Dec-23-03 P Leonhardt vs NN, 1912 
Dec-14-03 Timman vs C van Wijgerden, 1977 
|
Qian: this is checkmate... isnt it? |
|
|
|
Dec-09-03 Charousek vs J Wollner, 1893 
|
Qian: white didnt have the chance to play Qe8 because of the discovered check. |
|
|
|
Dec-07-03 Kasparov vs Vaganian, 1995 
|
Qian: 10. b4 and then black bxb4 and nothing happens. |
|
|
|
Nov-29-03 M Romm vs S Tatai, 1973 
|
Qian: Nxh5!! whoa!! if exh5 then mate in 3... wow. |
|
|
|
Nov-28-03 Mamedyarov vs D Schneider, 2003 
|
Qian: Bill, because if the Queen moves away, 18. Rxg7+ Kxg7 19. Qxe7 Kh6 (Kg8 leads to 20. Rg1+) with a fork on the second knight |
|
|
|
Nov-18-03 Karpov vs Kramnik, 1998 
|
Qian: i dont get the followup by aulero, can the king move to h4 afterwards? What will be the check after that? it has to be a check before black does bxh2 right? |
|
|
|
Sep-05-03 D Hermann vs Charousek, 1896 
|
Qian: a very interesting combo.
22. Kxh2 is no good because of the discovered queen attack
23. Qxf1 or Rxf1 is no good because of the mate at 23...Bh3+ 24. Kg2, Qh2#
24. Qxe2 is no good because of 24... Bh3+ 25. Kg1, Qh2+ 26. Kf1, Qh1# I think that is it. |
|
|
|
Sep-04-03 Morphy vs A Meek, 1857 
|
Qian: a pretty obvious combination. I would have went for cxd8=R just for the heck of it. The plan actually became clear after Nxd6 and black seems to have lost his advantage way before the execution. perhaps 24. bxd5 ? |
|
|
|
Aug-30-03 R Byrne vs P Markland, 1972 
|
Qian: I dont see it Watson. I will probably follow it with 23... Rxf2 which is equally as threatening. 24. Rxh6 Ndh5 25. Nf6+ Kg7 and that will probably be the end of white's attack. And that will also leave white with a lot to worry about. |
|
|
|
indicates a reply to the comment. |
|