Dec-10-03 Kibitzer's Café 
|
Sarimanok: <talchess2003>what leads you to that assumption? |
|
|
|
Dec-10-03 Pillsbury vs Lasker, 1896 
|
Sarimanok: Thank you Shadout Mapes. It was a very interesting game. Pillsbury exacting revenge to Lasker. |
|
|
|
Dec-10-03 Pillsbury vs Lasker, 1904 
|
Sarimanok: Why not 7...Nxd4? |
|
|
|
Dec-10-03 F J Lee vs Lasker, 1899 
|
Sarimanok: A nice and interesting example of a positional buildup to a fine combination. 37...Rd4 was a very nice move. |
|
|
|
Dec-10-03 Bobby Fischer 
|
Sarimanok: <Kaspablanca>Interesting Question, i have no idea. |
|
|
|
Dec-08-03 Serafino Dubois 
|
Sarimanok: Maybe he is an Immortal from the Highlander series. |
|
|
|
Dec-08-03 Wilhelm Steinitz 
|
Sarimanok: It means that that it is much harder to play good positional chess than to spot a brilliant combination. Accdg to Steinitz. |
|
|
|
Dec-08-03 S Dubois vs Steinitz, 1862 
|
Sarimanok: <Shadout Mapes> Thanks for the interesting point. |
|
|
|
Dec-07-03 Steinitz vs A Mongredien, 1862 
|
Sarimanok: A nice example on how to exploit inferior play by establishing a strong position. I would prefer 3...Qa5. Then establish a carokann formation. |
|
|
|
Dec-07-03 Paulsen vs Morphy, 1857 
|
Sarimanok: 12...Qd3! is a beautiful move indeed. 12 d3 is called for in order to develop white's dark square bishop.
A good lesson on the importance of opening development. |
|
|
|
indicates a reply to the comment. |
|