Jul-19-12 K Zvorykina vs Tal, 1955 
|
pom nasayao: If White plays 32.Nxc8, Black will play 32. . d3 and there is no stopping 33. . Qh1+ |
|
|
|
Jul-18-12 Tal vs Gipslis, 1955 
|
pom nasayao: Can anybody tell me why this is a draw?? |
|
|
|
Nov-06-11 Fischer vs V Kovacevic, 1970 
|
pom nasayao: Fischer loses either by Nb7 or Bxc6 |
|
|
|
Oct-03-11 J Szukszta vs Tal, 1956 
|
pom nasayao: the game is pure entertainment! |
|
|
|
Oct-02-11 Dorfman vs Tal, 1992 
|
pom nasayao: This must be Tal's last professional game |
|
|
|
Oct-02-11 J Penrose vs Tal, 1960 
|
pom nasayao: i think there is no other game on record which Tal was able to play Penrose again. Must be a lifetime good feeling for Dr. Penrose. |
|
|
|
Oct-01-11 B Malich vs Tal, 1960
|
pom nasayao: Should the WR remain in the 3rd rank in order to protect the WRP, the continuation may be Bd2+ and the WKP goes. If W plays e5 then B plays Pxe5+; Kxe5 Bg3 and the WRP goes. |
|
|
|
Oct-01-11 Tal vs E Contedini, 1960
|
pom nasayao: The end might have been 31. . Rxe8 32. Qa2+ Kh8 33. Nf7+ Kg8 34. Nxe8 and W has won the exchange. |
|
|
|
Nov-02-10 Tal vs A Beliavsky, 1989 
|
pom nasayao: This may have been the continuation: 27. . Bd7 28. c4! (providing a checking square for the WBishop, and a brief mating attack as well). The only way Black can prevent this is by capturing the WKnight. Therefore: 28. . Rxe7 29. Qxe7 Qd8 30. d6, the attack will be overwhelming |
|
|
|
Nov-02-10 D Gurevich vs Tal, 1988
|
pom nasayao: Why White played 7. Ne2??? it exposes the White King. |
|
|
|
indicates a reply to the comment. |
|