Arno Nickel vs Hydra (Computer) (2004) Dehydration

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

Arno Nickel vs Hydra (Computer)
"Dehydration" (game of the day Aug-25-2008)
Corr. Chess Match (2004) (correspondence), Abu Dhabi/Berlin, Sep-16
Sicilian Defense: Paulsen. Bastrikov Variation English Attack (B48) · 1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Given 24 times; par: 50 [what's this?]

explore this opening	find similar games	2 more A Nickel/Hydra games
	PGN: download \| view \| print	Help: general \| java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE. [CLICK HERE]

< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 · Later Kibitzing>
Jul-17-08		jeeky1996: Nice victory. In my opinion, all computers are strategically dumb except Rybka of course.

Jul-24-08		ravel5184: <last pawn> Are you the person I think you are?

Aug-25-08		andrewjsacks: This version or level of Hydra is obviously not that strong.

Aug-25-08		dabearsrock1010: towards the 35th moves of the game while white's king appears more exposed black's king is the real glaring weakness on the board which eventually decides the game. The refutation of 37...e5 is stunning and is a result of the king's weakness.

Aug-25-08		RandomVisitor: Wow. This was one of the first games I analyzed, over 2 years ago.

Aug-25-08		al wazir: I think 41. Rc7 would also have won. If 41...Rf8, then 42. Raa7 Kg8 43. g5. If 41...Bc4, then 42. Raa7 Rf8 43. g5 Ng7 44. Nf7+.

Aug-25-08		RandomVisitor: See Nickel's analysis of this game: http://amici.iccf.com/issues/issue_... Arno Nickel on the time control for this game: "we played with Fischer time: 20 days for the game and in addition 2 days per move"

Aug-25-08		WannaBe: <RandomVisitor: ... "we played with Fischer time: 20 days...."> Be very interesting to know the time duration of each move, logically, openings were played relatively quickly, and slows down into the middle game. Be curious to find out which move(s) took the longest to play, for both sides.

Aug-25-08		Katu: <jeeky1996:In my opinion, all computers are strategically dumb except Rybka of course.> ...and Fritz?

Aug-25-08		AniamL: Good pun.

Aug-25-08		kevin86: Black will be steamrolled by two rooks and a knight: To be rolled. 23...♖xg5 24 ♖b8+ ♖g8 25 ♖xg8+ ♔xg8 26 ♖a8#. or smothered 24 ♖b8+ ♖g8 (or ♘g8 25 ♘xf7#) 25 ♖xg8+ ♘xg8 26 ♘xf7#

Aug-25-08		ajile: I don't like White's spearhead pawn on e5. So I guess I'd prefer Black play a line with an early d6 to prevent this.

Oct-18-08		The Rocket: nickel was allowed assistence by personal computer engines so Its impossible to say how many moves he actually came up with

Dec-07-08		DwayneMeller: If the rocket is right...Nickel did not really win and is a fraudulent cheat! I've never heard of any human sitting down 1on1 against a high level computer ( fritz10 rybka or chessmaster10's chessmaster) and beating it ( I have heard of fritz6 being beaten by Anand but that was 6 not 10!)...now I hear this guy beat Hydra? A comp I never heard of...but is supposedly stronger than rybka zappa etc? You got to be kidding me! This was correspondence chess & EVERYONE knows comps slow down after that period of time (which is why his analysis is better than Hydra's moves) only in a sit down "OTB" type match like 2hours each Nickel v.Hydra NO COMP ASSISTANCE could he say "I beat Hydra" Hydra would tear him to shreds! Cuz he ain't smart enough to beat Hydra and he knows it!!!

Feb-15-09		WhiteRook48: maybe Nickel didn't get computer analysis. But we all know we should no match A Dime against Hydra (awful pun)

Feb-22-09		WhiteRook48: you have no evidence that he cheated

Feb-27-09		WhiteRook48: fascinating!

Mar-10-09		YuanTi: <If the rocket is right...Nickel did not really win and is a fraudulent cheat! I've never heard of any human sitting down 1on1 against a high level computer ( fritz10 rybka or chessmaster10's chessmaster) and beating it> Haha. Chessmaster is not even mentioned at high level computer games, and playing correspondence chess generally isn't regarded as cheating. Had GMAN followed a computers moves, he would almost certainly have lost, as Hydra was more powerful than any other chess computer at the time.

Jan-18-11		kevins55555: Did anyone notice this unusual thing?<<<<<<<<Abu Dhabi/ Berlin>>>>>>>> on the site? Abu is a character of the Aladdin scene of Disney!

Mar-17-11		theodor: 42. ..;Rf8?!

Mar-25-11		theodor: 43.g5;Ng8 44.Ra8(g8), threatening Rxf7#

Mar-03-12		Xeroxx: Arno Nickel vs Hydra

Jul-25-15		thegoodanarchist: Strategic mistake by Black, putting the knight on h6. Black is practically a piece down after that, since the knight is <almost> useless.

Jul-25-15		morfishine: Quite an interesting game, particularly for that year and how far engines have progressed since then. Surely an error was <35...Kh8> what with the pawn on <f6> Black's back rank is weak in the extreme: the only route to escape was via <f8>

Jul-25-15		thegoodanarchist: <morfishine: Quite an interesting game, particularly for that year and how far engines have progressed since then.> Do you think the world team here on cg.com could defeat today's top engine in the correspondence chess time control used on this site (for the human side only)? Could GMAN, for that matter? I believe that the time control for the engine was 6 hours per move or something like that - I would want to place the same control on the engine for the sake of repeating the experiment.

search thread:
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 · Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
No trolling.
The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.