Aug-08-13 Z Mestrovic vs Stein, 1967 
|
rgrinberg: I wonder why not 13. f4 instead of Qe2. Not sure of how Stein castles then. |
|
|
|
Aug-08-13 Stein vs E Book, 1969 
|
rgrinberg: On 23.. bxa 24. Ba3+ Nxa3 25. Qc6+ followed by mate in case anyone is wondering. |
|
|
|
Aug-07-13 Stein vs Geller, 1966 
|
rgrinberg: I guess Stein resigned to 24. Bg3 Nf6 and 24. Rg1 Nxh2+. |
|
|
|
Aug-01-13 F Langheinrich vs Aronian, 1994
|
rgrinberg: Did Aronian run out of time or something? |
|
|
|
Jul-21-13 A Bachofner vs K Arakhamia-Grant, 2001
|
rgrinberg: Instead of 14. Nxc6, 14. Nc4 looks interesting. On 15.. b5 (e5 Nd6+ is threatening) 16. e5 looks a little better. 27. Ne5 instead of h4 maybe? |
|
|
|
Jul-19-13 E Hansen vs A Martchenko, 2008
|
rgrinberg: 13.. f5 was completely unnecessary and bad. f6 followed by Nc5 would have led to much better chances for black. |
|
|
|
Jul-10-13 Morozevich vs A Mitenkov, 1992 
|
rgrinberg: Did the exchange sac really make sense for black? Seems like 15.. Qxe7 would put black in better shape material wise. |
|
|
|
Jul-10-13 M de Jesus Lares Flores vs Tiviakov, 2007 
|
rgrinberg: 26. gxf3 is strange. What's wrong with 26. Bxf3 Nxc4 27. Ne3 seems to be okay if ugly for white IMO. 30. Kg1 is also weird. 30 Bf1 seems to be okay for white. |
|
|
|
|