chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile

wachter123680
Member since Mar-01-13 · Last seen Aug-09-13
no bio

   wachter123680 has kibitzed 45 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Aug-09-13 Teichmann vs Alekhine, 1913 (replies)
 
wachter123680: NotyetaGM and Mateo, nice comments. It looked like Teich's blunder at 38. Also Teich's blundered at 35. Re5, may I submit, because he left his back rank undefended adequate. But with no blunders, I wonder did Alekhine have enough to win anyway??? If Teich at 19. had exd5, then
 
   May-18-13 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
 
wachter123680: I have a statement to make that the e.l.o. point ranking system today needs about a 30% reduction, because they are currently inaccurate, and that this would equalize the tournaments as due, and for many other sensible reasons. Top players should have about 2600, not the ...
 
   Mar-25-13 Timman vs Geller, 1983
 
wachter123680: I think even Geller with rook f7 may have had a chance, I'd not have resigned too easily
 
   Mar-25-13 V Komliakov vs Barsov, 1994 (replies)
 
wachter123680: did Barsov resign all too quickly in this game?
 
   Mar-25-13 Yermolinsky vs Barsov, 1987
 
wachter123680: Can I have some teacher help please? Could not figure reason for resign in black. How did he catcher that white would have pass pawn assure.
 
   Mar-25-13 L Day vs A Zuntacks, 1966
 
wachter123680: Zuntack lost at 29, rook for bishop was not a good move
 
   Mar-25-13 Kasparov vs B Kantsler, 1975 (replies)
 
wachter123680: Kaspars must have thought this little fifth rank a b c and d pawn wall on 10.. was cute tho.
 
   Mar-24-13 Euwe vs Fischer, 1957 (replies)
 
wachter123680: and Fischer's 7c5 was a total waste of an up m.o.
 
   Mar-24-13 Botvinnik vs Fischer, 1962 (replies)
 
wachter123680: its simple, Botvinnik had it at 61.
 
   Mar-24-13 Botvinnik vs Capablanca, 1938 (replies)
 
wachter123680: mabe its Capa would not have sacrificed the dark square bishop at move 5.. and Capa did not active the king's rook until move 25.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC