|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Jun-04-05 | | Knight13: Hey man. This game is played in 1989. At that time computers weren't strong enought to beat GMs. |
|
| Sep-27-05 | | Averageguy: Why not 18.dxc6 Bxa3 19.cxb7+ K moves 20. bxa8Q ? I know that 18.Bxc6+ wins, but I was just wondering. |
|
| Sep-27-05 | | stephenw: <Knight13> Not true about computers not defeating GMs. See Larsen vs Deep Thought, 1989 |
|
| Sep-27-05 | | PhilFeeley: Interesting interview with Kasparov in the Harvard Business Review (Coutu, Diane L., April 1, 2005, Vol. 83, Issue 4, p. 49) |
|
| Mar-27-06 | | vesivialvy93: i think the best dedicate chess computers of today's can play as good as deep thought (tasc r30 or mephisto atlanta) |
|
| Jun-15-08 | | iccsumant: < Jaymthegenius: In youre profile you say "Kasperov is best of all time!, get over" I disagree, as Kasparov has lost to Karpov, Anand, Ivanchuck, and Kramink in the past. I think it would be better to say Kramnik, Polgar, Karpov, Leko, Svidler, Larsen, Kasparov, Anand, and Ivanchuck are the best of all time, and the fact that Kramnik is world champion but Kasparov is highest rated player proves how flawed the ELO system is.> Hmmm...you seem like a genius...are you showing off that you just memorized a bunch of leading grandmaster names or a super genius trying to make a conclusion that Kasparov is not the strongest of all time? |
|
Jul-07-09
 | | JointheArmy: What a beating. |
|
| Jul-04-11 | | SetNoEscapeOn: Chessmaster's introduction to this game:
<The World Champion was invited to New York to face off with the world's leading main-frame computer program in a two-game exhibition at the Marshall Chess Club. The first game was a typical grandmaster crush, as Deep Thought was tied down to defense of the King pawn. In this, the second game, Kasparov opens the game up tactically and shows how a hesitant computer can be hung out to dry.> |
|
| Jul-07-12 | | HeadCrunch: A brilliant work of art by Kasparov against a fumbling Computer. |
|
| Jul-07-12 | | kingfu: Black sacrificed his Queen for positional beauty. Chess Computer programs have come a long way since then. |
|
| Jul-07-12 | | RookFile: Well, the fumbling computer was probably 2500 FIDE. Kasparov just smashed it as he would any other GM that strength, but the rest of us would not have done as well against Deep Thought. |
|
| Jul-07-12 | | Jim Bartle: How would white win after 12...a6? |
|
| Dec-16-12 | | Conrad93: 2500 FIDE. Err... Wrong! Robert Byrne (a brilliant GM) said he had to play the best game in his last ten years in order to defeat Deep Thought. |
|
Dec-17-12
 | | beatgiant: <Jim Bartle>
<How would white win after 12...a6?>
I wasn't able to find an immediate win either, but White probably continues in gambit style: 12...a6 13. Rg1 Nf6 14. Be2 Bxe2 (looks safest) 15. Kxe2. White has a big lead in development in exchange for a pawn and a shattered kingside. |
|
| Jun-14-14 | | Shams: The two games of this mini-match are the "we'll always have Paris" of man vs machine play. -----
<SetNoEscapeOn> <Chessmaster's introduction to this game: <The World Champion was invited to New York to face off with the world's leading main-frame computer program in a two-game exhibition at the Marshall Chess Club. The first game was a typical grandmaster crush, as Deep Thought was tied down to defense of the King pawn.>> Strange comment given that Deep Thought's king pawn left the board on move 4 in that game: Deep Thought vs Kasparov, 1989 |
|
Jul-15-15
 | | Zhbugnoimt: I love reading over past comments from years like 2004, where people still thought people could always get engines. The engines have progressed more than us humans in the past 11 years! More correctly, though, the programmers are progressing faster than the chess players. |
|
| May-31-17 | | Xonatron: Zhbugnoimt, I agree. I love these comments now that years have past by! |
|
| May-31-17 | | Xonatron: Stockfish 8 (after 6m20s) finally shows mate in 43 in the final position. It continues to narrow it down. After 9m40s it shows mate in 23. All with 37... Rc5.
In years to come, it will be interesting to compare this analysis. |
|
| May-31-17 | | Xonatron: By helping it with moves, I got Stockfish 8 to solve mate in 22 at the end of this game, with 37... Rc2+. |
|
| Nov-04-20 | | yurikvelo: <How would white win after 12...a6?> 12. .. a6 13. Rg1 Nf6 14. Rg3 Bh5 15. Kf1 g6 16. d6 Qxd6 17. Qxd6 exd6
18. Re1 O-O-O 19. Bd4 Bg7 20. Nd5 Nxd5 21. Bxg7 Rhg8 22. Bh6 Nc7
23. Bxf7 Rh8 24. Rc1 Kb8 25. Bg7 Rhe8 26. Bxe8 Rxe8 27. Re3 Rxe3
28. fxe3 Bf3 29. Bf8 Ne8 30. Rc4 Bc6 31. Rf4 Bd5 32. Rd4 Bxa2 33. Bxd6+ Kc8
34. Ke2 Ng7 35. Rd2 Ne6 36. Be7 g5 37. Kf3 h5 38. Ke4 b6 39. Kf5 g4
40. e4 Kc7 41. Ke5 a5 42. Rd6 Nc5 43. Bd8+ Kc8 44. Bxb6 Nd7+ 45. Kf4 h4
46. Kxg4 Ne5+ 47. Kf4 Nc4 48. Rd8+ Kb7 49. Bc5 a4 50. Ba3 Kc7 51. Rd4 Nb6
52. Rd6 Nc4 53. Rh6 h3 54. e5 Na5 55. e6 Nc6 56. Kf5 Bc4 57. Rxh3 Nd4+
58. Ke5 Bxe6 59. Rc3+ Kd7 60. Kxd4 Ba2 61. Re3 Bb1 62. h4 Bg6 63. Re7+ Kd8
64. Ke5 Bh5 65. Kd6 Kc8 66. Rc7+ Kd8 67.Rh7 Bg6 68. Rh8+ Be8 69. Rf8 Kc8
70. Rxe8+ Kb7 71. Bc5 a3 72. bxa3 Ka6 73. Kc6 Ka5 74. Ra8# |
|
| Nov-04-20 | | yurikvelo: deep multiPV
game was lost by move #9
https://pastebin.com/kMHqE4zV |
|
| Jun-04-21 | | drdos7: <Xonatron> <Stockfish 8 (after 6m20s) finally shows mate in 43 in the final position. It continues to narrow it down. After 9m40s it shows mate in 23. All with 37... Rc5. In years to come, it will be interesting to compare this analysis.> Houdini_5_Pro_pext_x64 Says Mate in 18 after 4:03. Houdini_5_Pro_pext_x64:
37/61 04:03 12,233,711k 50,292k -M18 37. ... Rc4-c5 38.a5-a6 f7-f5 39.Qd7xe6 d5-d4 40.Ke2-d3 h6-h5 41.Qe6-b6 Rc5-c8 42.a6-a7 Rc8-g8 43.Qb6-b7 h5-h4 44.a7-a8Q Rg8xa8 45.Qb7xa8 h4-h3 46.Kd3xd4 h3-h2 47.a4-a5 Kh7-g6 48.Qa8-g2+ Kg6-h5 49.Qg2xh2+ Kh5-g5 50.a5-a6 f5-f4 51.a6-a7 Kg5-g6 52.Qh2xf4 Kg6-h5 53.Qf4-f5+ Kh5-h4 54.a7-a8Q g7-g6 55.Qa8-h1+ |
|
| Jun-04-21 | | macer75: lol... computers are so bad compared to humans |
|
| Sep-13-21 | | rwbean: Stockfish 14 after about 2 hours can't see better than mate in 21 ... 37. ♕d7 ♖c2+ 38. ♔d3 ♖b2 39. a6 ♖b3+ 40. ♔c2 ♖f3 41. a7 ... pesky checks and mate on move 57. The computer annotation on this page doesn't give 9... ♘e5? a question mark ... it needs to run longer - it's about two pawns worse than 9...e5. It does point out that 12. ♕xc4 is better. |
|
| Jan-26-23 | | rwbean: Oops, left it a bit longer and Stockfish agrees, mate in 19. After 8,900 seconds, here's three ways it could happen. 37. ♕d7 ♖c2+ 38. ♔d3 ♖b2 39. a6 ♖b3+ 40. ♔c2 ♖f3 41. a7 ♖xf2+ 42. ♔d3 ♖f3+ 43. ♔d4 ♔g6 44. a8=♕ ♔h5 45. ♕f8 g5 46. ♕b5 ♔g6 47. ♕e2 ♖f4+ 48. ♔c5 ♖e4 49. ♕d3 f5 50. ♔d6 ♖xa4 51. ♕g8+ ♔f6 52. ♕xe6+ ♔g7 53. ♕c3+ d4 54. ♕c7+ ♔h8 55. ♕ec8# 37. ♕d7 ♖c2+ 38. ♔d3 ♖b2 39. a6 ♖b3+ 40. ♔c2 ♖f3 41. a7 ♖xf2+ 42. ♔d3 ♖f3+ 43. ♔d4 ♖f4+ 44. ♔c5 h5 45. a8=♕ d4 46. ♕dd8 ♔g6 47. ♕g8 ♖f5+ 48. ♔b4 ♖f2 49. ♕af8 ♖b2+ 50. ♔a5 ♔g5 51. ♕fxg7+ ♔f5 52. ♕g3 ♔e4 53. ♕a8+ ♖b7 54. ♕xb7+ ♔f5 55. ♕bf3# 37. ♕d7 ♖c2+ 38. ♔d3 ♖c5 39. a6 ♔g6 40. ♕d8 ♖c4 41. a5 ♖a4 42. a7 ♖a3+ 43. ♔d4 ♖a4+ 44. ♔c5 ♖c4+ 45. ♔d6 ♖f4 46. a8=♕ e5 47. ♕g8 ♖f6+ 48. ♔c5 ♖f5 49. ♕af8 ♔h5 50. ♕gxg7 ♖g5 51. ♕gxf7+ ♔h4 52. ♕xh6+ ♔g4 53. ♕h2 ♖g6 54. ♕g3+ ♔h5 55. ♕fxg6# |
|
 |
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Kibitzing
sac: 16.Nc7+