chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
David Bronstein vs Alexander Kotov
Training Match Tournament (1952), USSR
Old Indian Defense: Ukrainian Variation (A54)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 17 more Bronstein/Kotov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: All games have a Kibitzer's Corner provided for community discussion. If you have a question or comment about this game, register a free account so you can post there.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-13-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: This is a strange set-up for the endgame explorer. Though it fits the parameter of three moves,it is definitely not a normal queen v rook ending. From the beginning,the queen is doomed to capture from the rook-there is no escape.

Unlike the other drawn cases of this endgame,this example does not involve poor play or "exhaustion". It is however a good lesson that what I mentioned elsewhere--that a queen should ALWAYS win v a rook-is not necessarily true.

Sep-13-04  mjk: What game was Kotov playing when he skipped 67.♖xa1+ -- some aesthetic side-bet?
Sep-13-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: <mjk><What game was Kotov playing when he skipped 67.Rxa1+> It definitely looks like he thought he had some chances,, and threw in the churlish checks when he realized 66 Kb3 would not mate, but lose to 66...Qd4.
Apr-23-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eggman: <<... that a Queen should ALWAYS win versus a Rook - is not necessarily true.>>

Although this statement is technically correct I find it very misleading. When you say that a given endgame is a win, you make normal assumptions. The only positions in which the QUEEN-PLAYER TO MOVE cannot win are extreme situations in which he is in check or his Queen is pinned to his King by the Rook. Two examples:


click for larger view


click for larger view

(By the way in the second example (worth remembering) Black draws because after 1.♔h3 ♖h7+ 2.♔g4 ♖g7+ 3.♔h5 ♖h7+ 4.♔g5 (4.♔g6 ♖h6+!) ♖g7+ 5.♔h6 ♖h7+! White can only escape checks by heading to the e-file, when ...♖e7 secures the half-point.)

The point is that to say based on these and other similar examples that ♕ vs ♖ is sometimes drawn would be like saying that ♔+♗+♘ vs ♔ is sometimes drawn because of the following.


click for larger view

But one assumes that an ending doesn't start out with the advantaged-player under some kind of draw-forcing assault. Otherwise virtually any ending could be said to be sometimes drawn. And for that matter, if we reverse the positions of the White King and Queen in the first example, then we could say that ♕ vs ♖ is sometimes a win for the Rook! But again, surely this is extreme and misleading?

May-04-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: I recently saw something like this:


click for larger view

White moves:f4+! Black must either lose the knight or capture the pawn,either way,resulting in a draw.

Feb-08-09  WhiteRook48: which game was it?
Mar-07-09  WhiteRook48: whoa!
Jan-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: When I was in high school, I once drew this ending in an offhand game against our chess team's coach, Hubert Freestrom. We eventually reached a position like this:


click for larger view

I played ...Rf2+! 1/2-1/2

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Opus 1 (A00-A99)
by Chessdreamer
Queen vs King endgame.
from Chess teaches us to learn from our mistakes! by arielbekarov
Q vs R
from Endgames in progress by FENfiend
a rare example of a drawn queen v rook ending.
from spraggets gems/unique themes II (51-100) by kevin86

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC