chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Tigran Petrosian vs Miguel Najdorf
Second Piatigorsky Cup (1966), Santa Monica, CA USA, rd 8, Jul-28
King's Indian Attack: Smyslov Variation (A05)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 15 more Petrosian/Najdorf games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-31-05  wheelchiar bandit: b4!? how can it be proven wrong
Mar-16-06  Tobias: <wheelchiar bandit: b4!? how can it be proven wrong > It isn't wrong!
Mar-16-06  RookFile: Tartakower used to play this way in his games.
Mar-16-06  itz2000: 3. b4!
Jul-05-10  cuppajoe: < wheelchiar bandit: b4!? how can it be proven wrong>

I doubt if it can be, it's appeared in a World Championship match: Smyslov vs Botvinnik, 1958

Dec-18-14  zydeco: Good notes by both players on this game.

Petrosian's line is borrowed from Smyslov.

12....Qc7 is a bad inaccuracy - moving the queen for no good reason.

Najdorf feels that he's given white an advantage and begins to play very carefully. He calls 16.....b5 "a difficult move, which equalizes the game."

On move 31, Petrosian comments that "the game had become complicated in a rather lifeless way" - a strange statement which seems to mean that there were lots of intricate variations to calculate but nothing all that exciting.

Najdorf offered a draw on move 31. Petrosian declined it, and Najdorf, surprised, moved quickly and made the critical mistake with 31.....Rd4. 31....Nc3 would have led to complete equality.

45....h6 is a mistake. 45....h5 would have been better, reducing material further. Both players think that this endgame should be a draw, but Petrosian plays the last stage of the game perfectly.

On move 72, Najdorf had a decent chance with 72.....Nd7+ and the rook pawn will probably fall but leading to a theoretical draw. Petrosian comments: "But we must not forget that this was the last move before the time control, a moment which does not usually lend itself to the adoption of heroic decisions."

Najdorf sets a trap with 82....Kh7 and if 83.Rxf8 Rd5+ is stalemate.

Nov-24-23  Kingsider: two rats and orangutan. you aint foolin me.
Nov-27-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 77...Nh7? loses by force. 77...Nd7 seems to be much better.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC