, but it strikes us that P to K 4, would have been better play, and would have given White a fine game.

(i) 28.♗c4

White now succeeds in accomplishing his object, which was that of winning the B P.

(j) 30...♘e7

To avoid its threatened capture by the R followed Kt takes Q B P.

(k) 31.♖f4

A sad error. 31 R to Kt 5 ch, would have gained another Pawn, and ought to have enabled white to win the game.

(l) 36.♘xc7

An ill-considered move.

(m) 37.♘xa6

Throwing away his last chance. He should have played P to Q 5.

This game is one of the best played in the match and contains many beautiful and instructive situations. Mr. Heydon felt, however, in the later stages of it that the time, which was very strictly noted by the Victorian representative, Mr. Walker, was too short to admit of proper analysis on his part.>

- Australian Town and Country Journal (NSW) issue Saturday 19 November 1870>

The result of the match was that Victoria scored games 1, 2 and 3 ; New South Wales scored game No. 4. Games Nos. 5 and 6 were drawn, and No. 7 terminated in a dispute, which it has been agreed to refer to Judge Francis.>

- Australian Town and Country Journal (NSW) issue Saturday 12 November 1870>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC