Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆 3rd American Chess Congress, Chicago (1874) Chess Event Description
... [more]

Player: Frederick Perrin

 page 1 of 1; 12 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. J Congdon vs F Perrin 1-04718743rd American Chess Congress, ChicagoC78 Ruy Lopez
2. F Perrin vs J Congdon 1-02418743rd American Chess Congress, ChicagoD30 Queen's Gambit Declined
3. F H Elder vs F Perrin  1-04418743rd American Chess Congress, ChicagoC41 Philidor Defense
4. F Perrin vs F H Elder 1-04418743rd American Chess Congress, ChicagoB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
5. F Perrin vs Mackenzie 0-12518743rd American Chess Congress, ChicagoA80 Dutch
6. Mackenzie vs F Perrin 1-03218743rd American Chess Congress, ChicagoC01 French, Exchange
7. F Bock vs F Perrin 1-02918743rd American Chess Congress, ChicagoC01 French, Exchange
8. F Perrin vs F Bock 0-12218743rd American Chess Congress, ChicagoC53 Giuoco Piano
9. H Hosmer vs F Perrin  1-03918743rd American Chess Congress, ChicagoA03 Bird's Opening
10. F Perrin vs H Hosmer  0-13718743rd American Chess Congress, ChicagoB40 Sicilian
11. M Judd vs F Perrin 1-02618743rd American Chess Congress, ChicagoC01 French, Exchange
12. F Perrin vs M Judd  0-14518743rd American Chess Congress, ChicagoC50 Giuoco Piano
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Perrin wins | Perrin loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: One rarely sees such a high proportion of Fredericks in a tournament.
Mar-07-16  zanzibar: <FSR> or in the comments.

(It was 100%, afraid I've just cut it in half!)

* * * * *

The missing games aren't missing at all, they're forfeits, as explained on the bottom of page 98 of the 5th American Chess Congress tournament book (which does a retrospective review of previous Chess Congresses, and so is the defacto tournament book for both the 3rd and 4th Congresses).

<Mr. Bock, who had been playing under the disadvantages attending ill-health, resigned his two games to Mr. Hosmer, and on the last day of the tournament General Congdon resigned his games to Captain Mackenzie. By cancelling the games played by Messrs. Kennicott and Elder, and computing the drawn games as half a won game to each contestant producing a drawn battle, the final score appears as follows:

Geo. H. Mackenzie, won 8.5 games.
Henry Hosmer, " 8 "
Max Judd, " 7 "
Frederick Bock, " 4 "
J. A. Congdon, " 1.5 "
Frederick Perrin, " 1 "


The rules stated that any player who dropped out before completing 2/3 of their schedule would have their results nullified.

Thus, the 3rd Congress only had six players, officially.

One more aside. The tournament book reports that the <London (1862)> rules were used. This isn't true in one important respect - the players alternated colors in the RR even if a game were drawn in a pairing match.

Mar-07-16  zanzibar: Here's the complete list of prizes awarded for the main tournament:


George H. Mackenzie ... First Prize ... $225.00
Henry Hosmer ... ... ... Second Prize ... 150.00
Max Judd ... ... ... ... Third Prize ... 75.00


Wish <CG> preserved the formatting.

Mar-07-16  zanzibar: The full rules were spelled out in Brownson's <Chess Journal v59-69 (1875)> in the beginning of the journal.

The distinction begin a draw and a nullified game is mentioned as concerns colors.

(I'm wondering what the primary source of the games is, as the 5th Congress Book has none of the actual games).

Mar-07-16  zanzibar: So there was a tournament book specific to the Congress issued:

but it's unavailable on google books. Lyons lists it as the "scarcest of the American Chess Congress Books".

Mar-07-16  zanzibar: Again, we have a tournament where journal/newspaper coverage of the games was deliberately limited by the organizers - in an attempt to focus interest on the tournament book.

The Westminster Papers (v7 1875) went so far as to comment on this (I guess partly from the experience with London (1860) and Birmingham (1858)):

<The Chicago Committee have resolved to publish the games after the tourney in Book form. We can assure them that, in our judgment, this is not wise policy. The games should be published at once, and whilst the players are interested in the subject. We believe that those games of the Baden Tourney and the Vienna Tourney that were published by us as quickly as we could get them were more played over than all the games that have been published since. The games of the last tourney are still being published in the Continental Chess papers, but we never see any one playing over the games, nor do we see them quoted in this Country, Australia or America. (p62)


We can only repeat that when the book is published no one will read it, except those who have to do so as a matter of business; whereas, if the games had been sent to the journals at once, the whole of them would have been played over by the end of next month. (p82)>

Apr-20-16  Erkostic: I just posted on my blog, how two Chicago Newspapers covered the congress, part one can be found here.

Part two to follow.

Apr-30-16  Erkostic: Part two of my blog post on the congress

Apr-30-16  Calli: I have the OLMS reprint of the tournament book and can lookup any details if you wish.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC