chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Nigel Short vs Vasyl Ivanchuk
Reggio Emilia (2010/11), Reggio Emilia ITA, rd 8, Jan-05
Sicilian Defense: Nezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack. Fianchetto Variation (B31)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 11 times; par: 55 [what's this?]

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35437 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 37 more Short/Ivanchuk games
sac: 34...Bxh4+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-02-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: So a World Championshop contender isn't immmune from spite checking? The theme is the overworked defender. The square in question is f3, and the defender is the King. Once I recognized the crucial square and the only 2 defenders, the rest played itself out.
Feb-02-11  Chesschatology: I fell for the superficial charms of the 34... Qf4+ line, which leads to an unclear position, given the dangerous White passed a pawn. I fully believe that if I somehow got this position against Nigel, I would probably play the same move and then lose. The question is- why did I miss the simple Bh4+? Answer: seduced by spurious "brilliance"!
Feb-02-11  Eric Farley: The battle of mediocre players. The former Kasparov's lackey and punching bag was beaten by a less mediocre player.
Feb-02-11  zb2cr: Found this one. I can't add anything to the comments by <Phony Benoni>, <dzechiel>, <patzer2>, <TheBish>, <Nullfidian>, <knight Knight>, <TheaN>, and <agb2002>.
Feb-02-11  Fuegoverde: 34... Bxh4+, 35 Kxh4 or else W loose a Rook ... and then I tried 35...Rf4+ but coudn't find anything against 36 Kg3, so it must be 35... Rxf3, the white rook checks only bring the black King to a better place, so white must play 36 Kg4 Rxe2 wining or 36 Qg2 Qh6+ 37Kg4 Qh5++
Feb-02-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: Interesting that right after the (highly civilized) debate yesterday between <BOSKER>, me, <PhonyBenoni> and others about the occasional poor quality of the games that puzzles are taken from, today we get a very recent beauty between two world-class GMs.

They had another great game in Gibraltar, after Short began with 5/5.

Feb-02-11  Patriot: There were quite a few candidates to look at today: Qf4+, Bf4+, Bxh4+, Rxf3+, Qxf3+, Rxf2. With so many, how does one "home in" on the best, or at least a winning candidate, quickly? This is the problem I faced and I think it is one of the keys to becoming a better player. The reason is that during a game we don't always have time to analyze every forcing move in concert.

It was obviously more complex than your run-of-the-mill Monday or Tuesday problem, so after testing some of the candidates I decided it was time to do a material count and threat assessment before getting any deeper.

After that, I started looking at some of the candidates again and noticed a key pattern called "removal of the guard". For instance, 34...Rxf3+ 35.Qxf3 Bxh4+ in an attempt to lure the king away from defense of the queen. After let's say, 36.Kg2 (not 36.Kg4?? h5+, successfully removing the guard) 36...Qxf3+ 37.Kxf3 Bxe1. This looks appealing, but then I changed the move order and it looked even better. 34...Bxh4+ 35.Kxh4 Rxf3. Now it looks like white's position has crumbled, because of all sorts of threatening moves.

But I did fail in the problem in at least several ways. 1) I was inefficient at "homing in" on the right move; 2) I failed to consider all of white's forcing replies (like the simple Rb8+). After 35...Rxf3 for instance, I looked at 36.Qxf3 Qxf3 and just made sure it was winning based on material but after something like 36.Qg2 I thought perhaps 36...h6 was winning without looking at white's checks. It turns out the black king was checked to h6 and now the threat of Rxf1 or Qg5# or Qxe4+ is in the air.

Feb-02-11  Marmot PFL: With so many moves this is harder than a 2 star, but Bxh4+ seems to win - Kxh4 (else Bxe1 and Ne2 is also lost) Kxh4 Rxf3 Qg2 Qh6+ Kg4 Qh5 mate
Feb-02-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  scormus: I agree with all those who thought it was on the tough side for the day. I thought quite a bit about 34 ... Rxe2, allowing the BQ to come into f4 but (luckily?) I saw that ... Bxa4+ was more positive. Satifying to see the the WR +s on ranks 8, 7 and that they lead nowhwere.

I've learnt from previous POTDs that you need to watch out for those spite +s in case they turn into spike +s.

Feb-02-11  mastermind7994: Fantastic game from Ivanchuk. I did some of the variations starting with 34...Bxh4+! and 35...Rxf3 .among some other but I wasn't so sure.
Feb-02-11  Amarande: It was sufficient to me to see Bxh4+, after which White must capture (to not do so loses a whole Rook to begin with), and then that Rxf3 was safe.

I didn't calculate the rest; to me it was a "with the White King in this position, there must surely be mate in the offing" situation.

Feb-02-11  CHESSTTCAMPS: White has N+P for a bishop and a very shaky king position on g3, with an insufficient force of defending pieces on the 1st and 2nd rank. Initially I tried to make 34... Rxf3+?? work, but 35.Qxf3 Bxh4+ 36.Kg2 leaves black with no good continuation. Continuing on the f3 attack theme, I turned my attention to

34... Bxh4+!

This finishes effectively against any response:

A) 35.Kxh4 Rxf3 (with multiple threats) 36.Qxf3 Qxf3 37.Rb1 Rxe2 wins.

A.1) 36.Qg2 g5+ 37.Kh5 (Qxg5 38.Rh3+ Kg4 39.Qg3#) Rh3+ 38.Qxh3 (Kg4 Rh4#) Qxh3+ 39.Kxg5 Qg2+ wins

A.1.1) 37.Kg4 Qxe4+ 38.Kxg5 (Kh5 Qh4#) Qg6#

A.2) 36.Rb8+ Kg7 37.Rb7+ Kh6 38.Qh1 Qxe4+ 39.Nf4 Qxf4#

A.3) 36.Qh1 Qxe4+ 37.Kg5 Rf5+ 38.Kh6 Qe3+ 39.Nf4 Qxf4#

A.4) 36.N-any Q(x)f4#

A.5) 36.Qg1 Rh3+ 37.Kg4 Qf3+ 38.Kg5 Rh5#

A.6) 36.other Rxf1 or Qxe4+ wins quickly.

B) 35.K-moves Bxe1 35.Qxe1 Qxe2 wins.

The alternative candidate 34... Qf4+ works well against 35.Nxf4 Bxf4+ 36.Kh3 (36.Kg4 h5+ 37.Kh3 Rh2#) Rh2+ 37.Kg4 h5#, but is less effective against 35.Kg2 Bxh4 36.Rd1.

Time to verify....

Feb-02-11  gofer: I think we can quickly over-stretch white's defenses...

<34 ... Bxh4+>

35 Kg5 Rxf3 36 Qxf3 h5+ winning
35 Kh3 Rxf3+ 36 Qxf3 Qxf3+ winning
35 Kg2 Bxe1 36 Qxe1 Rxd2+ winning

<35 Kxh4 Rxf3>

36 Qxf3 Qxf3+ winning

36 Rb8+ Kg7 37 Rb7+ Kh6 could be played, but we still get to the following decision point for white, except that black's king is in a better position and white's is worse!

36 Qg2 Qh6+ 37 Kg4 Qh5#

36 Kg4 Qxe4+ 37 Kg5 Qf5+ 38 Kh6/Kh4 Qh5#

Time to check when this ended and how Nigel got into this pickle...

Feb-02-11  1.e4effort: After a bit of looking at options I liked 34...Bxh4+ best. 35. Kxh4...Qf4+

at that point I was looking to get the fRook involved - so I checked to see if i was right, but I found I was one move behind in that regard. So I say to myself "Bummer, dude".

I find that I'm getting better at making the move asked for in the POTD, but the continuations are not quite clicking all the time. Oh, well - I've heard that tomorrow is another day...

Feb-02-11  Marmot PFL: Another nice Ivanchuk win today, against Caruana.
Feb-02-11  CHESSTTCAMPS: <agb2002>
<..Another option is 34... Bxh4+ 35.Kxh4 (otherwise 35... Bxe1 and a massacre follows) Rf4+:>

Nobody else seems to have noticed 35...Rf4+, a fine option-limiting shortcut.

Feb-02-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sastre: If 35...Rf4+, White is winning after 36.Kg3.
Feb-02-11  CHESSTTCAMPS: <Sastre> Ah, you are right.
Feb-02-11  skemup: I think 34..Qf4+ works too.
Feb-02-11  weakpawn: I like 34..Qf4+ with following variations

35. Nf4 Bf4+
36. Kg4 h5+
37. Kh3 Rh2++

35. Nf4 Bf4+
36. Kh3 Rh2+
37. Kg4 h5++

Declining Queen scarifies would lead to
35. Kh3 Qh4+
36. Kg2 Bf4 threatening 37.Qh2 mate and Qf3 in case of 37.Qh1

Feb-02-11  WhiteRook48: I got it in the wrong order
Feb-02-11  David2009: Short vs Ivanchuk, 2011 Black 34...?

Black has the safe shot 34...Qf4+ because the Q cannot be captured: 35 Nxf4 Bxf4+ 36 Kh3 Rh2+ 37 Kg4 h5#. Alternatively 36 Kg4 h5+ 37 Kh3 Rh2#. Alternative defences are (A) 35 Kh3 Qxh4+ 36 Kg2 and Black has a strong attack; (B) 35 Kg2 and the N is pinned so Black can play Bxh4; (C) 35 Kf2? Qxf3+ 36 Kg1 Be3+ etc. Time to check how the game went:
=====
How bizarre - 34...Bxh4+ was played. Have I yet again managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory? Time to see what the regulars have said.
=====
<Thean>'s post cheers me up. Time to see how Crafty End Game trainer plays this position. We start one move before the puzzle position and we play 34 h4:


click for larger view

Short vs Ivanchuk, 2011 Black 34...? The EGT replies 34...Bxh4+. Not a good sign for my variation. Link: http://www.chessvideos.tv/endgame-t...

Now we set up the position colours-reversed:


click for larger view

(Short vs Ivanchuk, 2011 Black 34...? colours reversed) Link: http://www.chessvideos.tv/endgame-t...

The EGT defends (normal colours) with the variation 34...Qf4+ 35.Kg2 Bxh4 36.Rc1 Rxe2+ 37.Qxe2 Qxc1 38.a6 Qf4 39.Kh1. (To record these moves flip the Chessgames.com board round and play it out against the EGT, moving on the flipped board: this assumes you have enabled the recommended Java viewer). With Black to play we have


click for larger view

which Black can indeed win - but the passed Pawn gives White tremendous counter-play. Enjoy playing it out against Crafty EGT!

Conclusion - the game line is an altogether safer winning line - but less fun for the spectators!

Feb-02-11  wals: Three cheers, a win at last.

Rybka 4 x 64

White error: d 18 : 5 min :
(=-0.21):7.g4. Best,

1. = (0.16): 7.0-0 Be6 8.Be3 Nh6 9.a3 Nf7 10.Qe1 g5 11.Nc3 h5 12.Nd2 g4 13.h4 Qe7 14.a4 0-0-0 15.a5 Kb8 16.a6 b6 17.Nc4 Nd6

2. = (0.15): 7.b3 Ne7 8.Nc3 Bg7 9.Be3 b6 10.a4 a5 11.0-0 0-0 12.Qd2 Be6 13.Bh6 Qc7 14.Bxg7 Kxg7 15.Qe3 Rad8 16.Rfe1 Qd7 17.Red1 Qc7

At move 18 the game was =-0.58.
19.Ng1, -0.92.
20.a5, -1.23.
22.dxc4, -1.51.
32.Qf1, -2.84.
White making weak moves.

25...bxc5, -2.09.
30...Qd3, -2.47.
Black making strong moves.

White blunder: d 13 : 2 min :
(-7.77):33.Kg3. (Best, Rbb1, Rbb6.)
and
34.h4, -13.91, and 36.Rb8+, -#10.

Feb-03-11  kevin86: The king is seperated from the herd and is rounded up by black's army (of rustlers).
Feb-03-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: One man attempted ground Chuck, but Short work was made!
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC