|
The tournament held at Groningen, Netherlands 13 Aug-7 Sept 1946, was a watershed in chess history. Not only was it the first major international tournament after World War II, it marked the first time the Soviet Union sent a team of players to a foreign event. Their results confirmed the growing recognition of the great strength of Soviet players: Smyslov finished third, Boleslavsky and Flohr tied for sixth; though Kotov finished out of the running, he defeated both of the top finishers. ... [more]
|
|
Player: Daniel Abraham Yanofsky
| page 1 of 1; 19 games |
 |
 |
| Game |
| Result | Moves |
Year | Event/Locale | Opening |
| 1. Euwe vs Yanofsky |
 | 1-0 | 46 | 1946 | Groningen | E40 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 |
| 2. Yanofsky vs Stoltz |
| ½-½ | 41 | 1946 | Groningen | B32 Sicilian |
| 3. Flohr vs Yanofsky |
| 1-0 | 52 | 1946 | Groningen | D19 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch |
| 4. Yanofsky vs Tartakower |
| ½-½ | 69 | 1946 | Groningen | B03 Alekhine's Defense |
| 5. Kotov vs Yanofsky |
| ½-½ | 52 | 1946 | Groningen | E26 Nimzo-Indian, Samisch |
| 6. Vidmar vs Yanofsky |
| 0-1 | 50 | 1946 | Groningen | E17 Queen's Indian |
| 7. Yanofsky vs C Kottnauer |
| 0-1 | 61 | 1946 | Groningen | B91 Sicilian, Najdorf, Zagreb (Fianchetto) Variation |
| 8. M Christoffel vs Yanofsky |
| ½-½ | 40 | 1946 | Groningen | E61 King's Indian |
| 9. Yanofsky vs Guimard |
| 1-0 | 28 | 1946 | Groningen | C04 French, Tarrasch, Guimard Main line |
| 10. Najdorf vs Yanofsky |
| 1-0 | 42 | 1946 | Groningen | D34 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch |
| 11. Yanofsky vs Szabo |
| 0-1 | 39 | 1946 | Groningen | C84 Ruy Lopez, Closed |
| 12. E Lundin vs Yanofsky |
| 1-0 | 40 | 1946 | Groningen | E19 Queen's Indian, Old Main line, 9.Qxc3 |
| 13. Yanofsky vs Smyslov |
| ½-½ | 60 | 1946 | Groningen | C92 Ruy Lopez, Closed |
| 14. H Steiner vs Yanofsky |
| 0-1 | 43 | 1946 | Groningen | D19 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch |
| 15. Yanofsky vs Botvinnik |
| 1-0 | 53 | 1946 | Groningen | C99 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Chigorin, 12...cd |
| 16. Denker vs Yanofsky |
| ½-½ | 41 | 1946 | Groningen | D15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav |
| 17. Yanofsky vs Boleslavsky |
| ½-½ | 44 | 1946 | Groningen | B59 Sicilian, Boleslavsky Variation, 7.Nb3 |
| 18. O'Kelly vs Yanofsky |
| ½-½ | 54 | 1946 | Groningen | E36 Nimzo-Indian, Classical |
| 19. Yanofsky vs O Bernstein |
| ½-½ | 26 | 1946 | Groningen | C92 Ruy Lopez, Closed |
|
| page 1 of 1; 19 games |
|
|
|
Dec-20-12
 | | Benzol: Blessed be the <cg librarian> indeed. The two missing games are now part of the collection. :) |
|
| Aug-30-13 | | nescio: I think it should be mentoned that the organizers of this tournament had a luxury problem before it started. After everyone had arrived (which was by no means a certainty a year after the second world war) it turned out there were 21 participants instead of 20. They could have extended the schedule with 2 extra rounds, even make it a 22-player tournament, for the head of the Soviet delegation was Gavriil Veresov, champion of Belarus. Unfortunately that was impossible, if I remember correctly because the Americans and the Soviets had to leave on schedule to arrive in time for a USSR-USA match. To ask a foreigner to withdraw was out of the question, and Lodewijk Prins didn't want to let go this chance to play against the world's best. When Euwe declared that he was ready to withdraw, the Soviets, in particular Botvinnik and Veresov, convinced Prins to withdraw by promising him an invitation to a tournament in Moscow in the near future. Needless to say, that invitation has still to come. |
|
Feb-03-14
 | | GrahamClayton: Despite finishing only 11th, Kotov was the only player to defeat both the 1st and 2nd place finishers (Botvinnik and Euwe). |
|
Apr-20-14
 | | FSR: <GrahamClayton> Shades of St Petersburg (1909), where Dus-Chotimirsky finished 13th with a -2 result, but beat the joint winners Lasker and Rubinstein. Those two wins were 40% of his five wins in the tournament! Lasker and Rubinstein mauled the field, each scoring 14.5/18. The only other game either lost was Lasker's loss to Rubinstein. |
|
Apr-20-14
 | | plang: Kotov was a lot stronger player than Dus-Chotimirsky |
|
Apr-20-14
| | FSR: <plang> It's true, he did win the Stockholm Interzonal (1952) by 3.5 points, then a record. |
|
Apr-21-14
| | FSR: Er, make that three points. Counting is FUN-damental. |
|
Apr-21-14
 | | perfidious: Pity that fine result availed him naught, come to Zurich Candidates (1953), where Kotov inflicted the only defeat upon Smyslov, the winner, though himself an also-ran. |
|
Apr-02-21
 | | keypusher: Going in to the game against Kotov, Botvinnik had ten wins and three draws. He went 3-3 the rest of the way, and was lucky to win M Christoffel vs Botvinnik, 1946. |
|
Apr-02-21
| | keypusher: Should note that Botvinnik played some great games but had some good luck earlier in the tournament too, viz. Botvinnik vs Szabo, 1946 Botvinnik vs O'Kelly, 1946 (<nescio> called this win "one of the lowest points in his career", see Botvinnik vs Keres, 1948 (kibitz #64)) So the +10=3 stat is a bit misleading. |
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Create an account today
to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users.
Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username,
then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.
|
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
- No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
- No trolling.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic.
This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general,
visit the Kibitzer's Café.
|
Messages posted by Chessgames members
do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration. |
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC
|
Kibitzing
