Frank Marshall vs William Ward (1901)

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

Frank Marshall vs William Ward
6th Anglo-American Cable Match (1901), London ENG / New York USA, rd 1, Apr-19
Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation (D50) · 0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening	find similar games	6 more Marshall/W Ward games
	PGN: download \| view \| print	Help: general \| java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Feb-28-18		yurikvelo: https://pastebin.com/7zbS6zYY multiPV 39.g3! - win 39.Kf3?? - blunder and forced loss

Oct-11-20		KEG: The critical moment that decided this game was identified by <yurikvelo> on this site over two years ago. Marshall had what was almost certainly a won ending, and blundered this all away on his 39th move. In fact, this game--one of many major disappointments for Marshall in the (for him) disastrous year 1901--was spotty from beginning to end. Marshall badly misplayed the opening and may have been strategically lost (as White!) as early as move 16 and--after Ward blew his edge--once again by move 19. But Ward misplayed his favorable position and was in a lost ending by move 23, got a reprieve from Marshall and was OK again after Marshall's weak 34th move, blundered himself back to a lost ending on his own 34th move, but wound up winning when Marshall overlooked a fairly obvious combination on move 39 and was then hopelessly lost. Not a game either player was likely to want to remember. From a sporting perspective, Marshall's loss here allowed the British team to salvage a draw in this ten-board match. 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. Nf3 Nbd7 click for larger view A standard position in the Orthodox Queen's Gambit Declined. 6. c5?! Hardly to be recommended (best for White here is 6. cxd5 or 6. e3), though played by Marshall a couple of months earlier at Monte Carlo 1901 in his win against Mason (one of the few bright spots for Marshall at that tournament). 6... c6 Mason's move against Marshall at Monte Carlo 1901. 7. e3 e5 Mason had played 7...0-0. Both moves are reasonable, but the text is more dynamic. Ward may well have prepared this move in light of the earlier Marshall--Mason game. click for larger view 8. dxe5 Marshall appears to have become flustered after Ward's 7...e5. Best was the developing 8. Be2 8... Ne4! 9. BxB QxB 10. NxN dxN click for larger view Though playable, this is not a great position to achieve as White after just 1- moves. 11. Nd2 Nxc5 12. Nc4 0-0 13, Qd6 Marshall was reduced to seeking a trade of Queens to hold his own. 13... Re8 click for larger view 14. 0-0-0? Wild and unsound, but characteristic of what Soltis has aptly called Marshall's "sophomore slump" (i.e., his awful 1901 after his fine result at Paris 1900). 14... Be6 15. QxQ Marshall had nothing much better than to enter an inferior ending. 15... RxQ click for larger view 16. b4? This manic effort to create complications might have lost Marshall the game. Better were 16. b3 (so the a-pawn doesn't hang later), 16. Rf4, or even 16. Kc2. After 16. b4?, the position was: click for larger view

Oct-11-20		KEG: Post II 16... Na4 Simpler was 16...Nd7, though Black is also well-situated after the text. 17. Rd4 17. Rd6 was probably a better way to try to hold the game. 17... Bd5 17...g6 was a simpler way to anticipate any aggressive plans Marshall may have been contemplating. 18. Nd6 Marshall should have attended to the safety of his King with 18. Kd2. 18... Bxa2 Leaving Marshall's King badly exposed: click for larger view 19. Bc4? After this, Ward should have been able to clean up. Though hardly pleasant, Marshall had to play 19. Rxe4 (or maybe 19. Nxe4) 19... BxB 20. RxB click for larger view This is probably a winning ending for Black. It is thus remarkable how quickly Ward managed to ruin his chances and arrive at a lost position. 20... Nb6? Ward could have gone for the jugular here with 20...a5! and brought his a8 Rook to the party. 20...Rxe5 and 20...g6 would also have allowed Black to retain his advantage. After the text, Marshall slid out of danger. 21. Rxe4 Nd5 22. Kb2 click for larger view 22... b5? Mangling his own position. One major edge Ward enjoyed to this point was his Queen-side pawn majority. The text was the first terrible step by Ward to convert this solid advantage into a losing liability. Almost anything (e.g.. 22...g6; 22...Rb8; 22...Rd7; and even 22...Rf8; 22...a6) were better than the text. 23. Rc1! Now Marshall had all sorts of tactical chances of the sort at which he excelled even at this early stage of his career: click for larger view 23... Rc7? This blunder loses material and should have lost the game for Ward. He would have had at least a fighting chance with 23...a5! But now... 24. Rd4! Threatening 25. RxN (thanks to the pin of the Black c-pawn into which Ward had just walked). 24... Ne7 25. Nxb5 click for larger view A shocking turn of events for Ward, whose winning position just five moves earlier had been squandered, leaving him in what looked like a hopeless situation.

Oct-11-20		KEG: Post III 25... Rb7 26. Nd6! A powerful post for Marshall's Knight. 26... Rb6 27. Kc2 Though not fatal to his winning chances, putting his King on the c-file looks bad. Marshall should have piled on with 27. Rc5. If he wanted to get his King off the b-file, 27. Ka3 (since 27...a5 could have been answered with 28. b5!). After 27. Kc2, the position was: click for larger view 27... Rab8 A faulty notion that left him open to trouble on the a-file. 27...Nd5; 27...h6; or even 27...a6 were better 28. Kd1 Marshall could have exploited Ward's last move with 28. Ra1 immediately. 28... a6 28...h6 or 28...h5 or 28...g6 were all better. 29. Ra1 Having missed the chance to play this move on his last turn, Marshall should probably consolidated with 29. Ke2 or 29. Rcc4. But the game still looked easily won for White. 29... Nd5 30. Nc4! Happy to rid himself of his weak b-pawn in return for nabbing the Black a-pawn. 30... Rxb4 31. Rxa6 click for larger view 31... Nc3+ 32. Kc2 c5 Black's best chance. 33. Rh4 Nd5 33...Nb5 was probably the best available to him. The text left: click for larger view The game looked as good as ever for Marshall. But now he got sloppy: 34. Rc6! 34. Ra5 was very strong. The text blows the win in one fell swoop, the position now being: click for larger view All of a sudden, Ward had a saving counter-attack at his disposal beginning with 34...Ra4!. But he missed his chance and played: 34... R4b5? Now it should have been clear sailing for Marshall: 35. Kd2 Ne7 36. Rc7! click for larger view 36... R8b7 Having to trade Rooks (and thus forfeit his chances at counterplay) must have been a bitter pill for Ward to swallow, but he had little choice. 37. RxR RxR click for larger view It is amazing that Marshall (who later became a strong end-game player) managed to convert this winning ending into a dead-lost position in just two moves.

Oct-11-20		KEG: Post IV 38. Ke2 Not bad in itself, but part of an entirely misguided notion that would lose him the game on his next turn. 38... Rb4 This momentary pin of the White Knight should have been harmless, but Marshall was perhaps overconfident, the position now being: click for larger view As <yurikvelo> has pointed out, 39. g3 wins for White here. So does the even better 38. Re4. But Marshall blundered with: 39. Kf3?? And now he was lost after: 39... Ng6! click for larger view Game over. 40. Re4 RxN! Apparently Marshall overlooked this simple combination. click for larger view 41. e6 Of course, if 41. RxR Nxe5+. 41... RxR Even better was 41...Rb4. Black can still force the trade of Rooks, and after 42. exf7+ Kxf7 43. g3 can choose between trading off Rooks and 43...Kf6 44. Re8 Ne5+, finishing up a piece with an easy win in either case. 42. exf7+ Kxf7 43. KxR Ke6 click for larger view What followed was a hopeless effort by Marshall to create complications or to trade off the Black pawns (since a Knight alone cannot win). This was all futile, and Marshall might have spared himself the balance of the game: 44. f4 Ne7 45. g4 Nd5 46. f5+ Kd6 47. g5 c4 48. f6 gxf6 49. gxf6 Nxf6+ 50. Kd4 Ng4 51. Kxc4 Ke5 click for larger view Marshall had managed to eliminate all of Ward's pawns except the h-pawn. In some endings, Knight and Rook Pawn are unable to win against the King alone. But those are positions in which the Rook-pawn is too far advanced. Here, Ward had only to capture Marshall's two pawns. The win was thus quite simple from here.

Oct-11-20		KEG: Post V 52. Kd3 Nxh2 53. Ke2 Ke4 54. Kf2 Ng4+ 55. Kg3 Nxe3 click for larger view Now it was a simple King, Knight, and Pawn against King ending. With the Black Rook pawn still back on h7, Marshall had no drawing chances. Yet he played on for six more moves: 56. Kh4 Kf5 57. Kh5 Nd5 58. Kh4 Nf4 59. Kg3 Kg5 60. Kf3 Now the Black h-pawn can advance. 60... h5 61. Kg3 h4+ click for larger view 0-1

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
No trolling.
The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.