chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Jose Raul Capablanca vs Max Euwe
AVRO (1938), The Netherlands, rd 7, Nov-15
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical. Noa Variation (E34)  ·  1-0

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
1-0

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 10 times; par: 68 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 17 more Capablanca/Euwe games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-08-05  DevinPFelter: Capablanca's 10.Nf5 seems slightly inferior to Nf3. After bishop takes knight, queen takes bishop, knight to c6, black is already developed and white still has to play e3, develop the king's bishop, and castle. Granted, the two white bishops probably make up for this against the two black knights. 16.Ba6 would have been interesting: 16...bxa6 17.Qxc6. It doesn't seem like anything would stop 24.Qxa7. 26...f5 appears to miss 27.exf5 Qxf5 28.g4. 27...Nf6 would be more prudent.
Mar-12-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <DevinPFelter>
Thanks for these interesting comments!

<16.Ba6 would have been interesting>

Black can defend as follows:
16. Ba6 e4 17. Qg3 Nh5 18. Qc7 bxa6 19. Qxc6 Qd3. It still looks good for White, but I don't see an immediate gain of a pawn as happens in the actual game.

<26...f5 appears to miss 27.exf5 Qxf5 28.g4. 27...Nf6 would be more prudent.>

On 27...Nf6 28. Qxa7, Black is down two pawns with no apparent compensation. Presumably Euwe was aiming to stir up complications by opening White's king at all costs. That's consistent with the whole plan starting with 23...Nh5.

Oct-24-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mateo: Panov suggests 14... Rfe8 15. 0-0 Qf3 16. Bf3 e4 17. Be2 Nd5 =. But the direct 14... Qf3 15. Bf3 e4 and 16. Nd5 = seems good too, maybe even stronger.
Jan-18-08  paladin at large: The real story is how Capa calculates the safety of his king after throwing open the doors to his kingside.
May-28-08  RookFile: Yes, that's right. This isn't your usual, play it safe, get a slight advantage and win type of game from Capa. When you play a move like 28. g4 against Euwe, you'd better know that you can withstand the counterattack against your open king. Capa accurately saw that he would be able to defend and consolidate.
Oct-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jonathan Sarfati: Just like their earlier game Capablanca vs Euwe, 1931. Capa could calculate with the best of them if necessary—ask Marshall (e.g. when Marshall played the attack named after him Capablanca vs Marshall, 1918!
Sep-25-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: The idea behind 15 0-0! was 15..e4 16 Qg3..Qxe2 (16..Ne8? 17 Bb5!..a6 18 Rac1) 17 Bxf6..g6 18 Qf4..Qh5 19 Rfd1..Qf5 20 Qxf5..gxf 21 Rd7 with a big advantage for White in the endgame. An interesting alternative would have been 23 Qxa7..R6c7 24 Bd2!..Rxc1 25 Bxc1 though it is not clear that this is stronger than what Capablanca played.
Jan-16-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 18...Rd6 loses material by force. Of course, 20...bxc6 is not an option for 21.Bb4, and after played 20...Rxc6 21.Qb5 white attacks Pb7 and Pe5 at once winning a sound Pawn. 18...Rd7 would have been a bit better.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC