chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Antonio Medina Garcia vs Boris Spassky
"No Breyer Knowledge" (game of the day Mar-19-2025)
Gothenburg Interzonal (1955), Gothenburg SWE, rd 11, Sep-01
Spanish Game: Morphy Defense. Breyer Defense Quiet Variation (C94)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35437 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more A Medina Garcia/Spassky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Help with kibitzing features can be found on our Kibtizing Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-25-05  Rowson: This is a beautiful game showing the complex positional play typical of the Ruy Lopez, Closed, Breyer Defense, an opening which Spassky was a great exponent.
Jan-05-10  Rama: White missed 31. Qxb3 Bd5!, wins.
Oct-06-10  ozmikey: Nimzovich would have loved 21...Ne6! - a pawn sacrifice to set up a killer dark square blockade in the centre. Superb game from the young Spassky.
Nov-11-12  kaito95: Rama :31.Qxb3 a4 --> The white rook on f7 is down
Nov-11-12  paul1959: This is a come-from-behind win by Spassky. According to my old ECO , 21... Ne6 is bad (exd4 is =) and White had a big advantage after 23 exd5. 26 Re3 , cutting off the retreat of the Bh6 could have been the error.
Mar-19-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: 21...Ne6 looks OK to me, but White should have considered 26.Bd2. If Black persists with 26...Qh4; 27.Bxb4,axb4; looks equal to my five remaining brain cells.
Mar-19-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Not sure if I like the pun or not, but it's definitely creative.
Mar-19-25  goodevans: <zisa[product-of-three-3-digit-primes]> has given us at least three puns this year. This one seems a marked improvement on the previous efforts.

The game is okay but not hugely memorable. It seems to hinge on White trapping his own B then opting to do nothing about it, focusing instead on a feeble attack on f7. Overlooking Black's threat of ...Rc1 was the final nail in his coffin.

Mar-19-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I posted at chessgames.com chessforum saying that we could designate April to be User: zisa16742029 's Month. She could easily knock out 30 puns for April.
Mar-19-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: < Wanted: information about the origins of the Breyer Defence in the Ruy López, as featured in the Fischer v Spassky matches. When did Breyer play it or write about the line? Also, when was his name first attached to it?

(1939)

Iván Bottlik (Budapest) draws attention to his account of this matter on page 221 of volume three of Magyar Sakktörténet (Budapest, 1989):

‘Here is the situation regarding the puzzle of the Breyer Defence in the Ruy López. This term has been adopted by chess literature throughout the world, although no-one has so far managed to discover a game played by Breyer with 9...Nb8. There is no trace of it even in his writings. The term has become so well established that Vienna chess players told Gideon Barcza in 1955 that this move had been recommended by Breyer. (Breyer visited Vienna regularly and also played in tournaments there in 1920 and 1921.)

A 1955 text by a Viennese contemporary of Breyer, the International Master and renowned theoretician Hans Müller, contains decisive information and confirms that this variation did indeed originate with Breyer. In Schach Echo, 1955, page 247, he writes as follows in explaining a game with the move 9...Nb8: “This strange, though well thought out, retreat was first recommended by the Hungarian master G. Breyer in one of his essays as an improvement on the classical Chigorin Defence.”

In this explanation, Müller quotes from memory several of Breyer’s observations. There is therefore no doubt that at some point he saw the essay. Unfortunately, so far neither we nor any foreign researchers into Breyer’s life and work have been able to find any further trace.

Nevertheless, the term “Breyer Defence” can be justified by Müller’s text.’

Mr Bottlik’s letter to us adds:

‘It is several years since I wrote the above, but neither I nor others have been able to make any progress whatsoever. Concerning the “essay” mentioned by Müller, it should be noted that either it existed in manuscript form and was lost (like the manuscript of Breyer’s book on the ending rook and bishop versus rook) or else it was published somewhere and remains to be discovered.’

(2004)>

https://www.chesshistory.com/winter...

This was back in 1993, so the trail seems to have gone entirely cold.

But Wikipedia to the rescue?

<The Breyer Variation was recommended by Gyula Breyer as early as 1911,[57] but there are no known game records in which Breyer employed this line. The Breyer Variation did not become popular until the 1960s when it was adopted by Boris Spassky and others.> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruy_L...

Note [57] refers to <Barden, Leonard (1963). The Ruy Lopez • Winning Chess with 1 P-K4. Pergamon Press.>

Mar-19-25  stone free or die: Cryptic, as usual, <Missy> omits whose voice is asking the questions -

<[Edward Winter -] Wanted: information about the origins of the Breyer Defence in the Ruy López, as featured in the Fischer v Spassky matches. When did Breyer play it or write about the line? Also, when was his name first attached to it?>

It's in the link, but being on a phone I usually scroll-search before I text-search, and it's buried deep in the middle of the Beyer article (whose beginning is a discursion on 1.e4 throes, and whose ending is mostly a slag on Adams).

Mar-19-25  N0B0DY: unbardened by what has been ...
Mar-19-25  stone free or die: Upon barden soil we must tread...
Mar-20-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 26...Nxe5 would have been more precise, as after 26...Qh4 white could play 27.e6 Rax6 28.Nf1 Ne5 29.Nxe5 Qxh6 30.Nf3 etc.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC