chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Akiba Rubinstein vs Savielly Tartakower
Karlsbad (1911), Karlsbad (Karlovy Vary) AUH, rd 9, Sep-01
Dutch Defense: Rubinstein Variation (A84)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 28 more Rubinstein/Tartakower games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-19-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: What possessed Rubinstein to move the Queen with 35 Qg3??

35 Re8+ Kf7 36 R3e7+ Kf6 37 Qe2 Qb1+ 38 Kf2 leads to mate

Jan-17-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: Rubinstein throws away the win with one catastrophic blunder.
Jan-17-12  King Death: Even without Black's resource 35...Qe4 36.Re4 h2 it's hard to understand why Rubinstein would move the queen away.
Jan-17-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: The opening and early middlegame were not a success for Rubinstein.

At move 23, Tartakower had the advantage:


click for larger view

Instead of 23...Qh4? 24.exf4 Nxf4+, and a near equal position, Black could have kept the pressure on with 23...fxg3!.

A possible continuation could be: (-.90) (26 ply) 23...fxg3! 24.hxg3 Nd8 25.Rd5 Nc6 26.e4 Ne5 27.f4 Nxc4 28.Qe2 Nxd2 29.Rxd2, (-.92) (26 ply) 29...h5 30.Qc4+ Rf7, (-.89) (26 ply) 31.Rd3 h4 32.Qd5 Qe6 33.Qxe6 Rxe6.

A few moves later, Tartakower could have maintained the balance with: (.00) (26 ply) 27...Qxc4 28.Re7 Qxa2+ 29.Rd2 Qc4 30.Rxd6 Rxd6 31.Qxd6 Qa2+ 32.Kh3 Rxf3 33.Qd7.

Instead, he slipped a bit with: (.42) (26 ply) 27...h4 28.Re4, and then followed with a huge blunder: 28...Rxg3+?? 29.hxg3 Qxg3+, (5.17) (24 ply), 30.Kf1 h3 31.Qe2.

At that point, Rubinstein had a clearly winning position.

Tartakower's blunder may have been due to time trouble, as the first time control was 2 hours for 30 moves.

It is more difficult to guess the cause of Rubinstein's blunder, 35.Qg3??.

After 32...Qh4 33.Qh2, Rubinstein may have trained his sights on the h-pawn, expecting 33...Rh6 34.Re8+ Kf7 35.Ree3 Qg4 36.Rxh3, with a clearly winning position.

Tartakower's reply 33...Qh7?, was not the strongest move, and may have been unexpected by Rubinstein. Fritz strongly prefers the following continuation: 34.Re8+ Rf8 35.Rxf8+ Kxf8 37.Qxh3, and White is clearly winning.

Rubinstein's 34.Rde3 was also strong and winning. Fritz indicates the following as the best continuation: 34.Rde3 Rf8 35.Qxh3 Qxh3+ 36.Rxh3, and White is winning.

Faced with a near certain loss, Tartakower dodges one more time with 34...Rh6. All moves by Black are losing, Fritz indicating this move was Black's 19th best choice, leading to a forced mate, after 35.Re8+ Kf7 36.R3e7+ Kf6 37.Qe2 Qb1+ 38.Kf2.

Even if White does not play the mating line with 35.Re8+, Fritz indicates Black can hang on for only a few more moves.

Perhaps this series of what may have been unexpected moves by Tartakower upset Rubinstein's calculations, causing him to be more likely to blunder, or to drift into time trouble, and then blunder. What followed, 35.Qg3??, dropping a rook, was a tragic oversight.

At move 37, Tartakower needed to exercise a little care, and not play 37...Kf7??, when after 38.Re7+ Kxe7 39.Qxg7+, Rubinstein would have won!

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC