Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
George Brunton Fraser vs Wilhelm Steinitz
Dundee Congress (1867), Dundee SCO, rd 6, Sep-10
Spanish Game: Cozio Defense. General (C60)  ·  0-1



Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 15 more G B Fraser/Steinitz games
sac: 17...Rxg2+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some people don't like to know the result of the game in advance. This can be done by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page, then checking "Don't show game results".

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-20-04  mjk: 10.0-0? White probably though he was pretty safe--after all the exchanges, Black is uncastled, has doubled pawns, three pawn islands, and no pieces developed.

The problem is White is undeveloped and cramped.

This game is in (at least) two collections, but there is no kibitzing (until now)!

Feb-17-11  madhatter5: 8.♗xc6 is the real blunder. White, thinking that black's doubled pawns would cripple him in the ending, traded his bishop for the knight, and Steinitz pounced on the mistake by exploiting white's weak light squares and using the 2 bishops to their maximum nominal potential. Very instructive.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 17...Rxg2+!! is genial shot. Black bishop pair was a monster.
Apr-14-15  ToTheDeath: Steinitz must have felt like God in those days, understanding the laws of positional chess amongst a world of primitive pushers.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <ToTheDeath> In this case he rather shows his tactical genius. By the way, to sacrifice the Rook on g2 was possible already in the move 16. Instead of 17.b4(?), which seems to win material but which in fact "forces" black to pull out his winning combination, it was better to play 17.Be5 Re6 18.Bf4 preventing it. Of course, instead of 16.Bc3(?) allowing 16...Rxg2+!! white should have played for example 16.Bf6 Rd6 17.Be5 Re6 18.Bf4.
Apr-15-15  lentil: Why did B wait with 16. ... Rd6. 16 Rxg2+ seems to accomplish the same result.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <lentil> Steinitz just missed that it works already in the move 16. He probably wanted to have the Rook on the 6th rank because in some lines the Rook can check on h6 but it was not necessary, as white is so paralysed to organise any successful defense, and on the other hand white could prevent the combination in a way I have suggested above or by playing simple 17.g3. But Steinitz definitely saw the whole combo already when he played 16...Rd6 and he expected that white is going to play 17.b4, so 16...Rd6 was a tactical trap.
Apr-15-15  ToTheDeath: <Honza Cervenka> I was referring to the opening phase, in particular the winning bind he has after 11..Bd3, which of course no modern master would allow. Really nice combination too.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Chess Tactics, by GM Drazen Marovic
from Published Games by Year and Unconfirmed Source 6 by fredthebear
The Dark Side
by lonchaney
Game 4
from Modern Chess Instructor - Part II (Steinitz) by Okavango
Dundee Congress 1867
by Calli
Game 4
from Modern Chess Instructor - Part II (Steinitz) by Qindarka
Normal: Nkd & Qsde
from Game collection: K by c65win
Steinitz games
by amdixon
The t_t Players: Staunton, Steinitz & Zukertort
by fredthebear
Start from 17.b4
from Chess Tactics, by GM Drazen Marovic by popski
Start from 17.b4
from Chess Tactics, by GM Drazen Marovic by Atsa

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC