chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Heinrich Wolf vs Theodor von Scheve
Monte Carlo (1902), Monte Carlo MNC, rd 12, Feb-21
French Defense: Classical. Alapin Variation (C14)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 320 more games of H Wolf
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-28-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: A game shaping up to be an engrossing struggle, with Wolf eyeing the King-side while von Scheve attempted a whole-sale pawn advance on the other wing that came to a crashing halt when von Scheve began to lose the thread of the game on or about move 22 and then miscalculated with his blunder on move 26. The game ended shortly thereafter when von Scheve recognized belatingly that the pin on which he had staked his fortunes did not have the effect he had expected and that it was he and not Wolf who faced a back-rank mate.

1. e4 e6
2.d4 d5
3. Nc3 Nf6

The Classical French was far more popular than 3...Bb4 back in 1902.

4. Bg5 Be7
5. e5 Nfd7
6. BxB

The heyday of 6.. h4, later called the "Alekhine-Chatard Attack." though known in 1902, still lay in the future. The text is fine is White is prepared to settle for a small advantage without yet committing to an all-out King's side attack.

6... QxB


click for larger view

7. Nb5?

7. f4 is most usual and probably best here. But the text was popularized first by Alapin about 15 moves before this game, was tried several times by Charousek, and was later utilized by Marozcy a few times, most recently in his 6th round win over Reggio at this tournament (see my notes on the opening in that game on this site). It later became a pet line of Rudolph Spielmann.

7... Nb6

As played by Reggio in the earlier game. Reggio (playing White) had defeated Mason after he adopted the text at Monte Carlo 1901 (and was unfairly criticized for not playing the supposedly stronger 7...Qd8). In fact, as I noted in my notes on Reggio-Mason, both move are fine. Ironically, Reggio, having won as White in this position after Mason played 7...Nb7, then played the same move against Maroczy at Monte Carlo 1902. Despite the earlier results, von Scheve decided to try the text and came out of the opening in decent shape.

8. c3

As played in the earlier games by Maroczy and Reggio. Indeed, one of the ideas of 7. Nb5 is to allow White to buttress his center with 8. c3.

8... a6

The best way to attempt to punish the early venture by the White Knight on b5.

9. Na3


click for larger view

9... c5

Mason played 9...f5?! in his loss to Reggio at Monte Carlo 1901.

Reggio played the more solid 9...f6 against Maroczy in the above-mentioned 6th round game against Maroczy and was followed in this regard by Rodolf Spielmann. The text, however, later became considered best. It was most notably featured in Lilienthal's win as Black against Emanuel Lasker at Moscow 1936.

10. Qd2

Lasker played 10. Nc2 in his game against Lilienthal at Moscow 1936 and got a decent position, losing only because of later mistakes.

Lasker's move, as well as 10. f4 and 10. Qd2 as played by Wolf here are all reasonable choices.

10... Nc6
11. Nc2

Trying to find a way to get this Knight back in the game makes sense, but arguably 11. f4 was best.


click for larger view

11... Nd7

Perhaps already planning a Queen-side storm. But simplest and probably most prudent were 11...cxd4 or 11...f6.

12. f4

Beginning here the game became quite interesting; the players each locking in on attacking on one side of the board. In these sorts of struggles, the superior tactical player generally finds a way to win, as occurred here.

The prepares to bring White's g1 Knight into the intended King-side attack.

12... b5

Staking out his area for attack: the Queen-side.

13. Nf3

All according to plan.

13... f6

While hardly a blunder, the text played into Wolf's concept by creating a King-side weakness.

15. Be2 0-0
15. 0-0


click for larger view

Oct-29-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: Post II

15... a5?!

Seriously overplaying his hand on the Queen-side. von Scheve would not have been much worse with 15...c4 or 15...Bb7 (or 15...fxe5 or 15...Rb8 for that matter).

The text, by contrast, looks positively wretched. One must wonder--especially in light of Wolf's response--whether there is an error in the score here. Doesn't 15...a5 just lose a pawn, the position now being:


click for larger view

The Tournament Book commentary makes no mention that Black's b-pawn is now hanging, and provides no explanation as to why the usually reliable Wolf did not play 16. Bxb5 (or 16. exf6 and then 17. Bxb5).

I gave the position to both Fritz and Stockfish, each of which just (duh) played 16. Bxb5.

16. Ne3?

Surely the failure to snatch a pawn deserves a "?"

But now, to quote Lewis Carroll, things got "curiouser and curiouser":

16... fxe5?

Letting the pawn hang for another move rather than protect it with 16...Rb8 or 16...Ba6 or 16...b4. I just don't get it.

Now, surely, Wolf would grab the Black b-pawn, the position now being:


click for larger view

White can now just play 17. Bxb5 and then if 17...Bb7 18. dxe5 winning a pawn; and if instead 17...exd4 18. Nxd5! after which Black has nothing better than 18...Qd6 [18...exN 19. BxN Rb8 20. Bd5+ Kh8 21. cxd4 with a clear win for White] 19. BxN Rb8 20. c4 exN 21. Bxd5+ and White is up a full pawn with no real compensation for Black.

But the mystery continues, since Wolf reportedly played:

17. fxd4?


click for larger view

Material was still equal and it is hard to decide who was better. Black would now be fine with 17...Ba6 or 17...b4. But instead, von Scheve reportedly played:

17... c4?

Rightly called an "ineffectual advance" by the Tournament Book, which notes that--among other things--the text helps White bring his Bishop into action.

The position was now:


click for larger view

Wolf could now have stymied von Scheve's Queen-side plans with 18. b3. Instead--and another indication that something is amiss with the reported score of this game--Wolf played a mystery move:

18. Kh1?

Bad as this move looks, it--quite indirectly--proved to be the winning move by giving von Scheve the mistaken notion that (in a few moves) White could suffer a back-rank mate.

18... b4

Continuing his Queen-side pawn march.

The game was now getting quite exciting (assuming this position actually occurred--I still don't trust the score):


click for larger view

The contest was very much in the balance. But von Scheve was operating based on an illusion; and this illusion would soon cause him to blunder away his chances.

Oct-30-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: Post III

19. Rg1

Posting a Rook on g1 no doubt explains Wolf's 18. Kh1, but the idea was garbled and succeeded in spite of its actual merits.

19... a4

Meanwhile, on the other side of the board, von Scheve continued his unceasing pawn advance.


click for larger view

20. Bd1

One way to address the menacing Black pawn formation on the Queen side. There were, however, probably better ways: e.g., 20. b3; 20. Nc2; 20. a3; or even 20) Rgb1 [effectively conceding his last move was a lemon]

20... a3

Von Scheve was so set on his pawn storm he seems to have overlooked the stronger 20...Nb6.

21. b3

Pretty much forced, and leaving:


click for larger view

21... cxb3

Again too fixated to stop to play 21...Nb6.

22, Bxb3


click for larger view

22... Bb7

And now, when he should have trudged on with 22...bxc3 or 22...Nb6, von Scheve got other ideas, worried about a possible sacrifice by White on d5. But the text was not the way to deal with the problem.

23. Rgc1

"White transfers the action now to the Queen's side, Black having voluntarily weakened that wing." (Tournament Book)

But the way to exploit Black's play was with the far superior 23. Rab1.

The position now was:


click for larger view

23... Rac8

Still mysteriously declining to play bxc3 or Nb6.

24. Rab1 bxc3

Better late than never!

25. Rxc3


click for larger view

25... Ba8?

Already beginning to dig his pwn grave and almost certainly operating under the mistaken assumption that would be displayed by his next move. 25...Ncb8or 25...Rb8 would have afforded von Scheve excellent chances to hold his by now clearly inferior position.

26. Rbc1

Thus worked spectacularly given von Scheve's upcoming blunder on his next move, but speaking objectively of the position at hand Wolf should have played 26. Bc2 or 26. Ba4.

What proved to be the key position in the game had now been reached:


click for larger view

Oct-30-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: Post IV

26... Qb4??

The losing move. von Scheve was already in trouble, but 26...Nb6 and perhaps 26...Na7 might have saved the day.

The flaw in von Scheve's reasoning was exposed by the commentary in the Tournament Book:

"Overlooking that the pinning of the Rook does not prevent White's obvious sacrifice."

The nature of von Scheve's illusion is more easily explained by examining the position after 26...Qb4?:


click for larger view

As will soon become clear, von Scheve thought that the pin on the White c3 Rook would prevent White from playing Rxc6 [after the coming Knight sacrifice] because of White's back-rank weakness. But somewhere down the rocky road von Scheve seemed to have forgotten that the White Knight after the trade of Queens would land on d2 where it would cover f1!

Hard to believe? All I can say is, watch what developed now.

27. Nxd5!

27. Ng5 also wins for White, but the text was more forcing and more aesthetically pleasing.

von Scheve obviously thought 26...Qb4 made this impossible. His illusions were now quickly shattered.

27... exN
28. Bxd5+ Kh8

This left:


click for larger view

Can White now pick up a piece of c6? von Scheve apparently thought not. But he was wrong:

29. BxN BxB
30. RxB


click for larger view

Somewhere about here, von Scheve finally saw that he was busted.

30... RxR
31. RxR

Oops. Now 31...QxQ 32. NxQ prevents the back rank mate, while 31...RxN also loses quickly because:

31... RxN
32. gxR


click for larger view

The White Queen is now undefended, but Black is now the one facing a back-rank mate.

White is now up two pawns and the exchange. The game was thus over:

32... Qb7

Preventing the back-rank mate, but not altering the now inevitable result:

33. Qc2 g6
34. Kg2

Even more crushing was 34. e6, but the text was quite sufficient to induce resignation:


click for larger view

1-0

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC