chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Vasyl Ivanchuk vs Yue Wang
"Wang Zugs" (game of the day Dec-27-2009)
M-Tel Masters (2009), Sofia BUL, rd 2, May-14
Russian Game: Nimzowitsch Attack (C42)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 17 times; par: 81 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 20 more Ivanchuk/Y Wang games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Games that have been used in game collections will have a section at the bottom which shows collections which include it. For more information, see "What are Game Collections?" on our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-15-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  kamalakanta: What is wrong with 44.Bxe6 Kxe6 45.Bxg5?

It seems to me White can't lose this ending. It must have been time pressure.

May-15-09  Eisenheim: ivanchuk has been taking a beating lately - probably no better than a 2600 player (which is still pretty good, but just can't compete with the best)
May-15-09  cade: <kamalakanta> Chucky thought he had a chance to win and entering an opposite coloured bishop ending snuffs out that chance.
May-15-09  muradov: 47...h4+ what a nice move!
May-15-09  southall:


click for larger view

44.Bxg5?? (44.Bxe6 Kxe6 45.Bxg5 hxg4 46.Kxg4 d5 = and the opposite colored bishops gives Black the draw)

May-16-09  melianis: Didn't someone have a collection called "unusual winning moves"?
May-16-09  WhiteRook48: 5 Nc3?!?! is very dubious. 5. d4 was probably better, but GMs take risks
May-16-09  paul1959: Actually 47... h4+ may not be winning at all. Chess sites point to 49 b4 as the decisive mistake.

White King is in stalemate position after h2-h3 so White should try to block or give away pawns on the queenside. 49 h2-h3 is a possibility and if for example 49... a6-a5 then 50 c2-c3 b7-b6 51 b3-b4 Kmove 52 b4xa5 b6xa5 53 c3-c4 Now if Black maintains the stalemate , 54 c4-c5 d6xc5 55 d5-d6 draws. If Black releases the stalemate , White will play Kg3 followed by pushing the h-pawn.

May-18-09  cannibal: <paul1959>

I've looked at it for a while now, and I think 47. ... h4+ IS winning in all lines.

The clou is that black only makes a step to the fourth rank (a5 or b5) AFTER white does so. I.e., if 49.b4 (as in the game), then b5!, if 49.c4, then a5!, and if anything else (49.h3, Kh3, c3, or even a5), then b6!, and black just waits until white has to move b4 or c4.

One more thing I've been looking at: what if white decides NOT to go into stalemate with Kh4 and h3? Because in all the lines, white queens only one ply after black, so if there's any chance that he can avoid immediate mate somehow, he might be fine.

So, 49.Kh3 b6 50.b4 b5 51.a5 Kf2 52.c4


click for larger view

(we want to play the suicide bomber c4 while the black king is on f2, as with the king on f3 the mate is rather trivial)

52. ...bxc4 53.b5 c3 54.b6 (bxa6 won't change anything) c2 55.b7 c1Q 56.b8Q


click for larger view

and now at first I was a bit puzzled, because after e.g. Qf1+ Kh4, where's the mate? Fortunately, there's 56. ...Qc3+ 57.Kh4 Kg2!


click for larger view

and white can neither give a check nor
prevent mate at h3.

Maybe Chucky didn't see through all this at the board, because if he did, I think it might have been worth trying. After all, Wang Yue blew a winning endgame in one move the round before, and it doesn't look totally impossible to play something like 56... Qe3+ in time trouble, suddenly finding yourself without continuation.

May-19-09  dreammachine: chessmind has its own take

http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/pos...

http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/fil...

May-20-09  Duque Roquero: <cannibal> Thanks for your analysis. That line you found is very interesting. After 57…Kg2! White plays 58. Qb2+ (forced) and then 58…Qxb2; 59.h3 Qf2# (or Qh8#) .
May-28-09  Glossu: The game was shown in the Panda's Blogs at:
http://zorbin.wordpress.com/
May-29-09  notyetagm: DR. MUELLER:

http://www.chessbase.com/cbm/cbm129...

Jun-06-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer:

The thought occurred to me recently that 49. a5 might have been better than Ivanchuk's 49. b4. I seem to recall that Kmoch in "Pawn Power" (which I read several eons ago) uses the term "quartgrip" to describe a winning formation that White would now get if he could also get in b4 and c4. This formation allows a breakthrough roughly similar to the well-known breakthrough with 1. b6 that is available in this position:


click for larger view

.

Getting back to the Ivanchuk-Wang game, the 49. a5 idea does not work because White does not get time to get the b- and c-pawns to the fourth rank, and he ends up in a zugzwang much as in the game: 49.a5 b6 50.b4 b5 51.Kh3 Kf2 52.c3 Kf3 53.Kh4 Kg2 54.h3 Kf3 55.c4 bxc4 56.b5 c3 57.bxa6 c2 58.a7 c1=Q 59.a8=Q Qe1#.

Jun-06-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: For anyone who may be interested, here is an illustration (my own analysis; I have not checked Kmoch) how the "quartgrip" breakthrough works from the position below:


click for larger view

1.b5 Kg3 2.c5 axb5 3.c6 bxc6 [3...b6 4.a6 (or 4.axb6 ) ] 4.a6

Jun-06-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: To supplement the analysis from my previous post, if Black tries 2. Kf4, he still loses: 2...Kf4 3.b6 c6 (3...cxb6 4.c6 ) 4.dxc6 .
Jun-06-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: FWIW with regard to my comments above re: “quartgrip”, if one considers the position after 47. … h4+!! 48. Kxh4 Kf3!:


click for larger view

… and if one now imagines that White could bring about the “quartgrip” formation in one move (instead on the three actually required), the following position (with Black to move):


click for larger view

would indeed be winning for White regardless of whether Black tries the zugzwang idea that worked in the actual game: 1...Kf2 2.b5 Ke3 3.c5 Kd4 4.c6 b6 5.axb6 or tries to run his King immediately through the center to the Q-side: 1...Ke4 2.Kg3 Kd4 3.h4 Kxc4 4.h5 Kxd5 5.h6 c5 6.bxc5 dxc5 7.h7 c4 8.h8Q .

Nov-30-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: <kamalakanta>
What is wrong with 44.Bxe6 Kxe6 45.Bxg5?

Kamalakanta,
44.♗e6 ♔e6 45.♗g5 looks pretty good to me, eg {45..hg4 46.Kg4) and White seems to have the advantage with the 2-1 pawn advantage on the Kingside.

Dec-27-09  WhiteRook48: 52...Kg2 53 c4 bxc4 54 b5 c3 55 bxa6 c2 56 a7 c1=Q 57 a8=Q Qe1#
Dec-27-09  randomsac: Nasty way to trap the white king.
Dec-27-09  SuperPatzer77: Instead of White's actual move of 49. b4, White's best try is 49. a5!? below:

Black's strong reply to 49. a5 is:

49...c6! 50. dxc6 bxc6, 51. c3 d5!, 52. b4 Kg2!, 53. h3 Kf3 (now White is in complete zugzwang) 53. b5 (desperate move) cxb5, 54. c4! b4!! (54...d4??), 55. cxd5 b3, 56. d6 b2, 57. d7 b1=Q, 58. d8=Q Qe1# 0-1

It is awfully tricky!!! It is not easy to solve that. It's almost mind-boggling!!

See that Black still has a tempo and puts White into zugzwang so, Vassily Ivanchuk (White) resigns.

SuperPatzer77

Dec-27-09  ajile: Seriously what is the compensation for White in this opening with the doubled pawns? I'm not seeing it.
Dec-27-09  Starf1re: ajile: the compensation for the doubled pawns is white's half-open Q file, and Rybka suggests it as the main line after 4)nxe4....
Dec-27-09  ajile: lol

Just because Rybka has this opening loaded doesn't mean it's good.

Dec-27-09  The Rocket: "Seriously what is the compensation for White in this opening with the doubled pawns? I'm not seeing it."

open lines of course, and its really no weakness in the endgame....

Its hard to explain though to lower rated players who simply look superficually at the positions and see doubled pawns and suddenly think black is better.. its also about piece activity!! in fact the position is perfectly equal after both castle.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC