Jul-01-09 M Umansky vs The World, 2009 
|
f54280: imag: > How is it ridiculous? Isn't it obvious from a logical point of view? When White has the first move then, assuming best play by both sides, the game may only end either in draw or White win. It is everything but obvious. Maybe white is in zugzwang in the starting position ? |
|
|
|
Feb-18-09 A Nickel vs The World, 2008 
|
f54280: @Brent Baccala : I mailed you roughly a month ago about bugs (and fixes) in Hoffman on OSX, but you never replied. Did you get the mail ? |
|
|
|
Oct-27-08 rinus chessforum 
|
f54280: I just discovered today why rinus wasn't posting anymore in the main page. My deepest, sincere condolences. |
|
|
|
Aug-05-08 The World vs G Timmerman, 2007 
|
f54280: <kwid> I ordered quite a few things from convekta over the last few years, for me and my sons. At least: - Total Chess Training [CT-ART 3, the software version of the Bloch tactical book + 4 additional programs] - Chess Tactics for Beginners [The software version of the ... |
|
|
|
Jul-22-08 Sneaky chessforum 
|
f54280: Sorry if everybody already agreed on that paradox solution (I didn't read all the pages since the original paradox). I happen to have a math background and worked a bit on that paradox a few years ago, so I can't resist posting here... The paradox was: <If you are holding an ... |
|
|
|
Apr-04-08 C Jauregui vs J de Souza Mendes, 1959 
|
f54280: zooter, sliding forward means playing a move while the engine is thinking. That way, the analysis will focus on the position arising after this move, and give you a better evaluation of that particular move. You can then slide backward. As the position have been evaluated and is in ... |
|
|
|
Feb-15-08 Deep Breath chessforum 
Jan-10-07 Rublevsky vs Leko, 2007
|
f54280: Rublevsky lost the preceding game ( Leko vs Rublevsky, 2007 ), so drawing was not an option for him. Hence the dangerous c4 and the refusal of repetition (f4 was not a blunder, just a desesperate move) |
|
|
|
indicates a reply to the comment. |
|