queen sac E Diemer vs Schickner, 1950  (D00) Queen's Pawn Game, 25 moves, 1-0 Game 29 page 205 Marshall vs Tarrasch, 1905  (D51) Queen's Gambit Declined, 44 moves, 0-1 queen sac and disc check E Diemer vs A Schuppler, 1937  (D00) Queen's Pawn Game, 26 moves, 1-0 failure to castle E Diemer vs Toth, 1948  (D00) Queen's Pawn Game, 17 moves, 1-0 no chance to castle E Diemer vs H Halosar, 1934  (D00) Queen's Pawn Game, 10 moves, 1-0 Diemer made to look sheepish E Diemer vs F Lamb, 1947  (D00) Queen's Pawn Game, 8 moves, 0-1 R. Keene has the calculating power of several super-computers U Kunsztowicz vs Keene, 1973   (A50) Queen's Pawn Game, 39 moves, 0-1 A BAD 'BLUE' BY KASPAROV Deep Blue vs Kasparov, 1997  (B17) Caro-Kann, Steinitz Variation, 19 moves, 1-0 WELL I'LL BE FORKED CRIES THE BLACK QUEEN Timman vs Polugaevsky, 1973  (B96) Sicilian, Najdorf, 15 moves, 1-0 pawnsac in opening Nimzowitsch vs A Hakansson, 1922   (C02) French, Advance, 27 moves, 1-0 BIG GAME BY BIG NAME R Nezhmetdinov vs M Kamyshov, 1950  (B10) Caro-Kann, 25 moves, 1-0 Anand goes down Kasimdzhanov vs Anand, 2005  (B90) Sicilian, Najdorf, 38 moves, 1-0 "Topalov's style of play causes blunders by his opponents" Leko vs Topalov, 2005  (B80) Sicilian, Scheveningen, 40 moves, 0-1 pressure causes errors Polgar vs Topalov, 2005  (C67) Ruy Lopez, 64 moves, 0-1 Bronstein vs B Ratner, 1945  (B10) Caro-Kann, 29 moves, 1-0 Nh7 a winner Hartston vs Portisch, 1974  (C19) French, Winawer, Advance, 25 moves, 1-0 Fischer vs Najdorf, 1962  (B90) Sicilian, Najdorf, 24 moves, 1-0 Note "neuroticpatzers" comment re "vision of the board" C Hartlaub vs M W Testa, 1912  (C21) Center Game, 24 moves, 1-0 Z Zhang vs Sadvakasov, 1998  (B90) Sicilian, Najdorf, 39 moves, 0-1 J Penrose vs Bobotsov, 1969  (B05) Alekhine's Defense, Modern, 27 moves, 1-0 20 games