Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Mark Taimanov vs Isaac Boleslavsky
Zuerich Candidates (1953), Zuerich SUI, rd 10, Sep-15
King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation. Aronin-Taimanov Defense (E97)  ·  1/2-1/2



Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 13 more Taimanov/Boleslavsky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The tournament is found above the game. For the newest chess events, this information may be a link which takes you to the tournament page which includes other games, a crosstable, discussion, etc.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  IMlday: In this move order, isn't 6.dxe5 powerful? Typo?
Sep-02-04  AdrianP: <IMlday> 6. dxe5 looks good to me - compare N Tolstikh vs E Sazonova, 2001
Sep-02-04  clocked: Topalov vs Kasimdzhanov, 1999 was only blitz, but how about Piket vs Gelfand, 1995
Sep-02-04  square dance: this game is apparently from the famous zurich '53 tournament and this is the move order of the game played. its from round 10. i have the 1979 dover edition and the game is #67 and on page 107 for anyone who wants to check it out.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: For anyone who has 'The Chess Struggle In Practice' see page 156. The move order is the same as given here but it's in English descriptive notation.

Why doesn't White play 6.dxe5 in this position as <IMlday> suggests?

Sep-02-04  acirce: It is given this way in Bronstein's famous book too - and without comment until after move 8. However, is 6.dxe5 that great? 6.dxe5 dxe5 7.Qxd8+ Kxd8 8.Nxe5 Nxe4 9.Nxf7+ Ke8 10.Nxe4 Kxf7 and doesn't Black have decent compensation - easy development while White's is a little hampered, etc? 11.c5 with the idea of Bc4+ does look good though. Not sure about the evaluation.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: Maybe 5...e5 had not been played before, and Taimanov feared some home preparation. If you have never seen this before, the line <acirce> gives looks playable for black, and Taimanov may have seen as much and felt insecure about whether to enter into that. Here it's good to point out that he had been crushed, also with the white pieces and in a KID, against Najdorf in round 4 of this same tournament... In that case Najdorf surprised him with the Mar del Plata variation, that had been born earlier that year and had not crossed the Atlantic yet. Interestingly, the MDP variation had made its debut against Najdorf, who learned the hard way. See:

Taimanov vs Najdorf, 1953

(and the thread of comments under that game)


Najdorf vs Gligoric, 1953

All this makes me think that maybe Boleslavsky didn't have any particular ace under his sleeve, but knew that Taimanov, having lost to Najdorf, would probably make lots of assumptions about his (Boleslavsky's) secret tricks. Psychological warfare or true home preparation?

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Round Ten, Game 67
from WCC Index [Zurich 1953] by TigerTiger
Game 67
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by DrOMM
Game 67
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by Okavango
Game 67
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by isfsam
Game 67
from book: Zurich Candidates Tournament of 1953 (Bron by Baby Hawk
Game 67
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by cassiooo
Game 67
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by uril
Round Ten, Game 67
from WCC Index [Zurich 1953] by Atsa
Game 67
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by Qindarka
Game 67
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by smarticecream
Round Ten, Game 67
from WCC Index [Zurich 1953] by suenteus po 147
Game 67
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by passion4chess
Round Ten, Game 67
from WCC Index [Zurich 1953] by Scotsgeek
Round Ten, Game 67
from WCC Index [Zurich 1953] by JoseTigranTalFischer
Round Ten, Game 67
from WCC Zurich 1953 by Pawn N Hand
Game 67
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by MSteen
Game 67
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by Parmenides1963

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC